CancerSPPCNCT07490106
Benefits of Early Collaboration Between Oncologists and Palliative Care Physicians in Cases of Unplanned Hospitalization for Patients With Metastatic Cancer
A study testing Early integrated palliative care and Usual oncological care in people with Cancer and Sarcoma Metastatic, run by Centre Oscar Lambret at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
This is a multicenter, national, interventional, cluster-randomized study, "stepped wedge" design. This study includes patients with metastatic or locally advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer, currently undergoing systemic palliative treatment and hospitalized on an unscheduled basis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer, Sarcoma Metastatic, Gynaecologic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Early integrated palliative care and Usual oncological care
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 493 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Oct 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects aged 18 years and older;
- Diagnosed with metastatic or locally advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer;
- Currently undergoing systemic palliative treatment (no prospect of cure);
- Hospitalized on an unscheduled basis (i.e., unplanned hospitalization for scheduled oncology treatments);
- Patient covered by the French social security system;
- Informed consent, written and signed.
Who cannot join
- PS (WHO) = 4;
- Patient receiving end-of-life care;
- Patient opposed to the use of medical data for research purposes;
- Person deprived of liberty or under guardianship;
- Inability to undergo medical monitoring for the trial for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
This is a multicenter, national, interventional, cluster-randomized study, "stepped wedge" design. This study includes patients with metastatic or locally advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer, currently undergoing systemic palliative treatment and hospitalized on an unscheduled basis. The study will aim to evaluate the impact of early palliative care implementation for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified during an unplanned hospitalization.
Read the detailed description
This study will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of early palliative care for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified through unscheduled hospitalization in terms of reducing "aggressive" treatment.
Other objectives of the study include :
Compare approaches in terms of overall survival, treatment toxicities, advance directives, quality of life, anxiety, and depression.
- Describing care according to the organization at the time of inclusion.
- Evaluating the economic impact of early palliative care in patients with metastatic or advanced cancer through a medico-economic analysis combining cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
- Evaluating interactions between the various stakeholders (palliative care physicians, supportive care physicians, oncologists).
- Conditions
- Cancer, Sarcoma Metastatic, Gynaecologic Cancer, Digestive Cancers, ENT Cancer, Metastatic Cancer or Locally Advanced
- Being tested
- Early integrated palliative care, Usual oncological care
- Keywords
- Metastatic or Locally Advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Early integrated palliative careOther
Patients receive early integrated palliative care at the time of unplanned hospitalization for metastatic or advanced cancer. The intervention includes:
- A palliative care consultation
- A consultation with the treating oncologist
- A multidisciplinary onco-palliative meeting to define a coordinated care plan
Usual oncological careOther
Patients receive standard oncological care according to institutional practices. Palliative care is provided only when clinically indicated, without systematic early consultation at the time of unplanned hospitalization.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early integrated palliative care | Experimental | Patients receive early integrated palliative care following an unplanned hospitalization for metastatic or advanced cancer. The intervention includes a palliative care consultation, consultation with the treating oncologist, and a multidisciplinary onco-palliative discussion to define a shared care strategy. Implementation of an early collaboration between oncologists and palliative care physicians. At the time of unplanned hospitalization, patients receive a palliative care consultation, a consultation with their oncologist, and a multidisciplinary discussion (onco-palliative meeting) to define a coordinated care strategy. Receives: Other: Early integrated palliative care |
| Usual oncological care | Active comparator | Patients receive standard oncological management without systematic early involvement of palliative care. Palliative care may be introduced according to usual clinical practice. Standard oncological care provided according to institutional practices without systematic early palliative care consultation at the time of unplanned hospitalization. Receives: Other: Usual oncological care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Aggressiveness of end-of-life care (composite endpoint)
Treatment will be considered aggressive if at least one of the following criteria is met (composite criterion):
- Administration of systemic IV treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) within 14 days prior to death
- At least one visit to the emergency room within 30 days prior to death
- At least one admission to intensive care within 30 days prior to death
- At least one admission to resuscitation within 30 days prior to death
- Death in hospital outside of palliative care
Measured: Assessed during the last 30 days of life and up to 14 days before death
Secondary outcomes (6)
Components and additional indicators of aggressiveness of end-of-life care
Each component of the primary composite endpoint will be analyzed separately, including: intravenous systemic anticancer therapy within 14 days before death, ≥1 emergency department visit within 30 days before death, ≥1 intensive care unit admission within 30 days before death, ≥1 resuscitation unit admission within 30 days before death, and hospital death outside a palliative care unit. Additional indicators of aggressiveness will also be evaluated: initiation of a new line of systemic therapy within 30 days before death, number of hospitalizations in the last 30 days of life, cumulative duration of hospitalization in the last 30 days of life, number of emergency department visits, ICU admissions, resuscitation admissions, and palliative care admission within the last 3 days of life.
