AzTrials
AzTrials

Obsessive - Compulsive DisorderPPS-TDCSTOCNCT07429500

tDCS and Symptom Provocation in Treatment-Resistant OCD

A study testing tDCS session and symptom provocation in people with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit at 6 sites in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if symptom provocation before transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Can symptom-provocation before tDCS improve therapeutic response in OCD patients ? Researchers will compare… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
What is being tested?
tDCS session and symptom provocation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
178 participants
Where
6 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Dec 2026to 15 Oct 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) according to DSM-5, with a duration ≥ 2 years.
  • Good insight, defined as a BABS score ≤ 18.
  • Chronic OCD, with either a Y-BOCS total score > 20 or a subscale score > 15.
  • Treatment-resistant OCD, defined as:
  • failure of ≥ two adequate trials of SSRIs, or
  • failure of one SSRI plus augmentation with an atypical antipsychotic,
Show all 11Show fewer
  • and/or insufficient response after ≥ one year of cognitive-behavioural therapy.
  • Stable pharmacological treatment (fixed antidepressant dose) for at least 12 weeks prior to inclusion, with no significant improvement during this period.
  • Age 18 to 70 years.
  • Ability to provide informed written consent.
  • Affiliation with the French social security system.

Who cannot join

  • Women of childbearing potential without effective contraception, or those unwilling to maintain abstinence or contraception.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Compulsory psychiatric hospitalisation.
  • Legal guardianship or curatorship.
  • Current DSM-5 Axis I disorder other than OCD (schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar disorder, substance use).
  • Current major depressive episode (MADRS > 21).
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Suicide risk (MADRS item 10 > 3).
  • Dermatological lesions at electrode placement sites.
  • History of traumatic brain injury.
  • Presence of intracranial metal, pacemaker, or epilepsy.
  • Emergency situations or inability to provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

6 sites in 1 country

France6 sites
  • CH Camille Claudel

    Angoulême, 16000

    Rares IONASCU, Dr., +33 5 45 67 56 56, Rares.ionascu@ch-claudel.fr

    Rares IONASCU, Dr.

  • CH Esquirol

    Limoges

    Philippe NUBUKPO, Pr., +33 5 55 43 10 10, Philippe.nubukpo@9online.fr

    Philippe NUBUKPO, Pr.

  • CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, 44000

    Anne SAUVAGET, Pr., +33 2 98 71 63 26, Anne.sauvaget@chu-nantes.fr

    Anne SAUVAGET, Pr.

  • Unité de Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit

    Poitiers, 86000

    Ghina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr., +33 5 16 52 61 18, ghina.harika-germaneau@ch-poitiers.fr

    Ghina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr.

  • CH Guillaume Régnier

    Rennes, 35000

    Dominique DRAPIER, Pr., +33 2 99 33 39 00, d.drapier@ch-guillaumeregnier.fr

    Dominique DRAPIER

  • CHNDS

    Thouars, 79100

    Issa Wassouf, Dr., +33 5 49 68 49 68, iwassouf@wanadoo.fr

    Issa WASSOUF, Dr.

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if symptom provocation before transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is:

Can symptom-provocation before tDCS improve therapeutic response in OCD patients ?

Researchers will compare the clinical outcomes of OCD patients having received, in one arm, tDCS and, in the other arm, patients having received tDCS preceded by symptom provocation to see if therapeutic response and various other clinical variables differ.

Read the detailed description

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and disabling condition affecting 2-3% of the population. Despite evidence-based interventions-cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention (ERP) and serotonergic antidepressants, 40-60% of patients exhibit insufficient improvement, highlighting a substantial need for more effective therapeutic strategies.

Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies consistently implicate dysfunction within cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, particularly the supplementary motor area (SMA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). These findings have guided the development of neuromodulation interventions targeting these regions. Among them, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a safe, accessible, and potentially effective approach for modulating aberrant neural activity in OCD.

Our research group has previously investigated a bifocal tDCS montage combining cathodal SMA stimulation with anodal right OFC stimulation. In an open-label study of 21 patients, this protocol produced clinically meaningful improvement in 15% of participants and was well tolerated. A subsequent multicentre randomised controlled trial confirmed the feasibility, safety, and potential therapeutic value of this montage, although overall effects remained modest. These findings underscore the need to optimise neuromodulatory strategies in OCD.

One promising direction is to enhance neuromodulation by manipulating the pre-stimulation neural state. Evidence suggests that the impact of tDCS depends on ongoing cortical activity, raising the possibility that activating symptom-relevant circuits immediately before stimulation could potentiate its effects. Pre-stimulation symptom provocation-also referred to as paired associative cognitive stimulation-has shown encouraging results when combined with rTMS in depression, addiction, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In PTSD, for example, brief reactivation of traumatic memories prior to stimulation enhanced symptom reduction compared with stimulation alone.

This approach is grounded in the theory of memory, which posits that reactivated memories enter a transiently labile state during which their emotional intensity can be modified. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that targeted interventions delivered during this window can weaken maladaptive emotional memories. In OCD, intrusive thoughts typically accompanied by fear, disgust, or distress may therefore constitute ideal targets for reconsolidation-based modulation.

