Acculturative StressSABERNCT07471633
Piloting a Learning Collaborative for School-Based Bilingual Providers Delivering Evidence-Based Interventions
A study testing STRONG and Learning Collaborative in people with Acculturative Stress and Mental Health, run by University of Oregon at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This pilot feasibility trial is designed to evaluate an adapted Learning Collaborative (LC) as an implementation strategy to support delivery of the Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG) intervention in school settings serving newcomer youth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Acculturative Stress, Mental Health
- What is being tested?
- STRONG and Learning Collaborative
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2026to 31 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- School Leader Eligibility:
- (a) over 18 years old;
- (b) district-level or school-level staff who manage and oversee operations and may have some decision-making power; district examples are superintendents and directors, and school examples are principals, vice principals, and directors.
- School Providers Eligibility:
- (a) over 18 years old;
- (b) mental health clinicians or school staff who regularly interact with newcomer students;
Show all 16Show fewer
- (c) bilingual in Spanish/English. It is important to note that at least one mental health clinician must facilitate STRONG but the co-facilitator can either be another clinician or a school staff who regularly interacts with newcomer students; example of such a school staff include English Language Development Teachers, interpreters, and equity coordinators
- Student Eligibility:
- (a) newcomer status (students who have migrated to a new country)
- (b) 6th-12th grade
- c) speaks Spanish/English/Mam
- (d) elevated levels of mental health symptoms and/or functional impairment
- Caregiver Eligibility:
- (a) over 18 years old;
- (b) primary caregiver (e.g., biological parent; older sibling) of a newcomer student aged 10-17 who is participating in STRONG;
- (c) able to speak in English, Spanish or Mam.
Who cannot join
- For Students: Born in mainland United States
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
University of Oregon
Eugene, Oregon, 97408
Blanche Wright, PhD, 5413464831, bwright1@uoregon.edu
About this study
This pilot feasibility trial is designed to evaluate an adapted Learning Collaborative (LC) as an implementation strategy to support delivery of the Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG) intervention in school settings serving newcomer youth. The LC will support bilingual school-based mental health providers delivering STRONG, a group-based, school-delivered behavioral intervention targeting stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and externalizing behaviors among newcomer middle school students. STRONG will be facilitated by bilingual providers with participating students and their caregivers completing pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing youth emotional and behavioral well-being. The primary aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the LC for supporting school-based implementation of STRONG, with feasibility measured by participation in LC activities and completion of implementation supports, and acceptability and appropriateness assessed through provider and leader feedback. Secondary aims include examining whether provider and school leader engagement in LC activities is associated with STRONG implementation fidelity and youth outcomes, and exploring potential mechanisms linking LC engagement to fidelity, including provider self-efficacy, leadership support, and team psychological safety. School-based providers and school leaders (e.g., principals and superintendents) will participate in LC activities focused on shared learning, collaboration, and implementation problem-solving, along with ongoing supports such as structured team support calls, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, and feedback forms during STRONG implementation cycles.
Read the detailed description
Bilingual providers play a critical role in increasing access to mental health care, yet there is a dearth of literature on bilingual provider training needs when delivering evidence-based interventions, especially to youth, and even less research on school-based interventions delivered in Spanish. One group with high mental health needs that relies on bilingual providers is newcomer youth, who have migrated to the U.S. within the past 5 years. Despite this high need, very few interventions have been developed for newcomers. One exception is Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG), a group-based, school-delivered behavioral intervention targeting stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and externalizing behaviors among newcomer youth. To date, however, interventions like STRONG remain underutilized in schools due to barriers like low leader support and poor provider fit. To maximize the public health impact of interventions delivered to Spanish-speaking youth, strategies that enhance bilingual provider training are needed.
Learning Collaboratives (LC) are a promising implementation strategy that can strengthen intervention fit with schools and foster collective learning for bilingual providers. LCs involve recurring sessions with faculty experts, organization leaders, and providers who engage in Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to overcome implementation challenges, and extant studies show LCs can positively influence provider fidelity and intervention sustainment. The LC in this study will aim to enhance the implementation of STRONG in schools for newcomer youth facilitated by bilingual providers. This study will be guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks and builds upon a completed Exploration phase with school district partners, where STRONG was chosen as the intervention to be adopted.
