Venous Leg UlcerPhase 1NCT07463365
LUT017 Gel for Venous Leg Ulcers and Chronic Non-Healing Skin Wounds in Adults
A Phase 1 study testing LUT017 gel in people with Venous Leg Ulcer and Chronic Non-Healing Cutaneous Wounds, run by Antoni Ribas at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This research study is investigating a new topical medication called LUT017, which is being developed to help heal chronic skin wounds, particularly those known as venous leg ulcers (VLUs). VLUs are open sores that commonly occur on the lower legs due to poor blood flow in the veins. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Venous Leg Ulcer, Chronic Non-Healing Cutaneous Wounds, VLU
- What is being tested?
- LUT017 gel
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 18 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2026to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects with venous leg ulcers (VLU), defined by open skin lesion of the leg as a result of venous hypertension.
- Subject must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Active lower extremity ulceration (CEAP classification of C6).
- Non-healing VLU ≥ 4 weeks but not greater than 24 months.
- Ulcer size ≥ 2cm2 ≤ 20cm2.
- Target ulcer will be defined as the largest ulcer on the affected limb. Only one wound per subject will be designated as the study wound and treated with the investigational gel. If a subject has two wounds separated by less than 1 cm of intact skin, these wounds will be considered a single study wound, and the surface areas of both wounds will be added together for eligibility purposes; if the combined area exceeds 20 cm², the subject will be excluded from the study. Although only one wound will be directly treated, local activation of the MAPK pathway may result in biological stimulation of the adjacent untreated wound when wounds are separated by less than 1 cm.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Chronic venous insufficiency confirmed by ultrasound within previous 12 months.
- Adequate perfusion confirmed within the past 12 months.:
- Dorsalis Pedis (DP) or Posterior Tibial (PT) systolic pressure ≥ 60mmHg on the study limb.
- Transcutaneous partial pressure oxygen (TcP02) > 30mmHg.
- Great toe systolic pressure > 40mmHg.
- Must be able and willing to provide informed consent prior to study participation.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test at Screening and a negative urine pregnancy test at baseline (Day 0). They should agree to use highly effective methods of birth control, defined as those with failure less than 1%, such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUD's), sexual abstinence, or a vasectomized partner. Such subjects should agree to have monthly pregnancy test documented.
Who cannot join
- Target ulcer has exposed of tendon, muscle, or bone.
- Target ulcer is of non-venous etiology.
- Target ulcer has been treated with living cellular therapy within 4 weeks of the randomization.
- Target ulcer shows any signs of infection (only non-infected ulcers are eligible).
- Patient has undergone endovenous ablation or other venous surgery within 4 weeks of enrollment.
- Unable to tolerate multi-layer bandages or compression garments.
Show all 23Show fewer
- Decompensated congestive heart failure within 4 weeks of screening.
- Active soft tissue or bone infection requiring antibiotics.
- Skin cancer on the target limb within the last 24 months.
- Actively receiving chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy for cancer.
- Treatment with a serine/threonine-protein kinase BRAF inhibitor, including but not limited to Zelboraf® (vemurafenib), Tafinlar® (dabrafenib), BraftoviTM (encorafenib) or Nexavar® (sorafenib), within 30 days or 5 half-lives of the drug prior to Screening, whichever is longer.
- Blood chemistry or counts values as follows:
- White Blood Cells (WBC)< 1.5 x 109/L.
- Absolute < 0.9 x 109/L.
- Platelet count < 50 x 109/L.
- Alanine aminotransferase > 3 x upper limit of normal.
- Aspartate aminotransferase > 3 x upper limit of normal.
- Serum albumin <2.0 g/dL.
- HbA1c value of > 12% within the past three (3) months.
- Current use of systemic corticosteroids > 5 mg daily or equivalent within 4 weeks.
- Currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant.
- Inability or unwillingness to participate in all aspects of study protocol or as determined by the Investigator.
- Known hypersensitivity to the ingredients of the study drug.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Cynthia R Gonzalez contact
United States1 site
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Ignacio Baselga, PhD, 3102063548, ibaselga@mednet.ucla.edu
Cynthia R Gonzalez, cynthiargonzalez@mednet.ucla.edu
About this study
Official title: A Phase 1, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Topically Administered LUT017 Gel for Cutaneous Wound Healing
This research study is investigating a new topical medication called LUT017, which is being developed to help heal chronic skin wounds, particularly those known as venous leg ulcers (VLUs). VLUs are open sores that commonly occur on the lower legs due to poor blood flow in the veins. These wounds can be painful, slow to heal, and difficult to treat, especially in older adults and people with conditions like diabetes or obesity.
LUT017 is a gel that will be applied directly to the surface of these wounds. The goal of the study is to find out if the gel is safe and well tolerated when applied once a week for up to 8 weeks. The researchers will also look for early signs of whether the gel helps the wounds heal more quickly or completely. The gel contains a medicine that has been shown in animal studies to activate natural skin repair processes and promote cell growth, potentially speeding up the healing process.
