AzTrials
AzTrials

AO/OTA Type 2R3C Distal Radius FractureNCT07452536

A Pilot Clinical Study to Evidence Safety and Efficacy of Fracture Fixation of the Distal Radius Using a Bioresorbable Bone Adhesive to Augment Metal Hardware

A study testing Augmented with Tetranite Bone Adhesive in people with AO/OTA Type 2R3C Distal Radius Fracture, run by RevBio.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

A prospective, multi-center (up to 4 sites), single-arm, study of 20 subjects. Patient enrollment will consist of subjects with an AO/OTA type 2R3C distal radius fracture. Enrollment will be prospectively stratified based on patient age (Stratum A: <65 and Stratum B: ≥65 years) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older
Conditions the study is for
AO/OTA Type 2R3C Distal Radius Fracture
What is being tested?
Augmented with Tetranite Bone Adhesive
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Apr 2026to 15 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Unilateral, unstable and/or displaced distal radius AO/OTA type 2R3C fracture.
  • Standard treatment would consist of open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) with plate(s) and screws using a volar approach
  • Surgical visit occurs within 2 weeks of injury.
  • No radiographic evidence of fracture healing prior to surgical treatment.
  • Male or female, greater than 21 years of age
  • Subject living independently and ambulatory at the time of injury.
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Subject, and/or subject's representatives are able and willing to provide informed consent and HIPAA authorization.
  • Subject able and willing to meet all study requirements, including attending all post-index procedure assessment visits and radiological tests.
  • Intra-Operative Inclusion Criteria:
  • No sign of active infection at the planned operative site.
  • Surgeons will decide whether the fracture site is a good candidate for TN-MFF use once the site is open and they can visualize the bone and surrounding soft tissue.

Who cannot join

  • Significant ligamentous disruption requiring independent repair
  • Other fractures of the carpal bones or injured limb (Note: an associated ulnar styloid fracture is not exclusionary)
  • Pathological fracture related to an underlying malignancy
  • Open fractures
  • A previous fracture in the injured bone within the last 12 months
  • Presence of other orthopaedic implant in the injured bone
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Patients with presumptive diagnosis of named nerve or blood vessel injury
  • Current infection (either superficial or deep) at the planned operative site
  • Sepsis within one week from the planned index procedure
  • History of radiotherapy to the area
  • Active chemotherapy treatment
  • Patients receiving treatment with biologics for systemic inflammatory disease (e.g., Enbrel)
  • Physically or mentally compromised and unable to provide consent or perform functional examinations
  • Subject has a condition with anticipated survival shorter than 12 months

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Brittany McDonough contact

781-520-9611

bmcdonough@revbio.com

Gracie Cleaver contact

862-202-3109

gcleaver@revbio.com

About this study

A prospective, multi-center (up to 4 sites), single-arm, study of 20 subjects. Patient enrollment will consist of subjects with an AO/OTA type 2R3C distal radius fracture. Enrollment will be prospectively stratified based on patient age (Stratum A: <65 and Stratum B: ≥65 years)

Read the detailed description

The proposed study design is prospective, multi-center, single-arm, and non-randomized. RevBio is working to establish up to four (4) clinical sites. RevBio will perform site initiation visits to provide training to the investigator and its staff. Training will include information about study-specific procedures, a detailed review of the study protocol, instruction in completion of the electronic case report forms (eCRFs), informing the site about device instructions for use, and discussion of the regulatory requirements of the investigator. Patients will be recruited from the general patient population based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Once they sign the informed consent form and complete the screening process they will be enrolled in the study and scheduled for surgery. All data will be reported to the FDA to evidence safety and efficacy and substantiate advancing to future stages in a larger expanded study.

Being tested
Augmented with Tetranite Bone Adhesive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Augmented with Tetranite Bone AdhesiveCombination product

    Participants will receive typical standard of care treatment for AO/OTA type 2R3C distal radius fractures augmented with tetranite bone adhesive.

Study groups in NCT07452536
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Augmented with Tetranite Bone AdhesiveExperimentalParticipants will receive typical standard of care treatment for AO/OTA type 2R3C distal radius fracture augmented with tetranite bone adhesive.
Receives: Combination Product: Augmented with Tetranite Bone Adhesive

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety based on the rate of serious device related adverse events

    Safety based on the rate of serious device related adverse events

    Measured: For 52 weeks following surgery

  2. Efficacy based on the fracture union assessment at the 26-week follow-up

    Fracture union assessment at the 26-week follow-up

    Measured: 26 weeks

  3. Efficacy based on the DASH assessment at the 26-week timepoint

    DASH assessment at the 26-week timepoint

    Measured: 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Grip strength compared to baseline (contralateral limb)

    Grip strength compared to baseline (contralateral limb)

    Measured: 6 weeks post surgery to 52 weeks post surgery

  2. Range of motion compared to baseline (contralateral limb)

    Range of motion compared to baseline (contralateral limb)

    Measured: 2 weeks post surgery to 52 weeks post surgery

  3. Patient reported outcome measure: SF-36

    Patient reported outcome measures: SF-36

    Measured: 2 weeks post surgery to 52 weeks post surgery

  4. Patient reported outcome measure: DASH

    Patient reported outcome measure: DASH

    Measured: 2 weeks post surgery to 52 weeks post surgery

  5. Patient reported outcome measure: VAS Pain Score

    Patient reported outcome measure: VAS Pain Score

    Measured: 2 weeks post surgery to 52 weeks post surgery

  6. Maintenance of reduction compared to baseline (surgery)

    Maintenance of reduction compared to baseline (surgery)

    Measured: Surgery

  7. Fracture union assessment at the 6-,12-week follow-ups

    Fracture union assessment at the 6-,12-week follow-ups

    Measured: 6-,12-week follow-ups

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Mar 2026
  2. Study start15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07452536
Sponsor's protocol ID
DVAL24003
Other IDs
SB1AG085803
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
24 Feb 2026
Last updated
5 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Augmented with Tetranite Bone Adhesive in people with AO/OTA Type 2R3C Distal Radius Fracture, run by RevBio.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Brittany McDonough (781-520-9611, bmcdonough@revbio.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety based on the rate of serious device related adverse events (time frame: For 52 weeks following surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in