This study will recruit approximately 72 newcomer youth (ages 10-18) and their caregivers, 18 school mental health providers, and 9 school leaders, across four school districts and one county-level program. All youth will be receiving the STRONG intervention in their respective schools, delivered by school mental health providers and school staff familiar with the newcomer student experience, and all school provider/school leaders will take part in the LC.
STRONG is a 10-week intervention, consisting of 10 small group sessions, one individual session, and teacher and parent education sessions. STRONG is strengths based, teaches newcomers coping skills, draws from cognitive behavioral therapy, and helps foster positive identity and facilitate social connectedness among newcomers. School providers will participate in a 2-day in-person STRONG training led by a national expert and will have access to up to 4 hours of consultation with a STRONG national expert during their first time implementing STRONG. Providers will implement STRONG in two cycles, and data will be collected for each STRONG implementation cycle. Providers and school leaders will be asked to complete pre- \& post- surveys and an interview. Providers will also be asked to audio record the STRONG sessions so the research team can measure their fidelity to the STRONG model. To assess clinical outcomes, youth and their caregivers will be completing measures of mental health symptoms, coping and resilience, and social connectedness, at pre- \& post-STRONG.
School staff will participate in the LC over the span of 12 months (anticipated February 2026-February 2027). LC activities include in-person Peer Learning Workshops (formally "Learning Sessions;" anticipated in February 2026, September 2026, \& February 2027), and Team Support Calls (formally"Collaboration Calls;" frequency contingent on school leader and provider recommendations). The Peer Learning Workshops will focus on shared learning, collaboration, and implementation problem-solving related to STRONG delivery. Ongoing LC supports will include structured team support calls, PDSA cycles, and written feedback forms during STRONG implementation cycles. These activities are designed to support continuous quality improvement, address barriers to implementation, and strengthen teamwork and leadership engagement. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to evaluate implementation processes and outcomes and to inform future scaling of STRONG in school settings serving newcomer youth. At least one provider from each STRONG facilitation team will be asked to complete weekly feedback forms during each STRONG cycle (i.e., 10 feedback forms per STRONG implementation cycle). To prevent additional burden on school staff to provide evaluation data, the Peer Learning Workshops and Team Support Calls will be recorded in order to track implementation challenges, proposed solutions and the outcomes of attempting the proposed solutions. Providers will receive compensation for submitting the STRONG audio recording and the weekly feedback forms
For the Primary Aim, this study will use a simultaneous mixed method QUAL+quant design using post-surveys and interviews to assess provider and leader perspectives on acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of LC activities. Learning sessions will be audio recorded, and meeting minutes will be reviewed. Providers will complete various scales to assess leadership support of the LC, school commitment to the LC, and their level of agreement with recommending the LC to others. When the LC concludes, providers and leaders' semi-structured individual interviews will ask about barriers and facilitators to participating in LC activities and delivering STRONG. For qualitative analyses, we will apply Rapid Qualitative Analysis (RQA) to characterize feasibility including barriers and facilitators to LC engagement and implementation. RQA was created for implementation research to quickly leverage findings to tailor implementation strategies and inform practice.
For the secondary aim, we will use pre-post surveys with school leaders, school providers, parents and newcomers to evaluate the effectiveness of LC and STRONG. Feasibility is operationalized as attendance in LC learning sessions, number of PDSA cycles, completion of monthly PDSA reports, progress on PDSA goals, and barriers/facilitators to participating in the LC. Providers will complete monthly reports via Qualtrics to collect STRONG implementation metrics (e.g., student attendance), and PDSA data. We hypothesize that higher engagement in LC activities will be positively related to stronger fidelity and greater improvement in clinical outcomes. Fidelity will be measured with an observational coding system developed by the research team to measure STRONG adherence and competence. We will also have self-adherence checklists completed by a STRONG facilitator at each session. To assess clinical outcomes, Youth and caregivers will complete standardized clinical symptom measures for both internalizing and externalizing disorders at pre- and post- surveys.
