Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)IDTNNCT07453511
Identification of Possible Trigeminal Neuralgia
An observational study of Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) and Orofacial Pain, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe type of non-dental orofacial pain that can feel like sudden electric shocks in the face and is often mistaken for tooth pain or other dental problems. This can lead to delays in referral and unnecessary, sometimes irreversible, dental treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Dental Pain
- What is being tested?
- Completion of the IDTN Questionnaire
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- How many people
- 250 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Apr 2026to May 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Participants will be recruited from two clinical settings at University College London Hospitals (UCLH): the Facial Pain Service and the Oral Surgery Clinic. Eligible participants will be identified using clinic codes that indicate first-time attendance for pain-related referrals from primary care. This population includes individuals referred from primary care because of facial pain, dental pain, or suspected orofacial pain conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia.
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Attending the UCLH Facial Pain Service or Oral Surgery Clinic for their first appointment for facial or oral pain following referral from primary care
Who cannot join
- Not experiencing facial or oral pain
- Unable to understand English well enough to complete the questionnaire
- Lacking capacity to provide informed consent
- Insufficient time before their appointment to read the information sheet, provide consent, and complete the questionnaire
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United Kingdom1 site
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) - Eastman Dental Hospital
London, UK
Nikolaos Apostolidis, +44 020 3456 2303, nikolaos.apostolidis@nhs.net
About this study
Official title: Validating a Questionnaire for the Identification of Possible Trigeminal Neuralgia in Dental Practice
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe type of non-dental orofacial pain that can feel like sudden electric shocks in the face and is often mistaken for tooth pain or other dental problems. This can lead to delays in referral and unnecessary, sometimes irreversible, dental treatment. The goal of this observational study is to evaluate how well a new questionnaire (IDentification of possible Trigeminal Neuralgia - IDTN) identifies adults with possible trigeminal neuralgia among patients attending hospital clinics with orofacial pain, with the aim of supporting its use in dental and general medical practice to improve early recognition and referral.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- How accurately does the IDTN questionnaire identify patients with possible trigeminal neuralgia compared with the specialist clinical diagnosis?
- Which combination of questionnaire items best supports a practical screening score for use in dental and/or general medical practice?
Participants will:
- Complete the IDTN questionnaire before their clinical appointment (either electronically or on paper)
- Undergo their usual specialist clinical assessment, during which the final diagnosis will be recorded
- Allow the research team to compare questionnaire responses with the specialist diagnosis (the reference standard)
A subset of participants will also be asked to complete the questionnaire again a few days later to assess test-retest reliability.
Read the detailed description
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe neuropathic facial pain condition that is often difficult to recognize early, especially in primary care and dental settings. Many patients initially present with pain that can be mistaken for dental disease or other types of non-dental pain, such as temporomandibular disorders, which may lead to delays in diagnosis and inappropriate dental treatment. A practical screening tool for use in dental practice may support earlier identification and referral of patients with possible TN.
This study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed questionnaire, the IDentification of possible Trigeminal Neuralgia (IDTN) tool. The IDTN questionnaire was developed with input from patients, dentists, and clinical experts and is designed to capture key features of TN, including pain quality, paroxysmal attacks, pain location, triggers, and related clinical characteristics. This is the first validation study of this tool in a real-world clinical setting. Currently, there is no similar screening tool that has been validated and widely accepted for use in dental practice.
Study Design This is a single-site, prospective, observational diagnostic validation study conducted at University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS (National Health System) Foundation Trust, including the Facial Pain Service and Oral Surgery clinics. Adult patients attending for a first appointment with facial or oral pain will be invited to participate. The study is non-interventional and does not alter routine clinical care.
Study Procedures
Participants will complete the 15-item IDTN questionnaire before their specialist consultation, either:
- electronically (via a secure link before attendance, using the electronic health record system), or
- in paper format or via a tablet in the waiting area before the appointment.
The treating specialist will be blinded to the completed questionnaire during the consultation. After the appointment, the research team will record the specialist's final diagnosis from the electronic health record. This will serve as the reference standard for evaluating the questionnaire. If diagnostic uncertainty exists, cases may be reviewed through usual multidisciplinary discussion, and the final clinical diagnosis will be used for analysis.
In addition to questionnaire responses, the study team will collect limited clinical and demographic information from the electronic health record, including age, sex, referrer type, year of first symptoms, and diagnosis. Data will be linked using a study ID and analyzed in anonymized form.
