HDM-Induced Allergic RhinitisPhase 1NCT07436208
Serum sST2/ miR-223 as a Dual Biomarker for Disease Activity & Clinical Efficacy of SLIT in HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
A Phase 1 study testing Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts in people with HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 14 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- What is being tested?
- Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2025to 30 Nov 2025
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 14 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR
- Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years
Who cannot join
- The presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment
- Pregnancy
- lactation
- Refusal to provide informed consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Exploring the Role of Serum sST2/ miR-223 as a Dual Biomarker for Disease Activity & Clinical Efficacy of SLIT in HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR. Methods: This study included 54 patients with moderate-to-severe AR (MSAR) and 54 healthy controls (HC). Serum sST2, total IgE, HDM-specific IgE, and eosinophil counts were measured. Serum levels of miR-223 were assayed using real-time PCR. Clinical severity was assessed using the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). MSAR patients received SLIT for 6 months. Treatment response was defined by ≥30% reduction in symptom and medication scores.
Read the detailed description
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR
1st stage: A case-control study conducted over 3 months at the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, in collaboration with the Allergy Unit at Zagazig University Hospitals from February to May 2025. 2nd stage an interventional study (quasi experimental) for (MSAR patients): conducted over 6 months.
Study Population, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines . Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years and be willing to initiate and maintain SLIT for six months. Exclusion criteria included the presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to provide informed consent. Healthy, age- and sex-matched individuals without a history of allergic disease and with negative skin prick test (SPT) results were recruited as controls.
Sample size:
The sample size was calculated using open epi info according to the following mean sST2 level among AR cases versus control was 19.8+_7.5 versus 14.3+_6.9 (ref.) at power of study 80%, ci 95%, case: control 1:1, The minimum required sample size was 27 participants per group. However, we were able to recruit 54 participants in each group, all of whom were included in the final analysis. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique according to the predefined inclusion criteria.
- Clinical and Laboratory Procedures
- Baseline Assessment All participants underwent a detailed clinical assessment, including demographic data, duration of disease, body mass index (BMI), and previous treatment history.
- Symptom Scoring Symptom severity was evaluated using the TNSS, which includes four parameters-rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing-each rated on a 0 to 4 scale, for a maximum score of 16. A 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was also used to quantify overall symptom burden.
- Skin Prick Testing (SPT) SPT was performed using standardized allergen extracts, including Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae. Histamine and saline served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A wheal diameter of ≥3 mm compared to the negative control was considered positive.
- Immunological marker and sST2 measurement Venous blood samples were collected from all participants at baseline to determine serum eosinophils, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and house dust mite-specific HDM-IgE (kU/l) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Chemus Bioscience, USA). sST2 concentrations were quantified using a commercial ELISA kit (Elabscience, Cat No. E-EL-H6082). For patients undergoing SLIT, additional serum samples were collected after six months of therapy. All measurements were performed in duplicate. Laboratory personnel conducting the assays were blinded to the clinical information and sampling time.
- Detection of microRNA-223 Expression level via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR): MicroRNA was extracted by commercial miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kits (Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After extraction, microRNA was reversibly transcribed by reverse transcription kits (miScript II RT Kit, Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, it was incubated in dry bath block (Rocker Sahara 320 dry bath heat block, Rocker Scientific, Taiwan), initially at 37°C for 60 min, followed by a second incubation at 95°C for 5 min to inactivate miScript RT. After that, the reaction mixture was stored at -80°C.Quantitative determination of mature miR-223 was fulfilled by target-specific miScript Primer Assays using commercial kits (miScript SYBR Green real-time PCR Kit, Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Human RNU6B (RNU6-2) was used as a house keeping gene. After the initial activation step of HotStar Taq DNA Polymerase fo 15 min at 95°C, the real-time PCR reactions were run for 40 cycles of each of a denaturation for 15 s at 95 ºC, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, and extension for 30 s at 70°C. The Stratagene Mx3005P platform software (Agilent Technologies, USA) was used to figure out the threshold cycle (Ct) value. The delta-delta Ct method formula was utilized to estimate the fold changes of miR-223 expression .
- Intervention stage for (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders.
