MelasmaMelasmaNCT07495748
Comparative Evaluation of Topical Metformin and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Melasma
A study testing topical 3% tranexamic acid solution and Topical 30% metformin cream in people with Melasma, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of topical metformin (30%) and topical tranexamic acid (3%) in the treatment of melasma using reduction in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score over 12 weeks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melasma
- What is being tested?
- topical 3% tranexamic acid solution and Topical 30% metformin cream
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2026to 1 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged 18-50 years
- Clinically diagnosed facial melasma
- Both genders
- Patients willing to give informed consent
Who cannot join
- • Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients using systemic or topical melasma treatments in the previous 4 weeks
- Known hypersensitivity to study medications
- Presence of other facial dermatoses
- History of photosensitivity disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site
Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, 44000
Ayesha Saeed, PhD, +923325756579, ayeshasaeed@fui.edu.pk
Dr. Bad e Harum, FCPS
About this study
Official title: Comparative Evaluation of Topical Metformin and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Melasma Using MASI Score Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of topical metformin (30%) and topical tranexamic acid (3%) in the treatment of melasma using reduction in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score over 12 weeks. Melasma is a common hyperpigmentation disorder with significant cosmetic and psychological impact, and current treatments often have limitations. Both metformin and tranexamic acid have shown promising depigmenting effects through different mechanisms. A total of 70 patients will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Participants will apply the assigned treatment once daily along with sunscreen and will be assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is MASI score reduction, while secondary outcomes include patient-reported improvement and safety. This study seeks to provide comparative evidence for safer and more effective treatment options for melasma management.
Read the detailed description
Introduction / Background Melasma is a common acquired disorder of hyperpigmentation characterized by symmetrical light-to-dark brown macules and patches predominantly affecting sun-exposed areas of the face, particularly the cheeks, forehead, upper lip, and chin (1). It occurs more frequently in women of reproductive age and individuals with darker skin type (Fitzpatrick III to VI) (1). The precise cause of melasma is unknown but factors such as UV light exposure, pregnancy, exogenous hormones, and genetics have been shown to have an important role in the pathogenesis of melasma (1). The condition often causes significant cosmetic concern and psychological distress due to its chronic and recurrent nature (3,4).
Various treatment modalities have been used for melasma, including topical depigmenting agents, chemical peels, laser therapies, and systemic medications (8). Consequently, there is a continuous search for newer, safer, and more effective therapeutic options for the management of melasma (4).
Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent, has recently gained attention as a promising treatment for melasma. Its depigmenting effect is believed to occur through inhibition of the plasminogen-plasmin system in keratinocytes, leading to decreased release of arachidonic acid and prostaglandins that stimulate melanocyte activity.. Clinical studies evaluating topical TXA have demonstrated significant reductions in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores with good tolerability and minimal adverse effects (4,5,6) Metformin, a widely used oral antidiabetic drug, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic agent for hyperpigmentary disorders. Experimental studies have demonstrated that metformin inhibits melanogenesis through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) resulting in down-regulating MITF and melanogenic enzymes. Topical formulations of metformin have shown promising depigmenting effects in preliminary clinical studies, with reductions in MASI scores comparable to standard triple combination therapy and fewer adverse effects (3,5).
Recent clinical trials and systematic reviews suggest that topical metformin may represent a novel and safe treatment option for melasma, demonstrating significant improvement in MASI scores and good patient tolerability. However, direct comparative evidence between topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin remains limited. (5). Therefore, this study aims to perform a comparative evaluation of topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin in melasma using MASI score reduction after 12 weeks of treatment.
Rationale of the Study Melasma remains a therapeutic challenge due to its chronicity, high recurrence rate, and limitations associated with existing treatments such as hydroquinone-based therapies. Emerging agents like tranexamic acid and metformin have shown promising depigmenting effects through different mechanisms of action. However, limited comparative data exist regarding their relative effectiveness in reducing melasma severity.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin using changes in MASI score over a 12-week period. The findings may provide evidence for the use of topical metformin as a potential alternative depigmenting agent in melasma management.
Objectives
Primary Objective To compare the efficacy of topical metformin and topical tranexamic acid in reducing melasma severity based on change in MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Secondary Objectives
- To assess patient-reported improvement using a visual analog scale (VAS).
- To evaluate photographic improvement through standardized digital imaging.
