Well BeingBe aPiNCT07431372
Validation of the Shared Happiness Index in Multidisciplinary Primary Care Practices ( Be aPi )
An observational study of Well Being, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion at 1 site in Reunion.
Trial summary
Multi-professional primary care practices (Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles, MSP) have expanded widely in France over the last decade to respond to increasing healthcare needs, uneven distribution of physicians, and deteriorating working conditions, which were further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Well Being
- How many people
- 350 participants
- Where
- 1 siteReunion
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Mar 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: healthcare professionals
Who may be able to join
- Healthcare professionals (medical, paramedical) and professionals in the medical-social sector, medical assistants, health coordinators and mediators, as well as adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists
- who work in healthcare centres that had been operating for more than one year at the start of the study and who themselves had more than one year's seniority in the MSP.
Who cannot join
- Substitute professionals,
- Secretaries without coordination or medical assistant duties Professionals belonging to MSPs that had been operating for less than one year at the start of the study and who had less than one year's seniority within the organisation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Reunion1 site
Sakisoigne Health Centre
La Possession
Vanessa PALMA, MD, +262692211902, vanessa.palma@univ-reunion.fr
vanessa.palma@univ-reunion.fr
About this study
Official title: Validation of the Shared Happiness Index in Multidisciplinary Primary Care Practices
Multi-professional primary care practices (Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles, MSP) have expanded widely in France over the last decade to respond to increasing healthcare needs, uneven distribution of physicians, and deteriorating working conditions, which were further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. MSPs are expected to offer more collaborative and coordinated care, and to provide a more attractive work environment, particularly for younger healthcare professionals seeking less isolation and better work-life balance.
Well-being at work for healthcare professionals is now recognised as a key determinant of quality and safety of care. Studies have shown links between staff satisfaction, burnout, and patient outcomes, including communication quality, error rates and staff retention. However, research specifically focused on collective well-being or "shared happiness" within multi-professional primary care teams remains limited. Existing work in French MSPs (notably qualitative studies by F. Burté and O. Caillaud) has identified relevant dimensions of "shared happiness" and led to the preliminary construction of a questionnaire named the Shared Happiness Index (Indice de Bonheur Partagé, IBP). To date, no validated, standardised instrument exists to measure this collective well-being in MSPs.
Read more
The Be_aPi study aims to validate the IBP questionnaire among healthcare professionals working in MSPs. The study is observational, descriptive and cross-sectional, conducted in several French regions covered by the GIRCI (Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et Innovation) SOHO (Sud-Ouest Outre-Mer Hospitalier) network (Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie, Réunion and Mayotte). It comprises three main steps. First, a content validation phase will be carried out with two independent panels of experts. One panel, including psychometrics, methodology and linguistics experts and MSP representatives, will assess face validity by examining each item in relation to the concept of shared happiness in multi-professional primary care. A second panel will be involved in an e-Delphi process to establish consensus validity on the relevance and clarity of items, using Likert-type ratings and iterative feedback.
Second, the psychometric validation phase will recruit approximately 350 professionals from over 100 MSPs. Eligible participants include medical and paramedical professionals, medical-social staff, medical assistants, coordinators, health mediators, adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists, working in MSPs that have been operating for at least one year, with at least one year of seniority in their current MSP. Participants will complete an online survey including the IBP questionnaire and three reference instruments: the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Internal consistency of the IBP will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be examined with exploratory factor analysis and correlation patterns with the reference scales, according to a multi-trait multi-method approach.
Third, to evaluate test-retest reliability, participants who completed the initial IBP will be invited to fill in the same questionnaire again after a delay of approximately one month. The stability of scores over time will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Ceiling and floor effects, as well as the distribution of scores across professional categories and organisational characteristics of MSPs (e.g. single-site vs multi-site, role in the organisation, membership in interprofessional associations), will also be analysed.
