Obsessive - Compulsive DisorderPPS-TDCSTOCNCT07429500
tDCS and Symptom Provocation in Treatment-Resistant OCD
A study testing tDCS session and symptom provocation in people with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit at 6 sites in France.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if symptom provocation before transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is: Can symptom-provocation before tDCS improve therapeutic response in OCD patients ? Researchers will compare… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
- What is being tested?
- tDCS session and symptom provocation
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 178 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2026to 15 Oct 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) according to DSM-5, with a duration ≥ 2 years.
- Good insight, defined as a BABS score ≤ 18.
- Chronic OCD, with either a Y-BOCS total score > 20 or a subscale score > 15.
- Treatment-resistant OCD, defined as:
- failure of ≥ two adequate trials of SSRIs, or
- failure of one SSRI plus augmentation with an atypical antipsychotic,
Show all 11Show fewer
- and/or insufficient response after ≥ one year of cognitive-behavioural therapy.
- Stable pharmacological treatment (fixed antidepressant dose) for at least 12 weeks prior to inclusion, with no significant improvement during this period.
- Age 18 to 70 years.
- Ability to provide informed written consent.
- Affiliation with the French social security system.
Who cannot join
- Women of childbearing potential without effective contraception, or those unwilling to maintain abstinence or contraception.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Compulsory psychiatric hospitalisation.
- Legal guardianship or curatorship.
- Current DSM-5 Axis I disorder other than OCD (schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar disorder, substance use).
- Current major depressive episode (MADRS > 21).
Show all 11Show fewer
- Suicide risk (MADRS item 10 > 3).
- Dermatological lesions at electrode placement sites.
- History of traumatic brain injury.
- Presence of intracranial metal, pacemaker, or epilepsy.
- Emergency situations or inability to provide informed consent.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
6 sites in 1 country
France6 sites
CH Camille Claudel
Angoulême, 16000
Rares IONASCU, Dr., +33 5 45 67 56 56, Rares.ionascu@ch-claudel.fr
Rares IONASCU, Dr.
CH Esquirol
Limoges
Philippe NUBUKPO, Pr., +33 5 55 43 10 10, Philippe.nubukpo@9online.fr
Philippe NUBUKPO, Pr.
CHU de Nantes
Nantes, 44000
Anne SAUVAGET, Pr., +33 2 98 71 63 26, Anne.sauvaget@chu-nantes.fr
Anne SAUVAGET, Pr.
Unité de Recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
Poitiers, 86000
Ghina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr., +33 5 16 52 61 18, ghina.harika-germaneau@ch-poitiers.fr
Ghina HARIKA-GERMANEAU, Dr.
CH Guillaume Régnier
Rennes, 35000
Dominique DRAPIER, Pr., +33 2 99 33 39 00, d.drapier@ch-guillaumeregnier.fr
Dominique DRAPIER
CHNDS
Thouars, 79100
Issa Wassouf, Dr., +33 5 49 68 49 68, iwassouf@wanadoo.fr
Issa WASSOUF, Dr.
About this study
Official title: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if symptom provocation before transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Can symptom-provocation before tDCS improve therapeutic response in OCD patients ?
Researchers will compare the clinical outcomes of OCD patients having received, in one arm, tDCS and, in the other arm, patients having received tDCS preceded by symptom provocation to see if therapeutic response and various other clinical variables differ.
Read the detailed description
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and disabling condition affecting 2-3% of the population. Despite evidence-based interventions-cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention (ERP) and serotonergic antidepressants, 40-60% of patients exhibit insufficient improvement, highlighting a substantial need for more effective therapeutic strategies.
Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies consistently implicate dysfunction within cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, particularly the supplementary motor area (SMA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). These findings have guided the development of neuromodulation interventions targeting these regions. Among them, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a safe, accessible, and potentially effective approach for modulating aberrant neural activity in OCD.
Our research group has previously investigated a bifocal tDCS montage combining cathodal SMA stimulation with anodal right OFC stimulation. In an open-label study of 21 patients, this protocol produced clinically meaningful improvement in 15% of participants and was well tolerated. A subsequent multicentre randomised controlled trial confirmed the feasibility, safety, and potential therapeutic value of this montage, although overall effects remained modest. These findings underscore the need to optimise neuromodulatory strategies in OCD.