Measured: Assessed during the last 30 days of life and up to 14 days before death
Overall survival
Overall survival will be defined as the time from the date of the unplanned hospitalization leading to study inclusion until the date of death from any cause.
Measured: From study inclusion until death from any cause (follow-up up to 12 months)
Quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline and every 3 months.
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Quality of life MQOL-R questionnaire
The quality of life will be evaluated via the McGill Quality of Life-Revised (MQOL-R) questionnaire at baseline and every 3 months.
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Psychological distress and care pathway indicators
Anxiety and depression will be assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at baseline and every 3 months. Additional indicators related to the care pathway will also be collected, including the presence of advance directives and the number of oncology consultations, palliative care consultations, and multidisciplinary onco-palliative meetings during follow-up.
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Time Until Definitive Deterioration
The Time Until Definitive Deterioration (TUDD) will be calculated from MQOL-R scores. Definitive deterioration is defined as a decrease of at least 1 point from baseline without any subsequent improvement greater than 1 point above the baseline score. TUDD will be defined as the time from inclusion to the first observation of definitive deterioration or death.
Measured: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Mar 2026
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionOct 2031 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (44)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter, national, phase III cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial evaluating the impact of early palliative care implementation for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified during an unplanned hospitalization. Participating centers represent the clusters. All centers start in the control phase (usual care) and subsequently cross over to the intervention phase according to a randomized implementation schedule. Clusters are randomized to the timing of implementation of the early palliative care intervention (12 or 24 months after study initiation). Randomization is stratified according to the expected recruitment rate per center (≤2 versus \>2 patients per month). This design allows sequential implementation of the intervention across centers while enabling comparison between control and intervention periods.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 493 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Oscar Lambret
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07490106
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SPPC-2503
- Other IDs
- PREPS-24-0053, 2025-A02238-41
- Acronym
- SPPC
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Kovac T. [Protein glycolysation]. Med Pregl. 1987;40(1-2):55-9. No abstract available. Croatian.
PubMed 3657724Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herraez A, Santin AD, Colomba E, Miller DS, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim YM, Guerra EM, Sanli UA, McCormack MM, Smith AD, Keefe S, Bird S, Dutta L, Orlowski RJ, Lorusso D; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):437-448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108330. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
PubMed 35045221Mirallas O, Martin-Cullell B, Navarro V, Vega KS, Recuero-Borau J, Gomez-Puerto D, Lopez-Valbuena D, Salva de Torres C, Andurell L, Pedrola A, Berche R, Palmas F, Ucha JM, Villacampa G, Rezqallah A, Sanz-Beltran J, Bach R, Bueno S, Viaplana C, Molina G, Hernando-Calvo A, Aguilar-Company J, Roca M, Munoz-Couselo E, Martinez-Marti A, Alonso A, Eremiev S, Macarulla T, Oaknin A, Saura C, Elez E, Felip E, Penuelas A, Burgos R, Pardo PG, Garralda E, Tabernero J, Serradell S, Servitja S, Paez D, Dienstmann R, Carles J. Development of a prognostic model to predict 90-day mortality in hospitalised cancer patients (PROMISE tool): a prospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Oct 9;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101063. eCollection 2024 Nov.