The expected outcome of Be_aPi is a valid, reliable and transferable Shared Happiness Index specifically tailored to multi-professional primary care practices. This tool should enable regular monitoring of collective well-being, support targeted quality-of-work-life interventions, and ultimately contribute to improving quality and safety of care, staff retention and the long-term sustainability of MSPs. In the longer term, the IBP could inform policy instruments and financing schemes that aim to "take care of those who care," in line with national quality and safety strategies.
- Conditions
- Well Being
- Keywords
- shared hapiness, Primary care, Multidisciplinary primary care practices, Work-related well-being, Quality of work life, Burnout, Shared happiness
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Consensus validity - eDELPHI method
Evaluation of items in the Shared Happiness Index questionnaire using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = does not measure the concept studied at all and 5 = measures the concept studied completely) Analysis of responses to identify points of agreement and disagreement, then transmission of an anonymous summary of responses and comments to the entire panel. Repetition of these steps, refining the questionnaire with each round until consensus is reached or feedback converges.
Measured: before first participant inclusion
Face validity
Define each item in the questionnaire by a committee of experts. Analyze the items one by one by the committee and relate them to the concept being studied, shared happiness, in the context of a multi-professional healthcare facility.
Measured: Before first participant inclusion
Internal consistency - Cronbach's alpha
Internal consistency measures the extent to which the items in the test measure the same dimension or concept, in this case shared happiness.
Internal consistency is commonly measured by Cronbach's alpha, which ranges from 0 (low) to 1 (high). A high coefficient indicates that the test items are similar in content, i.e. homogeneous. A Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.7 is acceptable.
Measured: Month 1
test-retest reliability - intraclass coefficient (ICC)
Consistency of results over time for the same sample of subjects. This will be assessed by proposing that the initial sample complete the questionnaire again after a period of one month.
Estimation by intraclass coefficient. ICC ranges from 0 to 1. An ICC close to 1 indicates a high degree of agreement between measurements. Conversely, an ICC close to 0 indicates low agreement.
Measured: month 1
Construct validity - Exploratory Factor Analysis
Allows us to visualize the construction of the tool and the concept measured by the questionnaire. Construct validity will be assessed across all items selected during the content validation phase.
the construct validity will be assessed using exploratory factor analysis
Measured: day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Feb 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Well BeingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07431372
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025RUN0051
- Acronym
- Be aPi
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validation of the Shared Happiness Index in Multidisciplinary Primary Care Practices
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07431372
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Be aPi / 2025RUN0051
- Conditions
- Well Being
- Keywords
- shared hapiness, Primary care, Multidisciplinary primary care practices, Work-related well-being, Quality of work life, Burnout, Shared happiness
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 350 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la RéunionUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Multi-professional primary care practices (Maisons de Santé Pluriprofessionnelles, MSP) have expanded widely in France over the last decade to respond to increasing healthcare needs, uneven distribution of physicians, and deteriorating working conditions, which were further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. MSPs are expected to offer more collaborative and coordinated care, and to provide a more attractive work environment, particularly for younger healthcare professionals seeking less isolation and better work-life balance.
Well-being at work for healthcare professionals is now recognised as a key determinant of quality and safety of care. Studies have shown links between staff satisfaction, burnout, and patient outcomes, including communication quality, error rates and staff retention. However, research specifically focused on collective well-being or "shared happiness" within multi-professional primary care teams remains limited. Existing work in French MSPs (notably qualitative studies by F. Burté and O. Caillaud) has identified relevant dimensions of "shared happiness" and led to the preliminary construction of a questionnaire named the Shared Happiness Index (Indice de Bonheur Partagé, IBP). To date, no validated, standardised instrument exists to measure this collective well-being in MSPs.
The Be_aPi study aims to validate the IBP questionnaire among healthcare professionals working in MSPs. The study is observational, descriptive and cross-sectional, conducted in several French regions covered by the GIRCI (Groupement Interrégional de Recherche Clinique et Innovation) SOHO (Sud-Ouest Outre-Mer Hospitalier) network (Nouvelle-Aquitaine, Occitanie, Réunion and Mayotte). It comprises three main steps. First, a content validation phase will be carried out with two independent panels of experts. One panel, including psychometrics, methodology and linguistics experts and MSP representatives, will assess face validity by examining each item in relation to the concept of shared happiness in multi-professional primary care. A second panel will be involved in an e-Delphi process to establish consensus validity on the relevance and clarity of items, using Likert-type ratings and iterative feedback.
