RehabilitationNCT07450274
Rehabilitation of Upper Limbs After Stroke
A study testing Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. in people with Rehabilitation and Stroke, run by University of Rzeszow at 1 site in Poland.
Trial summary
The aim of the research will be to evaluate the effects of upper limb rehabilitation using modern Pablo Tyromotion technologies in people after stroke in the late period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePoland
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2026to 30 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 45-80 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
- spastic tension of the upper limb, paresis hand not more than 3 on the modified Ashworth scale
- current health condition confirmed by a medical examination, allowing participation in tests and exercises
Who cannot join
- lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
- concomitant neurological, rheumatological and orthopedic diseases, including permanent - contractures that may affect the grasping ability and locomotion
- unstable medical condition
- failure to complete a 3-week rehabilitation stay
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Poland1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Rzeszów
Rzeszów, 35-205
Justyna Leszczak, PhD, +48 721-581-801, leszczakjustyna.ur@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effects of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using the Pablo Tyromotion Device in People After Stroke
The aim of the research will be to evaluate the effects of upper limb rehabilitation using modern Pablo Tyromotion technologies in people after stroke in the late period.
Read the detailed description
Prior to the study, an assessment of the reliability, reproducibility and validity of the devices among stroke individuals will be carried out.
The research will be conducted among people who have suffered a stroke in the late period.
The subjects will be allocated, by random selection, to two groups:
The study group will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Pablo Tyromotion device.
The control group will participate in conventional rehabilitation without biofeedback exercises.
Patients will undergo ongoing rehabilitation at the Donum Corde Rehabilitation and Medical Care Center (four weeks). The first examination will be performed on the day of admission, the second on the day of discharge, and the third (control) one month after discharge, during a follow-up visit.
Measurements will be performed three times for all participants:
- assessment of hand and finger muscle strength
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- proprioceptive testing (mirror test, Thumb Location Test)
- rehabilitation outcome assessment
- functional capacity - Barthel Index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tone (spasticity)
- hand dexterity using the Box and Blocks test
- hand grip function according to the Frenchay scale
- motor function of the hand and upper limb according to the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Being tested
- Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.
- Keywords
- upper limb, hand, rehabilitation, biofeedback, modern technologies
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.Other
Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. The rehabilitation program will last 4 weeks from Monday to Friday.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices Pablo Tyromotion among stroke | No intervention | Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of device Pablo Tyromotion among stroke. Prior to the study among individuals with stroke, an evaluation of the reliability, repeatability and credibility of the Pablo Tyromotion to be included in the biofeedback rehabilitation. The evaluation of the Pablo Tyromotion will be carried out by two independent researchers twice. |
| Study group using Pablo Tyromotion | Experimental | Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.
In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of exercises on the Pablo Tyromotion device. Receives: Other: Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. |
| Control group | No intervention | In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of upper limb exercises. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Secondary outcomes (21)
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Hand grip strength
measurements to be performed with a dynamometer The dynamometer registers strength lower than up to 90 kg
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
pinching strength of the fingers
measurements to be performed with a pinch meter. The pinch meter registers strength lower than up to 22 kg
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Activities of daily living were assessed using Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
A maximum of 100 points can be obtained on the Barthel scale. There are three assessment ranges: getting from 0 to 20 points. means total dependence, from 20 to 80 points. means that to some extent the patient needs help from others, and the assessment in the border is 80 to 100 points. means that with a little help the patient can function alone.
0-20 points patient's condition "light" 21-85 points - "medium-heavy" patient condition 86-100 points - patient condition "very heavy"
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
The test uses a wooden box, divided into two equal parts by a partition, as well as 150 blocks. The subject moves as many blocks as possible from one part of the box to the other during 60 seconds.
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Thumb Localizing Test (TLT). (A) positioning of the paretic UE by the examiner. (B) four spaces in which the paretic UE is placed. Distal spaces are not far from the trunk because the reaching limb should be able to reach them without difficulty. (C) rating of positive results
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessments were performed with eyes closed. Proprioception of the elbow joint was assessed in the 60° elbow flexion position using a plastic Jamar goniometer. The initial fixed axis of the goniometer was set at the lateral epicondyle of the humerus, and the mobile axis was set parallel to the radius, in accordance with the methodology of the study of joint position sensation in the elbow
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
The scale consists of 7 tasks (pass/fail grading); the patient is awarded 1 point for each activity performed successfully, or 0 points for a failure to perform. The maximum score of seven points may be achieved for the performance of the tasks. Higher score corresponds to better manual skills. The scale measures the proximal control of the upper limb and the manual skills.
Measured: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2026
- Study start2 Mar 2026
- Primary completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for RehabilitationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Before starting the study, the reliability, repeatability and validity of the Pablo Tyromotion device will be assessed among people after stroke, followed by random selection into two groups (research group and control group).