- Conditions
- HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- Being tested
- Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts
- Keywords
- Soluble ST2 (sST2); Allergic Rhinitis; House Dust Mite (HDM); MicroRNA -223; Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT); IL-33/ST2 Axis
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extractsBiological
Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Moderate and severe allergic Rhinitis Patients (MSAR patients) received Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Receives: Biological: Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with reduction in Relieve symptoms
Reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication
Measured: 6 months
score improvement in TNSS score
Measured: 6 months
score improvement in VAS score
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Immunological response
Decrease in serum sST2 levels
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2026
- Study start1 Feb 2025
- Primary completion30 May 2025
- Study completion30 Nov 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HDM-Induced Allergic RhinitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Zagazig UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Moderate and severe allergic Rhinitis (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig University
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hanaa Abu Elazayem Ibrahim Nofal, Zagazig University
- Investigators
- Hanaa A Nofal, MD, Study director, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07436208
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Bousquet , J., Agache, I., Aliberti, M.R., Anguelova-Fischer, D., Bachert, C., Bedbrook, A., et al. (2020). Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on GRADE and real-world evidence. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(1), 70-80.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049 - Tamasauskiene , L., Gasiuniene, E., Sitkauskiene, B. (2021). Translation, adaption and validation of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) for Lithuanian population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01659-8 - Lote, S., Gupta, S.B., Poulose, D., et al. (2022). Role of the skin prick test in urticaria patients. Cureus, 14(2), e21818. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21818 - Klangkalya , N., Kanchongkittiphon, W., Sawatchai, A., Kiewngam, P., Jotikasthira, W., Manuyakorn, W. (2024). Skin prick test and serum specific IgE in predicting dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis diagnosed from nasal provocation test in chronic rhinitis children. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 42(4), 354-360. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-010822-1422. - Jeffries J, Zhou W, Hsu AY, et al. (2019). miRNA- 223 at the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Cancer Letter. 451:136-141.
Mokhtar GA, Gebriel MG, Abdelnour HM, Salah Abd El Azeem El Sayed M, Hadhoud AN, Roman SW, Mohamed NM, ElGwad AMA, Ibraheem AAA, Nofal HA, Omran FH, Mohammed SA. Exploring serum sST2 and miR-223 as potential biomarkers of disease activity and clinical response to SLIT in HDM-induced allergic rhinitis. Sci Rep. 2026 Sep 8;16(1):28106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-69247-2.
PubMed 42711401
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Exploring the Role of Serum sST2/ miR-223 as a Dual Biomarker for Disease Activity & Clinical Efficacy of SLIT in HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07436208
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- Conditions
- HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
- Keywords
- Soluble ST2 (sST2); Allergic Rhinitis; House Dust Mite (HDM); MicroRNA -223; Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT); IL-33/ST2 Axis
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zagazig UniversityOther government
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR. Methods: This study included 54 patients with moderate-to-severe AR (MSAR) and 54 healthy controls (HC). Serum sST2, total IgE, HDM-specific IgE, and eosinophil counts were measured. Serum levels of miR-223 were assayed using real-time PCR. Clinical severity was assessed using the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). MSAR patients received SLIT for 6 months. Treatment response was defined by ≥30% reduction in symptom and medication scores.
Detailed description
Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR
1st stage: A case-control study conducted over 3 months at the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, in collaboration with the Allergy Unit at Zagazig University Hospitals from February to May 2025. 2nd stage an interventional study (quasi experimental) for (MSAR patients): conducted over 6 months.
Study Population, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines . Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years and be willing to initiate and maintain SLIT for six months. Exclusion criteria included the presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to provide informed consent. Healthy, age- and sex-matched individuals without a history of allergic disease and with negative skin prick test (SPT) results were recruited as controls.
Sample size:
The sample size was calculated using open epi info according to the following mean sST2 level among AR cases versus control was 19.8+_7.5 versus 14.3+_6.9 (ref.) at power of study 80%, ci 95%, case: control 1:1, The minimum required sample size was 27 participants per group. However, we were able to recruit 54 participants in each group, all of whom were included in the final analysis. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique according to the predefined inclusion criteria.
- Clinical and Laboratory Procedures
- Baseline Assessment All participants underwent a detailed clinical assessment, including demographic data, duration of disease, body mass index (BMI), and previous treatment history.