Read more
The study will involve between 12 and 18 adult participants who have had a chronic leg wound for at least 4 weeks. All participants will go through a screening process to make sure they are eligible. If they qualify, they will first complete a two-week "run-in" phase where their wound will be treated with standard medical bandages. This phase helps ensure that only participants whose wounds are not healing with normal care are included.
If participants remain eligible after this period, they will start the treatment phase. During this phase, they will come to the clinic once a week for 8 weeks to receive the LUT017 gel treatment directly on their wound. Each visit will include a physical exam, vital signs, wound evaluation, photographs of the wound, and blood tests to monitor safety.
After the 8-week treatment period, participants will return for two follow-up visits-one at 3 months and one at 6 months after their first treatment. These visits will help the researchers understand how long any benefits of the treatment might last and monitor for any delayed side effects.
In total, participants will be involved in the study for about 6.5 months and will have approximately 12 to 14 visits to the clinic. Participation is entirely voluntary, and individuals can withdraw at any time. The research team is committed to ensuring participant safety and privacy throughout the study.
Read the detailed description
Study Overview and Clinical Context
This is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary biological activity of LUT017 gel when administered topically to subjects with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and other chronic non-healing cutaneous wounds. The study represents the first clinical investigation of LUT017 in the setting of impaired cutaneous wound healing and is intended to establish an initial safety profile, characterize systemic exposure following topical administration, and inform dose selection for future controlled studies.
Venous leg ulcers represent the most advanced clinical manifestation of chronic venous insufficiency and arise as a consequence of sustained venous hypertension, microvascular dysfunction, leukocyte trapping, and chronic inflammatory signaling within the lower extremities. The resulting wound environment is characterized by persistent cytokine activation, excessive matrix metalloproteinase activity, impaired fibroblast and keratinocyte responsiveness, oxidative stress, and altered extracellular matrix turnover. These processes lead to delayed epithelial migration, impaired re-epithelialization, and prolonged wound chronicity. Despite optimized compression therapy and local wound management, a substantial proportion of VLUs fail to heal within clinically acceptable timeframes. There are currently no approved pharmacologic agents specifically designed to activate regenerative signaling pathways in chronic wound beds.
The therapeutic hypothesis underlying this study is that localized activation of epidermal regenerative pathways may restore proliferative and migratory capacity in chronic wounds without inducing systemic toxicity. LUT017 has been developed to achieve this objective through paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in BRAF wild-type keratinocytes.
Mechanistic Rationale
LUT017 is a small-molecule inhibitor of BRAF. Although BRAF inhibitors were originally developed to suppress oncogenic BRAF V600 mutations in melanoma, it has been demonstrated that in cells expressing wild-type BRAF, particularly in the presence of upstream RAS activity, inhibition of BRAF can induce paradoxical activation of downstream MAPK signaling. This effect occurs through RAF dimerization and CRAF transactivation, leading to enhanced ERK phosphorylation. In epidermal keratinocytes, ERK activation promotes cellular proliferation, cytoskeletal reorganization, migration into the wound bed, and re-establishment of epithelial barrier integrity.
Preclinical wound-healing studies conducted in diabetic and excisional wound mouse models demonstrated accelerated wound closure following topical administration of a BRAF inhibitor analogue closely related to LUT017. Histologic evaluation revealed increased numbers of phosphorylated ERK-positive and Ki67-positive keratinocytes at wound margins, earlier onset of re-epithelialization, and enhanced epithelial tongue migration. Additional molecular analyses demonstrated activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and induction of follicular neogenesis within wound beds, suggesting that paradoxical MAPK activation may induce a regenerative phenotype rather than simple hyperproliferation.
Importantly, in two-stage skin carcinogenesis models, topical exposure to regenerative doses of BRAF inhibitors did not increase papilloma formation or squamous cell carcinoma incidence, supporting the safety of localized MAPK activation within the context of controlled topical exposure.
Investigational Product
LUT017 is a non-approved investigational BRAF inhibitor with a molecular weight of 546.94 Daltons and molecular formula C27H18ClF3N8. The compound has been optimized for topical administration and formulated as an aqueous-based gel designed to promote dermal penetration while minimizing systemic absorption. The formulation contains polyethylene glycol 400, Transcutol HP, 2-propanol, diisopropyl adipate, benzyl alcohol, Carbopol 980 NF polymer, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The gel has a slightly viscous consistency, a pH range of approximately 5 to 7, and is supplied in 50-gram tubes for controlled clinical use. The product is stored at controlled room temperature and protected from light.
The formulation strategy was designed to balance epidermal penetration and local pharmacodynamic activity while limiting systemic exposure, thereby reducing the risk of class-associated systemic toxicities observed with oral BRAF inhibitors.
Nonclinical Safety and Toxicology
LUT017 has undergone a comprehensive nonclinical evaluation program including dermal toxicity, systemic toxicology, genotoxicity, phototoxicity, ocular irritation, and cardiovascular safety assessments. Repeated-dose dermal toxicity studies conducted in both rodent and minipig models for durations up to 56 days demonstrated no evidence of systemic organ toxicity, no clinically significant ECG (electrocardiogram) abnormalities, and no persistent laboratory abnormalities. Histopathologic examination did not reveal treatment-related organ damage at doses substantially exceeding projected clinical exposure levels. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for dermal administration was established at 5 mg/kg/day in both species.