PubMed 39529819Patel TL, Bouchal SR, Laing CM, Hubbard S. Diminuer le recours au service des urgences pour les patients externes presentant des symptomes aigus de cancer : revue integrative sur l'emergence des centres de soins d'urgence en cancerologie. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):36-50. doi: 10.5737/236880763113650. eCollection 2021 Winter. French.
PubMed 38919462Paillé, P. et Mucchielli, A. (2021). Chapitre 12. L'analyse thématique. L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales - 5e éd. (p. 269 -357). Armand Colin. https://shs.cairn.info/l-analyse-qualitative-en-sciences-humaines--9782200624019-page-69?lang=fr.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Hemming K, Taljaard M. Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice? Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):1043-1052. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa077.
PubMed 32386407Whynes DK; TOMBOLA Group. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to HADS-identified anxiety and depression. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;15(5):820-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01102.x.
PubMed 19811595Franken MD, de Hond A, Degeling K, Punt CJA, Koopman M, Uyl-de Groot CA, Versteegh MM, van Oijen MGH. Evaluation of the performance of algorithms mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D index in a metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 20;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01481-2.
PubMed 32690011Gray LA, Hernandez Alava M, Wailoo AJ. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):1237. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5.
PubMed 34794404Ahmed S, Simon J, Biondo P, Slobogian V, Shirt L, King S, Paolucci A, Pabani A, Hao D, Bossio E, Cross R, Monds T, Nieuwenhuis J, Sinnarajah A. Acceptability of automatic referrals to supportive and palliative care by patients living with advanced lung cancer: qualitative interviews and a co-design process. Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 2;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00568-0.
PubMed 38566198Hannon B, Swami N, Pope A, Leighl N, Rodin G, Krzyzanowska M, Zimmermann C. Early Palliative Care and Its Role in Oncology: A Qualitative Study. Oncologist. 2016 Nov;21(11):1387-1395. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0176. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
PubMed 27449522Vinant P, Joffin I, Serresse L, Grabar S, Jaulmes H, Daoud M, Abitbol G, Fouassier P, Triol I, Rostaing S, Brette MD, Colombet I; INSIGHT investigators. Integration and activity of hospital-based palliative care consultation teams: the INSIGHT multicentric cohort study. BMC Palliat Care. 2017 May 30;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12904-017-0209-9.
PubMed 28558731Mignonat-Lecoanet C., Nahapetian H., Lecoanet A., Filbet M., " Modalités d'appel des soins palliatifs : enquête auprès des oncologues ", Médecine Palliative : Soins de Support - Accompagnement - Éthique, Volume 16, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 70-80, ISSN 1636-6522, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medpal.2017.01.001
Hui D, Bruera E. Models of integration of oncology and palliative care. Ann Palliat Med. 2015 Jul;4(3):89-98. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.04.01.
PubMed 26231806
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Benefits of Early Collaboration Between Oncologists and Palliative Care Physicians in Cases of Unplanned Hospitalization for Patients With Metastatic Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07490106
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SPPC / SPPC-2503
- Conditions
- Cancer, Sarcoma Metastatic, Gynaecologic Cancer, Digestive Cancers, ENT Cancer, Metastatic Cancer or Locally Advanced
- Keywords
- Metastatic or Locally Advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 493 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Oscar LambretUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multicenter, national, interventional, cluster-randomized study, "stepped wedge" design. This study includes patients with metastatic or locally advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer, currently undergoing systemic palliative treatment and hospitalized on an unscheduled basis. The study will aim to evaluate the impact of early palliative care implementation for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified during an unplanned hospitalization.
Detailed description
This study will aim to evaluate the effectiveness of early palliative care for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified through unscheduled hospitalization in terms of reducing "aggressive" treatment.
