Breast CancerNEOPRO-SITNCT07464457
Effects of Neoadjuvant Prehabilitation on Post-Interventional Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Oncology Patients With Solid Tumors
A study testing Prehabilitation in people with Breast Cancer and Solid Tumor, run by Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Philipp Lenz at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
The goal of NEOPRO-SIT is to establish and evaluate a neoadjuvant prehabilitation program comprised of targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support in patients with solid tumors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer, Solid Tumor
- What is being tested?
- Prehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 125 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Mar 2026to Oct 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with solid tumors (focus on breastcancer)
- Curative-intent multimodal treatment concept with local surgical or radiotherapeutic ablation
- Working age and > 18 years
- ECOG 0-2
- Sufficient language skills to understand questionnaires/training instructions
Who cannot join
- Severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities that do not allow participation in the program
- Medical contraindications for physical activity
- Lack of patient capacity to consent
- Pregnancy/breastfeeding
- Acute infections/fever
- Participation in another clinical intervention study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University hospital Münster
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149
Mira Meyer-Ács, +49 251 83 49134, mira.meyer-acs@ukmuenster.de
About this study
Official title: Effects of Neoadjuvant Prehabilitation on Post-Interventional Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Oncology Patients With Solid Tumors: A Prospective, Two-arm, Controlled, Monocentric Interventional Study
The goal of NEOPRO-SIT is to establish and evaluate a neoadjuvant prehabilitation program comprised of targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support in patients with solid tumors.
The main question is:
Will targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support increase both physical and psychological capacity as well of quality of life compared to standard of care in a prehabilitation setting?
Researchers will:
compare a prehabilitation program to standard of care
Participants will:
receive either standard or care or a comprehensive prehabilitation program
Read the detailed description
The project NEOPRO-SIT aims to establish and evaluate a neoadjuvant prehabilitation program comprised of targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support in patients with solid tumors.
NEOPRO-SIT is a prospective, two-arm, controlled, single-center interventional study evaluating the effectiveness of neoadjuvant prehabilitation in patients with solid tumors. The study compares the standard of care with a structured, closely supervised prehabilitation program. A total of 125 patients will be enrolled in this study.
The NEOPRO-SIT project evaluates whether a structured, supervised prehabilitation program during neoadjuvant therapy provides additional physical and psychological benefits compared with a low-resource consultation-based approach. Despite the limitations of a sequential non-randomized design, the study aims to establish a feasible, standardized prehabilitation concept that could improve patient outcomes and support more efficient integration of supportive care into routine oncology.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Solid Tumor
- Being tested
- Prehabilitation, standard of care
- Keywords
- prehabilitation, exercise therapy, psychoonlogic intervention, oncology, solid tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms, Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PrehabilitationBehavioural
Targeted exercise and psychooncological program
standard of careBehavioural
Clinical routine as applied in Germany
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | Active comparator | Standard of care Receives: Behavioral: standard of care |
| Prehabilitation arm | Experimental | Targeted execercise and psychooncological program Receives: Behavioral: Prehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical performance using the 6-Minute Walk Test
Physical performance at post-intervention (14-28 days after the ablative intervention), assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test.
Measured: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Secondary outcomes (10)
Muscle strength
Muscle strength, assessed using the 30-Second Chair Rise Test during and after ablative interventional therapy.
Measured: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Handgrip strength
Muscle strength, assessed using handgrip strength measured by dynamometry during and after ablative interventional therapy.
Measured: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Psychological distress
Psychological distress measured using the NCCN Distress Thermometer, a single-item visual analog scale ranging from 0 ("no distress") to 10 ("extreme distress"). A score of ≥4 is commonly used as a threshold for clinically significant distress requiring further evaluation.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Anxiety
Anxiety using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7), a 7-item measure assessing symptoms of generalized anxiety over the past two weeks. Each item is rated from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), yielding a total score range of 0-21. Cut-offs are 5 (mild anxiety), 10 (moderate anxiety), and 15 (severe anxiety).
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Depression
Depression assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-8), an 8-item instrument measuring depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Items are rated from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), resulting in a total score range of 0-24. Cut-offs are 5 (mild depression), 10 (moderate depression), 15 (moderately severe depression), and 20 (severe depression).
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Emotional regulation
Emotional regulation assessed by the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire Short (ERQ-S), a shortened version of the ERQ assessing two emotion regulation strategies: cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression. Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree"). Subscale scores are calculated as mean values, with higher scores indicating greater use of the respective strategy.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Emotion Beliefs
Beliefs about the usefulness and controllability of emotions assessed by the Emotion Beliefs Questionnaire (EBQ). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = "strongly disagree" to 7 = "strongly agree"). Subscale and total scores are calculated as mean values, with higher scores reflecting stronger maladaptive beliefs about emotions.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Health-related quality of life
Health-related quality of life, assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a validated, internationally used modular instrument for assessing quality of life in oncology patients. It comprises 30 items covering 15 symptom and functional domains.
