High-Burden Metastatic Solid TumorsPhase 2NCT07437625
Lesion-Allocated Therapy for Multiple Metastases and Tumor-Zoned Treatment for Bulky Tumors: A Phase II Study of Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Combined With Cryoablation in High-Burden Metastatic Disease
A Phase 2 study testing Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy), cryoablation and Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning Strategy in people with High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors, run by Li Min at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether a strategy-based, multimodal local treatment approach improves local control compared with single-modality local therapy in patients with high-burden metastatic disease characterized by multiple metastases and at least one bulky lesion. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors
- What is being tested?
- Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy), cryoablation and Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning Strategy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Feb 2026to 1 Jul 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 years;
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid malignancy with metastatic disease not amenable to curative surgery or definitive curative-intent radiotherapy;
- High-burden metastatic disease, defined as: Multiple metastases: ≥3 metastatic lesions on imaging, and at least 2 measurable lesions (RECIST v1.1) planned as protocol target lesions; and Bulky lesion: at least 1 lesion meeting bulky criteria (e.g., longest diameter ≥7 cm or tumor volume ≥100 mL, per protocol) designated as the bulky index lesion;
- At least 2 and up to 5 prespecified target lesions are suitable for protocol local therapy and can be assigned per protocol (lesion allocation and/or tumor zoning);
- ECOG performance status 0-2;
- Adequate organ function;
- Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Lesions requiring emergent surgical decompression or other urgent intervention that cannot be deferred to protocol timelines;
- Target lesions not safely accessible for percutaneous cryoablation and/or 125I seed implantation (e.g., no feasible needle path, unacceptable risk to critical structures despite protective maneuvers);
- Active, uncontrolled infection; uncontrolled pleural effusion/ascites requiring frequent drainage (unless stabilized);
- Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity prohibiting anesthesia/sedation or percutaneous intervention (e.g., unstable angina, recent MI, uncontrolled arrhythmia, severe COPD with high oxygen requirement);
- Prior local therapy to the same bulky index lesion that would confound response assessment (prior treatment to other non-index lesions may be allowed);
- Uncontrolled CNS metastases (symptomatic, requiring escalating steroids, or not stable after local therapy). Stable treated brain metastases may be allowed per protocol;
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would compromise protocol compliance or make participation unsafe.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Min Li, Dr. contact
China1 site
The 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA)
Jinan, Shandong, 250031
Min Li, Dr., 0531-51665482, liminyingxiang.@163.com
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Trial of Lesion-Allocated Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Combined With Cryoablation for Multiple Metastases and Tumor-Zoned Local Therapy for Bulky Tumors in Patients With High-Burden Metastatic Disease
This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether a strategy-based, multimodal local treatment approach improves local control compared with single-modality local therapy in patients with high-burden metastatic disease characterized by multiple metastases and at least one bulky lesion.
In the experimental arm, prespecified target lesions are prospectively allocated to either iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation or cryoablation using protocol-defined anatomic and technical suitability criteria, and at least one bulky index lesion is treated using a tumor-zoned approach (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with 125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints. The control arm treats all prespecified target lesions with a single local modality (either 125I seed implantation alone or cryoablation alone), with standardized supportive care and follow-up.
The primary objective is to determine whether the "lesion allocation plus tumor zoning" strategy can improve local control of treated target lesions with acceptable safety. Imaging-based efficacy endpoints are evaluated using protocol-defined criteria with standardized blinded independent imaging review. Key secondary endpoints include local progression-free survival of the bulky index lesion, overall response rate (RECIST), progression-free survival, time to systemic progression (including new lesions), overall survival, tumor-burden reduction metrics, technical success, and re-intervention rates. Safety is assessed throughout the study using CTCAE v5.0, including monitoring for procedure-related and radiation-related complications. Exploratory analyses assess dosimetry-outcome relationships, zonal response patterns within bulky lesions, imaging/radiomics biomarkers, and peripheral blood biomarker dynamics.
Read the detailed description
This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether a strategy-based, multimodal local treatment approach can improve local control and disease outcomes compared with single-modality local therapy in patients with high-burden metastatic disease. The trial targets a population in which tumor burden is driven by both multiple metastatic deposits and at least one bulky lesion, where uniform local treatment is often limited by anatomic heterogeneity, safety constraints, and incomplete coverage of high-risk tumor regions.
