Lung Cancer MetastaticPhase 1NCT07495098
Phase 1B Trial of Intratumoral Cisplatin for Stage IV Lung Cancer
A Phase 1 study testing cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) in people with Lung Cancer Metastatic and Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by University of Vermont.
Trial summary
The addition of intravenous (given through a vein) cisplatin to immunotherapy improves treatment outcomes for lung cancer, but unfortunately results in significantly more side effects since the rest of the body is exposed to significant amounts of the drug. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer Metastatic, Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 30 Jun 2031
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
2.5.1 Inclusion criteria
- Age 18 years or above
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2
- Have known or suspected metastatic NSCLC at time of enrollment (including patients who progress on initial therapy or are found to have metastatic disease during therapy and are not excluded
- Patient is able and willing to provide informed consent.
- Rapid on-site cytopathologic examination (ROSE) performed during the procedure (if not previously diagnosed) and returns likely NSCLC. No injection will be performed if ROSE is non-diagnostic.
- A CT scan of the chest (with or without contrast) within the prior 3 months.
- The presence of an EBUS accessible target site determined by a treating investigator. These may be primary lung cancers or metastatic sites (including when a lymph node station has been replaced by metastatic tumor), that are accessible by EBUS.
- MDC agreement of likely Stage IV NSCLC (confirmation from at minimum a Medical Oncologist and Radiation Oncologist on clinical stage).
- Patients must have adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:
- Leukocytes ≥3,000/mcL
- Platelets ≥100,000/mcL
- Total bilirubin ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN)
- AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤ institutional ULN
- Creatinine ≤ institutional ULN
2.5.2 Exclusion criteria
- Use of an investigational agent in prior 30 days
- Pregnancy/lactation (pregnancy test to be performed by pre-op as part of standard of care for women of child-bearing age as defined by UVMMC Policy NPREP16)
- Treatment with intravenous cytotoxic chemotherapy within the past 14 days
- Allergy to cisplatin or its derivatives
- Allergy to iodinated contrast
- Patient not appropriate for the research study based on physician discretion
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
The addition of intravenous (given through a vein) cisplatin to immunotherapy improves treatment outcomes for lung cancer, but unfortunately results in significantly more side effects since the rest of the body is exposed to significant amounts of the drug. Our clinical trial data indicate that injecting cisplatin directly into the tumor using a bronchoscope (a small flexible tube with a camera in it) has very few side effects, and results in significant cell death and potentially improvement in the immune response. The goal of this proposal is to evaluate a computational approach, that incorporates data from a CT scan, to determine the optimal dose and delivery location within a tumor to maximize tumor cell killing and the immune response.
Read the detailed description
Rationale:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The mainstay of therapy for lung cancer remains platinum-based chemotherapy. One of the most commonly used agents is cisplatin, due to the fact that it is highly toxic to cancer cells. Cisplatin binds with DNA, cross-linking strands and thereby inhibiting mitosis, which in turn leads to apoptosis and death of the cell. However, it has more recently been recognized that cisplatin has immunomodulatory effects that extend beyond those related merely to cell death. Cisplatin has been shown to upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC class 1), promote the recruitment and proliferation of effector cells, upregulate the activity of cytotoxic effector cells, and downregulate the immunosuppressive environment. Importantly, mechanisms by which cisplatin modulates the immune system may be present even at sublethal doses. In fact, the addition of an intravenous (i.v.) platinum agent to pembrolizumab increases the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in Stage IV NSCLC.
Although many standard regimens for the treatment of NSCLC include a platinum agent, this approach is associated with significant toxicity. Systemic i.v. cisplatin is associated with greater than 40 untoward effects; the most common is nephrotoxicity, but may commonly include gastrointestinal, hematologic, cardiac, and hepatic events. These off-target effects greatly impair patient quality of life and tolerance of the drug, which in turn limits the dose and frequency at which the medication can be given. In Stage IV NSCLC there is evidence that platinum-based chemotherapy may hasten death compared to palliative care. Adding i.v. chemotherapy to immunotherapy results in a dramatic and synergistic increase in adverse events. In fact, the FDA guidance document for cisplatin highlights a feature of this drug that is atypical for chemotherapeutics, namely that it is more highly absorbed in normal tissues than in tumor tissue.