Oral repeated-dose studies demonstrated dose-dependent but reversible laboratory changes at high systemic exposures, with a NOAEL of 25 mg/kg/day in female animals. These exposures exceed those anticipated following topical administration in humans.
Genotoxicity testing was negative in bacterial reverse mutation assays, in vitro micronucleus testing, in vivo micronucleus studies, and comet assays. Phototoxicity testing in vitro and in vivo did not demonstrate photoreactive potential at clinically relevant concentrations. Cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies in beagle dogs and telemetry-monitored minipigs demonstrated no clinically meaningful QT prolongation or arrhythmogenic signal.
Collectively, these data support initiation of clinical evaluation with appropriate monitoring and conservative dose escalation.
Study Design
This study employs a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design across three sequential topical concentration cohorts of LUT017 gel: 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.25%. Between twelve and eighteen subjects will be enrolled depending on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Dose escalation decisions will be based on the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events meeting predefined dose-limiting toxicity criteria within four weeks following first administration. The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest dose level at which no more than one of six subjects experiences a dose-limiting toxicity.
Enrollment within each cohort will be staggered to allow adequate safety evaluation before dosing subsequent participants. No intra-subject dose escalation or modification is permitted.
Study Periods
The trial consists of four sequential phases. During the screening period, which may extend up to 28 days, participants undergo baseline assessments including physical examination, laboratory testing, electrocardiography, ophthalmologic evaluation, and wound documentation.
Following screening, participants enter a 14-day run-in period during which standardized compression therapy and optimized wound care are administered. This run-in phase serves to confirm wound chronicity under controlled management conditions and to exclude ulcers that demonstrate substantial healing with standard therapy alone.
Eligible participants then proceed to the treatment phase, during which LUT017 gel is applied once weekly directly to the designated target wound for up to eight weeks or until complete re-epithelialization. Drug application is performed in clinic by qualified investigators to ensure standardized administration and compliance.
After completion of treatment, participants enter an extended follow-up phase with visits occurring at three months and six months after first dose to assess durability of wound response and monitor for delayed adverse events. Total subject participation is approximately six and one-half months.
Safety Monitoring
Safety evaluation is the primary objective of this study. Participants undergo serial physical examinations, vital sign assessments, laboratory evaluations including complete blood count and comprehensive metabolic panel, electrocardiograms, and systematic adverse event monitoring throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. Adverse events are graded using standard toxicity criteria and assessed for relationship to study drug.
Given the known class effects of systemic BRAF inhibitors, dermatologic monitoring is emphasized. Investigators assess for development of keratoacanthomas, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, squamous papillomas, photosensitivity reactions, erythema nodosum-like eruptions, folliculitis, cyst formation, and other proliferative cutaneous lesions. Suspicious lesions are evaluated and managed according to standard clinical practice.
Predefined stopping rules require temporary study suspension if severe or unexpected toxicity thresholds are reached, including treatment-related death or multiple grade 4 adverse events attributable to study drug.
Pharmacokinetic Assessment
To characterize systemic exposure following topical administration, plasma pharmacokinetic sampling is performed at prespecified time points including pre-dose and one hour post-dose on Day 0, and pre-dose sampling on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. These data will allow estimation of peak concentration, trough levels, and accumulation, and will confirm whether systemic exposure remains minimal as anticipated based on nonclinical modeling.
Statistical Considerations
This early-phase study is not powered for confirmatory efficacy testing. Safety data will be summarized descriptively. Wound healing parameters, including reduction in wound area and complete re-epithelialization rates, will be analyzed descriptively and may be explored using time-to-event methodologies such as Kaplan-Meier estimation. No formal hypothesis testing is planned.
Risk-Benefit Considerations
The potential risks of topical LUT017 include localized cutaneous hyperproliferation, inflammatory dermatologic reactions, and theoretically minimal systemic exposure-related effects. These risks are mitigated through conservative dose escalation, staggered enrollment, intensive monitoring, and predefined stopping criteria. The anticipated benefit is acceleration of wound closure and restoration of epithelial integrity in chronic wounds that have failed to respond to standard therapy.