The study is based on a complementary rationale at both the inter-lesion and intra-lesion levels. For multiple metastases, different lesions may be optimally treated with different modalities: cryoablation offers rapid cytoreduction and prompt symptom relief in appropriately accessible lesions with favorable safety margins, while iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation provides sustained low-dose-rate irradiation that can better sterilize residual disease in lesions where ablative margins are difficult to achieve or where durable peripheral control is prioritized. For bulky tumors, a tumor-zoned concept is applied to address intratumoral heterogeneity and margin risk: the core region is treated to achieve efficient debulking (typically with cryoablation), while the peripheral/high-risk margin zones are treated to enhance durable control (typically with 125I seeds) under protocol-defined organ-at-risk constraints. The trial is designed to determine whether this structured "allocation plus zoning" strategy translates into superior local disease control and meaningful tumor-burden reduction without unacceptable toxicity.
Participants will be randomized in parallel to one of two arms: (1) strategy-based combined local therapy, consisting of protocol-defined lesion allocation (each prespecified metastatic target lesion assigned to 125I seed implantation or cryoablation based on predefined anatomic/technical suitability criteria) plus tumor-zoned treatment for at least one prespecified bulky index lesion; or (2) single-modality local therapy, in which all prespecified target lesions are treated using a single local modality (either 125I seed implantation alone or cryoablation alone, as specified by the protocol and/or center capability) with standard supportive care. Treatment assignment is open label. To reduce assessment bias, imaging-based efficacy endpoints will be evaluated using a standardized blinded imaging review process by independent assessors according to protocol-defined criteria, with prespecified rules for target lesion selection, timing windows, and adjudication of progression events.
The primary endpoint is local control rate (LCR) of prespecified treated target lesions at a fixed time point and local progression-free survival (LPFS) of the bulky index lesion (as defined in the protocol). Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) (patient-level by RECIST), time to systemic progression (including appearance of new lesions), overall survival (OS), tumor-burden reduction metrics (e.g., change in sum of diameters and/or total measurable tumor volume), technical success rates for each procedure, need for re-intervention on treated target lesions.
Safety will be assessed throughout the study and includes procedure-related and radiation-related adverse events graded by CTCAE v5.0, with focused monitoring for clinically relevant risks such as bleeding, infection, fistula/organ injury, nerve or vascular injury, cryo-related complications, seed migration, radiation injury to adjacent organs, and any grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Prespecified dose planning and procedural quality assurance measures will be implemented for 125I seed implantation, and standardized cryoablation parameters and post-procedure imaging checks will be used to ensure consistent delivery and safety oversight. Exploratory analyses will evaluate dosimetry-outcome relationships (e.g., coverage and dose-volume parameters for seed implants), zonal treatment response patterns within bulky lesions, imaging biomarkers and radiomics features associated with benefit, and the dynamics of peripheral blood biomarkers as potential correlates of local control and systemic progression.
- Conditions
- High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors
- Being tested
- Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy), cryoablation, Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning Strategy
- Keywords
- Iodine-125 seed implantation, Cryoablation, High tumor burden, Multiple metastases, Lesion allocation, Tumor zoning, Local control
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy)Procedure or surgery
Image-guided percutaneous implantation of 125I radioactive seeds into prespecified target lesions according to protocol-defined treatment planning and organ-at-risk constraints. Seed number and distribution are determined by pre-implant planning to achieve protocol-specified target coverage, with post-implant verification imaging and dosimetry as required.
cryoablationProcedure or surgery
Image-guided percutaneous cryoablation of prespecified target lesions using standardized probe placement and freeze-thaw cycles per protocol. The ablation zone is planned to achieve protocol-defined tumor coverage while maintaining safety margins to adjacent critical structures, with intraprocedural monitoring and post-procedure imaging assessment.
Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning StrategyOther
Protocol-defined decision rules assign each prespecified metastatic target lesion to 125I seed implantation or cryoablation based on anatomic and technical suitability criteria. For at least one bulky index lesion, a tumor-zoned approach is applied (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with 125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints and quality assurance requirements.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lesion-Allocated + Tumor-Zoned Combined Local Therapy (125I Seeds + Cryoablation) | Experimental | Participants receive strategy-based multimodal local therapy. Prespecified metastatic target lesions are prospectively allocated to either iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation or cryoablation according to protocol-defined anatomic and technical suitability criteria. In addition, at least one bulky index lesion is treated using a tumor-zoned approach (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with ^125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints. Standardized follow-up and supportive care are provided per protocol. Receives: Other: Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning Strategy |
| Single-Modality Local Therapy (Cryoablation Alone or ^125I Seeds Alone) | Active comparator | Participants receive single-modality local therapy for all prespecified target lesions, using either cryoablation alone or iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation alone as specified by the protocol and/or center capability, with standardized supportive care and follow-up. Imaging-based efficacy endpoints are assessed per protocol with standardized blinded independent review. Receives: Procedure: Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy); Procedure: cryoablation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Local Control Rate (LCR) of Treated Target Lesions
Proportion of prespecified treated target lesions without local progression by blinded independent imaging review per protocol-defined criteria.