One promising direction is to enhance neuromodulation by manipulating the pre-stimulation neural state. Evidence suggests that the impact of tDCS depends on ongoing cortical activity, raising the possibility that activating symptom-relevant circuits immediately before stimulation could potentiate its effects. Pre-stimulation symptom provocation-also referred to as paired associative cognitive stimulation-has shown encouraging results when combined with rTMS in depression, addiction, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In PTSD, for example, brief reactivation of traumatic memories prior to stimulation enhanced symptom reduction compared with stimulation alone.
This approach is grounded in the theory of memory, which posits that reactivated memories enter a transiently labile state during which their emotional intensity can be modified. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that targeted interventions delivered during this window can weaken maladaptive emotional memories. In OCD, intrusive thoughts typically accompanied by fear, disgust, or distress may therefore constitute ideal targets for reconsolidation-based modulation.
Symptom provocation is widely used in neuroimaging research to activate OCD-related circuits and forms part of ERP-based treatment strategies. More recently, introduced its use before rTMS in OCD, reporting significant symptom reduction, although the specific contribution of provocation could not be isolated as all participants received it. Despite the fact that the specific contribution of symptom provocation could not be isolated in the initial trial, its continued use in clinical research has been supported by the excellent results reported in subsequent studies, as well as by its good acceptability among patients. The same research group recently published a standardized symptom-provocation protocol to ensure strong reproducibility and methodological reliability. This intervention requires only basic clinical skills and does not involve the use of complex psychotherapeutic techniques such as cognitive restructuring or symptom interpretation. To date, no study has evaluated symptom provocation combined with tDCS.
Given the safety, accessibility, and potential for home-based use of tDCS, identifying strategies that enhance its effectiveness is of clinical relevance. Brief activation of symptom-triggering cues prior to stimulation may allow tDCS to more effectively modulate targeted neural networks.
Objective This multicentre randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether personalised symptom provocation combined with bifocal tDCS (anodal right OFC, cathodal SMA) produces greater clinical improvement than tDCS alone in adults with severe, treatment-resistant OCD.
This study is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blind clinical trial conducted across six french psychiatric centres in France (Poitiers, Nantes, Rennes, Limoges, Thouars and Angoulême). Eligible participants with severe, treatment-resistant OCD will be randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two parallel groups:
- Active tDCS alone
- Active tDCS combined with personalised symptom provocation. Both study arms will receive identical tDCS stimulation parameters. The intervention consists of 10 sessions of 30 minutes, delivered over two consecutive weeks (five sessions per week), followed by a 5-month follow-up period. The total study duration is 41 months, including 36 months of enrollment.
- Conditions
- Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
- Being tested
- tDCS session, symptom provocation
- Keywords
- tDCS
- Medical subject headings
- Compulsive Personality Disorder
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
tDCS sessionProcedure or surgery
An active bifocal tDCS delivered through a CE-certified stimulator. The bifocal montage consists of an anodal electrode over the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and a cathodal electrode over the supplementary motor area (SMA), with 5X5 cm electrod. Stimulation intensity is set at 2 mA, with a 30-minute session duration, including 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods.
symptom provocationBehavioural
A 3-5 minutes personalised symptom provocation procedure immediately before stimulation. This standardised clinical procedure induces brief activation of obsession-related distress without engaging in compulsions. It is delivered by a trained clinician health-care professional and does not constitute psychotherapeutic treatment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS | Sham comparator | These patients will only receive tDCS Receives: Procedure: tDCS session |
| tDCS + symptom provocation | Active comparator | These patients will experience symptom provocation followed with tDCS Receives: Procedure: tDCS session; Behavioral: symptom provocation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a clinician-administered assessment used to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
Measured: measured at baseline and 42 days after the start of the therapy
Secondary outcomes (9)
Persistence of variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised
Assessment of the persistence of the therapeutic response at day 102 and 162 with the Y-BOCS and OCI-R scales.
The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised (OCI-R) is a self-report measure designed to assess the severity and type of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) symptoms. It evaluates six symptom dimensions: washing, checking, ordering, hoarding, neutralizing, and obsessing. Each dimension is scored from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.
Measured: measured between baseline, day 102 / day 162
Comparison of Clinical Global Impression Improvement between both groups
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) is a hetero-evaluation scale widely used in clinical studies to evaluate baseline severity and improvement in relation to treatment.
Measured: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, 102 and 162
Assessment of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale
The Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a hetero-evaluation rating scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. It consists of 10 items evaluating core dimensions of depression. Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Measured: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
Assessment of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) is a self-assessed scale to measure 8 dimensions of health and quality of life. Each dimension is graded on a score of 0 to 100, 0 being the poorest estimate of quality of life and 100 being the best.
