AzTrials
AzTrials

RuminationNCT07478393

Readiness and Progress in Emotion Regulation Therapy

A study testing Emotion Regulation Therapy via Telehealth in people with Rumination and Worry, run by Teachers College, Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is an open trial designed to examine individual changes that occur before, during, and after 6 modules of Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) delivered via telehealth for individuals in New York State who are experiencing elevated worry, rumination, or self-criticism. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Rumination, Worry, Self-Criticism
What is being tested?
Emotion Regulation Therapy via Telehealth
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
24 Oct 2025to 1 Sep 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Between the ages of 18 and 65
  • Fluent in English (and therefore able to provide consent)
  • Currently living in New York State
  • Access to at least one device with internet and video-conferencing capabilities
  • High self-reported worry, rumination, and/or self-criticism
  • Meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria for at least one, current psychological disorder

Who cannot join

  • Active suicidal ideation or intent
  • Substance dependence disorder, schizophrenia, bipolar-I disorder, or a primary DSM-5 diagnosis of borderline or narcissistic personality disorder
  • Currently in therapy or receiving any type of psychosocial treatment
  • Individuals taking psychotropic mediation that has not been stabilized for a period of at least 3 months
  • Current students at Teachers College, Columbia University

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Teachers College, Columbia University

    New York, New York, 10027

    Douglas S Mennin, PhD, 212-678-6609, mennin@tc.columbia.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study is an open trial designed to examine individual changes that occur before, during, and after 6 modules of Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT) delivered via telehealth for individuals in New York State who are experiencing elevated worry, rumination, or self-criticism.

Read the detailed description

The main questions this study aims to answer are to:

  1. Examine temporal patterns of ERT-specific treatment mechanisms (attention regulation, metacognitive regulation, motivation regulation, and valued living), relationships between these mechanisms and negative self-referential processing (NSRP; i.e., rumination, worry, and self-criticism) severity over time, and changes in these mechanisms in response to specific intervention strategies/modules.
  2. Investigate the effect of concordance and/or discordance between therapists and clients regarding skill acquisition, treatment goals, and case conceptualizations on treatment mechanisms as well as measures of treatment outcome and satisfaction.
  3. Demonstrate the preliminary efficacy of a 6-module, time-variable version of ERT in reducing symptoms of psychological distress (e.g., anxiety, depression, worry, rumination, self-criticism), changing ERT-specific treatment mechanisms (e.g., attention regulation), and improving quality of life and overall functioning.

Participants will:

  1. Fill out an online pre-screening questionnaire and complete a structured clinical interview via Zoom Healthcare
  2. Be enrolled as a patient at the Dean Hope Center for Educational and Psychological Services (DHCEPS), located at Teachers College
  3. Attend between 12-22 once-weekly telehealth ERT sessions
  4. Complete between 18-28 weekly questionnaires online via Qualtrics (two before starting treatment, 12-22 during each week of treatment, and 4 after ending treatment).
Being tested
Emotion Regulation Therapy via Telehealth
Keywords
Worry, Rumination, Self-Criticism, Emotion Regulation Therapy, Emotion Regulation, Treatment Mechanisms
Medical subject headings
Rumination Syndrome, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Emotional Regulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Emotion Regulation Therapy via TelehealthBehavioural

    Also called Emotion Regulation Therapy (ERT)

    The initial stage of treatment focuses on psychoeducation about anxiety/depression, the impact that these cognitions/behaviors/emotions have on recent situations, and self-monitoring of worry/anxiety/depression. The sessions focus on the development of skills that help understand and regulate one's emotional experience (i.e., recognizing emotions when they are happening, identifying the meaning of a given emotion experience, soothing oneself in the context of negative emotional experiences). Following the development of these skills, sessions focus on the application of somatic awareness and emotion regulation skills while imagining emotionally evocative themes. The remaining session focuses on terminating therapy, relapse prevention, and future goals. An Internet-based online platform will be used to promote engagement with and increase accessibility to between-session skills practice and treatment-related activities (e.g., self-monitoring, session summaries, worksheets).