Measured: 6 months after completion of protocol local therapy
Local Progression-Free Survival (LPFS) of the Bulky Index Lesion
Time from randomization to local progression of the prespecified bulky index lesion or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed by blinded independent imaging review.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time from randomization to radiographic disease progression (including new lesions) or death from any cause, whichever occurs first (RECIST v1.1, blinded independent review when applicable).
Measured: Up to 12 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Proportion of participants achieving complete response or partial response at the patient level per RECIST v1.1.
Measured: First assessment at ~8-12 weeks; up to 6 months
Time to Systemic Progression
Time from randomization to systemic progression, including appearance of new lesions and/or progression of non-target/non-treated disease per protocol criteria.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time from randomization to death from any cause.
Measured: Up to 24 months
Tumor-Burden Reduction
Change from baseline in sum of diameters of measurable disease (RECIST) and/or total measurable tumor volume for the bulky index lesion (volumetric imaging) per protocol.
Measured: Baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Technical Success (Procedure-Level)
Successful completion of the assigned procedure(s) per protocol (e.g., planned seed placement/coverage or planned ablation zone achieved) without immediate major protocol deviation.
Measured: Day of procedure to 7 days post-procedure
Re-intervention Rate of Treated Target Lesions
Proportion of treated target lesions requiring repeat local intervention due to local progression or incomplete control per protocol.
Measured: Up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Feb 2026
- Study startFeb 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for High-Burden Metastatic Solid TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This strategy-based local therapy model uses (1) lesion allocation of prespecified metastatic targets to either 125I seed implantation or cryoablation using predefined suitability criteria, and (2) tumor-zoned treatment of a bulky index lesion (core debulking plus peripheral/high-risk margin control) under organ-at-risk constraints, compared with single-modality local therapy for all target lesions.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Li Min
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Li Min, Jinan Military General Hospital
- Investigators
- Min Li, Study director, The 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07437625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 960HP20260222
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 22 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request after completion of the study and publication of the primary results. Data to be shared may include demographic information, treatment assignment, key efficacy outcomes, adverse events, and imaging-derived parameters. A data-sharing agreement will be required to ensure appropriate use of the dataset.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized Phase II Trial of Lesion-Allocated Iodine-125 Seed Implantation Combined With Cryoablation for Multiple Metastases and Tumor-Zoned Local Therapy for Bulky Tumors in Patients With High-Burden Metastatic Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07437625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 960HP20260222
- Conditions
- High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors
- Keywords
- Iodine-125 seed implantation, Cryoablation, High tumor burden, Multiple metastases, Lesion allocation, Tumor zoning, Local control
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Li MinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether a strategy-based, multimodal local treatment approach improves local control compared with single-modality local therapy in patients with high-burden metastatic disease characterized by multiple metastases and at least one bulky lesion.
In the experimental arm, prespecified target lesions are prospectively allocated to either iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation or cryoablation using protocol-defined anatomic and technical suitability criteria, and at least one bulky index lesion is treated using a tumor-zoned approach (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with 125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints. The control arm treats all prespecified target lesions with a single local modality (either 125I seed implantation alone or cryoablation alone), with standardized supportive care and follow-up.
The primary objective is to determine whether the "lesion allocation plus tumor zoning" strategy can improve local control of treated target lesions with acceptable safety. Imaging-based efficacy endpoints are evaluated using protocol-defined criteria with standardized blinded independent imaging review. Key secondary endpoints include local progression-free survival of the bulky index lesion, overall response rate (RECIST), progression-free survival, time to systemic progression (including new lesions), overall survival, tumor-burden reduction metrics, technical success, and re-intervention rates. Safety is assessed throughout the study using CTCAE v5.0, including monitoring for procedure-related and radiation-related complications. Exploratory analyses assess dosimetry-outcome relationships, zonal response patterns within bulky lesions, imaging/radiomics biomarkers, and peripheral blood biomarker dynamics.