Direct intratumoral delivery of cisplatin thus has the potential to dramatically reduce adverse systemic effects while providing an immunoadjuvant effect to optimize the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy for Stage IV NSCLC.
One approach for direct intratumoral delivery is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection of cisplatin (EBUS-TBNI cisplatin). A bronchoscope with an integrated ultrasound is used to deliver cisplatin, through a needle, directly into tumors that lie next to the airway. This therapy has been evaluated as treatment for recurrent lung cancer in a previously radiated field. Patients undergo one bronchoscopic procedure per week (one cycle) for 3 weeks. Our prior multicenter study of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin demonstrated a 71% complete or partial response of the treated tumor. Given the demonstrated tumor cytotoxicity of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin for recurrent cancer, the potential ability of cisplatin to augment the immune response, and the systemic toxicity associated with IV delivery, it is critical to evaluate EBUS-TBNI cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in the first-line setting. Importantly, this approach is additive to standard of care, does not replace any current therapeutic approach, and has the potential to dramatically reduce time-to-treatment and improve immunotherapy efficacy.
In Phase 1B we will test dosing based on tumor volume and morphology over the course of 3 procedures, 1 week apart, prior to the initiation of systemic therapy. Three intratumoral cisplatin deliveries, with the first typically given in the same procedural instance as diagnosis, was chosen as the treatment course since it would not delay standard of care therapy. During each of the procedures either a low or high microvascular region will be targeted for delivery.
HYPOTHESIS:
Delivery of an image-enabled, computationally selected, dose of intratumoral cisplatin into regions of low microvascular density within a lung tumor, will be safe and result in improved drug retention
STUDY POPULATION:
Patients eligible for consent will be age 18 or older Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2 Patients will have known or suspected Stage IV, metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after multidisciplinary review
STUDY DESIGN:
This a randomized, single blind, 3+3, Phase 1 study of Intratumoral Neoadjuvant Cisplatin for Stage IV Lung Cancer delivered via EBUS-TBNI. The primary endpoint is safety. This study utilizes a within-patient approach with all patients undergoing three EBUS-TBNI procedures, 1 week apart, where the dose will be delivered into either a low or high microvascular region (randomized).
The initial dose level will be 95% tumor coverage. Tumor morphology and volume will be obtained from each participant's preoperative CT scan. The dose to be delivered will be calculated using the validated computational model based on the goal % tumor coverage (e.g. dose needed to cover 95% of the tumor).
The dose escalation cohort is 98%. The dose de-escalation cohort is 90% coverage). Escalation/de-escalation will occur in standard 3+3 design.
ENDPOINT EVALUATION:
Primary Endpoint:
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT. There will be no dose escalation but standard 3+3 dose reduction will be performed as described in the statistical section. Briefly, any CTCAE grade 3 event within a patient's treatment regimen will result in discontinuation from the study and no further procedures (if the participant has not completed the treatment regimen).
Secondary Endpoints:
- Retained cisplatin mass by low versus high microvascular regions.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer Metastatic, Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Being tested
- cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))Drug
The safety of intratumoral cisplatin will be evaluated by delivery region will be evaluated.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Dose Cohort: 95% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 95% of the tumor Receives: Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) |
| De-escalation Dose Cohort: 90% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 90% of the tumor Receives: Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) |
| Escalation Dose Cohort: 98% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 98% of the tumor Receives: Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety, as defined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT.
