Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)NCT07486609
Diagnostic Study Accuracy of Jaw Motion Analyzer(JMA) Versus Research Diagnostic Criteria(RDC/TMD) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) for Temporomandibular Disorders Among Patients With Chronic Orofacial Pain.
A study testing The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test, Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs), run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The goal of this diagnostic accuracy study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of jaw motion analyzer(JMA) in terms of sensitivity and specificity with target cut of points used by valid reference standards which will be the research diagnostic criteria(RDC/TMD) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
- What is being tested?
- The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test, Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2025to 1 Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with Class I skeletal and / or dental
- Adult patients from 18 years of age .
- Chronic orofacial pain from at least the past 30 days .
Who cannot join
- Patients with Class II skeletal ( vertical growth pattern )
- Patients with Class II skeletal ( Horizontal growth pattern )
- Patients with Class III cases
- Patients with Deep Over bite
- Patients with with any skeletal disorders such as cherubism , synovial chondromatosis , tumors
- Patients with Periodontally affected teeth
Show all 10Show fewer
- Patients with pacemakers
- Patients carriers of ferromagnetic metallic implants
- Patients with claustrophobia from MRI
- Patients with severe obesity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Accuracy of Jaw Motion Analyzer Versus Research Diagnostic Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Pilot Study
The goal of this diagnostic accuracy study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of jaw motion analyzer(JMA) in terms of sensitivity and specificity with target cut of points used by valid reference standards which will be the research diagnostic criteria(RDC/TMD) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for Temporomandibular disorders(TMDs).
The main questions the study aim to answer are :
Read more
- Does the actual precision of JMA which will achieve the target cut off diagnostic values in diagnosing TMDs ?
- How much accuracy values to be achieved by JMA compared to RDC/TMD and MRI as reference standards ?
Researchers will determine the precision values of JMA for patients with chronic orofacial pain for targeting TMDs and compare with valid diagnostic reference standards which are the RDC/TMD and MRI.
Participants with chronic orofacial pain will undergo through two diagnostic interventions in two separate visits with one week interval; first visit will be intraoral scan(IOS) for both upper and lower dental arches with bite registration followed with IOS import in JMA (WINJAW+3.0, Zebris GmbH Germany) to measure the trajectory of mandibular movements and condylar path tracking and accordingly both functional and EPA reports will be extracted to obtain both graph tracing records of both mandibular and condylar path trajectories. On the second visit, participants will be examined by the RDC/TMD clinical examination based algorithms to diagnose TMDs and MRI will be used as confirmative approach.
Read the detailed description
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA) in distinguishing temporomandibular disorders among patients with chronic orofacial pain relative to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD ( RDC/TMD) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
- Being tested
- The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test, Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Keywords
- Temporomandibular disorders, Chronic orofacial pain, RDC/TMD, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Jaw Motion Analyzer
- Medical subject headings
- Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index testDevice
Also called Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI)
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) constitute a diagnostic protocol that is widely employed by clinical and research personnel . The RDC/TMD employs a set of standardized clinical and questionnaire items used to administer and score the suspected patients with TMD in to two main groups ; RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis that subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses and RDC/TMD Axis II assessment of TMD - related psychological disability. In addition to Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) especially sagittal and coronal views reveals acceptable accuracy to detect or exclude disk displacements and presence of inflammatory articular surface changes as indicators for degenerative joint diseases.
Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular DisodersDiagnostic test
The Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) constitute a diagnostic protocol that employs a set of standardized clinical and questionnaire items used to administer and score the suspected patients with TMD in to two main groups ; RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis that subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses and RDC/TMD Axis II assessment of TMD - related psychological disability . RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses to include group I ; muscle Disorders which constitutes (Ia) myofascial pain , (Ib) myofascial pain with limited opening , group II Disc Displacements which constitutes (IIa ) disc displacement with reduction , (IIb) disc displacement without reduction with limited opening and (IIc) disk displacement without reduction without limited opening and group III Arthralgia , Arthritis , Arthrosis
Magnetic Resonance ImagingRadiation
MRI especially sagittal and coronal views reveals acceptable accuracy to detect or exclude disk displacements among intra articular derangements , changes in configuration and osseous changes of Temporomandibular joints.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic orofacial pain | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test; Diagnostic Test: Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders; Radiation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Diagnostic accuracy of Jaw motion analyzer versus Research Diagnostic Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Temporomandibular disorders: A pilot study
The diagnostic accuracy methods will be measured are sensitivity, specificity and over all diagnostic accuracy. Since all tests, index and reference standards, will be performed in the same series of patients then paired data will be statistically analyzed as qualitative nominal data so McNemar's and Chi-square tests will be used .For the inter examiner agreement, Cohen's Kappa test will be used for all the categorial variables.