Test-Retest Reliability A subset of participants (20%) will be invited to complete the IDTN questionnaire again within a few days (approximately 2-3 days depending on operational feasibility) to assess the stability of responses over time.
Study Objectives
Primary objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IDTN questionnaire for identifying possible TN.
Secondary objectives
- To derive and internally validate a scoring algorithm for the IDTN questionnaire.
- To assess reliability (including test-retest reliability) and validity (including construct/content-related validity) of the tool. To finalize the included items.
- To support future implementation of a practical screening tool in dental and general medical practice.
In the future, the aim is to develop an electronic version of the screening tool with an integrated scoring algorithm, enabling wider use of the tool in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally.
Outcomes and Analysis Overview
The main diagnostic accuracy measures will include:
- Sensitivity and specificity
- Positive and negative predictive values
- Likelihood ratios
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC)
A screening threshold will be selected with priority given to high sensitivity, because the tool is intended to support early identification and referral. A secondary threshold based on the Youden Index may also be reported. A scoring algorithm will be explored using regression-based methods, with internal validation to reduce overfitting. Reliability and dimensionality analyses (including test-retest agreement and factor analysis) will also be performed.
Sample Size The anticipated sample size is 250 participants, with an expected 60 participants diagnosed with TN. An interim analysis will be conducted at 6 months, and if recruitment of new TN cases is lower than anticipated, the study may be expanded to additional facial pain or oral surgery centres using the same methodology to achieve the required numbers. This sample size was calculated to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the screening tool with 95% confidence intervals and a precision of approximately ±10%, assuming expected sensitivity and specificity of 80%.
Significance If validated, the IDTN questionnaire may provide a practical screening tool to help dental and general medical practitioners identify patients with possible trigeminal neuralgia earlier and refer them more promptly for specialist assessment and treatment. This may reduce diagnostic delay and avoid unnecessary and often irreversible dental procedures.
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Dental Pain, Questionnaire
- Being tested
- Completion of the IDTN Questionnaire
- Keywords
- Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Screening Tool, Questionnaire, Dental pain
- Medical subject headings
- Trigeminal Neuralgia, Facial Pain, Toothache
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Completion of the IDTN QuestionnaireOther
There are no interventions because this is an observational validation study. Participants complete a 15-item trigeminal neuralgia screening questionnaire (IDTN) before their clinical appointment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adults With Orofacial Pain | Adults aged 18 years or older attending the University COllege London Hospital (UCLH) Facial Pain Service or the Oral Surgery Clinic for their first appointment for facial or oral pain. All participants will complete the IDTN questionnaire before their routine clinical consultation. Their specialist diagnosis (for example, trigeminal neuralgia or other facial/oral pain condition) will be used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of the questionnaire. Receives: Other: Completion of the IDTN Questionnaire |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic Accuracy of the IDTN Questionnaire
Sensitivity and specificity of the IDTN screening tool for identifying possible trigeminal neuralgia (TN), using the specialist clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. This will assess how accurately the questionnaire distinguishes between participants with and without possible TN.
Measured: Day 1 (at the participant's clinic appointment)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Positive and Negative Predictive Values
Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the IDTN questionnaire in identifying possible TN compared with the clinical diagnosis.
Measured: Day 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC)
The AUC-ROC will be calculated to measure how well the IDTN questionnaire discriminates between participants with and without possible TN.
Measured: Day 1
Internal Consistency Reliability
Internal consistency of the questionnaire items will be evaluated using Cronbach's alpha to assess whether items measure the same underlying construct.
Measured: Through study completion (after all questionnaires are collected) (average 1 year)
Test - Retest Reliability
Stability of questionnaire responses over time will be assessed in a subsample of participants who complete the IDTN questionnaire twice within a few days. Agreement will be measured using intraclass correlation coefficient or Cohen's kappa.
Measured: 2-3 days after initial questionnaire completion
Validity
Construct validity will be assessed by comparing IDTN with validated questionnaires. Convergent validity will be evaluated against painDETECT, while divergent validity will be assessed using a TMD screening questionnaire (e.g. American Academy of Orofacial Pain - AAOP). Criterion validity will be based on comparison with the specialist clinical diagnosis.
