Urinary Catheterization, Nursing EducationNCT07464496
The Impact of Pecha Kucha Pre-Lab Teaching on Students' Foley Catheterization Skills: A Randomized Controlled Study
A study testing Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation, Demonstration-Based Training and No Additional Training in people with Urinary Catheterization, Nursing Education, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Urinary catheterization is a common nursing procedure used to drain urine from the bladder. When performed with the correct indications and sterile technique, it can help protect a patient's health. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Catheterization, Nursing Education
- What is being tested?
- Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation, Demonstration-Based Training and No Additional Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 8 Jan 2026to 20 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Being a second-year nursing student enrolled in the "Fundamentals of Nursing" course with regular attendance.
- Being 18 years of age or older. Volunteering and consenting to participate in the study. Not being a graduate of a Vocational School of Health Having no prior formal training or clinical experience regarding urinary catheterization skills.
Who cannot join
- Declining to participate in the research. Requesting to withdraw from the study at any stage of the data collection process after initially providing consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
turkoglu contact
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Health Science Türkiye- Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
Üsküdar, Istanbul, 34688
Ilayda türkoğlu, ilayda.tturkogluu@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Pre-Laboratory Information Using the Pecha Kucha Technique on Students' Knowledge Level, Skill Performance, Application Time in Foley Catheterization Training: A Randomized Controlled Study
Urinary catheterization is a common nursing procedure used to drain urine from the bladder. When performed with the correct indications and sterile technique, it can help protect a patient's health. However, errors during catheter insertion may lead to serious complications, especially catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). These infections are among the most common hospital-acquired infections and can increase hospital stay, health care costs, and complications for patients. Therefore, it is important for nursing students to learn this procedure safely and correctly.
Traditional nursing education usually includes a lecture followed by a demonstration by an instructor. Students then practice the procedure themselves. However, new teaching approaches may help students learn complex clinical skills more effectively.
Read more
Pecha Kucha is a short and structured presentation format. It includes 20 slides that automatically change every 20 seconds, and the presentation lasts 6 minutes and 40 seconds. This format encourages concise explanations and helps keep the audience focused.
This study aims to compare a Pecha Kucha-based educational module with traditional teaching in urinary catheterization training for nursing students. Researchers will examine whether the Pecha Kucha method improves students' knowledge, skill performance, procedure time, and satisfaction with the training.
The findings may help educators develop more effective and engaging teaching strategies for clinical skills education in nursing.
Read the detailed description
All students first attended a theoretical course that included a lecture and an instructional video demonstrating the procedure. After the theoretical session, students were provided with reference textbooks and example videos to review and study independently at home. One week later, before the laboratory practice session, the students were divided into three groups and received different preparatory instructions in the laboratory setting.
The first group received a brief training session delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation format. The second group received traditional instruction in which the procedure was demonstrated on a mannequin. The third group did not receive any additional demonstration in the laboratory and were expected to perform the procedure based only on the video they had previously watched.
- Being tested
- Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation, Demonstration-Based Training, No Additional Training
- Keywords
- Urinary Catheterization , Nursing Education, pecha kucha
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pecha Kucha Educational PresentationBehavioural
A short Pecha Kucha presentation (20 slides × 20 seconds) delivered before laboratory practice to reinforce procedural knowledge.
Demonstration-Based TrainingBehavioural
Instructor demonstration of the procedure performed on a mannequin before laboratory practice.
No Additional TrainingBehavioural
Students performed the laboratory procedure without receiving any additional pre-practice instruction.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation | Experimental | All students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure. They were also provided with educational resources for self-study at home. One week later, before laboratory practice, students in this group received a short Pecha Kucha presentation as a pre-practice educational intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation |
| Demonstration-Based Training | Active comparator | All students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure. They were also provided with educational resources for self-study at home. One week later, before laboratory practice, students in this group received a traditional instructor demonstration of the procedure on a mannequin. Receives: Behavioral: Demonstration-Based Training |
| No Additional Training | Other | All students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure and were provided with educational resources for home study. One week later, students in this group did not receive any additional training before laboratory practice and performed the procedure based on their prior preparation. Receives: Behavioral: No Additional Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Skill Performance Scores
Assessment of students' clinical skills on a full-size nursing manikin using the "Urinary Catheter Skill Assessment Checklist" (20 steps, max 100 points).
Measured: Immediately after the intervention
Secondary outcomes (2)
Procedure Completion Time
Total time (in minutes/seconds) taken by the student to complete the urinary catheterization procedure accurately from start to finish.
Measured: During the skill performance assessment immediately after the intervention.