- Conditions
- Venous Leg Ulcer, Chronic Non-Healing Cutaneous Wounds, VLU
- Being tested
- LUT017 gel
- Keywords
- Venous Leg Ulcer, Chronic Wound Healing, Topical BRAF Inhibitor, LUT017, Paradoxical MAPK Activation, Epidermal Regeneration, Cutaneous Wound Healing, Phase 1 Clinical Trial, Dose Escalation Study, Re-epithelialization, Dermatologic Regenerative Therapy, Local MAPK Activation
- Medical subject headings
- Varicose Ulcer
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LUT017 gelDrug
Also called LUT017, Topical BRAF inhibitor
LUT017 gel is a topical formulation of a small-molecule BRAF inhibitor developed to induce paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in BRAF wild-type keratinocytes. The gel is administered once weekly for up to 8 weeks directly to a designated venous leg ulcer or chronic non-healing cutaneous wound. Three concentrations (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.25% w/w) are evaluated sequentially using a 3+3 dose-escalation design. The formulation is an aqueous-based gel containing organic solvents to optimize dermal penetration while minimizing systemic absorption. Treatment is applied in clinic by qualified investigators following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| LUT017 Gel 0.03% Once Weekly | Experimental | Participants receive LUT017 gel 0.03% (0.3 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Treatment is administered in clinic following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and wound healing parameters are evaluated throughout treatment and follow-up. Receives: Drug: LUT017 gel |
| LUT017 Gel 0.1% Once Weekly | Experimental | Participants receive LUT017 gel 0.1% (1.0 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Treatment is administered in clinic following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care. Dose escalation proceeds according to a 3+3 design based on observed safety. Receives: Drug: LUT017 gel |
| LUT017 Gel 0.25% Once Weekly | Experimental | Participants receive LUT017 gel 0.25% (2.5 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Enrollment in this cohort occurs after safety review of lower dose levels under the predefined dose-escalation rules. Receives: Drug: LUT017 gel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Number and percentage of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), including adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious adverse events (SAEs), unexpected adverse events, AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs leading to death. Adverse events are graded according to CTCAE criteria and assessed for relationship to study drug.
Measured: From first dose (Day 0) through Week 8 (end of treatment period)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in Wound Area Over Time
Change from baseline in wound surface area measured by physical examination and standardized photographic documentation. Wound measurements are obtained using digital wound assessment tools and evaluated descriptively across dose cohorts.
Measured: Baseline through Week 8, Month 3, and Month 6
Rate of Complete Re-epithelialization
Proportion of participants achieving complete wound closure, defined as full re-epithelialization without drainage or need for dressing, as determined by clinical assessment.
Measured: Week 8, Month 3, and Month 6
Time to Complete Re-epithelialization
Time from first dose to documented complete re-epithelialization of the target wound. Time-to-event analyses will be performed descriptively using Kaplan-Meier methods.
Measured: From Day 0 through Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2026
- Study start2 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (16)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Venous Leg UlcerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Antoni Ribas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Antoni Ribas, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Antoni Ribas, M.D., PhD, Study director, University of California, Los AngelesSteven Farley, M.D., Principal investigator, University of California, Los AngelesAksone Nouvong, MD, Study chair, University of California, Los AngelesJessica O'Conell, MD, Study chair, University of California, Los AngelesVincent Rowe, MD, Study chair, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07463365
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25-1076
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 29 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: This is an early-phase, single-center study with a small sample size primarily designed to evaluate safety and tolerability. Due to the limited number of participants and the potential risk of re-identification, individual-level data will not be made publicly available. De-identified aggregate results may be shared through scientific publications and presentations.
Publications
Zhu S, Li S, Escuin-Ordinas H, Dimatteo R, Xi W, Ribas A, Segura T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable star poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(propylene sulfide) scaffolds loaded with poorly water-soluble drugs. J Control Release. 2018 Jul 28;282:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 9.
PubMed 29751029Woodworth CD, Michael E, Marker D, Allen S, Smith L, Nees M. Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor increases expression of genes that stimulate inflammation, apoptosis, and cell attachment. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 Apr;4(4):650-8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0238.
PubMed 15827339Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
PubMed 22256804Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):427-30. doi: 10.1038/nature08902.
PubMed 20179705Perez-Soler R, Delord JP, Halpern A, Kelly K, Krueger J, Sureda BM, von Pawel J, Temel J, Siena S, Soulieres D, Saltz L, Leyden J. HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash: future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management forum. Oncologist. 2005 May;10(5):345-56. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-5-345.
PubMed 15851793Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariotti F, Dattilo C, Mariani V, Girolomoni G. ERK1/2 regulates epidermal chemokine expression and skin inflammation. J Immunol. 2005 Apr 15;174(8):5047-56. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.5047.
PubMed 15814736Nowak JA, Polak L, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Hair follicle stem cells are specified and function in early skin morphogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Jul 3;3(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.009.
PubMed 18593557Mittmann N, Seung SJ. Rash rates with egfr inhibitors: meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(2):e54-63. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i2.605.
PubMed 21505590Lacouture ME, Wainberg ZA, Patel AB, Anadkat MJ, Stemmer SM, Shacham-Shmueli E, Medina E, Zelinger G, Shelach N, Ribas A. Reducing Skin Toxicities from EGFR Inhibitors with Topical BRAF Inhibitor Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2021 Sep;11(9):2158-2167. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1847. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
PubMed 33910927Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):803-12. doi: 10.1038/nrc1970.
PubMed 16990857Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R, Ludlam MJ, Stokoe D, Gloor SL, Vigers G, Morales T, Aliagas I, Liu B, Sideris S, Hoeflich KP, Jaiswal BS, Seshagiri S, Koeppen H, Belvin M, Friedman LS, Malek S. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):431-5. doi: 10.1038/nature08833. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
PubMed 20130576Hall-Jackson CA, Eyers PA, Cohen P, Goedert M, Boyle FT, Hewitt N, Plant H, Hedge P. Paradoxical activation of Raf by a novel Raf inhibitor. Chem Biol. 1999 Aug;6(8):559-68. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80088-x.