Measured: Day 1
Refinement of Questionnaire Items
After data collection is complete, the questionnaire will be reviewed and refined based on diagnostic accuracy findings, test-retest results, and participant/clinician feedback. This may include modifying, removing, or rewording items to improve clarity, usability, and diagnostic performance.
Measured: Through study completion (on average within 6 months after final participant visit)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Mar 2026
- Study startApr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionApr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionMay 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University College, LondonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University College, London
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Pain Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joanna M Zakrzewska, Study chair, University College London (UCL) and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH)Nikolaos Apostolidis, Principal investigator, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) and University College London (UCL)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07453511
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRAS 357989
- Other IDs
- EDGE 183594, CPMS ID 72856
- Acronym
- IDTN
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 24 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Fully anonymized individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the published results will be shared. This will include anonymized responses to the IDTN questionnaire, demographic variables (such as age and gender), and the final clinical diagnosis used as the reference standard. All direct identifiers will be removed, and data will be de-identified according to UCL/UCLH (University College London/University College London Hospitals) data governance requirements before sharing.
Publications
Jafree DJ, Zakrzewska JM, Bhatia S, Venda Nova C. Accuracy of the painDETECT screening questionnaire for detection of neuropathic components in hospital-based patients with orofacial pain: a prospective cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 6;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0932-5.
PubMed 30400770Teshima T, Zakrzewska JM, Potter R. A systematic review of screening diagnostic tools for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Pain. 2023 Jun;17(3):255-266. doi: 10.1177/20494637221146854. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
PubMed 37342400Hadlaq EM, Khan H, Mubayrik AB, Almuflehi NS, Mawardi H. Dentists' knowledge of chronic orofacial pain. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;22(10):1365-1371. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_110_19.
PubMed 31607725von Eckardstein KL, Keil M, Rohde V. Unnecessary dental procedures as a consequence of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Apr;38(2):355-60; discussion 360. doi: 10.1007/s10143-014-0591-1. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
PubMed 25418511Cruccu G, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Scholz J, Sindou M, Svensson P, Treede RD, Zakrzewska JM, Nurmikko T. Trigeminal neuralgia: New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neurology. 2016 Jul 12;87(2):220-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002840. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
PubMed 27306631Zakrzewska JM, Wu J, Mon-Williams M, Phillips N, Pavitt SH. Evaluating the impact of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1166-1174. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000853.
PubMed 28114183Allsop MJ, Twiddy M, Grant H, Czoski-Murray C, Mon-Williams M, Mushtaq F, Phillips N, Zakrzewska JM, Pavitt S. Diagnosis, medication, and surgical management for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a qualitative study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Nov;157(11):1925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2515-4. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
PubMed 26329729
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Validating a Questionnaire for the Identification of Possible Trigeminal Neuralgia in Dental Practice
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07453511
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IDTN / IRAS 357989
- Conditions
- Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Dental Pain, Questionnaire
- Keywords
- Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN), Orofacial Pain, Screening Tool, Questionnaire, Dental pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 250 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University College, LondonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- British Pain Society
- Study start
- Apr 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe type of non-dental orofacial pain that can feel like sudden electric shocks in the face and is often mistaken for tooth pain or other dental problems. This can lead to delays in referral and unnecessary, sometimes irreversible, dental treatment. The goal of this observational study is to evaluate how well a new questionnaire (IDentification of possible Trigeminal Neuralgia - IDTN) identifies adults with possible trigeminal neuralgia among patients attending hospital clinics with orofacial pain, with the aim of supporting its use in dental and general medical practice to improve early recognition and referral.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How accurately does the IDTN questionnaire identify patients with possible trigeminal neuralgia compared with the specialist clinical diagnosis?
- Which combination of questionnaire items best supports a practical screening score for use in dental and/or general medical practice?
Participants will:
- Complete the IDTN questionnaire before their clinical appointment (either electronically or on paper)
- Undergo their usual specialist clinical assessment, during which the final diagnosis will be recorded
- Allow the research team to compare questionnaire responses with the specialist diagnosis (the reference standard)
A subset of participants will also be asked to complete the questionnaire again a few days later to assess test-retest reliability.
Detailed description
Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe neuropathic facial pain condition that is often difficult to recognize early, especially in primary care and dental settings. Many patients initially present with pain that can be mistaken for dental disease or other types of non-dental pain, such as temporomandibular disorders, which may lead to delays in diagnosis and inappropriate dental treatment. A practical screening tool for use in dental practice may support earlier identification and referral of patients with possible TN.
