AzTrials
AzTrials

Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)NCT07457983

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

A study testing Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Nephrolithiasis, run by Fadime Tosun at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective standard urological procedure for the fragmentation and removal of large renal calculi. Although PCNL is performed as a minimally invasive technique, dilation of the renal capsule and parenchymal tract, as well as peritubular distension caused by the nephrostomy… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Apr 2026to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II.
  • Scheduled for elective percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia.
  • Able to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years.
  • ASA physical status III-IV.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics (bupivacaine), opioids, or study medications.
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant therapy contraindicating regional block.
  • Infection at the injection site.
  • Severe psychiatric or cognitive disorder precluding reliable pain assessment or questionnaire completion.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Adıyaman University Faculty of Medicine Anesthesiology and Reanimation

    Adıyaman

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Perioperative Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is an effective standard urological procedure for the fragmentation and removal of large renal calculi. Although PCNL is performed as a minimally invasive technique, dilation of the renal capsule and parenchymal tract, as well as peritubular distension caused by the nephrostomy tube, may result in severe postoperative pain. Various analgesic strategies have been described in the literature for postoperative pain management following PCNL. These include systemic opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and several regional analgesia techniques. However, due to their adverse effect profiles, opioids and NSAIDs are not ideal options, particularly in patients with renal dysfunction. Regional techniques that have been utilized include local infiltration, intercostal nerve blocks, paravertebral blocks, and epidural analgesia.

The kidney is primarily innervated between the T10 and L1 segments, whereas the ureter receives innervation from T10 to L2. Based on this anatomical knowledge, unilateral regional blockade between T10 and L2 can provide adequate analgesia for PCNL procedures. Thoracic paravertebral block was previously a commonly preferred technique; however, it may be associated with complications such as intravascular injection, unintended epidural or intrathecal spread, and pneumothorax during its performance. In recent years, the number of reports describing the use of the erector spinae plane block (ESPB) as part of multimodal anesthesia for postoperative analgesia has increased. In ESPB, local anesthetic is injected into the interfascial plane between the transverse process of the vertebra and the erector spinae muscles, and has been reported to spread to multiple paravertebral spaces. ESPB is considered a peri-paravertebral block that can affect both visceral and somatic pain pathways.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, and quality of recovery in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Read the detailed description

This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the perioperative efficacy of ultrasound-guided ESPB in adult patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia.

After enrollment, patients will be randomly allocated into two groups using a closed-envelope method: an ESPB group and a control group. All patients will receive a standardized general anesthesia protocol. Anesthesia induction will be performed with propofol 2 mg/kg Propofol®, Polifarma İlaç San.ve Tic. A.Ş., Türkiye), rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (Esmeron®, Merck Sharp Dohme İlaçları LTD Şti, Türkiye)as neuromuscular blocker, and remifentanil 1 µg/kg (ultan, centurion pharma, İstanbul, Türkiye) as opioid. Additional rocuronium 0.1 mg/kg will be administered intraoperatively as needed to maintain muscle relaxation. Anesthesia will be maintained with 2% sevoflurane (Sevorane®, Abbott, Chicago, ABD) in 50% oxygen and a continuous infusion of remifentanil at 0.1-1 µg/kg/min, titrated according to hemodynamic responses. Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring will be used for close hemodynamic follow-up in all patients.

In the ESPB group, following induction of general anesthesia and prior to surgical incision, an ultrasound-guided ESPB will be performed at the T10 transverse process level on the side of the surgical kidney. Under aseptic conditions, using an in-plane technique, a total of 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine (Marcaine® %0,5, AstraZeneca, İstanbul, Türkiye)will be injected between the erector spinae muscle and the transverse process. In the control group, no additional regional block or sham procedure will be performed; patients will undergo surgery under general anesthesia with the same standardized systemic analgesia protocol as the ESPB group.

Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, including mean arterial pressure and heart rate, will be recorded at predefined time points, and total intraoperative remifentanil consumption will be documented. At the end of surgery, all patients will receive 15 mg/kg paracetamol and 0.5 mg/kg meperidine intravenously as part of the standard postoperative analgesic regimen. During postoperative ward follow-up, all patients will receive 15 mg/kg paracetamol four times daily. Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. For patients with NRS ≥ 3, intravenous tramadol 1 mg/kg will be administered as rescue analgesia, and total postoperative tramadol consumption within the first 24 hours will be recorded.

Postoperative nausea and vomiting will be evaluated at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, and the presence or absence of symptoms will be documented. Quality of recovery will be assessed at 24 hours after surgery using the Turkish validated version of the 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire (QoR-15T). The total QoR-15T score ranges from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better quality of recovery. Postoperative pain assessments and QoR-15T evaluations will be performed by nurses who are blinded to group allocation, ensuring assessor blinding.

The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether the addition of ESPB to standard general anesthesia reduces postoperative opioid consumption within the first 24 hours after percutaneous nephrolithotomy compared with standard systemic analgesia alone. Secondary objectives include the comparison of postoperative pain scores at predefined time points, intraoperative remifentanil requirements, hemodynamic stability, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting, and quality of recovery as measured by the QoR-15T. This study is expected to provide clinically relevant evidence regarding the analgesic efficacy and recovery benefits of ESPB in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Being tested
Erector Spinae Plane Block
Keywords
Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Erector spinae plane block, Opioid consumption, Numerical pain scores (NRS), Recovery quality (QoR-15T)
Medical subject headings
Nephrolithiasis, Kidney Calculi

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Erector Spinae Plane BlockProcedure or surgery

    In addition to standard general anesthesia, patients are scheduled to undergo an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T10 transverse process level using 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine

Study groups in NCT07457983
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Block groupExperimentalStandard pain management + Erector spinae plane block
Receives: Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane Block
Control groupNo interventionPatients will receive standard general anesthesia and perioperative systemic analgesia, but erector spinae plane block will not be performed.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Total Postoperative Tramadol Consumption within 24 Hours

    Total dose of intravenous tramadol (mg) administered as rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Measured: 0-24 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption

    Total dose of remifentanil (µg) used intraoperatively

    Measured: İntraoperative period

  2. Postoperative Pain Scores (NRS)

    Postoperative pain scores will be assesed with numerical pain scores at postoperative period. NRS score will range to 0-10. O refers to no pain and 10 refers to the worst pain ever had.

    Measured: Postoperative 0th, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th and 24th hours

  3. QoR-15T (Turkish) quality of recovery scale

    The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) at 24 hours scale is a patient-reported outcome questionnaire that measures the quality of postoperative recovery. The validity of Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) has been proven in many languages. In our study, the Turkish Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15T) will be used to measure postoperative recovery in the Turkish population. The Turkish Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15T) scale consists of 2 parts and a total of 15 questions are asked to patients. Patients can score each question between 0 and 10, so the total Turkish Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15T) score can range from 0 to 150. A higher score indicates a better recovery quality.

    Measured: Postoperative 24th hours, based on a single assessment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion15 May 2026
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned to two groups using the sealed-envelope Arm 1:Patients will receive erector spinae plane block (ESPB) in addition to standard care. Arm 2: Patients will receive only standard pain management.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07457983
Sponsor's protocol ID
ADYU-AR-FT-02
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
4 Mar 2026
Last updated
20 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Erector Spinae Plane Block in people with Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and Nephrolithiasis, run by Fadime Tosun at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Total Postoperative Tramadol Consumption within 24 Hours (time frame: 0-24 hours postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jul 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in