Purposeful sampling strategies will be used to recruit school staff and caregivers from an established network of school district partners, including school district leaders and providers. Our network of school district partners will help identify potential school staff participants - specifically, leaders, and providers to participate in the interviews. School district partners will not be engaged in research activities. Specifically, they will not obtain informed consent, discuss the research study, or collect any data related to the study. Their sole role will be to identify potential school staff and parent/caregivers and obtain their permission to provide the research team with their contact information. Any questions from potential participants will be redirected to the research team. Research team members will follow up directly with the potential participants to explain the study, review informed consent, and screen for eligibility. For parents/caregivers of newcomer students, school staff will be asked to identify parents of newcomers (aged 10-17) and gain their permission for the research team to contact them regarding the research study. When parents/caregivers provide permission to be contacted by research personnel, school staff will message caregiver contact information to the research team. For newcomer students, the research team will complete an informed assent process with students who are eligible and invited to participate in the STRONG intervention.
- Conditions
- Acculturative Stress, Mental Health
- Being tested
- STRONG, Learning Collaborative
- Keywords
- implementation strategies, youth mental health, schools
- Medical subject headings
- Psychological Well-Being
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
STRONGBehavioural
Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG) is a school-based group intervention for anxiety, depression, and externalizing symptoms in newcomer youth. STRONG is an evidence-based treatment and has been translated in 6 languages. Newcomer youth will be receiving the STRONG intervention, which will be administered by school mental health providers. STRONG is a 10-week intervention, with one individual session with each newcomer student, a caregiver/parent session, and a teacher session if available. STRONG is strengths based, teaches newcomers coping skills, draws from cognitive behavioral therapy and because it is a group intervention, it helps facilitate social connectedness among newcomers.
Learning CollaborativeBehavioural
A 12-month Learning Collaborative (LC) will be assigned to schools leaders/staff to help support the implementation of the STRONG intervention in schools. A LC helps systems implement effective interventions to improve the quality of care offered. Teams implementing STRONG and school leaders will meet often to learn about topics relevant to STRONG/newcomers and collaboratively solve challenges that arise when implementing STRONG. The LC consists of in person Peer Learning Workshop where participants will hear a presentation on a topic relevant to STRONG/newcomers and discuss their progress in implementing STRONG. The LC will also include Team Support Calls with all teams delivering STRONG on a regular basis. School leaders and school mental health providers will be participating in the LC.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Collaborative + STRONG | Experimental | A 12-month Learning Collaborative (LC) will be assigned to schools leaders/staff to help support the implementation of the STRONG intervention in schools. A LC helps systems implement effective interventions to improve the quality of care offered. Teams implementing STRONG and school leaders will meet often to learn about topics relevant to STRONG/newcomers and collaboratively solve challenges that arise when implementing STRONG. The LC consists of in person Peer Learning Workshop where participants will hear a presentation on a topic relevant to STRONG/newcomers and discuss their progress in implementing STRONG. The LC will also include Team Support Calls with all teams delivering STRONG on a regular basis. School leaders and school mental health providers will be participating in the LC, and school mental health providers will be administering the STRONG intervention to newcomer youth. Receives: Behavioral: STRONG; Behavioral: Learning Collaborative |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of LC - School Staff Ratings
To access feasibility of the LC, school mental health providers and school leaders will complete the Feasibility subscale from the Acceptability, Feasibility \& Appropriateness measure. The response scale is 1 = not at all, 3 = moderately, 5 = extremely.
Measured: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
Feasibility of LC - Attendance
Attendance records for LC learning sessions and consultation calls will be collected by the research team
Measured: During each Learning Collaborative learning session and consultation call (monthly during 12 month duration of Learning Collaborative)
Feasibility of LC - Completion of PDSA cycles
Using meeting minutes from LC consultation calls and session surveys completed by facilitators, the research team will track the use of plan-do-study-act cycles by each school team and their progress to testing improvement ideas.
