AzTrials
AzTrials

Molar Hypomineralization, IncisorMIHNCT07443878

Resin Infiltration vs Ionomer-Based Fluoride Varnish for the Prevention of Post-Eruptive Breakdown in Molars With Mild MIH

A study testing Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) and Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M) in people with Molar Hypomineralization, Incisor, run by Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí at 1 site in Mexico.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

round/Objective: The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a resin infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) compared to an ionomer-based fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT®, 3M) in preventing post-eruptive enamel breakdown (PEB) in permanent molars with mild Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 13 years
Conditions the study is for
Molar Hypomineralization, Incisor
What is being tested?
Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) and Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
17 participants
Where
1 siteMexico
Study dates
23 Sep 2023to 30 Sep 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 13 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Participants with two or more permanent molars affected by mild Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH), graded according to EAPD criteria.
  • Mild MIH-affected permanent molars with no history of prior dental treatment.
  • Fully erupted or partially erupted permanent molars
  • Permanent molars with MIH presenting ICDAS code 0, 1, or 2 (non-cavitated caries lesions).
  • Systemically healthy patients.
  • Patients (and/or legal guardians) who agree to participate, providing written informed consent and child assent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of only one permanent molar affected by MIH.
  • Permanent molars with MIH that already present post-eruptive breakdown (PEB).
  • Permanent molars with caries lesions classified as ICDAS 3 or higher.
  • Enamel defects of other etiologies in permanent molars (e.g., Amelogenesis Imperfecta, fluorosis, or hypoplasia).
  • Patients with systemic diseases or lack of cooperation during dental treatment

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Mexico1 site
  • Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí

    San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí

Other trials in Mexico

About this study

Official title: Resin Infiltration Versus Ionomer-Based Fluoride Varnish to Prevent Post-Eruptive Breakdown in Molars With Mild Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization

round/Objective: The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of a resin infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) compared to an ionomer-based fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT®, 3M) in preventing post-eruptive enamel breakdown (PEB) in permanent molars with mild Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH).

Research Question: Can resin infiltration effectively prevent post-eruptive enamel breakdown in permanent molars with mild MIH compared to an ionomer-based fluoride varnish? Methodology: The researchers will compare the resin infiltrant Icon® (DMG) with Clinpro XT® Varnish (3M) to prevent post-eruptive enamel breakdown in permanent molars with mild MIH.

Read more

Participants:

Children aged 6 to 13 years presenting at least two permanent molars affected by mild MIH, with no prior structural loss or previous dental treatment.

Requirement to attend follow-up evaluations at 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Being tested
Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG), Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M)
Keywords
Molar Hypomineralization, Incisor, Preventive Dentistry
Medical subject headings
Molar Hypomineralization

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG)Other

    Application of a low-viscosity light-cured resin (Icon®) after surface pretreatment with 15% hydrochloric acid gel (Icon-Etch). The resin is applied to the affected permanent molar to seal the porous enamel and prevent post-eruptive breakdown.

  • Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M)Other

    Application of a site-specific, light-cured varnish-modified glass ionomer (Clinpro XT®). It provides a physical barrier and long-term fluoride release to strengthen the hypomineralized enamel.

Study groups in NCT07443878
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Resin Infiltrant (Icon®)ExperimentalParticipants will receive resin infiltration (Icon®, DMG) on one permanent molar affected by mild MIH. The side (left or right) will be determined by random allocation
Receives: Other: Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG)
Ionomer-Based Fluoride Varnish (Clinpro XT®)Active comparatorParticipants will receive ionomer-based fluoride varnish (Clinpro XT®, 3M) on the contralateral permanent molar affected by mild MIH
Receives: Other: Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Post-eruptive breakdown (PEB)

    The primary outcome is the occurrence of Post-Eruptive Breakdown (PEB), defined as the loss of enamel structural integrity resulting in cavitation or a clinical 'step-off' appearance within the hypomineralized area of the permanent molar. This will be recorded as a dichotomous variable (Presence/Absence) based on the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) diagnostic criteria.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2026
  2. Study start23 Sep 2023
  3. Primary completion30 Sep 2024
  4. Study completion30 Sep 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
This is a split-mouth study design where each participant receives both interventions in different quadrants
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
17 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07443878
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEI-FE-066-023
Acronym
MIH
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
23 Feb 2026
Last updated
4 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Nogueira VKC, Mendes Soares IP, Fragelli CMB, Boldieri T, Manton DJ, Bussaneli DG, Cordeiro RCL. Structural integrity of MIH-affected teeth after treatment with fluoride varnish or resin infiltration: An 18-Month randomized clinical trial. J Dent. 2021 Feb;105:103570. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103570. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

    PubMed 33385533

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Resin Infiltrant (Icon®, DMG) and Varnish-Modified Glass Ionomer (Clinpro XT®, 3M) in people with Molar Hypomineralization, Incisor, run by Universidad Autonoma de San Luis Potosí at 1 site in Mexico.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Mexico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Post-eruptive breakdown (PEB) (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07443878, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in