AzTrials
AzTrials

Early Childhood Development (ECD)Phase 3BUNDLENCT07490899

Combined Nutrition and Parenting Study

A Phase 3 study testing Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers and Food provision and nutrition education in people with Early Childhood Development (ECD), run by University of South Carolina at 4 sites in Liberia.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to evaluate whether early childhood development is improved by a bundled set of interventions that promote responsive stimulation and improved nutrition by the provision of eggs and dried fish (nutrient-dense animal source foods), and whether, in combination, these stimulation and nutrition… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 30 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Early Childhood Development (ECD)
What is being tested?
Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers and Food provision and nutrition education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2,240 participants
Where
4 sitesLiberia
Study dates
Feb 2027to Jun 2028
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 30 months
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Resides in selected community in Liberia
  • Household has a child aged 6-30 months at study enrollment
  • Child has a primary female caregiver and second (male or female) caregiver ≥ 18 years of age
  • Caregivers and child intend to continue residing in the study area for the follow-up duration
  • Both primary and second caregiver provide informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Children with known allergies to eggs or fish
  • Caregivers with cognitive and severe physical disabilities who are unable to implement intervention activities
  • Children with developmental disabilities

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Leila Larson, PhD MPH contact

803-576-5649

larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu

Edward Frongillo, PhD contact

leilamlarson@gmail.com

Liberia4 sites
  • Plan International

    Kakata

    Leila Larson, PhD MPH, 803-576-5649, larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu

  • Plan International

    Sanniquellie

    Leila Larson, PhD MPH, 803-576-5649, larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu

  • Plan International

    Tubmanburg

    Leila Larson, PhD MPH, 803-576-5649, larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu

  • Plan International

    Voinjama

    Leila Larson, PhD MPH, 803-576-5649, larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu

Other trials in Liberia

About this study

Official title: Impact of Combined Nutrition, Responsive Parenting, and Health Intervention on Childhood Development Study

This study aims to evaluate whether early childhood development is improved by a bundled set of interventions that promote responsive stimulation and improved nutrition by the provision of eggs and dried fish (nutrient-dense animal source foods), and whether, in combination, these stimulation and nutrition interventions are more effective than responsive stimulation or food provision alone.

Read the detailed description

The BUNDLE study will examine the effects of a 7-month nutrition and caregiving intervention for female and male caregivers delivered by trained adult community facilitators in rural communities across Liberia. The study will use a four-arm 2x2 factorial cluster randomized design to test the effectiveness of the interventions on primary outcomes of child cognitive, language, motor, and socio-emotional development. In this study, 2240 children aged 6 to 30 months will be recruited from 160 rural communities randomized to a comparison arm or one of the three intervention arms. The comparison arm will receive the local standard of care. Three intervention arms will also receive either a responsive stimulation intervention with female and male caregivers, provision of eggs and dried fish accompanied by nutrition education, or responsive stimulation + provision of eggs and dried fish. We hypothesize that child development will be improved in all intervention arms compared to the comparison arm and in the combined intervention arm compared to the single intervention arms.

Being tested
Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers, Food provision and nutrition education
Keywords
cluster randomized trial, responsive caregiving, nutrition, early childhood development, animal source food

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Responsive stimulation, female and male caregiversBehavioural

    Caregiving-related social and behavior change (SBC) messages and activities for primary female and secondary (male or female) caregivers focused on responsive stimulation, encompassing responsive caregiver-child interactions and the provision of early learning opportunities.

  • Food provision and nutrition educationOther

    Provision of eggs and dried Bonny fish. Nutrition-related social and behavior change (SBC) messages focused on infant and young child feeding (IYCF), the importance of feeding the child eggs and dried fish, and ways to feed these foods to the child.