Symptom provocation is widely used in neuroimaging research to activate OCD-related circuits and forms part of ERP-based treatment strategies. More recently, introduced its use before rTMS in OCD, reporting significant symptom reduction, although the specific contribution of provocation could not be isolated as all participants received it. Despite the fact that the specific contribution of symptom provocation could not be isolated in the initial trial, its continued use in clinical research has been supported by the excellent results reported in subsequent studies, as well as by its good acceptability among patients. The same research group recently published a standardized symptom-provocation protocol to ensure strong reproducibility and methodological reliability. This intervention requires only basic clinical skills and does not involve the use of complex psychotherapeutic techniques such as cognitive restructuring or symptom interpretation. To date, no study has evaluated symptom provocation combined with tDCS.

Given the safety, accessibility, and potential for home-based use of tDCS, identifying strategies that enhance its effectiveness is of clinical relevance. Brief activation of symptom-triggering cues prior to stimulation may allow tDCS to more effectively modulate targeted neural networks.

Objective This multicentre randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether personalised symptom provocation combined with bifocal tDCS (anodal right OFC, cathodal SMA) produces greater clinical improvement than tDCS alone in adults with severe, treatment-resistant OCD.

This study is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blind clinical trial conducted across six french psychiatric centres in France (Poitiers, Nantes, Rennes, Limoges, Thouars and Angoulême). Eligible participants with severe, treatment-resistant OCD will be randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two parallel groups:

  • Active tDCS alone
  • Active tDCS combined with personalised symptom provocation. Both study arms will receive identical tDCS stimulation parameters. The intervention consists of 10 sessions of 30 minutes, delivered over two consecutive weeks (five sessions per week), followed by a 5-month follow-up period. The total study duration is 41 months, including 36 months of enrollment.
Being tested
tDCS session, symptom provocation
Keywords
tDCS
Medical subject headings
Compulsive Personality Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tDCS sessionProcedure or surgery

    An active bifocal tDCS delivered through a CE-certified stimulator. The bifocal montage consists of an anodal electrode over the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and a cathodal electrode over the supplementary motor area (SMA), with 5X5 cm electrod. Stimulation intensity is set at 2 mA, with a 30-minute session duration, including 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods.

  • symptom provocationBehavioural

    A 3-5 minutes personalised symptom provocation procedure immediately before stimulation. This standardised clinical procedure induces brief activation of obsession-related distress without engaging in compulsions. It is delivered by a trained clinician health-care professional and does not constitute psychotherapeutic treatment.

Study groups in NCT07429500
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
tDCSSham comparatorThese patients will only receive tDCS
Receives: Procedure: tDCS session
tDCS + symptom provocationActive comparatorThese patients will experience symptom provocation followed with tDCS
Receives: Procedure: tDCS session; Behavioral: symptom provocation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score

    The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a clinician-administered assessment used to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Measured: measured at baseline and 42 days after the start of the therapy

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Persistence of variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised

    Assessment of the persistence of the therapeutic response at day 102 and 162 with the Y-BOCS and OCI-R scales.

    The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) is a self-report measure designed to assess the severity and type of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. It evaluates six symptom dimensions: washing, checking, ordering, hoarding, neutralizing, and obsessing. Each dimension is scored from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

    Measured: measured between baseline, day 102 / day 162

  2. Comparison of Clinical Global Impression Improvement between both groups

    The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a hetero-evaluation scale widely used in clinical studies to evaluate baseline severity and improvement in relation to treatment.

    Measured: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, 102 and 162

  3. Assessment of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale

    The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a hetero-evaluation rating scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 10 items evaluating core dimensions of depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.

    Measured: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162

  4. Assessment of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey

    The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a self-assessed scale to measure 8 dimensions of health and quality of life. Each dimension is graded on a score of 0 to 100, 0 being the poorest estimate of quality of life and 100 being the best.

    Measured: baseline, day 102, and day 162

  5. Analysis of side effects and tolerance of tDCS

    Assessed with the Brunoni questionnaire

    Measured: Assessed during treatment

  6. Analysis of complete response rate

    35% improvement of the Y-BOCS score.

    Measured: between baseline and days 42 / day 102 / day 162

  7. Assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale is a self-assessed scale yielding anxiety and depression scores ranging from 0 to 15 each (and a global score of 30), corresponding to higher depression or anxiety severities.

    Measured: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162

  8. Assessment of insight with the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale

    The Brown Assessment of Beliefs scale is a clinician-assessed scale producing a score between 0 and 24. A higher score indicates a weaker insight.

    Measured: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162

  9. "Echelle d'évaluation Globale du Fonctionnement": Assessment of psychological and socio-professional functioning

    The "Echelle d'évaluation Globale du Fonctionnement" (EGF) evaluates the psychological and socio-professional functioning. It is a clinican-graded scale giving a score of 1 - 100. A score of 100 corresponds to high functioning with absence of symptoms.

    Measured: baseline, day 102, day 162

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Oct 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
178 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07429500
Sponsor's protocol ID
2025-A00146-43
Acronym
PPS-TDCSTOC
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
9 Feb 2026
Last updated
21 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing tDCS session and symptom provocation in people with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit at 6 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ghina Harika-Germaneau, Dr. (+33 5 16 52 61 18, ghina.harika-germaneau@ch-poitiers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score (time frame: measured at baseline and 42 days after the start of the therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in