SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VariantsNCT07473986
REAl LIfe" Observational Study on the Effectiveness of Evusheld Prophylaxis Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants in Vaccine Non-responder Immunocompromised Patients
An observational study of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
A weak immune response to two doses of vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been observed in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs)1,2,3. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants
- What is being tested?
- Evusheld
- How many people
- 88 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 8 Jul 2022to 31 Dec 2024
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: immunocompromised subjects with no serological response after third dose of mRNA vaccine
Who may be able to join
- Adults >= 18 years-old and over, all sexes,
- Negative SARS-COV2 serology tests befire enrollment,
- Severe impairmentof the immune system induced by documented pathology, weight >= 40 kg at initial screening,
- Written informed consent and any required authorization obtained from the partecipant prior to performing any protocol related procedures.
Who cannot join
- Any condition that might compromise safety or interfere with study results,
- Pregnant or nursing female.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Italy1 site
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
Pavia, Pavia, 27100
About this study
Official title: REAl LIfe" Observational Study on the Effectiveness of Evusheld Prophylaxis Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants in Vaccine Non-responder Immunocompromised Patients (REALISE)
A weak immune response to two doses of vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been observed in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs)1,2,3. Studies focused on third dose in SOTRs revealed that the percentage of responders increased even if a large portion of patients remained at risk for COVID-194. More in detail, the humoral response to three doses of vaccine at 1 month after the third dose in SOTRs ranged from ≈50 to ≈70% of patients5,6,7. Therefore at least a third of the patients who have an impaired immune response remain unprotected despite the administration of three doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine8,9. Similar data emerged from studies conducted on other categories of immunosuppressed patients: less than 40% of onco-haematological patients develop antibodies after administration of two doses of vaccine and only a quarter of non-responders retrieve a humoral response after the third dose10,11. Likewise, rheumatological diseases induce a known frequent immune dysregulation that compromises an adequate response to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine12. Additionally, the emergence of the new Omicron variant has posed new issues in terms of vaccine immunogenicity. It has been observed that three doses of vaccine lead to a lower neutralization response against Omicron variant than respect to the other variants (Delta, Wild type), especially in transplanted patients13. The use of monoclonal antibodies in prophylaxis may represent a valuable choice for non-responder subjects after complete vaccination in order to prevent severe COVID-19. In this regard, recent data showed that the long-acting monoclonal antibodies (LAABs) were able to block the binding of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to host cells and protect against infection in cell and animal models of disease14. Evusheld (AZD7442) is a combination of two LAABs- Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab- derived from B-cells donated by convalescent patients after SARS-CoV-2 virus. These human monoclonal antibodies were optimized with half-life extension and reduced Fc receptor and complement C1q binding. The half-life extension more than triples the durability of its action compared to conventional antibodies and could afford up to 12 months of protection from COVID-19 following a single administration15,16. The reduced Fc receptor binding aims to minimize the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement of disease - a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies promote, rather than inhibit, infection or disease. Data on the safety and efficacy of Evusheld administered in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis of Covid-19 can be obtained from the Provent trial that represents the largest study to date conducted in the world setting. PROVENT is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a single 300mg dose of AZD7442 compared to placebo for the prevention of COVID-19. The trial was conducted in 87 sites in the US, UK, Spain, France and Belgium. 5.197 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular (IM) dose of either 300mg of AZD7442 (n = 3460) or saline placebo (n = 1,737), administered in two separate, sequential IM injections. More than 75% had baseline co-morbidities and other characteristics that are associated with an increased risk for severe COVID-19 should they become infected, including those with immunosuppressive disease or taking immunosuppressive medications. In the Phase III PROVENT trial, Evusheld seems to reduce the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 by 77%, (95% confidence interval (CI): 46, 90) compared to placebo with high neutralizing antibody titers for at least six months, although further studies will be needed (AstraZeneca news release. New analyses of two AZD7442 COVID-19 trials in high-risk populations confirm robust efficacy and long-term prevention17. There were no cases of severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related deaths in those treated with AZD7442. In the placebo arm, there were three cases of severe COVID-19, which included two deaths. The monoclonal antibodies were well-tolerated and preliminary analyses show adverse events were balanced between the placebo and AZD7442 groups18. Other ongoing trials include Storm Chaser and Tackle COVID-19; although they are focused on the post-exposure prevention of severe COVID-19 in subjects already exposed to the viral agent, they confirm the safety and tolerability profile of Evusheld in accordance with what emerged from the Provent trial. In Italy, following the publication of AIFA determination N. 42 of 19.02.2022, starting from 20.02.2022 it is possible to use the combination of Evusheld monoclonal antibodies (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) in specific and defined categories of patients who have severe immune system impairment including solid organ transplant recipients. In light of the encouraging data currently available, Evusheld could
- Conditions
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants
- Being tested
- Evusheld, Control
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EvusheldDrug
Treatment with Evusheld
ControlOther
No treatment with Evusheld
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| non-responder immunocompromised patients vaccinated with three doses of mRNA vaccines | Not described Receives: Drug: Evusheld | |
| non-responder immunocompromised patients recipients of solid organ transplantation | Not described Receives: Other: Control |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
percentage of patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection
Measured: up to 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Mar 2026
- Study start8 Jul 2022
- Primary completion31 Dec 2024