Measured: During each Learning Collaborative learning session and consultation call (monthly during 12 month duration of Learning Collaborative)
Feasibility of LC - Barriers & Facilitators
Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, providers and leaders' semi-structured individual interviews will ask about barriers and facilitators to participating in LC activities and delivering STRONG
Measured: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
Acceptability of LC - Staff Ratings
To access acceptability of the LC, the STRONG facilitators and school leaders will complete the Acceptability (6-items) and Appropriateness (5-items) subscales from the Acceptability, Feasibility \& Appropriateness measure . The response scale is 1 = not at all, 3 = moderately, 5 = extremely.
Measured: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
Acceptability of LC - Staff Recommendation
School staff will rate their level of agreement with recommending the LC to others
Measured: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
STRONG Fidelity
An observational coding system will be developed to measure STRONG fidelity and competence for each session, which will be audio recorded by facilitators.
Measured: Each STRONG session (weekly for 10 weeks)
STRONG Adherence
The facilitator will be asked to complete self-adherence checklists for each session to assess their delivery of STRONG.
Measured: Each STRONG session (weekly for 10 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Youth Mental Health - SDQ
The Strengths \& Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) will be completed by youth and their caregivers to assess youth mental health symptoms. The SDQ has four subscales: motional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention problems, and peer problems and a 3-point Likert scale (0 = "Not at All" to 2 = "Certainly True"). Total sum scores (range=0-40) or externalizing (range 0=20; conduct and hyperactivity/inattention problems) or internalizing scores (range 0-20; Emotional problems and peer problems) can be calculated to assess clinical levels of symptoms.
Measured: Baseline, Mid-treament (5 weeks), and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Youth Mental Health - YSR
The Youth Self Report (YSR) is a reliable and well-validated measure that contains a list of 118 behavior-problem items that the youth rates on a 3-point scale (not true = 0; sometime trues=1; very true=2). The YSR provides scores for internalizing and externalizing categories as well as DSM-oriented scales for anxious/depressed, depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behavior \& aggressive behavior.
Measured: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Youth Mental Health - CBCL
The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Parent Report Form is a reliable and well-validated measure contains a list of 118 behavior-problem items that the parent rates on a 3-point scale (not true = 0; sometime trues=1; very true=2). The CBCL provides scores for internalizing and externalizing categories as well as DSM-oriented scales for anxious/depressed, depressed, somatic complaints, social problems, thought problems, attention problems, rule-breaking behaviour \& aggressive behaviour.
Measured: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale
The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale measures youth adaptability and resilience using 25 items. Participants respond on a 5-point Likert scale (0= "Not True at All" to 4 = "True Nearly All of Time"). Total scores are calculated (range = 0 to 100), and higher scores indicate more resilience. This will only be collected from youth.
Measured: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
School Connectedness Scale
The School Connectedness Scale measures school bond as reported by youth using 5 items. Items are measured on a 5-point Likert agreement scale (1="Strong Disagree" to 5="Strongly Agree"). Mean scores are calculated and higher scores indicating higher school bond.
Measured: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Responses to Stress Questionnaire
The Responses to Stress Questionnaire is a 57-item measure of coping factors. The response scale is a 4-point Likert scale (1= "Not at all" to 4 = "A lot"). Mean scores are calculated with higher mean scores indicating higher coping in each coping factor. This will be collected for youth caregivers only
Measured: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acculturative StressStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- All student participants will be assigned to participate in STRONG. All provider and leader participants will participate in the LC.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Oregon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Blanche Wright, University of Oregon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07471633
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00002199
- Acronym
- SABER
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Piloting a Learning Collaborative for School-Based Bilingual Providers Delivering Evidence-Based Interventions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07471633
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SABER / STUDY00002199
- Conditions
- Acculturative Stress, Mental Health
- Keywords
- implementation strategies, youth mental health, schools
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of OregonUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot feasibility trial is designed to evaluate an adapted Learning Collaborative (LC) as an implementation strategy to support delivery of the Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG) intervention in school settings serving newcomer youth. The LC will support bilingual school-based mental health providers delivering STRONG, a group-based, school-delivered behavioral intervention targeting stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and externalizing behaviors among newcomer middle school students. STRONG will be facilitated by bilingual providers with participating students and their caregivers completing pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing youth emotional and behavioral well-being. The primary aim is to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of the LC for supporting school-based implementation of STRONG, with feasibility measured by participation in LC activities and completion of implementation supports, and acceptability and appropriateness assessed through provider and leader feedback. Secondary aims include examining whether provider and school leader engagement in LC activities is associated with STRONG implementation fidelity and youth outcomes, and exploring potential mechanisms linking LC engagement to fidelity, including provider self-efficacy, leadership support, and team psychological safety. School-based providers and school leaders (e.g., principals and superintendents) will participate in LC activities focused on shared learning, collaboration, and implementation problem-solving, along with ongoing supports such as structured team support calls, Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, and feedback forms during STRONG implementation cycles.