- To compare the safety and tolerability of both topical agents. Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis (H0):
There is no significant difference between 3% topical tranexamic acid and 30% topical metformin in reducing melasma severity as measured by the change in MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Alternative Hypothesis (H1):
Topical 30% metforminis more effective than topical 3% tranexamic acid in reducing MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Operational Definitions
Melasma Acquired symmetrical hyperpigmented macules and patches on sun-exposed facial areas (forehead, malar regions, upper lip, and chin) diagnosed clinically by a dermatologist and confirmed by characteristic clinical appearance.
MASI Score (Melasma Area and Severity Index) A validated scoring system used to assess melasma severity based on area of involvement, darkness of pigmentation, and homogeneity of lesions across four facial regions (forehead, right malar, left malar, and chin). Scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Study Setting Department of Dermatology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi,Pakistan. Duration of Study 6 months after approval of synopsis Sample Size Sample size was calculated using WHO Sample Size Calculator (OpenEpi) for comparison of two means using data derived from previous studies (references mentioned)
Previous studies have reported:
- Mean MASI reduction with topical tranexamic acid ≈ 3.8 ± 2.1
- Mean MASI reduction with topical metformin ≈ 2.2 ± 1.9
Parameters used:
- Confidence level: 95%
- Power: 80%
- Ratio of groups: 1:1 The calculated sample size is approximately 31 patients per group.
Adding 10% possible dropouts, the final sample size becomes:
- 35 patients per group Final Sample Size Total sample size = 70 patients
- Group A: 35 patients (Topical Tranexamic Acid)
- Group B: 35 patients (Topical Metformin)
Sampling Technique:
Eligible patients will be recruited using non-probability consecutive sampling and then randomly allocated into two groups using the sealed opaque envelope method. consecutive sampling.
Sample Selection:
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients aged 18-50 years
- Clinically diagnosed facial melasma
- Both genders
- Patients willing to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients using systemic or topical melasma treatments in the previous 4 weeks
- Known hypersensitivity to study medications
- Presence of other facial dermatoses
- History of photosensitivity disorders
Data Collection Procedure:
Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after informed consent. Baseline demographic data including age, gender, duration of melasma, and skin phototype will be recorded.
Baseline MASI score will be calculated for each patient. Participants will then be randomly divided into two groups:
Group A: Topical Tranexamic Acid 3% solution Group B: Topical Metformin 30 % cream The 30% metformin cream will be prepared in the hospital pharmacy by dissolving 30 g of metformin powder in a mixture of 70% ethyl alcohol and propylene glycol to make 100 g of the final formulation, stored in airtight containers under aseptic conditions, While the tranexamic acid 3 % solution will be prepared by dissolving 3g of tranexamic powder in 10ml of 96% ethanol plus 10ml of 1'3-butanediol with distilled water added upto 100ml to make a 3% concentration.
Patients will be instructed to apply the assigned topical treatment once daily for 12 weeks along with sunscreen (SPF >50) use during daytime. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. MASI score will be reassessed at each visit.
Baseline Assessment
- Demographic data
- Disease duration
- Baseline MASI score
- Fitzpatrick skin type
- Type of melasma - epidermal' dermal' mixed.
- Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10 for pigmentation severity from patient's perspective Follow-Up Visits
- Week 4
- Week 8
- Week 12
At each visit:
- MASI score reassessment
- Change in VAS score from baseline
- Recording of adverse effects - erythema ' irritation' burning'scaling. Data Analysis Plan: Data will be entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26.
- Quantitative variables such as age and MASI score will be presented as mean ± standard deviation.
- Categorical variables such as gender will be presented as frequency and percentage.
- Paired t-test will be used to assess within-group MASI score reduction.
- Independent t-test will be used to compare mean MASI score reduction between the two groups.
- P-value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Limitations of the Study: This study may have certain limitations. It will be conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, different topical formulations (tranexamic acid solution and metformin cream) will be used, which may influence drug penetration and treatment response. Furthermore, the follow-up duration of 12 weeks may be insufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes or recurrence of melasma.
- Conditions
- Melasma
- Being tested
- topical 3% tranexamic acid solution, Topical 30% metformin cream
- Keywords
- Melasma, topical metformin, topical tranexamic acid, hyper-pigmentation, MASI
- Medical subject headings
- Melanosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
topical 3% tranexamic acid solutionDrug
nightly topical 3% tranexamic acid solution for 12 weeks with mineral sunscreen
Topical 30% metformin creamDrug
Participants will apply topical 30% metformin once a night for 12 weeks, with concurrent use of mineral sunscreen.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Topical 3% tranexamic acid solution | Active comparator | nightly tranexamic acid for 12 weeks with mineral sunscreen Receives: Drug: topical 3% tranexamic acid solution |
| topical 30% metfomin cream | Experimental | Participants will apply topical 30% metformin cream, once nightly on the affected facial area for 12 weeks, with use of mineral sunscreen Receives: Drug: Topical 30% metformin cream |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mean reduction in MASI (MASI) score
Compare the mean reduction in MASI scores from baseline to 12 weeks between topical 30% metformin and 3% tranexamic acid.
