AzTrials
AzTrials

Cataract SurgeryNCT07484659

Reducing Patient Waiting Time for Cataract Surgery

A study testing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in people with Cataract Surgery, run by Seva Canada Society at 1 site in India.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine how coordination between hospital departments affects patient flow between the free ward (B1), paid ward (C1) and the operating theatre (OT) for cataract surgeries at a tertiary eye care hospital. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cataract Surgery
What is being tested?
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
360 participants
Where
1 siteIndia
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to Nov 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 20 years
  • Adult cataract surgical patients.

Who cannot join

  • Age < 20 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

India1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sri Sankaradeva Nethralaya

    Guwahati, Assam, 781028

    Dr Harsha Bhattacharjee, 0361-2233444, ssnghy1@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in India

About this study

Official title: Reducing Patient Waiting Time for Cataract Surgery Through Improved Coordination Between Ward and Operation Theatre

The purpose of this study is to examine how coordination between hospital departments affects patient flow between the free ward (B1), paid ward (C1) and the operating theatre (OT) for cataract surgeries at a tertiary eye care hospital. This will be an Interventional study using both quantitative and qualitative methods conducted at Tejas Eye Hospital.

Patients aged 40-85 years, scheduled for cataract surgery during the study period will be included. Two trained investigators would observe the process and collect the data in structured format from ward admission to transfer into the operating theatre. Every participant would be observed from the ward on the day of his schedule surgery till his surgery is over in operation theatre. Demographic details and personal characteristics of every participant would be recorded in data collection form. In this pathway, timings, events, errors, deviations would be recorded at different spots between ward and operation theatre in first phase of study. Data would be collected from total 364 participants selected using stratified sampling technique.

Read more

The data will be analyzed using MS excel and EpInfo. Summary statistics would be calculated for different variables and listing of various events and errors would be done. Using the above analysis various delays, communication gaps and different deviation would be identified. A dissemination meeting would be organized with all involved in above processes and findings would be shared in detail. Specific intervention would be decided for execution in the second phase of this study.

In second phase, predetermined interventions from analysis of first phase would be implemented and similar data collection would be carried out to see the impact of interventions. Data collection would be done from the phase one sample size and comparison would be carried out for important variables like delays to establish the final outcome of the study. Similarly reduction in frequencies of errors and deviations would also be calculated.

Read the detailed description

Hospitals worldwide face persistent challenges in achieving effective coordination between clinical departments. According to the World Health Organization, nearly 50% of medical errors are associated with poor communication and coordination among healthcare teams. Studies from the United States indicate that up to 70% of healthcare professionals identify communication failures as a major contributor to adverse events, including wrong patient selection, incorrect medication use, miscommunication of clinical status, and inaccurate reporting of patient symptoms. Global surveys further suggest that only about one-third of healthcare professionals perceive interdepartmental coordination in their organizations as effective.

The delivery of hospital care involves complex workflows that require timely coordination between multiple units. Breakdowns in communication and process alignment can lead to delays, inefficiencies, and increased risk of errors, particularly in high-volume surgical settings. Despite its importance, achieving consistent coordination remains a challenge at global, national, and institutional levels.

In India, the healthcare system is undergoing rapid transformation with increased emphasis on quality, patient safety, and standardized care delivery. However, studies have shown that poor coordination among hospital departments remains common. Research published in Indian healthcare journals indicates that approximately 60% of healthcare professionals report communication gaps between departments, resulting in delays, fragmented care, and reduced patient satisfaction. Constraints such as limited resources, infrastructure challenges, and high patient volumes further complicate coordination, especially in tertiary and public healthcare settings.