Measured: baseline, day 102, and day 162
Analysis of side effects and tolerance of tDCS
Assessed with the Brunoni questionnaire
Measured: Assessed during treatment
Analysis of complete response rate
35% improvement of the Y-BOCS score.
Measured: between baseline and days 42 / day 102 / day 162
Assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale is a self-assessed scale yielding anxiety and depression scores ranging from 0 to 15 each (and a global score of 30), corresponding to higher depression or anxiety severities.
Measured: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
Assessment of insight with the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale
The Brown Assessment of Beliefs scale is a clinician-assessed scale producing a score between 0 and 24. A higher score indicates a weaker insight.
Measured: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
"Echelle d'évaluation Globale du Fonctionnement": Assessment of psychological and socio-professional functioning
The "Echelle d'évaluation Globale du Fonctionnement" (EGF) evaluates the psychological and socio-professional functioning. It is a clinican-graded scale giving a score of 1 - 100. A score of 100 corresponds to high functioning with absence of symptoms.
Measured: baseline, day 102, day 162
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Oct 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Obsessive - Compulsive DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07429500
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-A00146-43
- Acronym
- PPS-TDCSTOC
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07429500
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PPS-TDCSTOC / 2025-A00146-43
- Conditions
- Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
- Keywords
- tDCS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 178 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Henri LaboritUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if symptom provocation before transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) patients. The main question it aims to answer is:
Can symptom-provocation before tDCS improve therapeutic response in OCD patients ?
Researchers will compare the clinical outcomes of OCD patients having received, in one arm, tDCS and, in the other arm, patients having received tDCS preceded by symptom provocation to see if therapeutic response and various other clinical variables differ.
Detailed description
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a chronic and disabling condition affecting 2-3% of the population. Despite evidence-based interventions-cognitive behavioural therapy with exposure and response prevention (ERP) and serotonergic antidepressants, 40-60% of patients exhibit insufficient improvement, highlighting a substantial need for more effective therapeutic strategies.
Neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies consistently implicate dysfunction within cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical circuits, particularly the supplementary motor area (SMA) and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC). These findings have guided the development of neuromodulation interventions targeting these regions. Among them, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a safe, accessible, and potentially effective approach for modulating aberrant neural activity in OCD.
Our research group has previously investigated a bifocal tDCS montage combining cathodal SMA stimulation with anodal right OFC stimulation. In an open-label study of 21 patients, this protocol produced clinically meaningful improvement in 15% of participants and was well tolerated. A subsequent multicentre randomised controlled trial confirmed the feasibility, safety, and potential therapeutic value of this montage, although overall effects remained modest. These findings underscore the need to optimise neuromodulatory strategies in OCD.
One promising direction is to enhance neuromodulation by manipulating the pre-stimulation neural state. Evidence suggests that the impact of tDCS depends on ongoing cortical activity, raising the possibility that activating symptom-relevant circuits immediately before stimulation could potentiate its effects. Pre-stimulation symptom provocation-also referred to as paired associative cognitive stimulation-has shown encouraging results when combined with rTMS in depression, addiction, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In PTSD, for example, brief reactivation of traumatic memories prior to stimulation enhanced symptom reduction compared with stimulation alone.
This approach is grounded in the theory of memory, which posits that reactivated memories enter a transiently labile state during which their emotional intensity can be modified. Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that targeted interventions delivered during this window can weaken maladaptive emotional memories. In OCD, intrusive thoughts typically accompanied by fear, disgust, or distress may therefore constitute ideal targets for reconsolidation-based modulation.
Symptom provocation is widely used in neuroimaging research to activate OCD-related circuits and forms part of ERP-based treatment strategies. More recently, introduced its use before rTMS in OCD, reporting significant symptom reduction, although the specific contribution of provocation could not be isolated as all participants received it. Despite the fact that the specific contribution of symptom provocation could not be isolated in the initial trial, its continued use in clinical research has been supported by the excellent results reported in subsequent studies, as well as by its good acceptability among patients. The same research group recently published a standardized symptom-provocation protocol to ensure strong reproducibility and methodological reliability. This intervention requires only basic clinical skills and does not involve the use of complex psychotherapeutic techniques such as cognitive restructuring or symptom interpretation. To date, no study has evaluated symptom provocation combined with tDCS.
Given the safety, accessibility, and potential for home-based use of tDCS, identifying strategies that enhance its effectiveness is of clinical relevance. Brief activation of symptom-triggering cues prior to stimulation may allow tDCS to more effectively modulate targeted neural networks.