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rzeszow
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Donum Corde Rehabilitation Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Justyna Leszczak, University of Rzeszow
- Investigators
- Justyna Leszczak, PhD, Principal investigator, Univeristy of Rzeszów,
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07450274
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Neurorehabilitation upper limb
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 13 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effects of Upper Limb Rehabilitation Using the Pablo Tyromotion Device in People After Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07450274
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Neurorehabilitation upper limb
- Conditions
- Rehabilitation, Stroke
- Keywords
- upper limb, hand, rehabilitation, biofeedback, modern technologies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RzeszowUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Donum Corde Rehabilitation Center
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the research will be to evaluate the effects of upper limb rehabilitation using modern Pablo Tyromotion technologies in people after stroke in the late period.
Detailed description
Prior to the study, an assessment of the reliability, reproducibility and validity of the devices among stroke individuals will be carried out.
The research will be conducted among people who have suffered a stroke in the late period.
The subjects will be allocated, by random selection, to two groups:
The study group will complete a conventional rehabilitation program supplemented with biofeedback exercises using the Pablo Tyromotion device.
The control group will participate in conventional rehabilitation without biofeedback exercises.
Patients will undergo ongoing rehabilitation at the Donum Corde Rehabilitation and Medical Care Center (four weeks). The first examination will be performed on the day of admission, the second on the day of discharge, and the third (control) one month after discharge, during a follow-up visit.
Measurements will be performed three times for all participants:
- assessment of hand and finger muscle strength
- calculated body mass index (BMI)
- proprioceptive testing (mirror test, Thumb Location Test)
- rehabilitation outcome assessment
- functional capacity - Barthel Index, ADL
- Ashworth muscle tone (spasticity)
- hand dexterity using the Box and Blocks test
- hand grip function according to the Frenchay scale
- motor function of the hand and upper limb according to the Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale for Upper Extremity
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Before starting the study, the reliability, repeatability and validity of the Pablo Tyromotion device will be assessed among people after stroke, followed by random selection into two groups (research group and control group).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of devices Pablo Tyromotion among stroke | No intervention | –Evaluation of reliability, repeatability and validity of device Pablo Tyromotion among stroke. Prior to the study among individuals with stroke, an evaluation of the reliability, repeatability and credibility of the Pablo Tyromotion to be included in the biofeedback rehabilitation. The evaluation of the Pablo Tyromotion will be carried out by two independent researchers twice. |
| Study group using Pablo Tyromotion | Experimental | Other: Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of exercises on the Pablo Tyromotion device. |
| Control group | No intervention | –In the control group, patients will complete a 3.5-hour daily rehabilitation program. The program will include two hours of individual therapy with a physiotherapist, one hour of verticalization, and 30 minutes of upper limb exercises. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- age 45-80 years
- elementary (basic) gripping ability
- degree of paresis of the upper limb and hand 4 -5 on the Brunnström scale
- degree of disability on the Rankin scale 3
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- lack of informed, voluntary consent of the patient
- second or subsequent stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of the brainstem and cerebellum
- disorders of higher mental functions limiting comprehension and carrying out tasks during exercises
- visual field disturbances
- mechanical and thermal injuries that may limit the grasping function of the hand
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy.Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. The rehabilitation program will last 4 weeks from Monday to Friday. | Other | Study group using Pablo Tyromotion |
Primary outcome
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
It consists of 33 items assessing motor function and reflexes. The patient can score a maximum of 66 points, where each item on the scale is rated as: 0=unable, 1=partially able, or 2=fully able to perform the movement
21 secondary outcomes
Hand grip strength
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Hand grip strength
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Hand grip strength
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
pinching strength of the fingers
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
pinching strength of the fingers
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
pinching strength of the fingers
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of functional status was assessed using the Barthel Index. The subjects could score the maximum of 100 points.
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Manual skills, assessed with Box and Blocks test;
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Assessment of proprioception Thumb Localizing Test (TLT)
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: Second examination - at the end of the three-week program
Handgrip function, according Frenchay scale
Time frame: Third study (flow-up) - month after Rehabilitation Center discharge, during a follow-up visit
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Mar 2026.
Related trials for Rehabilitation
Not yet recruiting
Feasibility of a Robot-Guided Active Play Intervention for Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
MyHand-SCI: An Active Hand Orthosis for Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injuries, Tetraplegia
Recruiting
Sensory Integration Therapy vs Conventional Physical Therapy in Children With Mixed Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Justyna Leszczak, PhD principal investigator
Univeristy of Rzeszów,
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rehabilitation program using upper limb function training with the Pablo Tyromotion device and conventional physiotherapy. in people with Rehabilitation and Stroke, run by University of Rzeszow at 1 site in Poland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Justyna K Leszczak, PhD (+48721581801, jleszczak@ur.edu.pl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor capacities of the upper limb, according to Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment Scale (time frame: First examination - before the start of the rehabilitation program). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2026.