Detailed description
Bilingual providers play a critical role in increasing access to mental health care, yet there is a dearth of literature on bilingual provider training needs when delivering evidence-based interventions, especially to youth, and even less research on school-based interventions delivered in Spanish. One group with high mental health needs that relies on bilingual providers is newcomer youth, who have migrated to the U.S. within the past 5 years. Despite this high need, very few interventions have been developed for newcomers. One exception is Supporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG), a group-based, school-delivered behavioral intervention targeting stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms, and externalizing behaviors among newcomer youth. To date, however, interventions like STRONG remain underutilized in schools due to barriers like low leader support and poor provider fit. To maximize the public health impact of interventions delivered to Spanish-speaking youth, strategies that enhance bilingual provider training are needed.
Learning Collaboratives (LC) are a promising implementation strategy that can strengthen intervention fit with schools and foster collective learning for bilingual providers. LCs involve recurring sessions with faculty experts, organization leaders, and providers who engage in Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to overcome implementation challenges, and extant studies show LCs can positively influence provider fidelity and intervention sustainment. The LC in this study will aim to enhance the implementation of STRONG in schools for newcomer youth facilitated by bilingual providers. This study will be guided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation and Sustainment (EPIS) and Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) frameworks and builds upon a completed Exploration phase with school district partners, where STRONG was chosen as the intervention to be adopted.
This study will recruit approximately 72 newcomer youth (ages 10-18) and their caregivers, 18 school mental health providers, and 9 school leaders, across four school districts and one county-level program. All youth will be receiving the STRONG intervention in their respective schools, delivered by school mental health providers and school staff familiar with the newcomer student experience, and all school provider/school leaders will take part in the LC.
STRONG is a 10-week intervention, consisting of 10 small group sessions, one individual session, and teacher and parent education sessions. STRONG is strengths based, teaches newcomers coping skills, draws from cognitive behavioral therapy, and helps foster positive identity and facilitate social connectedness among newcomers. School providers will participate in a 2-day in-person STRONG training led by a national expert and will have access to up to 4 hours of consultation with a STRONG national expert during their first time implementing STRONG. Providers will implement STRONG in two cycles, and data will be collected for each STRONG implementation cycle. Providers and school leaders will be asked to complete pre- \& post- surveys and an interview. Providers will also be asked to audio record the STRONG sessions so the research team can measure their fidelity to the STRONG model. To assess clinical outcomes, youth and their caregivers will be completing measures of mental health symptoms, coping and resilience, and social connectedness, at pre- \& post-STRONG.