Measured: 12 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
Patients with adverse effects
Proportion of participants developing adverse effects (erythema, burning, peeling/dryness, or dyspigmentation) during treatment, compared between groups at follow-up visits.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Mar 2026
- Study start1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelasmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Foundation University IslamabadThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Topical 30% metformin cream and topical 3% tranexamic acid solution for 12 weeks
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation University Islamabad
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07495748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FUMCRCT5
- Acronym
- Melasma
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 17 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Al Mohammady A, Kadah AS, Mahran MA, Elsaie ML. Microneedling-assisted delivery of metformin versus tranexamic acid in treating melasma: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 18;30(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03032-1.
PubMed 40826371Banavase Channakeshavaiah R, Andanooru Chandrappa NK. Topical metformin in the treatment of melasma: A preliminary clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 May;19(5):1161-1164. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13145. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
PubMed 31502392Suliman RS, Alhuwayshil J, Almuflehi AA, Al Zaghir AK, Alateqi HA, Mohamedin HE, Mohammed AE, Alghamdi SS. Emerging topical therapies for melasma: a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety. J Dermatolog Treat. 2025 Dec;36(1):2591502. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2025.2591502. Epub 2025 Nov 27.
PubMed 41307217Jiang J, Akinseye O, Tovar-Garza A, Pandya AG. The effect of melasma on self-esteem: A pilot study. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Dec 8;4(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.11.003. eCollection 2018 Mar.
PubMed 29872675
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Evaluation of Topical Metformin and Topical Tranexamic Acid in Melasma Using MASI Score Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07495748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Melasma / FUMCRCT5
- Conditions
- Melasma
- Keywords
- Melasma, topical metformin, topical tranexamic acid, hyper-pigmentation, MASI
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Foundation University IslamabadUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomised controlled trial aims to compare the efficacy of topical metformin (30%) and topical tranexamic acid (3%) in the treatment of melasma using reduction in the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) score over 12 weeks. Melasma is a common hyperpigmentation disorder with significant cosmetic and psychological impact, and current treatments often have limitations. Both metformin and tranexamic acid have shown promising depigmenting effects through different mechanisms. A total of 70 patients will be enrolled and randomly divided into two groups. Participants will apply the assigned treatment once daily along with sunscreen and will be assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. The primary outcome is MASI score reduction, while secondary outcomes include patient-reported improvement and safety. This study seeks to provide comparative evidence for safer and more effective treatment options for melasma management.
Detailed description
Introduction / Background Melasma is a common acquired disorder of hyperpigmentation characterized by symmetrical light-to-dark brown macules and patches predominantly affecting sun-exposed areas of the face, particularly the cheeks, forehead, upper lip, and chin (1). It occurs more frequently in women of reproductive age and individuals with darker skin type (Fitzpatrick III to VI) (1). The precise cause of melasma is unknown but factors such as UV light exposure, pregnancy, exogenous hormones, and genetics have been shown to have an important role in the pathogenesis of melasma (1). The condition often causes significant cosmetic concern and psychological distress due to its chronic and recurrent nature (3,4).
Various treatment modalities have been used for melasma, including topical depigmenting agents, chemical peels, laser therapies, and systemic medications (8). Consequently, there is a continuous search for newer, safer, and more effective therapeutic options for the management of melasma (4).
Tranexamic acid (TXA), a synthetic antifibrinolytic agent, has recently gained attention as a promising treatment for melasma. Its depigmenting effect is believed to occur through inhibition of the plasminogen-plasmin system in keratinocytes, leading to decreased release of arachidonic acid and prostaglandins that stimulate melanocyte activity.. Clinical studies evaluating topical TXA have demonstrated significant reductions in Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI) scores with good tolerability and minimal adverse effects (4,5,6) Metformin, a widely used oral antidiabetic drug, has recently emerged as a potential therapeutic agent for hyperpigmentary disorders. Experimental studies have demonstrated that metformin inhibits melanogenesis through activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) resulting in down-regulating MITF and melanogenic enzymes. Topical formulations of metformin have shown promising depigmenting effects in preliminary clinical studies, with reductions in MASI scores comparable to standard triple combination therapy and fewer adverse effects (3,5).