PubMed 10421767Escuin-Ordinas H, Liu Y, Sun L, Hugo W, Dimatteo R, Huang RR, Krystofinski P, Azhdam A, Lee J, Comin-Anduix B, Cochran AJ, Lo RS, Segura T, Scumpia PO, Ribas A. Wound healing with topical BRAF inhibitor therapy in a diabetic model suggests tissue regenerative effects. PLoS One. 2021 Jun 23;16(6):e0252597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252597. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34161353Escuin-Ordinas H, Li S, Xie MW, Sun L, Hugo W, Huang RR, Jiao J, de-Faria FM, Realegeno S, Krystofinski P, Azhdam A, Komenan SM, Atefi M, Comin-Anduix B, Pellegrini M, Cochran AJ, Modlin RL, Herschman HR, Lo RS, McBride WH, Segura T, Ribas A. Cutaneous wound healing through paradoxical MAPK activation by BRAF inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 1;7:12348. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12348.
PubMed 27476449Balmain A, Ramsden M, Bowden GT, Smith J. Activation of the mouse cellular Harvey-ras gene in chemically induced benign skin papillomas. Nature. 1984 Feb 16-22;307(5952):658-60. doi: 10.1038/307658a0.
PubMed 6694757
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 1, Open-Label Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy Study of Topically Administered LUT017 Gel for Cutaneous Wound Healing
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07463365
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25-1076
- Conditions
- Venous Leg Ulcer, Chronic Non-Healing Cutaneous Wounds, VLU
- Keywords
- Venous Leg Ulcer, Chronic Wound Healing, Topical BRAF Inhibitor, LUT017, Paradoxical MAPK Activation, Epidermal Regeneration, Cutaneous Wound Healing, Phase 1 Clinical Trial
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 18 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Antoni RibasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research study is investigating a new topical medication called LUT017, which is being developed to help heal chronic skin wounds, particularly those known as venous leg ulcers (VLUs). VLUs are open sores that commonly occur on the lower legs due to poor blood flow in the veins. These wounds can be painful, slow to heal, and difficult to treat, especially in older adults and people with conditions like diabetes or obesity.
LUT017 is a gel that will be applied directly to the surface of these wounds. The goal of the study is to find out if the gel is safe and well tolerated when applied once a week for up to 8 weeks. The researchers will also look for early signs of whether the gel helps the wounds heal more quickly or completely. The gel contains a medicine that has been shown in animal studies to activate natural skin repair processes and promote cell growth, potentially speeding up the healing process.
The study will involve between 12 and 18 adult participants who have had a chronic leg wound for at least 4 weeks. All participants will go through a screening process to make sure they are eligible. If they qualify, they will first complete a two-week "run-in" phase where their wound will be treated with standard medical bandages. This phase helps ensure that only participants whose wounds are not healing with normal care are included.
If participants remain eligible after this period, they will start the treatment phase. During this phase, they will come to the clinic once a week for 8 weeks to receive the LUT017 gel treatment directly on their wound. Each visit will include a physical exam, vital signs, wound evaluation, photographs of the wound, and blood tests to monitor safety.
After the 8-week treatment period, participants will return for two follow-up visits-one at 3 months and one at 6 months after their first treatment. These visits will help the researchers understand how long any benefits of the treatment might last and monitor for any delayed side effects.
In total, participants will be involved in the study for about 6.5 months and will have approximately 12 to 14 visits to the clinic. Participation is entirely voluntary, and individuals can withdraw at any time. The research team is committed to ensuring participant safety and privacy throughout the study.
Detailed description
Study Overview and Clinical Context
This is a Phase 1, open-label, dose-escalation clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary biological activity of LUT017 gel when administered topically to subjects with venous leg ulcers (VLUs) and other chronic non-healing cutaneous wounds. The study represents the first clinical investigation of LUT017 in the setting of impaired cutaneous wound healing and is intended to establish an initial safety profile, characterize systemic exposure following topical administration, and inform dose selection for future controlled studies.
Venous leg ulcers represent the most advanced clinical manifestation of chronic venous insufficiency and arise as a consequence of sustained venous hypertension, microvascular dysfunction, leukocyte trapping, and chronic inflammatory signaling within the lower extremities. The resulting wound environment is characterized by persistent cytokine activation, excessive matrix metalloproteinase activity, impaired fibroblast and keratinocyte responsiveness, oxidative stress, and altered extracellular matrix turnover. These processes lead to delayed epithelial migration, impaired re-epithelialization, and prolonged wound chronicity. Despite optimized compression therapy and local wound management, a substantial proportion of VLUs fail to heal within clinically acceptable timeframes. There are currently no approved pharmacologic agents specifically designed to activate regenerative signaling pathways in chronic wound beds.
The therapeutic hypothesis underlying this study is that localized activation of epidermal regenerative pathways may restore proliferative and migratory capacity in chronic wounds without inducing systemic toxicity. LUT017 has been developed to achieve this objective through paradoxical activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in BRAF wild-type keratinocytes.