Educational Satisfaction Level
Students' level of satisfaction with the assigned educational method
Measured: Immediately after the intervention.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Mar 2026
- Study start8 Jan 2026
- Primary completion15 Jan 2026
- Study completion20 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urinary Catheterization, Nursing EducationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, İlayda Türkoğlu, Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi
- Investigators
- Ilayda turkoglu, Principal investigator, University of Health Science Türkiye, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07464496
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 4565
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: As per the ethical committee approval, data will only be accessible by the research team
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Pre-Laboratory Information Using the Pecha Kucha Technique on Students' Knowledge Level, Skill Performance, Application Time in Foley Catheterization Training: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07464496
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 4565
- Keywords
- Urinary Catheterization , Nursing Education, pecha kucha
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Urinary catheterization is a common nursing procedure used to drain urine from the bladder. When performed with the correct indications and sterile technique, it can help protect a patient's health. However, errors during catheter insertion may lead to serious complications, especially catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). These infections are among the most common hospital-acquired infections and can increase hospital stay, health care costs, and complications for patients. Therefore, it is important for nursing students to learn this procedure safely and correctly.
Traditional nursing education usually includes a lecture followed by a demonstration by an instructor. Students then practice the procedure themselves. However, new teaching approaches may help students learn complex clinical skills more effectively.
Pecha Kucha is a short and structured presentation format. It includes 20 slides that automatically change every 20 seconds, and the presentation lasts 6 minutes and 40 seconds. This format encourages concise explanations and helps keep the audience focused.
This study aims to compare a Pecha Kucha-based educational module with traditional teaching in urinary catheterization training for nursing students. Researchers will examine whether the Pecha Kucha method improves students' knowledge, skill performance, procedure time, and satisfaction with the training.
The findings may help educators develop more effective and engaging teaching strategies for clinical skills education in nursing.
Detailed description
All students first attended a theoretical course that included a lecture and an instructional video demonstrating the procedure. After the theoretical session, students were provided with reference textbooks and example videos to review and study independently at home. One week later, before the laboratory practice session, the students were divided into three groups and received different preparatory instructions in the laboratory setting.
The first group received a brief training session delivered using the Pecha Kucha presentation format. The second group received traditional instruction in which the procedure was demonstrated on a mannequin. The third group did not receive any additional demonstration in the laboratory and were expected to perform the procedure based only on the video they had previously watched.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation | Experimental | Behavioral: Pecha Kucha Educational PresentationAll students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure. They were also provided with educational resources for self-study at home. One week later, before laboratory practice, students in this group received a short Pecha Kucha presentation as a pre-practice educational intervention. |
| Demonstration-Based Training | Active comparator | Behavioral: Demonstration-Based TrainingAll students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure. They were also provided with educational resources for self-study at home. One week later, before laboratory practice, students in this group received a traditional instructor demonstration of the procedure on a mannequin. |
| No Additional Training | Other | Behavioral: No Additional TrainingAll students first received theoretical instruction and watched an educational video about the procedure and were provided with educational resources for home study. One week later, students in this group did not receive any additional training before laboratory practice and performed the procedure based on their prior preparation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Being a second-year nursing student enrolled in the "Fundamentals of Nursing" course with regular attendance.
- Being 18 years of age or older. Volunteering and consenting to participate in the study. Not being a graduate of a Vocational School of Health Having no prior formal training or clinical experience regarding urinary catheterization skills.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Declining to participate in the research. Requesting to withdraw from the study at any stage of the data collection process after initially providing consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pecha Kucha Educational PresentationA short Pecha Kucha presentation (20 slides × 20 seconds) delivered before laboratory practice to reinforce procedural knowledge. | Behavioural | Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation |
| Demonstration-Based TrainingInstructor demonstration of the procedure performed on a mannequin before laboratory practice. | Behavioural | Demonstration-Based Training |
| No Additional TrainingStudents performed the laboratory procedure without receiving any additional pre-practice instruction. | Behavioural | No Additional Training |
Primary outcome
Skill Performance Scores
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention
Assessment of students' clinical skills on a full-size nursing manikin using the "Urinary Catheter Skill Assessment Checklist" (20 steps, max 100 points).
2 secondary outcomes
Procedure Completion Time
Time frame: During the skill performance assessment immediately after the intervention.
Educational Satisfaction Level
Time frame: Immediately after the intervention.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. As per the ethical committee approval, data will only be accessible by the research team
Related trials for Urinary Catheterization, Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Gagné Instructional Model
Nursing Education, Clinical Skills Training
Enrolling by invitation
THE EFFECT OF URINARY CATHETER PLACEMENT TRAINING
Nursing Students
Not yet recruiting
Simulation-Based Training for Urinary Catheterization Skills in Nursing Students
Nursing Students, Urinary Catheterization
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of Escape Room-Based Bladder Catheterization Training on Nursing Students' Academic Achievement, Problem-Solving Skills, and Motivation: A Mixed-Methods Study
NURSING EDUCATION, NURSING STUDENTS
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
turkoglu contact
Ilayda turkoglu principal investigator
University of Health Science Türkiye, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pecha Kucha Educational Presentation, Demonstration-Based Training and No Additional Training in people with Urinary Catheterization, Nursing Education, run by Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ilayda turkoglu, PhD (+905073819491, ilayda.tturkogluu@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Skill Performance Scores (time frame: Immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2026.