School staff will participate in the LC over the span of 12 months (anticipated February 2026-February 2027). LC activities include in-person Peer Learning Workshops (formally "Learning Sessions;" anticipated in February 2026, September 2026, \& February 2027), and Team Support Calls (formally"Collaboration Calls;" frequency contingent on school leader and provider recommendations). The Peer Learning Workshops will focus on shared learning, collaboration, and implementation problem-solving related to STRONG delivery. Ongoing LC supports will include structured team support calls, PDSA cycles, and written feedback forms during STRONG implementation cycles. These activities are designed to support continuous quality improvement, address barriers to implementation, and strengthen teamwork and leadership engagement. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated to evaluate implementation processes and outcomes and to inform future scaling of STRONG in school settings serving newcomer youth. At least one provider from each STRONG facilitation team will be asked to complete weekly feedback forms during each STRONG cycle (i.e., 10 feedback forms per STRONG implementation cycle). To prevent additional burden on school staff to provide evaluation data, the Peer Learning Workshops and Team Support Calls will be recorded in order to track implementation challenges, proposed solutions and the outcomes of attempting the proposed solutions. Providers will receive compensation for submitting the STRONG audio recording and the weekly feedback forms
For the Primary Aim, this study will use a simultaneous mixed method QUAL+quant design using post-surveys and interviews to assess provider and leader perspectives on acceptability, feasibility and appropriateness of LC activities. Learning sessions will be audio recorded, and meeting minutes will be reviewed. Providers will complete various scales to assess leadership support of the LC, school commitment to the LC, and their level of agreement with recommending the LC to others. When the LC concludes, providers and leaders' semi-structured individual interviews will ask about barriers and facilitators to participating in LC activities and delivering STRONG. For qualitative analyses, we will apply Rapid Qualitative Analysis (RQA) to characterize feasibility including barriers and facilitators to LC engagement and implementation. RQA was created for implementation research to quickly leverage findings to tailor implementation strategies and inform practice.
For the secondary aim, we will use pre-post surveys with school leaders, school providers, parents and newcomers to evaluate the effectiveness of LC and STRONG. Feasibility is operationalized as attendance in LC learning sessions, number of PDSA cycles, completion of monthly PDSA reports, progress on PDSA goals, and barriers/facilitators to participating in the LC. Providers will complete monthly reports via Qualtrics to collect STRONG implementation metrics (e.g., student attendance), and PDSA data. We hypothesize that higher engagement in LC activities will be positively related to stronger fidelity and greater improvement in clinical outcomes. Fidelity will be measured with an observational coding system developed by the research team to measure STRONG adherence and competence. We will also have self-adherence checklists completed by a STRONG facilitator at each session. To assess clinical outcomes, Youth and caregivers will complete standardized clinical symptom measures for both internalizing and externalizing disorders at pre- and post- surveys.
Purposeful sampling strategies will be used to recruit school staff and caregivers from an established network of school district partners, including school district leaders and providers. Our network of school district partners will help identify potential school staff participants - specifically, leaders, and providers to participate in the interviews. School district partners will not be engaged in research activities. Specifically, they will not obtain informed consent, discuss the research study, or collect any data related to the study. Their sole role will be to identify potential school staff and parent/caregivers and obtain their permission to provide the research team with their contact information. Any questions from potential participants will be redirected to the research team. Research team members will follow up directly with the potential participants to explain the study, review informed consent, and screen for eligibility. For parents/caregivers of newcomer students, school staff will be asked to identify parents of newcomers (aged 10-17) and gain their permission for the research team to contact them regarding the research study. When parents/caregivers provide permission to be contacted by research personnel, school staff will message caregiver contact information to the research team. For newcomer students, the research team will complete an informed assent process with students who are eligible and invited to participate in the STRONG intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- All student participants will be assigned to participate in STRONG. All provider and leader participants will participate in the LC.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Learning Collaborative + STRONG | Experimental | Behavioral: STRONG, Behavioral: Learning CollaborativeA 12-month Learning Collaborative (LC) will be assigned to schools leaders/staff to help support the implementation of the STRONG intervention in schools. A LC helps systems implement effective interventions to improve the quality of care offered. Teams implementing STRONG and school leaders will meet often to learn about topics relevant to STRONG/newcomers and collaboratively solve challenges that arise when implementing STRONG. The LC consists of in person Peer Learning Workshop where participants will hear a presentation on a topic relevant to STRONG/newcomers and discuss their progress in implementing STRONG. The LC will also include Team Support Calls with all teams delivering STRONG on a regular basis. School leaders and school mental health providers will be participating in the LC, and school mental health providers will be administering the STRONG intervention to newcomer youth. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- (a) over 18 years old;
- (b) district-level or school-level staff who manage and oversee operations and may have some decision-making power; district examples are superintendents and directors, and school examples are principals, vice principals, and directors.
