AzTrials
AzTrials

HDM-Induced Allergic RhinitisPhase 1NCT07436208

Serum sST2/ miR-223 as a Dual Biomarker for Disease Activity & Clinical Efficacy of SLIT in HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis

A Phase 1 study testing Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts in people with HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM)… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 14 to 35 years
Conditions the study is for
HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
54 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Feb 2025to 30 Nov 2025
Phase
Phase 1
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 14 to 35 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR
  • Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years

Who cannot join

  • The presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment
  • Pregnancy
  • lactation
  • Refusal to provide informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Zagazig University outpatients clinics

    Zagazig

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Exploring the Role of Serum sST2/ miR-223 as a Dual Biomarker for Disease Activity & Clinical Efficacy of SLIT in HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR. Methods: This study included 54 patients with moderate-to-severe AR (MSAR) and 54 healthy controls (HC). Serum sST2, total IgE, HDM-specific IgE, and eosinophil counts were measured. Serum levels of miR-223 were assayed using real-time PCR. Clinical severity was assessed using the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) and visual analogue scale (VAS). MSAR patients received SLIT for 6 months. Treatment response was defined by ≥30% reduction in symptom and medication scores.

Read the detailed description

Soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2), a decoy receptor of interleukin-33 (IL-33), involved in allergic inflammation. Objectives: This study explored serum sST2 as a biomarker for disease activity and for predicting clinical response to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with house dust mite (HDM) induced AR

1st stage: A case-control study conducted over 3 months at the Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, in collaboration with the Allergy Unit at Zagazig University Hospitals from February to May 2025. 2nd stage an interventional study (quasi experimental) for (MSAR patients): conducted over 6 months.

Study Population, Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Eligible participants were 14 years or older with a diagnosis of HDM-induced AR and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines . Patients were required to have persistent moderate to severe symptoms for at least two years and be willing to initiate and maintain SLIT for six months. Exclusion criteria included the presence of autoimmune or chronic inflammatory conditions, severe asthma or other pulmonary disease, systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressive therapy within four weeks prior to enrollment, pregnancy or lactation, and refusal to provide informed consent. Healthy, age- and sex-matched individuals without a history of allergic disease and with negative skin prick test (SPT) results were recruited as controls.

Sample size:

The sample size was calculated using open epi info according to the following mean sST2 level among AR cases versus control was 19.8+_7.5 versus 14.3+_6.9 (ref.) at power of study 80%, ci 95%, case: control 1:1, The minimum required sample size was 27 participants per group. However, we were able to recruit 54 participants in each group, all of whom were included in the final analysis. Participants were selected using a simple random sampling technique according to the predefined inclusion criteria.

  • Clinical and Laboratory Procedures
  • Baseline Assessment All participants underwent a detailed clinical assessment, including demographic data, duration of disease, body mass index (BMI), and previous treatment history.
  • Symptom Scoring Symptom severity was evaluated using the TNSS, which includes four parameters-rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, nasal itching, and sneezing-each rated on a 0 to 4 scale, for a maximum score of 16. A 10-cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was also used to quantify overall symptom burden.
  • Skin Prick Testing (SPT) SPT was performed using standardized allergen extracts, including Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus and D. farinae. Histamine and saline served as positive and negative controls, respectively. A wheal diameter of ≥3 mm compared to the negative control was considered positive.
  • Immunological marker and sST2 measurement Venous blood samples were collected from all participants at baseline to determine serum eosinophils, total immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and house dust mite-specific HDM-IgE (kU/l) measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) according to the manufacturer's protocol (Chemus Bioscience, USA). sST2 concentrations were quantified using a commercial ELISA kit (Elabscience, Cat No. E-EL-H6082). For patients undergoing SLIT, additional serum samples were collected after six months of therapy. All measurements were performed in duplicate. Laboratory personnel conducting the assays were blinded to the clinical information and sampling time.
  • Detection of microRNA-223 Expression level via quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR): MicroRNA was extracted by commercial miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kits (Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. After extraction, microRNA was reversibly transcribed by reverse transcription kits (miScript II RT Kit, Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Then, it was incubated in dry bath block (Rocker Sahara 320 dry bath heat block, Rocker Scientific, Taiwan), initially at 37°C for 60 min, followed by a second incubation at 95°C for 5 min to inactivate miScript RT. After that, the reaction mixture was stored at -80°C.Quantitative determination of mature miR-223 was fulfilled by target-specific miScript Primer Assays using commercial kits (miScript SYBR Green real-time PCR Kit, Qiagen, Germany), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Human RNU6B (RNU6-2) was used as a house keeping gene. After the initial activation step of HotStar Taq DNA Polymerase fo 15 min at 95°C, the real-time PCR reactions were run for 40 cycles of each of a denaturation for 15 s at 95 ºC, annealing for 30 s at 55°C, and extension for 30 s at 70°C. The Stratagene Mx3005P platform software (Agilent Technologies, USA) was used to figure out the threshold cycle (Ct) value. The delta-delta Ct method formula was utilized to estimate the fold changes of miR-223 expression .
  • Intervention stage for (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders.
Being tested
Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts
Keywords
Soluble ST2 (sST2); Allergic Rhinitis; House Dust Mite (HDM); MicroRNA -223; Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT); IL-33/ST2 Axis
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extractsBiological

    Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects. The therapeutic response was evaluated after six months based on a composite outcome: a reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication score, improvement in TNSS and VAS scores, and a decrease in serum sST2 levels. Patients meeting these criteria were classified as responders; those not meeting the threshold were considered non-responders.

Study groups in NCT07436208
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention groupExperimentalModerate and severe allergic Rhinitis Patients (MSAR patients) received Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol
Receives: Biological: Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of participants with reduction in Relieve symptoms

    Reduction of at least 30% in the combined symptom and medication

    Measured: 6 months

  2. score improvement in TNSS score

    Measured: 6 months

  3. score improvement in VAS score

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Immunological response

    Decrease in serum sST2 levels

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completion30 May 2025
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Moderate and severe allergic Rhinitis (MSAR patients) Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) Protocol Patients received standardized daily SLIT containing HDM extracts for a period of six months. Administration began under clinical supervision, and patients were monitored monthly for adherence and adverse effects.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
54 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07436208
Sponsor's protocol ID
HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
22 Feb 2026
Last updated
27 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Bousquet , J., Agache, I., Aliberti, M.R., Anguelova-Fischer, D., Bachert, C., Bedbrook, A., et al. (2020). Next-generation Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on GRADE and real-world evidence. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 145(1), 70-80.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049 - Tamasauskiene , L., Gasiuniene, E., Sitkauskiene, B. (2021). Translation, adaption and validation of the total nasal symptom score (TNSS) for Lithuanian population. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01659-8 - Lote, S., Gupta, S.B., Poulose, D., et al. (2022). Role of the skin prick test in urticaria patients. Cureus, 14(2), e21818. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.21818 - Klangkalya , N., Kanchongkittiphon, W., Sawatchai, A., Kiewngam, P., Jotikasthira, W., Manuyakorn, W. (2024). Skin prick test and serum specific IgE in predicting dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis diagnosed from nasal provocation test in chronic rhinitis children. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunology, 42(4), 354-360. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-010822-1422. - Jeffries J, Zhou W, Hsu AY, et al. (2019). miRNA- 223 at the crossroads of inflammation and cancer. Cancer Letter. 451:136-141.

  • Mokhtar GA, Gebriel MG, Abdelnour HM, Salah Abd El Azeem El Sayed M, Hadhoud AN, Roman SW, Mohamed NM, ElGwad AMA, Ibraheem AAA, Nofal HA, Omran FH, Mohammed SA. Exploring serum sST2 and miR-223 as potential biomarkers of disease activity and clinical response to SLIT in HDM-induced allergic rhinitis. Sci Rep. 2026 Sep 8;16(1):28106. doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-69247-2.

    PubMed 42711401

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1 study testing Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) containing HDM extracts in people with HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis, run by Zagazig University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of participants with reduction in Relieve symptoms (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07436208, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in