Detailed description
This open-label, randomized Phase II trial evaluates whether a strategy-based, multimodal local treatment approach can improve local control and disease outcomes compared with single-modality local therapy in patients with high-burden metastatic disease. The trial targets a population in which tumor burden is driven by both multiple metastatic deposits and at least one bulky lesion, where uniform local treatment is often limited by anatomic heterogeneity, safety constraints, and incomplete coverage of high-risk tumor regions.
The study is based on a complementary rationale at both the inter-lesion and intra-lesion levels. For multiple metastases, different lesions may be optimally treated with different modalities: cryoablation offers rapid cytoreduction and prompt symptom relief in appropriately accessible lesions with favorable safety margins, while iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation provides sustained low-dose-rate irradiation that can better sterilize residual disease in lesions where ablative margins are difficult to achieve or where durable peripheral control is prioritized. For bulky tumors, a tumor-zoned concept is applied to address intratumoral heterogeneity and margin risk: the core region is treated to achieve efficient debulking (typically with cryoablation), while the peripheral/high-risk margin zones are treated to enhance durable control (typically with 125I seeds) under protocol-defined organ-at-risk constraints. The trial is designed to determine whether this structured "allocation plus zoning" strategy translates into superior local disease control and meaningful tumor-burden reduction without unacceptable toxicity.
Participants will be randomized in parallel to one of two arms: (1) strategy-based combined local therapy, consisting of protocol-defined lesion allocation (each prespecified metastatic target lesion assigned to 125I seed implantation or cryoablation based on predefined anatomic/technical suitability criteria) plus tumor-zoned treatment for at least one prespecified bulky index lesion; or (2) single-modality local therapy, in which all prespecified target lesions are treated using a single local modality (either 125I seed implantation alone or cryoablation alone, as specified by the protocol and/or center capability) with standard supportive care. Treatment assignment is open label. To reduce assessment bias, imaging-based efficacy endpoints will be evaluated using a standardized blinded imaging review process by independent assessors according to protocol-defined criteria, with prespecified rules for target lesion selection, timing windows, and adjudication of progression events.
The primary endpoint is local control rate (LCR) of prespecified treated target lesions at a fixed time point and local progression-free survival (LPFS) of the bulky index lesion (as defined in the protocol). Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) (patient-level by RECIST), time to systemic progression (including appearance of new lesions), overall survival (OS), tumor-burden reduction metrics (e.g., change in sum of diameters and/or total measurable tumor volume), technical success rates for each procedure, need for re-intervention on treated target lesions.
Safety will be assessed throughout the study and includes procedure-related and radiation-related adverse events graded by CTCAE v5.0, with focused monitoring for clinically relevant risks such as bleeding, infection, fistula/organ injury, nerve or vascular injury, cryo-related complications, seed migration, radiation injury to adjacent organs, and any grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events. Prespecified dose planning and procedural quality assurance measures will be implemented for 125I seed implantation, and standardized cryoablation parameters and post-procedure imaging checks will be used to ensure consistent delivery and safety oversight. Exploratory analyses will evaluate dosimetry-outcome relationships (e.g., coverage and dose-volume parameters for seed implants), zonal treatment response patterns within bulky lesions, imaging biomarkers and radiomics features associated with benefit, and the dynamics of peripheral blood biomarkers as potential correlates of local control and systemic progression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This strategy-based local therapy model uses (1) lesion allocation of prespecified metastatic targets to either 125I seed implantation or cryoablation using predefined suitability criteria, and (2) tumor-zoned treatment of a bulky index lesion (core debulking plus peripheral/high-risk margin control) under organ-at-risk constraints, compared with single-modality local therapy for all target lesions.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lesion-Allocated + Tumor-Zoned Combined Local Therapy (125I Seeds + Cryoablation) | Experimental | Other: Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning StrategyParticipants receive strategy-based multimodal local therapy. Prespecified metastatic target lesions are prospectively allocated to either iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation or cryoablation according to protocol-defined anatomic and technical suitability criteria. In addition, at least one bulky index lesion is treated using a tumor-zoned approach (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with ^125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints. Standardized follow-up and supportive care are provided per protocol. |
| Single-Modality Local Therapy (Cryoablation Alone or ^125I Seeds Alone) | Active comparator | Procedure: Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy), Procedure: cryoablationParticipants receive single-modality local therapy for all prespecified target lesions, using either cryoablation alone or iodine-125 (125I) seed implantation alone as specified by the protocol and/or center capability, with standardized supportive care and follow-up. Imaging-based efficacy endpoints are assessed per protocol with standardized blinded independent review. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age ≥18 years;