This study will evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a newly developed questionnaire, the IDentification of possible Trigeminal Neuralgia (IDTN) tool. The IDTN questionnaire was developed with input from patients, dentists, and clinical experts and is designed to capture key features of TN, including pain quality, paroxysmal attacks, pain location, triggers, and related clinical characteristics. This is the first validation study of this tool in a real-world clinical setting. Currently, there is no similar screening tool that has been validated and widely accepted for use in dental practice.
Study Design This is a single-site, prospective, observational diagnostic validation study conducted at University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS (National Health System) Foundation Trust, including the Facial Pain Service and Oral Surgery clinics. Adult patients attending for a first appointment with facial or oral pain will be invited to participate. The study is non-interventional and does not alter routine clinical care.
Study Procedures
Participants will complete the 15-item IDTN questionnaire before their specialist consultation, either:
- electronically (via a secure link before attendance, using the electronic health record system), or
- in paper format or via a tablet in the waiting area before the appointment.
The treating specialist will be blinded to the completed questionnaire during the consultation. After the appointment, the research team will record the specialist's final diagnosis from the electronic health record. This will serve as the reference standard for evaluating the questionnaire. If diagnostic uncertainty exists, cases may be reviewed through usual multidisciplinary discussion, and the final clinical diagnosis will be used for analysis.
In addition to questionnaire responses, the study team will collect limited clinical and demographic information from the electronic health record, including age, sex, referrer type, year of first symptoms, and diagnosis. Data will be linked using a study ID and analyzed in anonymized form.
Test-Retest Reliability A subset of participants (20%) will be invited to complete the IDTN questionnaire again within a few days (approximately 2-3 days depending on operational feasibility) to assess the stability of responses over time.
Study Objectives
Primary objective To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the IDTN questionnaire for identifying possible TN.
Secondary objectives
- To derive and internally validate a scoring algorithm for the IDTN questionnaire.
- To assess reliability (including test-retest reliability) and validity (including construct/content-related validity) of the tool. To finalize the included items.
- To support future implementation of a practical screening tool in dental and general medical practice.
In the future, the aim is to develop an electronic version of the screening tool with an integrated scoring algorithm, enabling wider use of the tool in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally.
Outcomes and Analysis Overview
The main diagnostic accuracy measures will include:
- Sensitivity and specificity
- Positive and negative predictive values
- Likelihood ratios
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC)
A screening threshold will be selected with priority given to high sensitivity, because the tool is intended to support early identification and referral. A secondary threshold based on the Youden Index may also be reported. A scoring algorithm will be explored using regression-based methods, with internal validation to reduce overfitting. Reliability and dimensionality analyses (including test-retest agreement and factor analysis) will also be performed.
Sample Size The anticipated sample size is 250 participants, with an expected 60 participants diagnosed with TN. An interim analysis will be conducted at 6 months, and if recruitment of new TN cases is lower than anticipated, the study may be expanded to additional facial pain or oral surgery centres using the same methodology to achieve the required numbers. This sample size was calculated to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the screening tool with 95% confidence intervals and a precision of approximately ±10%, assuming expected sensitivity and specificity of 80%.
Significance If validated, the IDTN questionnaire may provide a practical screening tool to help dental and general medical practitioners identify patients with possible trigeminal neuralgia earlier and refer them more promptly for specialist assessment and treatment. This may reduce diagnostic delay and avoid unnecessary and often irreversible dental procedures.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adults With Orofacial Pain | – | Other: Completion of the IDTN QuestionnaireAdults aged 18 years or older attending the University COllege London Hospital (UCLH) Facial Pain Service or the Oral Surgery Clinic for their first appointment for facial or oral pain. All participants will complete the IDTN questionnaire before their routine clinical consultation. Their specialist diagnosis (for example, trigeminal neuralgia or other facial/oral pain condition) will be used as the reference standard to assess the accuracy of the questionnaire. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Participants will be recruited from two clinical settings at University College London Hospitals (UCLH): the Facial Pain Service and the Oral Surgery Clinic. Eligible participants will be identified using clinic codes that indicate first-time attendance for pain-related referrals from primary care. This population includes individuals referred from primary care because of facial pain, dental pain, or suspected orofacial pain conditions, including trigeminal neuralgia.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Attending the UCLH Facial Pain Service or Oral Surgery Clinic for their first appointment for facial or oral pain following referral from primary care
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Not experiencing facial or oral pain
- Unable to understand English well enough to complete the questionnaire
- Lacking capacity to provide informed consent
- Insufficient time before their appointment to read the information sheet, provide consent, and complete the questionnaire
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Completion of the IDTN QuestionnaireThere are no interventions because this is an observational validation study. Participants complete a 15-item trigeminal neuralgia screening questionnaire (IDTN) before their clinical appointment. | Other | Adults With Orofacial Pain |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic Accuracy of the IDTN Questionnaire
Time frame: Day 1 (at the participant's clinic appointment)
Sensitivity and specificity of the IDTN screening tool for identifying possible trigeminal neuralgia (TN), using the specialist clinical diagnosis as the reference standard. This will assess how accurately the questionnaire distinguishes between participants with and without possible TN.