"Delays in perioperative cataract surgery workflows are often attributed to communication gaps between ward and operating theatre teams, variability in staff and surgeon availability, patient comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, and inadequate patient preparedness, as reported in national guidelines and peer-reviewed studies." (WHO; NPCBVI; AIOS; Indian Journal of Ophthalmology; NABH) Even with advancing technologies and equipment's there is a need to improve communication and streamline the processes for reducing patient waiting time and increasing patient satisfaction especially in high volume surgical institution. It becomes more relevant in case of not for profit hospitals working in rural and tribal area and having ratio of 70:30 of free and paying patient.

Tejas eye hospital is a charitable tertiary eye care hospital having yearly outpatient department (OPD) of more than 125000 and surgical operation of more than 13000. Tejas eye hospital also receives a good number of patients from underprivileged area on regular basis from its outreach program through diagnostic eye camps, vision centers, door to door screening and satellite center. The challenges are increased with visiting surgeons and other specialist. The arrival of the patients in pulsatile form, seasonal effects, relatively unaware clientage is likely to increase the possibility for communication gaps, clinical errors and protocol deviations.

The purpose of this study is to examine how coordination between hospital departments affects patient flow between the ward and the operating theatre (OT) at a tertiary eye care hospital. This will be an Interventional study, conducted in two phases, using both quantitative and qualitative methods conducted at Tejas Eye Hospital. Patients scheduled for cataract surgery during the study period will be included.

Phase 1: Two trained investigators would observe the process and collect the data in structured format from ward admission to transfer into the operating theatre. Every participant would be observed from the ward on the day of his schedule surgery till his surgery is over in operation theatre. Demographic details and personal characteristics of every participant would be recorded in data collection form.

Patient name, age, gender, whether through referral, free or paying section. Date, time and month of operation and type of clinical conditions would be recorded for all patients by a trained investigator. Every patient would be observed throughout his/her movement from wards to operation theatre and observations would be made and recorded for duration of time required, communication made, reasons for delay, and preoperative preparations till start of cataract surgery.

In this pathway, timings, events, errors, deviations would be recorded at different spots between ward and operation theatre in first phase of study.

The data will be analyzed using MS excel and EpInfo. Summary statistics would be calculated for different variables and listing of various events and errors would be done. Using the above analysis various delays, communication gaps and different deviation would be identify. The findings would also be collated with patient satisfaction survey in this study. A dissemination meeting would be organized with all involved in above processes and findings would be shared in detail. Specific intervention would be decided for execution in the second phase of this study.

Phase 2: Predetermined interventions from analysis of first phase would be implemented and similar data collection would be carried out to see the impact of interventions. Comparison would be carried out to establish the final outcome of the study. Similarly change in frequencies of errors and deviations would also be calculated.

Aim: To optimize the cataract surgery operational workflow by evaluating coordination between the ward and operating theatre (OT) through measurement of ward-to-OT transit time, communication-related delays, and process deviations among patients undergoing elective cataract surgery at Tejas Eye Hospital.

Primary Objective: To reduce pre-operative waiting time (ward call-up to OT entry) among adult cataract patients by 30% following the implementation of standardized ward-OT coordination protocols at the hospital within 6 months.

Operational Definitions: Cataract Surgery Cycle Time: Time (in minutes) from ward call-up initiation to patient entry into the operating theatre.

Management Delay:

Any delay >10 minutes attributable to:

  • Incomplete documentation
  • Staff unavailability
  • Surgeon changeover
  • Communication gaps between ward and OT
  • Patient readiness issues not related to acute medical emergencies

Communication Error:

Any documented instance of:

  • Incorrect or missing information during handover
  • Unclear responsibility assignment
  • Repeated clarification requests causing delay
Being tested
Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)
Keywords
Waiting time, Operational errors, Eye care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)Other

    Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for ward-OT coordination

Study groups in NCT07484659
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Operational workflow between ward and OTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Waiting time in minutes

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completionSep 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionNov 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
360 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07484659
Sponsor's protocol ID
Tejas/ORCB/1/20260114
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
16 Mar 2026
Last updated
30 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in people with Cataract Surgery, run by Seva Canada Society at 1 site in India.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Waiting time in minutes (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in