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed solid malignancy with metastatic disease not amenable to curative surgery or definitive curative-intent radiotherapy;
- High-burden metastatic disease, defined as: Multiple metastases: ≥3 metastatic lesions on imaging, and at least 2 measurable lesions (RECIST v1.1) planned as protocol target lesions; and Bulky lesion: at least 1 lesion meeting bulky criteria (e.g., longest diameter ≥7 cm or tumor volume ≥100 mL, per protocol) designated as the bulky index lesion;
- At least 2 and up to 5 prespecified target lesions are suitable for protocol local therapy and can be assigned per protocol (lesion allocation and/or tumor zoning);
- ECOG performance status 0-2;
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Lesions requiring emergent surgical decompression or other urgent intervention that cannot be deferred to protocol timelines;
- Target lesions not safely accessible for percutaneous cryoablation and/or 125I seed implantation (e.g., no feasible needle path, unacceptable risk to critical structures despite protective maneuvers);
- Active, uncontrolled infection; uncontrolled pleural effusion/ascites requiring frequent drainage (unless stabilized);
- Severe cardiopulmonary comorbidity prohibiting anesthesia/sedation or percutaneous intervention (e.g., unstable angina, recent MI, uncontrolled arrhythmia, severe COPD with high oxygen requirement);
- Prior local therapy to the same bulky index lesion that would confound response assessment (prior treatment to other non-index lesions may be allowed);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy)Image-guided percutaneous implantation of 125I radioactive seeds into prespecified target lesions according to protocol-defined treatment planning and organ-at-risk constraints. Seed number and distribution are determined by pre-implant planning to achieve protocol-specified target coverage, with post-implant verification imaging and dosimetry as required. | Procedure or surgery | Single-Modality Local Therapy (Cryoablation Alone or ^125I Seeds Alone) |
| cryoablationImage-guided percutaneous cryoablation of prespecified target lesions using standardized probe placement and freeze-thaw cycles per protocol. The ablation zone is planned to achieve protocol-defined tumor coverage while maintaining safety margins to adjacent critical structures, with intraprocedural monitoring and post-procedure imaging assessment. | Procedure or surgery | Single-Modality Local Therapy (Cryoablation Alone or ^125I Seeds Alone) |
| Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning StrategyProtocol-defined decision rules assign each prespecified metastatic target lesion to 125I seed implantation or cryoablation based on anatomic and technical suitability criteria. For at least one bulky index lesion, a tumor-zoned approach is applied (e.g., core debulking with cryoablation and peripheral/high-risk margin control with 125I seeds) under predefined organ-at-risk constraints and quality assurance requirements. | Other | Lesion-Allocated + Tumor-Zoned Combined Local Therapy (125I Seeds + Cryoablation) |
Primary outcome
Local Control Rate (LCR) of Treated Target Lesions
Time frame: 6 months after completion of protocol local therapy
Proportion of prespecified treated target lesions without local progression by blinded independent imaging review per protocol-defined criteria.
Local Progression-Free Survival (LPFS) of the Bulky Index Lesion
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Time from randomization to local progression of the prespecified bulky index lesion or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed by blinded independent imaging review.
7 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: First assessment at ~8-12 weeks; up to 6 months
Time to Systemic Progression
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 24 months
Tumor-Burden Reduction
Time frame: Baseline to 3 months and 6 months
Technical Success (Procedure-Level)
Time frame: Day of procedure to 7 days post-procedure
Re-intervention Rate of Treated Target Lesions
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request after completion of the study and publication of the primary results. Data to be shared may include demographic information, treatment assignment, key efficacy outcomes, adverse events, and imaging-derived parameters. A data-sharing agreement will be required to ensure appropriate use of the dataset.
Related trials for High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of PLN-101095 in Adults With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumor
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of a Selective T Cell Receptor (TCR) Targeting, Bifunctional Antibody-fusion Molecule STAR0602 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Genital Neoplasm, Female
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Min Li, Dr. contact
Min Li study director
The 960th Hospital of People's Liberation Army (PLA)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Iodine-125 (125I) Seed Implantation (Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy), cryoablation and Lesion Allocation and Tumor Zoning Strategy in people with High-Burden Metastatic Solid Tumors, run by Li Min at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Min Li, Dr. (0531-51665482, liminyingxiang.@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Local Control Rate (LCR) of Treated Target Lesions (time frame: 6 months after completion of protocol local therapy). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.