- (a) over 18 years old;
- (b) mental health clinicians or school staff who regularly interact with newcomer students;
- (c) bilingual in Spanish/English. It is important to note that at least one mental health clinician must facilitate STRONG but the co-facilitator can either be another clinician or a school staff who regularly interacts with newcomer students; example of such a school staff include English Language Development Teachers, interpreters, and equity coordinators
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- For Students: Born in mainland United States
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| STRONGSupporting Transition Resilience of Newcomer Groups (STRONG) is a school-based group intervention for anxiety, depression, and externalizing symptoms in newcomer youth. STRONG is an evidence-based treatment and has been translated in 6 languages. Newcomer youth will be receiving the STRONG intervention, which will be administered by school mental health providers. STRONG is a 10-week intervention, with one individual session with each newcomer student, a caregiver/parent session, and a teacher session if available. STRONG is strengths based, teaches newcomers coping skills, draws from cognitive behavioral therapy and because it is a group intervention, it helps facilitate social connectedness among newcomers. | Behavioural | Learning Collaborative + STRONG |
| Learning CollaborativeA 12-month Learning Collaborative (LC) will be assigned to schools leaders/staff to help support the implementation of the STRONG intervention in schools. A LC helps systems implement effective interventions to improve the quality of care offered. Teams implementing STRONG and school leaders will meet often to learn about topics relevant to STRONG/newcomers and collaboratively solve challenges that arise when implementing STRONG. The LC consists of in person Peer Learning Workshop where participants will hear a presentation on a topic relevant to STRONG/newcomers and discuss their progress in implementing STRONG. The LC will also include Team Support Calls with all teams delivering STRONG on a regular basis. School leaders and school mental health providers will be participating in the LC. | Behavioural | Learning Collaborative + STRONG |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of LC - School Staff Ratings
Time frame: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
To access feasibility of the LC, school mental health providers and school leaders will complete the Feasibility subscale from the Acceptability, Feasibility \& Appropriateness measure. The response scale is 1 = not at all, 3 = moderately, 5 = extremely.
Feasibility of LC - Attendance
Time frame: During each Learning Collaborative learning session and consultation call (monthly during 12 month duration of Learning Collaborative)
Attendance records for LC learning sessions and consultation calls will be collected by the research team
Feasibility of LC - Completion of PDSA cycles
Time frame: During each Learning Collaborative learning session and consultation call (monthly during 12 month duration of Learning Collaborative)
Using meeting minutes from LC consultation calls and session surveys completed by facilitators, the research team will track the use of plan-do-study-act cycles by each school team and their progress to testing improvement ideas.
Feasibility of LC - Barriers & Facilitators
Time frame: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, providers and leaders' semi-structured individual interviews will ask about barriers and facilitators to participating in LC activities and delivering STRONG
Acceptability of LC - Staff Ratings
Time frame: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
To access acceptability of the LC, the STRONG facilitators and school leaders will complete the Acceptability (6-items) and Appropriateness (5-items) subscales from the Acceptability, Feasibility \& Appropriateness measure . The response scale is 1 = not at all, 3 = moderately, 5 = extremely.
Acceptability of LC - Staff Recommendation
Time frame: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)
School staff will rate their level of agreement with recommending the LC to others
STRONG Fidelity
Time frame: Each STRONG session (weekly for 10 weeks)
An observational coding system will be developed to measure STRONG fidelity and competence for each session, which will be audio recorded by facilitators.
STRONG Adherence
Time frame: Each STRONG session (weekly for 10 weeks)
The facilitator will be asked to complete self-adherence checklists for each session to assess their delivery of STRONG.
6 secondary outcomes
Youth Mental Health - SDQ
Time frame: Baseline, Mid-treament (5 weeks), and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Youth Mental Health - YSR
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Youth Mental Health - CBCL
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Connor Davidson Resilience Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
School Connectedness Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Responses to Stress Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Post-Treatment (after 10 weeks)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing STRONG and Learning Collaborative in people with Acculturative Stress and Mental Health, run by University of Oregon at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Blanche Wright, PhD (541-346-4911, bwright1@uoregon.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of LC - School Staff Ratings (time frame: Post Learning Collaborative (12 months from initial implementation)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Apr 2026.