Recent clinical trials and systematic reviews suggest that topical metformin may represent a novel and safe treatment option for melasma, demonstrating significant improvement in MASI scores and good patient tolerability. However, direct comparative evidence between topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin remains limited. (5). Therefore, this study aims to perform a comparative evaluation of topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin in melasma using MASI score reduction after 12 weeks of treatment.
Rationale of the Study Melasma remains a therapeutic challenge due to its chronicity, high recurrence rate, and limitations associated with existing treatments such as hydroquinone-based therapies. Emerging agents like tranexamic acid and metformin have shown promising depigmenting effects through different mechanisms of action. However, limited comparative data exist regarding their relative effectiveness in reducing melasma severity.
This study aims to compare the efficacy of topical tranexamic acid and topical metformin using changes in MASI score over a 12-week period. The findings may provide evidence for the use of topical metformin as a potential alternative depigmenting agent in melasma management.
Objectives
Primary Objective To compare the efficacy of topical metformin and topical tranexamic acid in reducing melasma severity based on change in MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Secondary Objectives
- To assess patient-reported improvement using a visual analog scale (VAS).
- To evaluate photographic improvement through standardized digital imaging.
- To compare the safety and tolerability of both topical agents. Hypothesis
Null Hypothesis (H0):
There is no significant difference between 3% topical tranexamic acid and 30% topical metformin in reducing melasma severity as measured by the change in MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Alternative Hypothesis (H1):
Topical 30% metforminis more effective than topical 3% tranexamic acid in reducing MASI score after 12 weeks of treatment.
Operational Definitions
Melasma Acquired symmetrical hyperpigmented macules and patches on sun-exposed facial areas (forehead, malar regions, upper lip, and chin) diagnosed clinically by a dermatologist and confirmed by characteristic clinical appearance.
MASI Score (Melasma Area and Severity Index) A validated scoring system used to assess melasma severity based on area of involvement, darkness of pigmentation, and homogeneity of lesions across four facial regions (forehead, right malar, left malar, and chin). Scores range from 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating greater severity.
Study Design: Randomized controlled trial. Study Setting Department of Dermatology, Fauji Foundation Hospital, Rawalpindi,Pakistan. Duration of Study 6 months after approval of synopsis Sample Size Sample size was calculated using WHO Sample Size Calculator (OpenEpi) for comparison of two means using data derived from previous studies (references mentioned)
Previous studies have reported:
- Mean MASI reduction with topical tranexamic acid ≈ 3.8 ± 2.1
- Mean MASI reduction with topical metformin ≈ 2.2 ± 1.9
Parameters used:
- Confidence level: 95%
- Power: 80%
- Ratio of groups: 1:1 The calculated sample size is approximately 31 patients per group.
Adding 10% possible dropouts, the final sample size becomes:
- 35 patients per group Final Sample Size Total sample size = 70 patients
- Group A: 35 patients (Topical Tranexamic Acid)
- Group B: 35 patients (Topical Metformin)
Sampling Technique:
Eligible patients will be recruited using non-probability consecutive sampling and then randomly allocated into two groups using the sealed opaque envelope method. consecutive sampling.
Sample Selection:
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients aged 18-50 years
- Clinically diagnosed facial melasma
- Both genders
- Patients willing to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnant or lactating women
- Patients using systemic or topical melasma treatments in the previous 4 weeks
- Known hypersensitivity to study medications
- Presence of other facial dermatoses
- History of photosensitivity disorders
Data Collection Procedure:
Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be enrolled after informed consent. Baseline demographic data including age, gender, duration of melasma, and skin phototype will be recorded.
Baseline MASI score will be calculated for each patient. Participants will then be randomly divided into two groups:
Group A: Topical Tranexamic Acid 3% solution Group B: Topical Metformin 30 % cream The 30% metformin cream will be prepared in the hospital pharmacy by dissolving 30 g of metformin powder in a mixture of 70% ethyl alcohol and propylene glycol to make 100 g of the final formulation, stored in airtight containers under aseptic conditions, While the tranexamic acid 3 % solution will be prepared by dissolving 3g of tranexamic powder in 10ml of 96% ethanol plus 10ml of 1'3-butanediol with distilled water added upto 100ml to make a 3% concentration.