- Symptom Scoring Symptom severity was evaluated using the TNSS, which includes four parameters-rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing-each rated on a 0 to 4 scale, for a maximum score of 16. A 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was also used to quantify overall symptom burden.
- Skin Prick Testing (SPT) SPT was performed using standardized allergen extracts, including Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae. Histamine and saline served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A wheal diameter of ≥3 mm compared to the negative control was considered positive.
- Immunological marker and sST2 measurement Venous blood samples were collected from all participants at baseline to determine serum eosinophils, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and house dust mite-specific HDM-IgE (kU/l) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Chemus Bioscience, USA). sST2 concentrations were quantified using a commercial ELISA kit (Elabscience, Cat No. E-EL-H6082). For patients undergoing SLIT, additional serum samples were collected after six months of therapy. All measurements were performed in duplicate. Laboratory personnel conducting the assays were blinded to the clinical information and sampling time.
- Detection of microRNA-223 Expression level via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR): MicroRNA was extracted by commercial miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kits (Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After extraction, microRNA was reversibly transcribed by reverse transcription kits (miScript II RT Kit, Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, it was incubated in dry bath block (Rocker Sahara 320 dry bath heat block, Rocker Scientific, Taiwan), initially at 37°C for 60 min, followed by a second incubation at 95°C for 5 min to inactivate miScript RT. After that, the reaction mixture was stored at -80°C.Quantitative determination of mature miR-223 was fulfilled by target-specific miScript Primer Assays using commercial kits (miScript SYBR Green real-time PCR Kit, Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Human RNU6B (RNU6-2) was used as a house keeping gene. After the initial activation step of HotStar Taq DNA Polymerase fo 15 min at 95°C, the real-time PCR reactions were run for 40 cycles of each of a denaturation for 15 s at 95 ºC, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, and extension for 30 s at 70°C. The Stratagene Mx3005P platform software (Agilent Technologies, USA) was used to figure out the threshold cycle (Ct) value. The delta-delta Ct method formula was utilized to estimate the fold changes of miR-223 expression .
- Intervention stage for (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Moderate and severe allergic Rhinitis (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Biological: Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extractsModerate and severe allergic Rhinitis Patients (MSAR patients) received Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 14 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR
- Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- The presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment
- Pregnancy
- lactation
- Refusal to provide informed consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extractsPatients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders. | Biological | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with reduction in Relieve symptoms
Time frame: 6 months
Reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication
score improvement in TNSS score
Time frame: 6 months
score improvement in VAS score
Time frame: 6 months
1 secondary outcome
Immunological response
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2026.
- Results publicationBousquet , J., Agache, I., Aliberti, M.R., Anguelova-Fischer, D., Bachert, C., Bedbrook, A., et al. (2020). Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on GRADE and real-world evidence. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(1), 70-80.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049 - Tamasauskiene , L., Gasiuniene, E., Sitkauskiene, B. (2021). Translation, adaption and validation of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) for Lithuanian population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01659-8 - Lote, S., Gupta, S.B., Poulose, D., et al. (2022). Role of the skin prick test in urticaria patients. Cureus, 14(2), e21818. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21818 - Klangkalya , N., Kanchongkittiphon, W., Sawatchai, A., Kiewngam, P., Jotikasthira, W., Manuyakorn, W. (2024). Skin prick test and serum specific IgE in predicting dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis diagnosed from nasal provocation test in chronic rhinitis children. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 42(4), 354-360. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-010822-1422. - Jeffries J, Zhou W, Hsu AY, et al. (2019). miRNA- 223 at the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Cancer Letter. 451:136-141.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42711401Mokhtar GA, Gebriel MG, Abdelnour HM, Salah Abd El Azeem El Sayed M, Hadhoud AN, Roman SW, Mohamed NM, ElGwad AMA, Ibraheem AAA, Nofal HA, Omran FH, Mohammed SA. Exploring serum sST2 and miR-223 as potential biomarkers of disease activity and clinical response to SLIT in HDM-induced allergic rhinitis. Sci Rep. 2026 Sep 8;16(1):28106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-69247-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hanaa A Nofal, MD study director
Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts in people with HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with reduction in Relieve symptoms (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07436208, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.