Measured: For 4 weeks after initial delivery of intratumoral cisplatin
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cisplatin retention
Post-injection platinum blood levels will allow calculation of retained cisplatin mass via an established pharmacokinetic model. Cisplatin retention will be evaluated by location of injection (low vs high % blood volume)
Measured: At each delivery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Jul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung Cancer MetastaticStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The delivered dose will be calculated based on tumor volume and morphology to achieve 95% tumor coverage and will be ≤40mg. Dose escalation to 98% or dose de-escalation to 90% tumor coverage are alternative dose levels, maintaining total dose ≤40mg. We will use the standard 3+3 dose ranging protocol. Any patient who experiences a DLT will be removed from further treatments. If 1 of 3 patients experience a DLT we will continue at that dose level. If ≥33% of patients develop a dose-limiting toxicity at any time during the enrollment at a given dose cohort then the % goal tumor coverage for dose calculation will be reduced (e.g.to 90% tumor coverage).
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Vermont
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, C. Matthew Kinsey MD, MPH, University of Vermont
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07495098
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 00000613B
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 1B Trial of Intratumoral Cisplatin for Stage IV Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07495098
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 00000613B
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer Metastatic, Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of VermontUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The addition of intravenous (given through a vein) cisplatin to immunotherapy improves treatment outcomes for lung cancer, but unfortunately results in significantly more side effects since the rest of the body is exposed to significant amounts of the drug. Our clinical trial data indicate that injecting cisplatin directly into the tumor using a bronchoscope (a small flexible tube with a camera in it) has very few side effects, and results in significant cell death and potentially improvement in the immune response. The goal of this proposal is to evaluate a computational approach, that incorporates data from a CT scan, to determine the optimal dose and delivery location within a tumor to maximize tumor cell killing and the immune response.
Detailed description
Rationale:
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States. The mainstay of therapy for lung cancer remains platinum-based chemotherapy. One of the most commonly used agents is cisplatin, due to the fact that it is highly toxic to cancer cells. Cisplatin binds with DNA, cross-linking strands and thereby inhibiting mitosis, which in turn leads to apoptosis and death of the cell. However, it has more recently been recognized that cisplatin has immunomodulatory effects that extend beyond those related merely to cell death. Cisplatin has been shown to upregulate major histocompatibility complex (MHC class 1), promote the recruitment and proliferation of effector cells, upregulate the activity of cytotoxic effector cells, and downregulate the immunosuppressive environment. Importantly, mechanisms by which cisplatin modulates the immune system may be present even at sublethal doses. In fact, the addition of an intravenous (i.v.) platinum agent to pembrolizumab increases the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade in Stage IV NSCLC.
Although many standard regimens for the treatment of NSCLC include a platinum agent, this approach is associated with significant toxicity. Systemic i.v. cisplatin is associated with greater than 40 untoward effects; the most common is nephrotoxicity, but may commonly include gastrointestinal, hematologic, cardiac, and hepatic events. These off-target effects greatly impair patient quality of life and tolerance of the drug, which in turn limits the dose and frequency at which the medication can be given. In Stage IV NSCLC there is evidence that platinum-based chemotherapy may hasten death compared to palliative care. Adding i.v. chemotherapy to immunotherapy results in a dramatic and synergistic increase in adverse events. In fact, the FDA guidance document for cisplatin highlights a feature of this drug that is atypical for chemotherapeutics, namely that it is more highly absorbed in normal tissues than in tumor tissue.
Direct intratumoral delivery of cisplatin thus has the potential to dramatically reduce adverse systemic effects while providing an immunoadjuvant effect to optimize the efficacy of subsequent immunotherapy for Stage IV NSCLC.
One approach for direct intratumoral delivery is endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle injection of cisplatin (EBUS-TBNI cisplatin). A bronchoscope with an integrated ultrasound is used to deliver cisplatin, through a needle, directly into tumors that lie next to the airway. This therapy has been evaluated as treatment for recurrent lung cancer in a previously radiated field. Patients undergo one bronchoscopic procedure per week (one cycle) for 3 weeks. Our prior multicenter study of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin demonstrated a 71% complete or partial response of the treated tumor. Given the demonstrated tumor cytotoxicity of EBUS-TBNI cisplatin for recurrent cancer, the potential ability of cisplatin to augment the immune response, and the systemic toxicity associated with IV delivery, it is critical to evaluate EBUS-TBNI cisplatin as neoadjuvant therapy in the first-line setting. Importantly, this approach is additive to standard of care, does not replace any current therapeutic approach, and has the potential to dramatically reduce time-to-treatment and improve immunotherapy efficacy.