Measured: Patients are scheduled to undergo primarily with the index test JMA( Jaw Motion Analyzer WINJAW+3.0, Zebris GmbH Germany) followed by RDC/TMD and MRI , the reference standards, by one week interval in between the two visits.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Mar 2026
- Study start2 Mar 2025
- Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Farida Elkhouli, Cairo University
- Investigators
- Farida A Elkhouli, Master degree researcher, Principal investigator, Department of prosthodontics. Cairo UniversityAmal M. Mahmoud, Professor of Prosthodontics, Study chair, Department of prosthodontics. Cairo UniversityMohamed K. Khashab, Associate Professor, Study chair, Department of prosthodontics. Cairo UniversityHaitham S Sharshar, clinical researcher, Study chair, Cairo UniversityIman A Radi, Professor of Prosthodontics, Study director, Department of prosthodontics. Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07486609
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- jawmotionanalyzerrdctmdmri2026
- Other IDs
- 1
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 20 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Patients flow chart timeline , number , eligibility, subdivision variables and outcome results. In addition to data sample that emphasizes the healthy , borderline and diseased.
Publications
Calil BC, da Cunha DV, Vieira MF, de Oliveira Andrade A, Furtado DA, Bellomo Junior DP, Pereira AA. Identification of arthropathy and myopathy of the temporomandibular syndrome by biomechanical facial features. Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00764-5.
PubMed 32295597
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Jaw Motion Analyzer Versus Research Diagnostic Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Temporomandibular Disorders: A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07486609
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- jawmotionanalyzerrdctmdmri2026
- Conditions
- Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
- Keywords
- Temporomandibular disorders, Chronic orofacial pain, RDC/TMD, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Jaw Motion Analyzer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this diagnostic accuracy study is to determine the diagnostic accuracy of jaw motion analyzer(JMA) in terms of sensitivity and specificity with target cut of points used by valid reference standards which will be the research diagnostic criteria(RDC/TMD) and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) for Temporomandibular disorders(TMDs).
The main questions the study aim to answer are :
- Does the actual precision of JMA which will achieve the target cut off diagnostic values in diagnosing TMDs ?
- How much accuracy values to be achieved by JMA compared to RDC/TMD and MRI as reference standards ?
Researchers will determine the precision values of JMA for patients with chronic orofacial pain for targeting TMDs and compare with valid diagnostic reference standards which are the RDC/TMD and MRI.
Participants with chronic orofacial pain will undergo through two diagnostic interventions in two separate visits with one week interval; first visit will be intraoral scan(IOS) for both upper and lower dental arches with bite registration followed with IOS import in JMA (WINJAW+3.0, Zebris GmbH Germany) to measure the trajectory of mandibular movements and condylar path tracking and accordingly both functional and EPA reports will be extracted to obtain both graph tracing records of both mandibular and condylar path trajectories. On the second visit, participants will be examined by the RDC/TMD clinical examination based algorithms to diagnose TMDs and MRI will be used as confirmative approach.
Detailed description
Evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA) in distinguishing temporomandibular disorders among patients with chronic orofacial pain relative to the Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD ( RDC/TMD) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Patients with chronic orofacial pain | Experimental | Device: The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test, Diagnostic Test: Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders, Radiation: Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with Class I skeletal and / or dental
- Adult patients from 18 years of age .
- Chronic orofacial pain from at least the past 30 days .