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Length of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay, defined as the number of inpatient days during ablative interventional treatment.
Measured: From ablative intervention up to one month after ablative intervention
Infections
Infections, with or without the need for inpatient treatment
Measured: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2026
- Study startMar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Philipp Lenz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Philipp Lenz, University Hospital Muenster
- Investigators
- Annalen Bleckmann, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, University hospital MünsterPhilipp Lenz, Prof. Dr. med., Principal investigator, University hospital MünsterMarkus Ramm, Dr. rer. nat., Principal investigator, University hospital Münster
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07464457
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-1006-f-S
- Acronym
- NEOPRO-SIT
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD are subject to data protection
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Neoadjuvant Prehabilitation on Post-Interventional Physical and Psychological Outcomes in Oncology Patients With Solid Tumors: A Prospective, Two-arm, Controlled, Monocentric Interventional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07464457
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NEOPRO-SIT / 2025-1006-f-S
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer, Solid Tumor
- Keywords
- prehabilitation, exercise therapy, psychoonlogic intervention, oncology, solid tumors
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 125 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Philipp LenzUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of NEOPRO-SIT is to establish and evaluate a neoadjuvant prehabilitation program comprised of targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support in patients with solid tumors.
The main question is:
Will targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support increase both physical and psychological capacity as well of quality of life compared to standard of care in a prehabilitation setting?
Researchers will:
compare a prehabilitation program to standard of care
Participants will:
receive either standard or care or a comprehensive prehabilitation program
Detailed description
The project NEOPRO-SIT aims to establish and evaluate a neoadjuvant prehabilitation program comprised of targeted exercise therapy and structured psycho-oncological support in patients with solid tumors.
NEOPRO-SIT is a prospective, two-arm, controlled, single-center interventional study evaluating the effectiveness of neoadjuvant prehabilitation in patients with solid tumors. The study compares the standard of care with a structured, closely supervised prehabilitation program. A total of 125 patients will be enrolled in this study.
The NEOPRO-SIT project evaluates whether a structured, supervised prehabilitation program during neoadjuvant therapy provides additional physical and psychological benefits compared with a low-resource consultation-based approach. Despite the limitations of a sequential non-randomized design, the study aims to establish a feasible, standardized prehabilitation concept that could improve patient outcomes and support more efficient integration of supportive care into routine oncology.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | Active comparator | Behavioral: standard of careStandard of care |
| Prehabilitation arm | Experimental | Behavioral: PrehabilitationTargeted execercise and psychooncological program |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with solid tumors (focus on breastcancer)
- Curative-intent multimodal treatment concept with local surgical or radiotherapeutic ablation
- Working age and > 18 years
- ECOG 0-2
- Sufficient language skills to understand questionnaires/training instructions
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities that do not allow participation in the program
- Medical contraindications for physical activity
- Lack of patient capacity to consent
- Pregnancy/breastfeeding
- Acute infections/fever
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PrehabilitationTargeted exercise and psychooncological program | Behavioural | Prehabilitation arm |
| standard of careClinical routine as applied in Germany | Behavioural | Control arm |
Primary outcome
Physical performance using the 6-Minute Walk Test
Time frame: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Physical performance at post-intervention (14-28 days after the ablative intervention), assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test.
10 secondary outcomes
Muscle strength
Time frame: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Handgrip strength
Time frame: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention
Psychological distress
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Anxiety
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Depression
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Emotional regulation
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Emotion Beliefs
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Health-related quality of life
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: From ablative intervention up to one month after ablative intervention
Infections
Time frame: From enrollment to 6 months after the ablative intervention
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD are subject to data protection
Related trials for Breast Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
Gene Signatures to Guide HR+MBC Therapy in a Diverse Cohort
Invasive Mammary Carcinoma, Metastatic Breast Cancer
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Reliability, Time Cost, and Participant Comfort of Lymphedema Assessments in Upper Extremity
Lymphedema, Upper Extremity Lymphedema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Camrelizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Combination With or Without Famitinib as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Participants With Triple Negative Breast Cancer (BCTOP-T-N01)
TNBC - Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing Whether Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib is as Effective as Chemotherapy Followed by Hormone Therapy With Ribociclib for the Treatment of High Anatomic Stage Breast Cancer With Low Recurrence Risk, The RxFINE-Low Trial
Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Annalen Bleckmann, Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
University hospital Münster
Philipp Lenz, Prof. Dr. med. principal investigator
University hospital Münster
Markus Ramm, Dr. rer. nat. principal investigator
University hospital Münster
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prehabilitation in people with Breast Cancer and Solid Tumor, run by Priv.-Doz. Dr. med. Philipp Lenz at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mira Meyer-Ács (+49 251 8349134, mira.meyer-acs@ukmuenster.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical performance using the 6-Minute Walk Test (time frame: From enrollment to 14 - 28 days after ablative intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2026.