Second, the psychometric validation phase will recruit approximately 350 professionals from over 100 MSPs. Eligible participants include medical and paramedical professionals, medical-social staff, medical assistants, coordinators, health mediators, adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists, working in MSPs that have been operating for at least one year, with at least one year of seniority in their current MSP. Participants will complete an online survey including the IBP questionnaire and three reference instruments: the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Internal consistency of the IBP will be assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be examined with exploratory factor analysis and correlation patterns with the reference scales, according to a multi-trait multi-method approach.
Third, to evaluate test-retest reliability, participants who completed the initial IBP will be invited to fill in the same questionnaire again after a delay of approximately one month. The stability of scores over time will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients. Ceiling and floor effects, as well as the distribution of scores across professional categories and organisational characteristics of MSPs (e.g. single-site vs multi-site, role in the organisation, membership in interprofessional associations), will also be analysed.
The expected outcome of Be_aPi is a valid, reliable and transferable Shared Happiness Index specifically tailored to multi-professional primary care practices. This tool should enable regular monitoring of collective well-being, support targeted quality-of-work-life interventions, and ultimately contribute to improving quality and safety of care, staff retention and the long-term sustainability of MSPs. In the longer term, the IBP could inform policy instruments and financing schemes that aim to "take care of those who care," in line with national quality and safety strategies.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- healthcare professionals
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Healthcare professionals (medical, paramedical) and professionals in the medical-social sector, medical assistants, health coordinators and mediators, as well as adapted physical activity instructors and psychologists
- who work in healthcare centres that had been operating for more than one year at the start of the study and who themselves had more than one year's seniority in the MSP.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Substitute professionals,
- Secretaries without coordination or medical assistant duties Professionals belonging to MSPs that had been operating for less than one year at the start of the study and who had less than one year's seniority within the organisation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Consensus validity - eDELPHI method
Time frame: before first participant inclusion
Evaluation of items in the Shared Happiness Index questionnaire using a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (1 = does not measure the concept studied at all and 5 = measures the concept studied completely) Analysis of responses to identify points of agreement and disagreement, then transmission of an anonymous summary of responses and comments to the entire panel. Repetition of these steps, refining the questionnaire with each round until consensus is reached or feedback converges.
Face validity
Time frame: Before first participant inclusion
Define each item in the questionnaire by a committee of experts. Analyze the items one by one by the committee and relate them to the concept being studied, shared happiness, in the context of a multi-professional healthcare facility.
Internal consistency - Cronbach's alpha
Time frame: Month 1
Internal consistency measures the extent to which the items in the test measure the same dimension or concept, in this case shared happiness. Internal consistency is commonly measured by Cronbach's alpha, which ranges from 0 (low) to 1 (high). A high coefficient indicates that the test items are similar in content, i.e. homogeneous. A Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.7 is acceptable.
test-retest reliability - intraclass coefficient (ICC)
Time frame: month 1
Consistency of results over time for the same sample of subjects. This will be assessed by proposing that the initial sample complete the questionnaire again after a period of one month. Estimation by intraclass coefficient. ICC ranges from 0 to 1. An ICC close to 1 indicates a high degree of agreement between measurements. Conversely, an ICC close to 0 indicates low agreement.
Construct validity - Exploratory Factor Analysis
Time frame: day 1
Allows us to visualize the construction of the tool and the concept measured by the questionnaire. Construct validity will be assessed across all items selected during the content validation phase. the construct validity will be assessed using exploratory factor analysis
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Well Being
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Well Being, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion at 1 site in Reunion.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Reunion. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Vanessa PALMA, MD (+262692211902, vanessa.palma@univ-reunion.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Consensus validity - eDELPHI method (time frame: before first participant inclusion). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Sep 2026.