AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Caries in Primary MolarsNCT07437794

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Neo Putty MTA Versus Formocresol Used in Vital Pulpotomy of Mandibular Primary Molars

A study testing NeoPutty MTA and Formocresol in people with Deep Caries in Primary Molars, run by October University for Modern Sciences and Arts at 1 site in Egypt.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of NeoPutty MTA compared to formocresol in vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars in children aged 4 to 9 years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 9 years
Conditions the study is for
Deep Caries in Primary Molars
What is being tested?
NeoPutty MTA and Formocresol
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to 1 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 9 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children with asymptomatic decayed primary mandibular molar(s).
  • Patient and parent showing cooperation and compliance.
  • Children 4-9 years old.
  • Vital carious primary(s) with complete root formation.
  • Asymptomatic teeth or without clinical symptoms of spontaneous pain.
  • No clinical evidence of pulp degeneration like the history of spontaneous or nocturnal pain, tenderness to percussion, pathologic tooth mobility, swelling, or fistulous tract.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Both genders will be included.
  • No radiographic evidence of pulp degeneration such as internal root resorption, external root resorption, or furcal radiolucency.
  • Presence of two thirds of the root.
  • Teeth that can be restored.
  • Children with prior parental consent.

Who cannot join

  • History of any systemic disease.
  • Hemostasis is not achieved within 5 minutes of pulp amputation, by direct contact with a wet cotton pellet before the material placement.
  • The remaining radicular tissue was non-vital (with suppuration or purulence necrosis).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Ahmed Shawky, bachelor of dentistry contact

+201124465202

ahmed.shawky3@msa.edu.eg

Egypt1 site
  • October university for modern sciences and arts

    Giza, Giza Governorate, 12116

    Ahmed Shawky, +201124465202, ahmed.shawky3@msa.edu.eg

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Neo Putty MTA Versus Formocresol Used in Vital Pulpotomy of Mandibular Primary Molars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success of NeoPutty MTA compared to formocresol in vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars in children aged 4 to 9 years. Participants will be randomly allocated into two groups (1:1) to receive pulpotomy using either NeoPutty MTA or formocresol, followed by restoration with stainless steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be assessed during follow-up visits.

Read the detailed description

Pulpotomy is a commonly performed vital pulp therapy in pediatric dentistry. Formocresol has been widely used due to its high clinical success; however, concerns exist regarding its potential toxicity. NeoPutty MTA is a premixed bioceramic material introduced as an alternative pulpotomy agent with improved handling properties and bioactivity. This randomized parallel-group clinical trial will compare NeoPutty MTA versus formocresol in vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars. Children aged 4-9 years presenting with asymptomatic carious mandibular primary molars will be recruited from the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, MSA University. Eligible teeth will undergo standardized pulpotomy procedures, restoration with glass ionomer cement, and stainless steel crowns. Clinical and radiographic follow-up will be performed at scheduled intervals to evaluate success and failure outcomes.

Being tested
NeoPutty MTA, Formocresol
Keywords
Deep Caries in Primary Molars, NeoPutty MTA, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Formocresol, Vital Pulp Therapy, Pulpotomy, Stainless Steel Crown

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NeoPutty MTADrug

    NeoPutty MTA (NuSmile) will be placed directly over the radicular pulp stumps after hemostasis, then the tooth will be sealed with resin-modified glass ionomer cement and restored with stainless steel crown.

  • FormocresolDrug

    A sterile cotton pellet lightly moistened with a 1:5 dilution of Buckley's formocresol will be placed against the pulp stumps for 3-5 minutes, then removed. Reinforced zinc oxide eugenol will be placed, followed by glass ionomer cement and stainless steel crown restoration.

Study groups in NCT07437794
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A: NeoPutty MTA PulpotomyExperimentalParticipants will receive vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars using NeoPutty MTA as the pulpotomy medicament, followed by restoration with glass ionomer cement and stainless steel crown.
Receives: Drug: NeoPutty MTA
Arm B: Formocresol PulpotomyActive comparatorParticipants will receive vital pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars using formocresol (1:5 dilution of Buckley's formocresol) applied with cotton pellet, followed by reinforced zinc oxide eugenol, glass ionomer cement, and stainless steel crown.
Receives: Drug: Formocresol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Postoperative pain

    Presence or absence of spontaneous postoperative pain reported by the child/parent after pulpotomy treatment.

    Measured: 1 week postoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Pain on percussion

    Description: Presence or absence of pain on percussion during clinical follow-up visits.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  2. Presence of sinus tract, fistula or abscess

    Description: Clinical evaluation for presence of swelling, abscess, or sinus/fistulous tract related to the treated tooth.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  3. Tooth mobility

    Description: Tooth mobility assessed clinically using a mobility scoring system ranges from 0-3 were (score 0 the best) indicates no mobility and (score 3 the worst) indicates vertical and horizontal mobility.

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months

  4. Widening of Periodontal Ligament Space

    Radiographic evidence of widening of the periodontal ligament space assessed using standardized periapical radiographs. Recorded as Present / Absent.

    Measured: 6 months and 12 months after treatment

  5. Internal and External Root Resorption

    Radiographic evidence of internal or external root resorption observed on periapical radiographs. Recorded as Present / Absent.

    Measured: 6 months and 12 months after treatment

  6. Furcal or Periapical Radiolucency

    Presence of radiolucent lesion in the furcation or periapical area detected on standardized periapical radiographs. Recorded as Present / Absent.

    Measured: 6 months and 12 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 May 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07437794
Sponsor's protocol ID
Ahmed MSA University
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
23 Feb 2026
Last updated
27 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing NeoPutty MTA and Formocresol in people with Deep Caries in Primary Molars, run by October University for Modern Sciences and Arts at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ahmed Shawky, bachelor of dentistry (+201124465202, ahmed.shawky3@msa.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Postoperative pain (time frame: 1 week postoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in