Mechanistic Rationale
LUT017 is a small-molecule inhibitor of BRAF. Although BRAF inhibitors were originally developed to suppress oncogenic BRAF V600 mutations in melanoma, it has been demonstrated that in cells expressing wild-type BRAF, particularly in the presence of upstream RAS activity, inhibition of BRAF can induce paradoxical activation of downstream MAPK signaling. This effect occurs through RAF dimerization and CRAF transactivation, leading to enhanced ERK phosphorylation. In epidermal keratinocytes, ERK activation promotes cellular proliferation, cytoskeletal reorganization, migration into the wound bed, and re-establishment of epithelial barrier integrity.
Preclinical wound-healing studies conducted in diabetic and excisional wound mouse models demonstrated accelerated wound closure following topical administration of a BRAF inhibitor analogue closely related to LUT017. Histologic evaluation revealed increased numbers of phosphorylated ERK-positive and Ki67-positive keratinocytes at wound margins, earlier onset of re-epithelialization, and enhanced epithelial tongue migration. Additional molecular analyses demonstrated activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and induction of follicular neogenesis within wound beds, suggesting that paradoxical MAPK activation may induce a regenerative phenotype rather than simple hyperproliferation.
Importantly, in two-stage skin carcinogenesis models, topical exposure to regenerative doses of BRAF inhibitors did not increase papilloma formation or squamous cell carcinoma incidence, supporting the safety of localized MAPK activation within the context of controlled topical exposure.
Investigational Product
LUT017 is a non-approved investigational BRAF inhibitor with a molecular weight of 546.94 Daltons and molecular formula C27H18ClF3N8. The compound has been optimized for topical administration and formulated as an aqueous-based gel designed to promote dermal penetration while minimizing systemic absorption. The formulation contains polyethylene glycol 400, Transcutol HP, 2-propanol, diisopropyl adipate, benzyl alcohol, Carbopol 980 NF polymer, sodium hydroxide, and purified water. The gel has a slightly viscous consistency, a pH range of approximately 5 to 7, and is supplied in 50-gram tubes for controlled clinical use. The product is stored at controlled room temperature and protected from light.
The formulation strategy was designed to balance epidermal penetration and local pharmacodynamic activity while limiting systemic exposure, thereby reducing the risk of class-associated systemic toxicities observed with oral BRAF inhibitors.
Nonclinical Safety and Toxicology
LUT017 has undergone a comprehensive nonclinical evaluation program including dermal toxicity, systemic toxicology, genotoxicity, phototoxicity, ocular irritation, and cardiovascular safety assessments. Repeated-dose dermal toxicity studies conducted in both rodent and minipig models for durations up to 56 days demonstrated no evidence of systemic organ toxicity, no clinically significant ECG (electrocardiogram) abnormalities, and no persistent laboratory abnormalities. Histopathologic examination did not reveal treatment-related organ damage at doses substantially exceeding projected clinical exposure levels. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) for dermal administration was established at 5 mg/kg/day in both species.
Oral repeated-dose studies demonstrated dose-dependent but reversible laboratory changes at high systemic exposures, with a NOAEL of 25 mg/kg/day in female animals. These exposures exceed those anticipated following topical administration in humans.
Genotoxicity testing was negative in bacterial reverse mutation assays, in vitro micronucleus testing, in vivo micronucleus studies, and comet assays. Phototoxicity testing in vitro and in vivo did not demonstrate photoreactive potential at clinically relevant concentrations. Cardiovascular safety pharmacology studies in beagle dogs and telemetry-monitored minipigs demonstrated no clinically meaningful QT prolongation or arrhythmogenic signal.
Collectively, these data support initiation of clinical evaluation with appropriate monitoring and conservative dose escalation.
Study Design
This study employs a traditional 3+3 dose-escalation design across three sequential topical concentration cohorts of LUT017 gel: 0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.25%. Between twelve and eighteen subjects will be enrolled depending on the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Dose escalation decisions will be based on the occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events meeting predefined dose-limiting toxicity criteria within four weeks following first administration. The maximum tolerated dose is defined as the highest dose level at which no more than one of six subjects experiences a dose-limiting toxicity.
Enrollment within each cohort will be staggered to allow adequate safety evaluation before dosing subsequent participants. No intra-subject dose escalation or modification is permitted.
Study Periods
The trial consists of four sequential phases. During the screening period, which may extend up to 28 days, participants undergo baseline assessments including physical examination, laboratory testing, electrocardiography, ophthalmologic evaluation, and wound documentation.
Following screening, participants enter a 14-day run-in period during which standardized compression therapy and optimized wound care are administered. This run-in phase serves to confirm wound chronicity under controlled management conditions and to exclude ulcers that demonstrate substantial healing with standard therapy alone.
Eligible participants then proceed to the treatment phase, during which LUT017 gel is applied once weekly directly to the designated target wound for up to eight weeks or until complete re-epithelialization. Drug application is performed in clinic by qualified investigators to ensure standardized administration and compliance.
After completion of treatment, participants enter an extended follow-up phase with visits occurring at three months and six months after first dose to assess durability of wound response and monitor for delayed adverse events. Total subject participation is approximately six and one-half months.