Study groups in NCT07490899
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Responsive Stimulation, female and male caregiversExperimentalAdult community facilitators will facilitate peer group sessions with primary female secondary (male or female) caregivers using Plan International's adapted Responsive Caregiving curriculum. Caregivers will be encouraged to bring their children to the sessions to practice the learned activities. Facilitators will deliver key messages and allow participants to practice learned activities and provide them with feedback and encouragement. The sessions will focus on practice, problem-solving, and peer support. Sessions will be conducted fortnightly for 7 months. Each session will last approximately 60-90 minutes. Home visits will be conducted by the facilitators every 2.5 months to provide one-on-one support to the caregivers around the intervention activities.
Receives: Behavioral: Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers
NutritionExperimentalHouseholds will receive weekly provisions of 7 eggs and 3 pieces of dried Bonny fish for the participating child, and an additional 3 eggs and 1 piece of fish to share. At the start of the intervention, Community Health Assistants will provide a group nutrition education session focused on the importance of feeding the child eggs and dried fish, ways to feed these foods to the child, and on infant and young child feeding more generally. This session will last 60-90 minutes. Brief nutrition messages will be reinforced when the food is delivered to households on a fortnightly basis.
Receives: Other: Food provision and nutrition education
Responsive stimulation + Nutrition, female and male caregiversExperimentalThis arm is a combination of the responsive stimulation arm and the nutrition arm. Briefly, adult community facilitators will facilitate peer group sessions with primary female and secondary (male or female) caregivers using Plan International's adapted Responsive Caregiving curriculum. Households will also receive weekly provisions of 7 eggs and 3 pieces of dried Bonny fish for the participating child, and an additional 3 eggs and 1 piece of fish to share. They will also receive nutrition education.
Receives: Behavioral: Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers; Other: Food provision and nutrition education
Standard of care controlNo interventionNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cognitive Development

    Change from baseline to end-line in cognitive composite score on Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, 4th Edition. Raw scores range from 0 to 162 with higher scores representing higher cognitive development.

    Measured: 7 months

  2. Language Development

    Change from baseline to end-line in language composite score on the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, 4th Edition. Raw scores range from 0 to 158 with higher scores representing higher language development.

    Measured: 7 months

  3. Motor Development

    Change from baseline to end-line in motor composite score on the Bayley Scale of Infant and Toddler Development, 4th Edition. Raw scores range from 0 to 208 with higher scores representing higher motor development.

    Measured: 7 months

  4. Socio-emotional Development

    Change from baseline to end-line in socio-emotional score on the Wolke Behavior Rating scale. Scores range from 9 to 81 with higher scores representing higher socio-emotional development.

    Measured: 7 months

Secondary outcomes (27)
  1. Child height or length-for-age z-score

    Change from baseline to end-line in child height or length-for-age z-score.

    Measured: 7 months

  2. Child weight-for-age z-score

    Change from baseline to end-line in child weight-for-age z-score.

    Measured: 7 months

  3. Child weight-for-height (or length) z-score

    Change from baseline to end-line in child weight-for-height (or length) z-score.

    Measured: 7 months

  4. Child egg consumption

    Change from baseline to end-line in percent children consuming at least 3 eggs in the past week

    Measured: 7 months

  5. Child fish consumption

    Change from baseline to end-line in percent children consuming at least 1 piece of fish in the past week

    Measured: 7 months

  6. Child dietary diversity

    Change from baseline to end-line in child dietary diversity score defined as number of food groups out of a total of eight food groups consumed in the previous 7 days based on World Health Organization guidelines and is assessed in children aged six months or older.

    Measured: 7 months

  7. Responsive feeding

    Change from baseline to end-line in responsive feeding score assessed using the responsive feeding assessment. Scores range from 8 to 32 with higher scores representing higher responsive feeding behaviors.

    Measured: 7 months

  8. Early learning opportunities

    Change from baseline to end-line in early learning opportunities score assessed using the Tool for Early learning. Scores range from 0 to 14 with higher scores representing more opportunities for early learning.

    Measured: 7 months

  9. Primary female caregiver social support

    Change from baseline to end-line in primary female caregiver perceived social support assessed using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Scores range from 12 to 84 with higher scores representing higher social support.

    Measured: 7 months

  10. Primary female caregiver responsive caregiver-child interactions

    Change from baseline to end-line in proportion of responsive interactions between the primary female caregiver and child assessed using the Tool for Responsive Care.

    Measured: 7 months

  11. Male caregiver responsive caregiver-child interactions

    Change from baseline to end-line in proportion of responsive interactions between the male caregiver and child assessed using the Tool for Responsive Care.

    Measured: 7 months

  12. Secondary female caregiver responsive caregiver-child interactions

    Change from baseline to end-line in proportion of responsive interactions between the secondary female caregiver and child assessed using the Tool for Responsive Care.

    Measured: 7 months

  13. Primary female caregiver depression

    Change from baseline to end-line in the primary female caregiver depression score assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Scores range from 0 to 27 with higher scores representing higher depressive symptoms.

    Measured: 7 months

  14. Male caregiver depression

    Change from baseline to end-line in the male caregiver depression score assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Scores range from 0 to 27 with higher scores representing higher depressive symptoms.