Other objectives of the study include :
Compare approaches in terms of overall survival, treatment toxicities, advance directives, quality of life, anxiety, and depression.
- Describing care according to the organization at the time of inclusion.
- Evaluating the economic impact of early palliative care in patients with metastatic or advanced cancer through a medico-economic analysis combining cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis.
- Evaluating interactions between the various stakeholders (palliative care physicians, supportive care physicians, oncologists).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This study is a multicenter, national, phase III cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial evaluating the impact of early palliative care implementation for patients with metastatic or advanced cancer identified during an unplanned hospitalization. Participating centers represent the clusters. All centers start in the control phase (usual care) and subsequently cross over to the intervention phase according to a randomized implementation schedule. Clusters are randomized to the timing of implementation of the early palliative care intervention (12 or 24 months after study initiation). Randomization is stratified according to the expected recruitment rate per center (≤2 versus >2 patients per month). This design allows sequential implementation of the intervention across centers while enabling comparison between control and intervention periods.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early integrated palliative care | Experimental | Other: Early integrated palliative carePatients receive early integrated palliative care following an unplanned hospitalization for metastatic or advanced cancer. The intervention includes a palliative care consultation, consultation with the treating oncologist, and a multidisciplinary onco-palliative discussion to define a shared care strategy. Implementation of an early collaboration between oncologists and palliative care physicians. At the time of unplanned hospitalization, patients receive a palliative care consultation, a consultation with their oncologist, and a multidisciplinary discussion (onco-palliative meeting) to define a coordinated care strategy. |
| Usual oncological care | Active comparator | Other: Usual oncological carePatients receive standard oncological management without systematic early involvement of palliative care. Palliative care may be introduced according to usual clinical practice. Standard oncological care provided according to institutional practices without systematic early palliative care consultation at the time of unplanned hospitalization. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Subjects aged 18 years and older;
- Diagnosed with metastatic or locally advanced digestive, gynecological, ENT, or sarcoma cancer;
- Currently undergoing systemic palliative treatment (no prospect of cure);
- Hospitalized on an unscheduled basis (i.e., unplanned hospitalization for scheduled oncology treatments);
- Patient covered by the French social security system;
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- PS (WHO) = 4;
- Patient receiving end-of-life care;
- Patient opposed to the use of medical data for research purposes;
- Person deprived of liberty or under guardianship;
- Inability to undergo medical monitoring for the trial for geographical, social, or psychological reasons.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Early integrated palliative carePatients receive early integrated palliative care at the time of unplanned hospitalization for metastatic or advanced cancer. The intervention includes: * A palliative care consultation * A consultation with the treating oncologist * A multidisciplinary onco-palliative meeting to define a coordinated care plan | Other | Early integrated palliative care |
| Usual oncological carePatients receive standard oncological care according to institutional practices. Palliative care is provided only when clinically indicated, without systematic early consultation at the time of unplanned hospitalization. | Other | Usual oncological care |
Primary outcome
Aggressiveness of end-of-life care (composite endpoint)
Time frame: Assessed during the last 30 days of life and up to 14 days before death
Treatment will be considered aggressive if at least one of the following criteria is met (composite criterion): * Administration of systemic IV treatment (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy) within 14 days prior to death * At least one visit to the emergency room within 30 days prior to death * At least one admission to intensive care within 30 days prior to death * At least one admission to resuscitation within 30 days prior to death * Death in hospital outside of palliative care
6 secondary outcomes
Components and additional indicators of aggressiveness of end-of-life care
Time frame: Assessed during the last 30 days of life and up to 14 days before death
Overall survival
Time frame: From study inclusion until death from any cause (follow-up up to 12 months)
Quality of life EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Quality of life MQOL-R questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Psychological distress and care pathway indicators
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Time Until Definitive Deterioration
Time frame: Baseline and every 3 months until death or up to 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 3657724Kovac T. [Protein glycolysation]. Med Pregl. 1987;40(1-2):55-9. No abstract available. Croatian.