6 secondary outcomes
Positive and Negative Predictive Values
Time frame: Day 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC)
Time frame: Day 1
Internal Consistency Reliability
Time frame: Through study completion (after all questionnaires are collected) (average 1 year)
Test - Retest Reliability
Time frame: 2-3 days after initial questionnaire completion
Validity
Time frame: Day 1
Refinement of Questionnaire Items
Time frame: Through study completion (on average within 6 months after final participant visit)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 30400770Jafree DJ, Zakrzewska JM, Bhatia S, Venda Nova C. Accuracy of the painDETECT screening questionnaire for detection of neuropathic components in hospital-based patients with orofacial pain: a prospective cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2018 Nov 6;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0932-5.
- Background: PubMed 37342400Teshima T, Zakrzewska JM, Potter R. A systematic review of screening diagnostic tools for trigeminal neuralgia. Br J Pain. 2023 Jun;17(3):255-266. doi: 10.1177/20494637221146854. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
- Background: PubMed 31607725Hadlaq EM, Khan H, Mubayrik AB, Almuflehi NS, Mawardi H. Dentists' knowledge of chronic orofacial pain. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;22(10):1365-1371. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_110_19.
- Background: PubMed 25418511von Eckardstein KL, Keil M, Rohde V. Unnecessary dental procedures as a consequence of trigeminal neuralgia. Neurosurg Rev. 2015 Apr;38(2):355-60; discussion 360. doi: 10.1007/s10143-014-0591-1. Epub 2014 Nov 25.
- Background: PubMed 27306631Cruccu G, Finnerup NB, Jensen TS, Scholz J, Sindou M, Svensson P, Treede RD, Zakrzewska JM, Nurmikko T. Trigeminal neuralgia: New classification and diagnostic grading for practice and research. Neurology. 2016 Jul 12;87(2):220-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002840. Epub 2016 Jun 15.
- Background: PubMed 28114183Zakrzewska JM, Wu J, Mon-Williams M, Phillips N, Pavitt SH. Evaluating the impact of trigeminal neuralgia. Pain. 2017 Jun;158(6):1166-1174. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000853.
- Background: PubMed 26329729Allsop MJ, Twiddy M, Grant H, Czoski-Murray C, Mon-Williams M, Mushtaq F, Phillips N, Zakrzewska JM, Pavitt S. Diagnosis, medication, and surgical management for patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a qualitative study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2015 Nov;157(11):1925-33. doi: 10.1007/s00701-015-2515-4. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Fully anonymized individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the published results will be shared. This will include anonymized responses to the IDTN questionnaire, demographic variables (such as age and gender), and the final clinical diagnosis used as the reference standard. All direct identifiers will be removed, and data will be de-identified according to UCL/UCLH (University College London/University College London Hospitals) data governance requirements before sharing.
Related trials for Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)
RecruitingPhase 2
Ultra-Early Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for TN
Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia
Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Trigeminal Neuralgia
Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Joanna M Zakrzewska study chair
University College London (UCL) and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH)
Nikolaos Apostolidis principal investigator
University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (UCLH) and University College London (UCL)
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Trigeminal Neuralgia (TN) and Orofacial Pain, run by University College, London at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Joanna M Zakrzewska, MD (+44 020 3456 1195, jzakrzewska@nhs.net), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic Accuracy of the IDTN Questionnaire (time frame: Day 1 (at the participant's clinic appointment)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07453511, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.