    Measured: 7 months

  15. Secondary female caregiver depression

    Change from baseline to end-line in the secondary female caregiver depression score assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Scores range from 0 to 27 with higher scores representing higher depressive symptoms.

    Measured: 7 months

  16. Primary female caregiver anxiety

    Change from baseline to end-line in the primary female caregiver anxiety score assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores representing higher anxiety.

    Measured: 7 months

  17. Male caregiver anxiety

    Change from baseline to end-line in the male caregiver anxiety score assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores representing higher anxiety.

    Measured: 7 months

  18. Secondary female caregiver anxiety

    Change from baseline to end-line in the secondary female caregiver anxiety score assessed using the General Anxiety Disorder-7 Questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 21 with higher scores representing higher anxiety.

    Measured: 7 months

  19. Primary female caregiver positive mental health

    Change from baseline to end-line in the primary caregiver positive mental health score assessed using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form. Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores representing poorer mental health.

    Measured: 7 months

  20. Male caregiver positive mental health

    Change from baseline to end-line in the male caregiver positive mental health score assessed using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form. Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores representing poorer mental health.

    Measured: 7 months

  21. Secondary female caregiver positive mental health

    Change from baseline to end-line in the secondary female caregiver positive mental health score assessed using the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form. Scores range from 14 to 84 with higher scores representing poorer mental health.

    Measured: 7 months

  22. Primary female caregiver stress

    Change from baseline to end-line in the primary female caregiver perceived stress score assessed using the Parenting Stress Index. Scores range from 36 to 147 with higher scores representing higher stress.

    Measured: 7 months

  23. Male caregiver stress

    Change from baseline to end-line in the male caregiver perceived stress score assessed using the Parenting Stress Index. Scores range from 36 to 147 with higher scores representing higher stress.

    Measured: 7 months

  24. Secondary female caregiver stress

    Change from baseline to end-line in the secondary female caregiver perceived stress score assessed using the Parenting Stress Index. Scores range from 36 to 147 with higher scores representing higher stress.

    Measured: 7 months

  25. Primary female caregiver Co-parenting

    Change from baseline to end-line in the primary female co-parenting score assessed using the brief Coparenting Relationship Scale. Scores range from 0 to 84 with higher scores representing more positive coparenting.

    Measured: 7 months

  26. Male caregiver Co-parenting

    Change from baseline to end-line in the male caregiver co-parenting score assessed using the brief Coparenting Relationship Scale. Scores range from 0 to 84 with higher scores representing more positive coparenting.

    Measured: 7 months

  27. Secondary female caregiver Co-parenting

    Change from baseline to end-line in the secondary female caregiver co-parenting score assessed using the brief Coparenting Relationship Scale. Scores range from 0 to 84 with higher scores representing more positive coparenting.

    Measured: 7 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Mar 2026
  2. Study startFeb 2027 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
In Bomi, Lofa, Nimba, and Margibi counties in Liberia, 40 rural communities in each county will be randomly selected with equal probability per county, for a total of 160 communities. Each community will be randomized to a comparison arm or one of three intervention arms; randomization will be stratified by county. Using household listings in each community, 14 households fitting the study's eligibility criteria will be randomly selected and invited to participate in the study. Random selection of households will continue until 14 households have provided informed consent. If fewer than 14 eligible households are found, additional households will be selected using the same procedure from a neighboring rural community.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
2,240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07490899
Sponsor's protocol ID
1R01HD116874-01
Other IDs
1R01HD116874-01
Acronym
BUNDLE
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
10 Mar 2026
Last updated
24 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All direct respondent identifiers (e.g., names and addresses) will be removed and maintained in a secure file. All other scientific data (sum scores, item data, scale composites) will be preserved and shared. Respondent identifiers will not be shared. Documentation to be made publicly available to the research community will include questionnaires and tools, a detailed User Guide, a codebook with univariate statistics for each variable, and study-level metadata following the Data Documentation Initiative specification. Each variable in the codebook will include a brief description of the item along with the question number and question text from the questionnaire, variable name, variable label, value labels, and standard codes for missing values-including codes for non-applicable, "don't know," and refusal. Documentation will be provided in portable document format (PDF).

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Responsive stimulation, female and male caregivers and Food provision and nutrition education in people with Early Childhood Development (ECD), run by University of South Carolina at 4 sites in Liberia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Liberia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Leila Larson, PhD MPH (803-576-5649, larsonl@mailbox.sc.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cognitive Development (time frame: 7 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in