- Background: PubMed 35045221Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herraez A, Santin AD, Colomba E, Miller DS, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim YM, Guerra EM, Sanli UA, McCormack MM, Smith AD, Keefe S, Bird S, Dutta L, Orlowski RJ, Lorusso D; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Feb 3;386(5):437-448. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108330. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
- Background: PubMed 39529819Mirallas O, Martin-Cullell B, Navarro V, Vega KS, Recuero-Borau J, Gomez-Puerto D, Lopez-Valbuena D, Salva de Torres C, Andurell L, Pedrola A, Berche R, Palmas F, Ucha JM, Villacampa G, Rezqallah A, Sanz-Beltran J, Bach R, Bueno S, Viaplana C, Molina G, Hernando-Calvo A, Aguilar-Company J, Roca M, Munoz-Couselo E, Martinez-Marti A, Alonso A, Eremiev S, Macarulla T, Oaknin A, Saura C, Elez E, Felip E, Penuelas A, Burgos R, Pardo PG, Garralda E, Tabernero J, Serradell S, Servitja S, Paez D, Dienstmann R, Carles J. Development of a prognostic model to predict 90-day mortality in hospitalised cancer patients (PROMISE tool): a prospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2024 Oct 9;46:101063. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.101063. eCollection 2024 Nov.
- Background: PubMed 38919462Patel TL, Bouchal SR, Laing CM, Hubbard S. Diminuer le recours au service des urgences pour les patients externes presentant des symptomes aigus de cancer : revue integrative sur l'emergence des centres de soins d'urgence en cancerologie. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):36-50. doi: 10.5737/236880763113650. eCollection 2021 Winter. French.
- BackgroundPaillé, P. et Mucchielli, A. (2021). Chapitre 12. L'analyse thématique. L'analyse qualitative en sciences humaines et sociales - 5e éd. (p. 269 -357). Armand Colin. https://shs.cairn.info/l-analyse-qualitative-en-sciences-humaines--9782200624019-page-69?lang=fr.
- BackgroundBraun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Background: PubMed 32386407Hemming K, Taljaard M. Reflection on modern methods: when is a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial a good study design choice? Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):1043-1052. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa077.
- Background: PubMed 19811595Whynes DK; TOMBOLA Group. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D to HADS-identified anxiety and depression. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Oct;15(5):820-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01102.x.
- Background: PubMed 32690011Franken MD, de Hond A, Degeling K, Punt CJA, Koopman M, Uyl-de Groot CA, Versteegh MM, van Oijen MGH. Evaluation of the performance of algorithms mapping EORTC QLQ-C30 onto the EQ-5D index in a metastatic colorectal cancer cost-effectiveness model. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jul 20;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01481-2.
- Background: PubMed 34794404Gray LA, Hernandez Alava M, Wailoo AJ. Mapping the EORTC QLQ-C30 to EQ-5D-3L in patients with breast cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):1237. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08964-5.
- Background: PubMed 38566198Ahmed S, Simon J, Biondo P, Slobogian V, Shirt L, King S, Paolucci A, Pabani A, Hao D, Bossio E, Cross R, Monds T, Nieuwenhuis J, Sinnarajah A. Acceptability of automatic referrals to supportive and palliative care by patients living with advanced lung cancer: qualitative interviews and a co-design process. Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 2;10(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00568-0.
- Background: PubMed 27449522Hannon B, Swami N, Pope A, Leighl N, Rodin G, Krzyzanowska M, Zimmermann C. Early Palliative Care and Its Role in Oncology: A Qualitative Study. Oncologist. 2016 Nov;21(11):1387-1395. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0176. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Early integrated palliative care and Usual oncological care in people with Cancer and Sarcoma Metastatic, run by Centre Oscar Lambret at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fanny BEN OUNE (+33320295896, promotion@o-lambret.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Aggressiveness of end-of-life care (composite endpoint) (time frame: Assessed during the last 30 days of life and up to 14 days before death). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07490106, which also lists 44 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2026.