Patients will be instructed to apply the assigned topical treatment once daily for 12 weeks along with sunscreen (SPF >50) use during daytime. Follow-up visits will be conducted at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. MASI score will be reassessed at each visit.
Baseline Assessment
- Demographic data
- Disease duration
- Baseline MASI score
- Fitzpatrick skin type
- Type of melasma - epidermal' dermal' mixed.
- Baseline Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-10 for pigmentation severity from patient's perspective Follow-Up Visits
- Week 4
- Week 8
- Week 12
At each visit:
- MASI score reassessment
- Change in VAS score from baseline
- Recording of adverse effects - erythema ' irritation' burning'scaling. Data Analysis Plan: Data will be entered and analyzed using SPSS version 26.
- Quantitative variables such as age and MASI score will be presented as mean ± standard deviation.
- Categorical variables such as gender will be presented as frequency and percentage.
- Paired t-test will be used to assess within-group MASI score reduction.
- Independent t-test will be used to compare mean MASI score reduction between the two groups.
- P-value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Limitations of the Study: This study may have certain limitations. It will be conducted at a single center with a relatively small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the findings. Additionally, different topical formulations (tranexamic acid solution and metformin cream) will be used, which may influence drug penetration and treatment response. Furthermore, the follow-up duration of 12 weeks may be insufficient to evaluate long-term outcomes or recurrence of melasma.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Topical 30% metformin cream and topical 3% tranexamic acid solution for 12 weeks
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Topical 3% tranexamic acid solution | Active comparator | Drug: topical 3% tranexamic acid solutionnightly tranexamic acid for 12 weeks with mineral sunscreen |
| topical 30% metfomin cream | Experimental | Drug: Topical 30% metformin creamParticipants will apply topical 30% metformin cream, once nightly on the affected facial area for 12 weeks, with use of mineral sunscreen |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients aged 18-50 years
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- • Pregnant or lactating women
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| topical 3% tranexamic acid solutionnightly topical 3% tranexamic acid solution for 12 weeks with mineral sunscreen | Drug | Topical 3% tranexamic acid solution |
| Topical 30% metformin creamParticipants will apply topical 30% metformin once a night for 12 weeks, with concurrent use of mineral sunscreen. | Drug | topical 30% metfomin cream |
Primary outcome
Mean reduction in MASI (MASI) score
Time frame: 12 weeks
Compare the mean reduction in MASI scores from baseline to 12 weeks between topical 30% metformin and 3% tranexamic acid.
1 secondary outcome
Patients with adverse effects
Time frame: 12 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Mar 2026.
- Background: PubMed 40826371Al Mohammady A, Kadah AS, Mahran MA, Elsaie ML. Microneedling-assisted delivery of metformin versus tranexamic acid in treating melasma: a randomized controlled study. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 18;30(1):761. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03032-1.
- Background: PubMed 31502392Banavase Channakeshavaiah R, Andanooru Chandrappa NK. Topical metformin in the treatment of melasma: A preliminary clinical trial. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 May;19(5):1161-1164. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13145. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
- Background: PubMed 41307217Suliman RS, Alhuwayshil J, Almuflehi AA, Al Zaghir AK, Alateqi HA, Mohamedin HE, Mohammed AE, Alghamdi SS. Emerging topical therapies for melasma: a comparative analysis of efficacy and safety. J Dermatolog Treat. 2025 Dec;36(1):2591502. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2025.2591502. Epub 2025 Nov 27.
- Background: PubMed 29872675Jiang J, Akinseye O, Tovar-Garza A, Pandya AG. The effect of melasma on self-esteem: A pilot study. Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Dec 8;4(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.11.003. eCollection 2018 Mar.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melasma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Microneedling-Assisted Metformin, Tranexamic Acid, and Modified Kligman's Formula for Melasma
Melasma (Facial Melasma)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Triple-Combination Cream Plus Microneedling Along With Tranexamic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Melasma: A Randomized Comparative Study
Melasma (Facial Melasma)
Not yet recruiting
COMPARISON OF TOPICAL VITAMIN C VS NIACINAMIDE IN TREATMENT OF MELASMA
Melasma
Not yet recruiting
New Treatment in Melasma
Female, With
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Baseline Dermoscopic Vascular Score and Response to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Facial Melasma
Melasma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing topical 3% tranexamic acid solution and Topical 30% metformin cream in people with Melasma, run by Foundation University Islamabad at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dr. Bad e Harum, FCPS, Fellowship in Derma (+923335090999, harum_bade@yahoo.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mean reduction in MASI (MASI) score (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07495748, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.