Safety Monitoring
Safety evaluation is the primary objective of this study. Participants undergo serial physical examinations, vital sign assessments, laboratory evaluations including complete blood count and comprehensive metabolic panel, electrocardiograms, and systematic adverse event monitoring throughout the treatment and follow-up periods. Adverse events are graded using standard toxicity criteria and assessed for relationship to study drug.
Given the known class effects of systemic BRAF inhibitors, dermatologic monitoring is emphasized. Investigators assess for development of keratoacanthomas, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, squamous papillomas, photosensitivity reactions, erythema nodosum-like eruptions, folliculitis, cyst formation, and other proliferative cutaneous lesions. Suspicious lesions are evaluated and managed according to standard clinical practice.
Predefined stopping rules require temporary study suspension if severe or unexpected toxicity thresholds are reached, including treatment-related death or multiple grade 4 adverse events attributable to study drug.
Pharmacokinetic Assessment
To characterize systemic exposure following topical administration, plasma pharmacokinetic sampling is performed at prespecified time points including pre-dose and one hour post-dose on Day 0, and pre-dose sampling on Days 7, 14, 21, and 28. These data will allow estimation of peak concentration, trough levels, and accumulation, and will confirm whether systemic exposure remains minimal as anticipated based on nonclinical modeling.
Statistical Considerations
This early-phase study is not powered for confirmatory efficacy testing. Safety data will be summarized descriptively. Wound healing parameters, including reduction in wound area and complete re-epithelialization rates, will be analyzed descriptively and may be explored using time-to-event methodologies such as Kaplan-Meier estimation. No formal hypothesis testing is planned.
Risk-Benefit Considerations
The potential risks of topical LUT017 include localized cutaneous hyperproliferation, inflammatory dermatologic reactions, and theoretically minimal systemic exposure-related effects. These risks are mitigated through conservative dose escalation, staggered enrollment, intensive monitoring, and predefined stopping criteria. The anticipated benefit is acceleration of wound closure and restoration of epithelial integrity in chronic wounds that have failed to respond to standard therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| LUT017 Gel 0.03% Once Weekly | Experimental | Drug: LUT017 gelParticipants receive LUT017 gel 0.03% (0.3 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Treatment is administered in clinic following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and wound healing parameters are evaluated throughout treatment and follow-up. |
| LUT017 Gel 0.1% Once Weekly | Experimental | Drug: LUT017 gelParticipants receive LUT017 gel 0.1% (1.0 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Treatment is administered in clinic following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care. Dose escalation proceeds according to a 3+3 design based on observed safety. |
| LUT017 Gel 0.25% Once Weekly | Experimental | Drug: LUT017 gelParticipants receive LUT017 gel 0.25% (2.5 mg/g) applied topically once weekly for up to 8 weeks to a designated chronic venous leg ulcer or non-healing cutaneous wound. Enrollment in this cohort occurs after safety review of lower dose levels under the predefined dose-escalation rules. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Subjects with venous leg ulcers (VLU), defined by open skin lesion of the leg as a result of venous hypertension.
- Subject must be ≥ 18 years of age.
- Active lower extremity ulceration (CEAP classification of C6).
- Non-healing VLU ≥ 4 weeks but not greater than 24 months.
- Ulcer size ≥ 2cm2 ≤ 20cm2.
Key exclusion criteria (23 listed)
- Target ulcer has exposed of tendon, muscle, or bone.
- Target ulcer is of non-venous etiology.
- Target ulcer has been treated with living cellular therapy within 4 weeks of the randomization.
- Target ulcer shows any signs of infection (only non-infected ulcers are eligible).
- Patient has undergone endovenous ablation or other venous surgery within 4 weeks of enrollment.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LUT017 gelAlso: LUT017, Topical BRAF inhibitorLUT017 gel is a topical formulation of a small-molecule BRAF inhibitor developed to induce paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in BRAF wild-type keratinocytes. The gel is administered once weekly for up to 8 weeks directly to a designated venous leg ulcer or chronic non-healing cutaneous wound. Three concentrations (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.25% w/w) are evaluated sequentially using a 3+3 dose-escalation design. The formulation is an aqueous-based gel containing organic solvents to optimize dermal penetration while minimizing systemic absorption. Treatment is applied in clinic by qualified investigators following a 14-day run-in period of standardized wound care. | Drug | LUT017 Gel 0.03% Once Weekly, LUT017 Gel 0.1% Once Weekly, LUT017 Gel 0.25% Once Weekly |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability)
Time frame: From first dose (Day 0) through Week 8 (end of treatment period)
Number and percentage of participants experiencing treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), including adverse drug reactions (ADRs), serious adverse events (SAEs), unexpected adverse events, AEs leading to discontinuation, and AEs leading to death. Adverse events are graded according to CTCAE criteria and assessed for relationship to study drug.