Study groups in NCT07478393
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Emotion Regulation TherapyExperimentalAll participants will receive a 6-module, time-variable version of Emotion Regulation Therapy delivered weekly via synchronous telehealth using videoconferencing software and an asynchronous Internet-based online platform to supplement the content covered in each session.
Receives: Behavioral: Emotion Regulation Therapy via Telehealth

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Weekly Assessment of Change in Attentional Control

    The Attentional Control Scale (ACS) is a 20-item measure used to measure difficulties with concentration associated with problems regulating emotions. Items are rated on a 4-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 4 (always), and raw scores range from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate better attentional control.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

  2. Weekly Assessment of Change in Decentering

    The decentering subscale of the Experiences Questionnaire (EQ-D) is an 11-item subscale assessing one's ability to distance themselves from their emotional experience. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (all the time), and total scores range from 11 to 55. Higher scores indicate better ability to distancing oneself from one's emotional experience.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

  3. Weekly Assessment of Change in Reappraisal

    The reappraisal subscale of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ-R) is a 6-item measure of the habitual use of cognitive reappraisal to regulate emotions. Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), and total scores range from 6 to 42. Higher scores indicate a better ability to regulate emotions using the strategy of reappraisal.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

  4. Weekly Assessment of Change in Valued Living/Action

    The Valuing Questionnaire (VQ) is a 10-item measure of the degree to which respondents have lived according to their personal values over the past week. Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (not at all true) to 6 (completely true). The VQ yields two 5-item subscales: Progress, which assesses enactment of values and perseverance toward them, and Obstruction, which assesses disruption of valued living by avoidance of unwanted experiences and distraction from values. Each subscale ranges from 0 to 30. Higher Progress scores indicate more valued living, and higher Obstruction scores indicate greater interference with valued living.

    Measured: Baseline, 1st Treatment Session (2 Weeks Post-Baseline), Follow-Up (4 Weeks Post-Treatment)

  5. Weekly Assessment of Change in Clarity of Approach-Avoidance Motivation

    The Mental Representation of Approach Avoidance Questionnaire (MRAAQ) is a 42-item self-report assessment designed to capture the mental representation of approach-avoidance motivation. Respondents rate how true each statement is for them when they are in an emotional moment, on a 5-point scale from 0 (not at all true for me) to 4 (very true for me). Items are summed into six subscales: Anticipation of Threat (8 items; range 0-32), Consummating Safety (7 items; range 0-28), Anticipation of Reward (8 items; range 0-32), Consummating Reward (7 items; range 0-28), Loss (6 items; range 0-24), and Motivational Clarity (6 items; range 0-24). Higher scores on each subscale indicate greater levels of that motivational process. Higher Anticipation of Threat and Loss scores reflect a worse outcome, whereas higher Consummating Safety, Anticipation of Reward, Consummating Reward, and Motivational Clarity scores reflect a better outcome.

    Measured: Baseline, 1st Treatment Session (2 Weeks Post-Baseline), Follow-Up (4 Weeks Post-Treatment)

  6. Weekly Assessment of Change in Rumination

    The Rumination-Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) is a 12-item measure that assesses past-focused rumination with specificity regarding the types of rumination that people may experience. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), and total scores range from 12 to 60. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater rumination.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

  7. Weekly Assessment of Change in Worry

    The Penn State Worry Questionnaire - Past Week (PSWQ-PW) is a 15-item adapted version of the original PSWQ that assesses the extent to which worry has been excessive, uncontrollable, and pervasive in the past week. Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 (never) to 6 (almost always), and total scores range from 0 to 90. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater worry in the past week.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

  8. Weekly Assessment of Change in Self-Criticism

    The self-judgment subscale of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) contains 5-items and assesses the tendency to self-criticize. Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (almost never) to 5 (almost always), and total scores range from 5 to 25. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater self-criticism.

    Measured: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Weekly Assessment of Change in Depression Severity

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank v. 1.0 - Emotional Distress - Depression - Short Form 8a assess for depression severity. The 8 items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always), yielding raw scores from 8 to 40. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater depression severity.

    Measured: Baseline, 1st Treatment Session (2 Weeks Post-Baseline), Follow-Up (4 Weeks Post-Treatment)

  2. Weekly Assessment of Change in Anxiety Severity

    The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Item Bank - Emotional Distress - Anxiety - Short Form 8a assess for anxiety severity. The 8 items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1 (never) to 5 (always), yielding raw scores from 8 to 40. Higher scores on this measure indicate greater anxiety severity.

    Measured: Baseline, 1st Treatment Session (2 Weeks Post-Baseline), Follow-Up (4 Weeks Post-Treatment)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2026
  2. Study start24 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07478393
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-453
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
12 Mar 2026
Last updated
20 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Emotion Regulation Therapy via Telehealth in people with Rumination and Worry, run by Teachers College, Columbia University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Douglas S Mennin (212.678.6609, mennin@tc.columbia.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Weekly Assessment of Change in Attentional Control (time frame: Weekly from Baseline (2 weeks) through Treatment (12-22 weeks) and Follow-Up (4 weeks)). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in