Objective This multicentre randomised controlled trial aims to determine whether personalised symptom provocation combined with bifocal tDCS (anodal right OFC, cathodal SMA) produces greater clinical improvement than tDCS alone in adults with severe, treatment-resistant OCD.
This study is a multicentre, randomised, controlled, single-blind clinical trial conducted across six french psychiatric centres in France (Poitiers, Nantes, Rennes, Limoges, Thouars and Angoulême). Eligible participants with severe, treatment-resistant OCD will be randomly allocated (1:1) to one of two parallel groups:
- Active tDCS alone
- Active tDCS combined with personalised symptom provocation. Both study arms will receive identical tDCS stimulation parameters. The intervention consists of 10 sessions of 30 minutes, delivered over two consecutive weeks (five sessions per week), followed by a 5-month follow-up period. The total study duration is 41 months, including 36 months of enrollment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS | Sham comparator | Procedure: tDCS sessionThese patients will only receive tDCS |
| tDCS + symptom provocation | Active comparator | Procedure: tDCS session, Behavioral: symptom provocationThese patients will experience symptom provocation followed with tDCS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Diagnosis of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) according to DSM-5, with a duration ≥ 2 years.
- Good insight, defined as a BABS score ≤ 18.
- Chronic OCD, with either a Y-BOCS total score > 20 or a subscale score > 15.
- Treatment-resistant OCD, defined as:
- and/or insufficient response after ≥ one year of cognitive-behavioural therapy.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Women of childbearing potential without effective contraception, or those unwilling to maintain abstinence or contraception.
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Compulsory psychiatric hospitalisation.
- Legal guardianship or curatorship.
- Current DSM-5 Axis I disorder other than OCD (schizophrenia spectrum, bipolar disorder, substance use).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| tDCS sessionAn active bifocal tDCS delivered through a CE-certified stimulator. The bifocal montage consists of an anodal electrode over the right orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and a cathodal electrode over the supplementary motor area (SMA), with 5X5 cm electrod. Stimulation intensity is set at 2 mA, with a 30-minute session duration, including 30-second ramp-up and ramp-down periods. | Procedure or surgery | tDCS, tDCS + symptom provocation |
| symptom provocationA 3-5 minutes personalised symptom provocation procedure immediately before stimulation. This standardised clinical procedure induces brief activation of obsession-related distress without engaging in compulsions. It is delivered by a trained clinician health-care professional and does not constitute psychotherapeutic treatment. | Behavioural | tDCS + symptom provocation |
Primary outcome
Variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score
Time frame: measured at baseline and 42 days after the start of the therapy
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) is a clinician-administered assessment used to measure the severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.
9 secondary outcomes
Persistence of variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score and Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised
Time frame: measured between baseline, day 102 / day 162
Comparison of Clinical Global Impression Improvement between both groups
Time frame: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, 102 and 162
Assessment of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale
Time frame: Scales assessed at baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
Assessment of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey
Time frame: baseline, day 102, and day 162
Analysis of side effects and tolerance of tDCS
Time frame: Assessed during treatment
Analysis of complete response rate
Time frame: between baseline and days 42 / day 102 / day 162
Assessment of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale
Time frame: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
Assessment of insight with the Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale
Time frame: baseline, day 42, day 102, day 162
"Echelle d'évaluation Globale du Fonctionnement": Assessment of psychological and socio-professional functioning
Time frame: baseline, day 102, day 162
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Investigation of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Patients With Elbow Epicondylitis
Lateral Epicondylitis, Medial Epicondylitis
Recruiting
Focused Ultrasound for Behavioral Health
Depression, Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Linear Accelerator Radiosurgical Anterior Capsulotomy With Task-based fMRI Identification of PERSonalized and PrEdictiVE Biomarkers of REsponse in Treatment-Refractory Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (PERSEVERE Trial)
Treatment-refractory Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (trOCD)
Recruiting
tDCS Associated With Symptom Provocation in the Management of Patients With Resistant Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Recruiting
Mindfulness Intervention for Psychological and Family Dynamics in Children With Body-Focused Repetitive Behaviors
Mindfulness Skills, Psychosocial Education
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing tDCS session and symptom provocation in people with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder, run by Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit at 6 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ghina Harika-Germaneau, Dr. (+33 5 16 52 61 18, ghina.harika-germaneau@ch-poitiers.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Variation of Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale score (time frame: measured at baseline and 42 days after the start of the therapy). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2026.