3 secondary outcomes
Change in Wound Area Over Time
Time frame: Baseline through Week 8, Month 3, and Month 6
Rate of Complete Re-epithelialization
Time frame: Week 8, Month 3, and Month 6
Time to Complete Re-epithelialization
Time frame: From Day 0 through Month 6
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29751029Zhu S, Li S, Escuin-Ordinas H, Dimatteo R, Xi W, Ribas A, Segura T. Accelerated wound healing by injectable star poly(ethylene glycol)-b-poly(propylene sulfide) scaffolds loaded with poorly water-soluble drugs. J Control Release. 2018 Jul 28;282:156-165. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.05.006. Epub 2018 May 9.
- Background: PubMed 15827339Woodworth CD, Michael E, Marker D, Allen S, Smith L, Nees M. Inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor increases expression of genes that stimulate inflammation, apoptosis, and cell attachment. Mol Cancer Ther. 2005 Apr;4(4):650-8. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0238.
- Background: PubMed 22256804Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
- Background: PubMed 20179705Poulikakos PI, Zhang C, Bollag G, Shokat KM, Rosen N. RAF inhibitors transactivate RAF dimers and ERK signalling in cells with wild-type BRAF. Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):427-30. doi: 10.1038/nature08902.
- Background: PubMed 15851793Perez-Soler R, Delord JP, Halpern A, Kelly K, Krueger J, Sureda BM, von Pawel J, Temel J, Siena S, Soulieres D, Saltz L, Leyden J. HER1/EGFR inhibitor-associated rash: future directions for management and investigation outcomes from the HER1/EGFR inhibitor rash management forum. Oncologist. 2005 May;10(5):345-56. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-5-345.
- Background: PubMed 15814736Pastore S, Mascia F, Mariotti F, Dattilo C, Mariani V, Girolomoni G. ERK1/2 regulates epidermal chemokine expression and skin inflammation. J Immunol. 2005 Apr 15;174(8):5047-56. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.5047.
- Background: PubMed 18593557Nowak JA, Polak L, Pasolli HA, Fuchs E. Hair follicle stem cells are specified and function in early skin morphogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Jul 3;3(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2008.05.009.
- Background: PubMed 21505590Mittmann N, Seung SJ. Rash rates with egfr inhibitors: meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(2):e54-63. doi: 10.3747/co.v18i2.605.
- Background: PubMed 33910927Lacouture ME, Wainberg ZA, Patel AB, Anadkat MJ, Stemmer SM, Shacham-Shmueli E, Medina E, Zelinger G, Shelach N, Ribas A. Reducing Skin Toxicities from EGFR Inhibitors with Topical BRAF Inhibitor Therapy. Cancer Discov. 2021 Sep;11(9):2158-2167. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-20-1847. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
- Background: PubMed 16990857Lacouture ME. Mechanisms of cutaneous toxicities to EGFR inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Oct;6(10):803-12. doi: 10.1038/nrc1970.
- Background: PubMed 20130576Hatzivassiliou G, Song K, Yen I, Brandhuber BJ, Anderson DJ, Alvarado R, Ludlam MJ, Stokoe D, Gloor SL, Vigers G, Morales T, Aliagas I, Liu B, Sideris S, Hoeflich KP, Jaiswal BS, Seshagiri S, Koeppen H, Belvin M, Friedman LS, Malek S. RAF inhibitors prime wild-type RAF to activate the MAPK pathway and enhance growth. Nature. 2010 Mar 18;464(7287):431-5. doi: 10.1038/nature08833. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
- Background: PubMed 10421767Hall-Jackson CA, Eyers PA, Cohen P, Goedert M, Boyle FT, Hewitt N, Plant H, Hedge P. Paradoxical activation of Raf by a novel Raf inhibitor. Chem Biol. 1999 Aug;6(8):559-68. doi: 10.1016/s1074-5521(99)80088-x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. This is an early-phase, single-center study with a small sample size primarily designed to evaluate safety and tolerability. Due to the limited number of participants and the potential risk of re-identification, individual-level data will not be made publicly available. De-identified aggregate results may be shared through scientific publications and presentations.
Related trials for Venous Leg Ulcer
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Efficacy and Safety of ZKARE® Gel and Its Accessory ZKAPI® in the Treatment of Chronic Ulcers.
Chronic Ulcers
Recruiting
Vacuum Compression Therapy and Tissue Oxygenation in Chronic Leg Ulcers
Leg Ulcers, Leg Ulcers Venous
Recruiting
Dose-Response Structured Calf Muscle Pump Activation Strategies Versus Unsupervised Home Walks
Venous Ulcer of Leg
RecruitingPhase 4
Topical Sevoflurane for Treatment of Chronic Leg Ulcers
Leg Ulcer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Cynthia R Gonzalez contact
Antoni Ribas, M.D., PhD study director
University of California, Los Angeles
Steven Farley, M.D. principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
Aksone Nouvong, MD study chair
University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing LUT017 gel in people with Venous Leg Ulcer and Chronic Non-Healing Cutaneous Wounds, run by Antoni Ribas at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 23 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ignacio Baselga, PhD (3102063548, ibaselga@mednet.ucla.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (Safety and Tolerability) (time frame: From first dose (Day 0) through Week 8 (end of treatment period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07463365, which also lists 16 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.