In Phase 1B we will test dosing based on tumor volume and morphology over the course of 3 procedures, 1 week apart, prior to the initiation of systemic therapy. Three intratumoral cisplatin deliveries, with the first typically given in the same procedural instance as diagnosis, was chosen as the treatment course since it would not delay standard of care therapy. During each of the procedures either a low or high microvascular region will be targeted for delivery.
HYPOTHESIS:
Delivery of an image-enabled, computationally selected, dose of intratumoral cisplatin into regions of low microvascular density within a lung tumor, will be safe and result in improved drug retention
STUDY POPULATION:
Patients eligible for consent will be age 18 or older Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score 0-2 Patients will have known or suspected Stage IV, metastatic, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after multidisciplinary review
STUDY DESIGN:
This a randomized, single blind, 3+3, Phase 1 study of Intratumoral Neoadjuvant Cisplatin for Stage IV Lung Cancer delivered via EBUS-TBNI. The primary endpoint is safety. This study utilizes a within-patient approach with all patients undergoing three EBUS-TBNI procedures, 1 week apart, where the dose will be delivered into either a low or high microvascular region (randomized).
The initial dose level will be 95% tumor coverage. Tumor morphology and volume will be obtained from each participant's preoperative CT scan. The dose to be delivered will be calculated using the validated computational model based on the goal % tumor coverage (e.g. dose needed to cover 95% of the tumor).
The dose escalation cohort is 98%. The dose de-escalation cohort is 90% coverage). Escalation/de-escalation will occur in standard 3+3 design.
ENDPOINT EVALUATION:
Primary Endpoint:
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT. There will be no dose escalation but standard 3+3 dose reduction will be performed as described in the statistical section. Briefly, any CTCAE grade 3 event within a patient's treatment regimen will result in discontinuation from the study and no further procedures (if the participant has not completed the treatment regimen).
Secondary Endpoints:
- Retained cisplatin mass by low versus high microvascular regions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- The delivered dose will be calculated based on tumor volume and morphology to achieve 95% tumor coverage and will be ≤40mg. Dose escalation to 98% or dose de-escalation to 90% tumor coverage are alternative dose levels, maintaining total dose ≤40mg. We will use the standard 3+3 dose ranging protocol. Any patient who experiences a DLT will be removed from further treatments. If 1 of 3 patients experience a DLT we will continue at that dose level. If ≥33% of patients develop a dose-limiting toxicity at any time during the enrollment at a given dose cohort then the % goal tumor coverage for dose calculation will be reduced (e.g.to 90% tumor coverage).
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Initial Dose Cohort: 95% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 95% of the tumor |
| De-escalation Dose Cohort: 90% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 90% of the tumor |
| Escalation Dose Cohort: 98% Tumor Coverage | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))Intratumoral cisplatin dosed to cover 98% of the tumor |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP))The safety of intratumoral cisplatin will be evaluated by delivery region will be evaluated. | Drug | De-escalation Dose Cohort: 90% Tumor Coverage, Escalation Dose Cohort: 98% Tumor Coverage, Initial Dose Cohort: 95% Tumor Coverage |
Primary outcome
Safety, as defined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT)
Time frame: For 4 weeks after initial delivery of intratumoral cisplatin
Safety (dose limiting toxicity, DLT), as defined by CTCAE (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) v 6.0. CTCAE grade 3 or above will be considered a DLT.
1 secondary outcome
Cisplatin retention
Time frame: At each delivery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Lung Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Daraxonrasib (RMC-6236) in Patients With RAS Mutated NSCLC (RASolve 301)
NSCLC (Non-small Cell Lung Cancer), Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP)) in people with Lung Cancer Metastatic and Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by University of Vermont.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Kristi Chapman (8026567953, Kristina.Chapman@uvmhealth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety, as defined by dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (time frame: For 4 weeks after initial delivery of intratumoral cisplatin). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.