- Study completion31 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VariantsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alba Muzzi, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07473986
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- REALISE
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 16 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- REAl LIfe" Observational Study on the Effectiveness of Evusheld Prophylaxis Against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants in Vaccine Non-responder Immunocompromised Patients (REALISE)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07473986
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REALISE
- Conditions
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 88 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di PaviaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Jul 2022 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A weak immune response to two doses of vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has been observed in immunocompromised patients, including solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs)1,2,3. Studies focused on third dose in SOTRs revealed that the percentage of responders increased even if a large portion of patients remained at risk for COVID-194. More in detail, the humoral response to three doses of vaccine at 1 month after the third dose in SOTRs ranged from ≈50 to ≈70% of patients5,6,7. Therefore at least a third of the patients who have an impaired immune response remain unprotected despite the administration of three doses of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine8,9. Similar data emerged from studies conducted on other categories of immunosuppressed patients: less than 40% of onco-haematological patients develop antibodies after administration of two doses of vaccine and only a quarter of non-responders retrieve a humoral response after the third dose10,11. Likewise, rheumatological diseases induce a known frequent immune dysregulation that compromises an adequate response to the anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine12. Additionally, the emergence of the new Omicron variant has posed new issues in terms of vaccine immunogenicity. It has been observed that three doses of vaccine lead to a lower neutralization response against Omicron variant than respect to the other variants (Delta, Wild type), especially in transplanted patients13. The use of monoclonal antibodies in prophylaxis may represent a valuable choice for non-responder subjects after complete vaccination in order to prevent severe COVID-19. In this regard, recent data showed that the long-acting monoclonal antibodies (LAABs) were able to block the binding of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to host cells and protect against infection in cell and animal models of disease14. Evusheld (AZD7442) is a combination of two LAABs- Tixagevimab and Cilgavimab- derived from B-cells donated by convalescent patients after SARS-CoV-2 virus. These human monoclonal antibodies were optimized with half-life extension and reduced Fc receptor and complement C1q binding. The half-life extension more than triples the durability of its action compared to conventional antibodies and could afford up to 12 months of protection from COVID-19 following a single administration15,16. The reduced Fc receptor binding aims to minimize the risk of antibody-dependent enhancement of disease - a phenomenon in which virus-specific antibodies promote, rather than inhibit, infection or disease. Data on the safety and efficacy of Evusheld administered in the context of pre-exposure prophylaxis of Covid-19 can be obtained from the Provent trial that represents the largest study to date conducted in the world setting. PROVENT is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial assessing the efficacy and safety of a single 300mg dose of AZD7442 compared to placebo for the prevention of COVID-19. The trial was conducted in 87 sites in the US, UK, Spain, France and Belgium. 5.197 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive a single intramuscular (IM) dose of either 300mg of AZD7442 (n = 3460) or saline placebo (n = 1,737), administered in two separate, sequential IM injections. More than 75% had baseline co-morbidities and other characteristics that are associated with an increased risk for severe COVID-19 should they become infected, including those with immunosuppressive disease or taking immunosuppressive medications. In the Phase III PROVENT trial, Evusheld seems to reduce the risk of developing symptomatic COVID-19 by 77%, (95% confidence interval (CI): 46, 90) compared to placebo with high neutralizing antibody titers for at least six months, although further studies will be needed (AstraZeneca news release. New analyses of two AZD7442 COVID-19 trials in high-risk populations confirm robust efficacy and long-term prevention17. There were no cases of severe COVID-19 or COVID-19-related deaths in those treated with AZD7442. In the placebo arm, there were three cases of severe COVID-19, which included two deaths. The monoclonal antibodies were well-tolerated and preliminary analyses show adverse events were balanced between the placebo and AZD7442 groups18. Other ongoing trials include Storm Chaser and Tackle COVID-19; although they are focused on the post-exposure prevention of severe COVID-19 in subjects already exposed to the viral agent, they confirm the safety and tolerability profile of Evusheld in accordance with what emerged from the Provent trial. In Italy, following the publication of AIFA determination N. 42 of 19.02.2022, starting from 20.02.2022 it is possible to use the combination of Evusheld monoclonal antibodies (Tixagevimab-Cilgavimab) in specific and defined categories of patients who have severe immune system impairment including solid organ transplant recipients. In light of the encouraging data currently available, Evusheld could
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| non-responder immunocompromised patients vaccinated with three doses of mRNA vaccines | – | Drug: Evusheld |
| non-responder immunocompromised patients recipients of solid organ transplantation | – | Other: Control |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- immunocompromised subjects with no serological response after third dose of mRNA vaccine
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults >= 18 years-old and over, all sexes,
- Negative SARS-COV2 serology tests befire enrollment,
- Severe impairmentof the immune system induced by documented pathology, weight >= 40 kg at initial screening,
- Written informed consent and any required authorization obtained from the partecipant prior to performing any protocol related procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any condition that might compromise safety or interfere with study results,
- Pregnant or nursing female.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EvusheldTreatment with Evusheld | Drug | non-responder immunocompromised patients vaccinated with three doses of mRNA vaccines |
| ControlNo treatment with Evusheld | Other | non-responder immunocompromised patients recipients of solid organ transplantation |
Primary outcome
percentage of patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection
Time frame: up to 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Mar 2026.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variants, run by Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
percentage of patients with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (time frame: up to 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Mar 2026.