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patients with Class II skeletal ( vertical growth pattern )
- Patients with Class II skeletal ( Horizontal growth pattern )
- Patients with Class III cases
- Patients with Deep Over bite
- Patients with with any skeletal disorders such as cherubism , synovial chondromatosis , tumors
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index testAlso: Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD), Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI)The Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) constitute a diagnostic protocol that is widely employed by clinical and research personnel . The RDC/TMD employs a set of standardized clinical and questionnaire items used to administer and score the suspected patients with TMD in to two main groups ; RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis that subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses and RDC/TMD Axis II assessment of TMD - related psychological disability. In addition to Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) especially sagittal and coronal views reveals acceptable accuracy to detect or exclude disk displacements and presence of inflammatory articular surface changes as indicators for degenerative joint diseases. | Device | Patients with chronic orofacial pain |
| Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular DisodersThe Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) constitute a diagnostic protocol that employs a set of standardized clinical and questionnaire items used to administer and score the suspected patients with TMD in to two main groups ; RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis that subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses and RDC/TMD Axis II assessment of TMD - related psychological disability . RDC/TMD Axis I clinical diagnosis subdivides the TMD in to three diagnostic groups that include 8 sub diagnoses to include group I ; muscle Disorders which constitutes (Ia) myofascial pain , (Ib) myofascial pain with limited opening , group II Disc Displacements which constitutes (IIa ) disc displacement with reduction , (IIb) disc displacement without reduction with limited opening and (IIc) disk displacement without reduction without limited opening and group III Arthralgia , Arthritis , Arthrosis | Diagnostic test | Patients with chronic orofacial pain |
| Magnetic Resonance ImagingMRI especially sagittal and coronal views reveals acceptable accuracy to detect or exclude disk displacements among intra articular derangements , changes in configuration and osseous changes of Temporomandibular joints. | Radiation | Patients with chronic orofacial pain |
Primary outcome
Diagnostic accuracy of Jaw motion analyzer versus Research Diagnostic Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Temporomandibular disorders: A pilot study
Time frame: Patients are scheduled to undergo primarily with the index test JMA( Jaw Motion Analyzer WINJAW+3.0, Zebris GmbH Germany) followed by RDC/TMD and MRI , the reference standards, by one week interval in between the two visits.
The diagnostic accuracy methods will be measured are sensitivity, specificity and over all diagnostic accuracy. Since all tests, index and reference standards, will be performed in the same series of patients then paired data will be statistically analyzed as qualitative nominal data so McNemar's and Chi-square tests will be used .For the inter examiner agreement, Cohen's Kappa test will be used for all the categorial variables.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Mar 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 32295597Calil BC, da Cunha DV, Vieira MF, de Oliveira Andrade A, Furtado DA, Bellomo Junior DP, Pereira AA. Identification of arthropathy and myopathy of the temporomandibular syndrome by biomechanical facial features. Biomed Eng Online. 2020 Apr 15;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12938-020-00764-5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Patients flow chart timeline , number , eligibility, subdivision variables and outcome results. In addition to data sample that emphasizes the healthy , borderline and diseased.
Related trials for Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
Recruiting
Effects of Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Temporomandibular Disorders.
TMD, Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs)
RecruitingObservational study
Spinal Mobility, Rigidity, and Kinesiophobia in PD and TMD
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Rigidity
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Orofascial Myofunctional Therapy and Cervical Stabilization Exercises on Temporomandibular Dysfunction
Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs), Temporo-mandibular Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Conventional,3D Printed and Novel Hybrid Stabilization Splints in the Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs), Myofascial Pain - Dysfunction Syndrome of TMJ
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Italian Version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD)
Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs), Kinesiophobia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Farida A Elkhouli, Master degree researcher principal investigator
Department of prosthodontics. Cairo University
Amal M. Mahmoud, Professor of Prosthodontics study chair
Department of prosthodontics. Cairo University
Mohamed K. Khashab, Associate Professor study chair
Department of prosthodontics. Cairo University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing The Jaw Motion Analyzer (JMA, Zebris, Germany) as the index test, Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disoders and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in people with Temporomandibular Disorders (TMDs), run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Diagnostic accuracy of Jaw motion analyzer versus Research Diagnostic Criteria and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Temporomandibular disorders: A pilot study (time frame: Patients are scheduled to undergo primarily with the index test JMA( Jaw Motion Analyzer WINJAW+3.0, Zebris GmbH Germany) followed by RDC/TMD and MRI , the reference standards, by one week interval in between the two visits.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07486609, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Mar 2026.