AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPhase 2TAG-MSNCT07497399

Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis

A Phase 2 study testing NLY01 in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 3 sites in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if the study drug will reduce brain and retinal atrophy by reducing inflammation and subsequently slowing neurodegeneration in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Multiple Sclerosis
What is being tested?
NLY01
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
120 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
28 Apr 2026to Jan 2030
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of MS (2024 criteria); clinically stable on MS therapy for ≥12 months without relapse or new lesions on brain MRI
  • Aged 18-60 years
  • Body mass index ≥27.0 kg/m2

Who cannot join

  • No GLP-1RA or GIP/GLP-1 RA in past year; no known hypersensitivity to medication class
  • No known Barrett's esophagus/gastroesophageal reflux disease, pancreatitis (including past), or gastroparesis
  • No personal/family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or history of multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2
  • No chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤50 mL/min) in past year, type 1 diabetes, known diabetic retinopathy, use of insulin or insulin-inducing medications*, dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors**, or warfarin; current/active alcohol or illicit substance abuse
  • No concerns about candidacy of individual on part of person's neurologist or study team clinicians
  • Current or planned (next 2 years) pregnancy/breastfeeding; if able to become pregnant, agree to reliable contraception (contraception requirements as discussed below)***
Show all 16Show fewer
  • currently-approved: Lispro, Aspart, Glulisine, Afrezza, Regular, Concentrated Regular, or Novolin, Velosulin, NPH, glargine, detemir, degludec, and premixed; approved secretagogues: sulphonylureas (e.g. glipizide (± metformin), glyburide (± metformin), glimepiride, pioglitazone/glimepiride) \& meglitinide analogues (nateglinide and repaglinide); currently-approved:sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, alogliptin *Contraception: Participants of childbearing potential (participant has a uterus and is pre-menopausal) must agree to use contraception, using either one method with a failure rate of <1%/year, or two methods of lesser effectiveness:
  • Contraceptive methods with a failure rate of < 1% per year includes the following:
  • Combined (estrogen and progesterone containing) hormonal contraception (vaginal ring, birth control patch) or progesterone-only hormonal contraception (birth control injections, intrauterine device (IUD), or hormone-releasing implant), or copper IUD
  • Complete abstinence from sexual encounters with a person who has testes
  • Those who do not wish to use one of the above methods of contraception must use two methods. Options include:
  • Oral hormonal contraception plus one barrier method during sexual encounter with a person who has testes (below). While typically oral hormonal contraception has a low failure rate, it is possible that the absorption of contraceptive pills taken by mouth will be impacted by the study drug and thus lower contraceptive effectiveness. Thus, people using pills as primary contraception must, during asexual encounter with a person who has testes, use a second form of barrier contraceptive (below) or must change to one of the other contraceptive methods listed above.
  • Two forms of barrier contraception during sexual encounter with a person who has testes. Examples of barrier contraceptive methods include the following:
  • A condom with or without spermicide
  • A cap, diaphragm, or sponge with or without spermicide
  • Periodic abstinence (e.g., calendar, ovulation, symptothermal, or postovulation methods) and withdrawal are not acceptable methods of contraception.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Study Manager contact

667-306-8153

mvieira4@jh.edu

United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
  • Johns Hopkins University

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

    Margaret Vieira, 667-306-8153, mvieira4@jh.edu

    Ellen Mowry, MD, MCR

    Recruiting
  • University of Kansas Medical Center

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66103

    Sara Baker, 913-588-6937, sbaker12@kumc.edu

    Sharon Lynch, MD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine

    New York, New York, 10029

    Susan Filomena, 212-241-4364, susan.e.filomena@mssm.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Targeting Agonists of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor for Multiple Sclerosis (TAG-MS): A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Arm Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate if the study drug will reduce brain and retinal atrophy by reducing inflammation and subsequently slowing neurodegeneration in people with Multiple Sclerosis. The main outcome for the trial is change in normalized brain parenchymal volume (nBPV), measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Researchers will compare outcomes from participants randomized to the study drug, versus participants randomized to placebo, to see if there are signs of slowed neurodegeneration (i.e., reduction in brain and retinal atrophy).

Being tested
NLY01, Placebo
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NLY01Drug

    NLY01 is a pegylated exenatide

  • PlaceboDrug

    Placebo (saline solution)

Study groups in NCT07497399
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NLY01 (Study Drug)Active comparator5 mg subcutaneous weekly for the first 4 weeks, then 10 mg subcutaneous weekly, with pre-planned dose adjustments if adverse events prevent full dosage.
Receives: Drug: NLY01
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in normalized (for head size) brain parenchymal volume (nBPV)

    Change in normalized (for head size) nBPV (mL). Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks). Presented as mean and standard deviation

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Change in normalized gray matter volume (mL)

    Presented as mean and standard deviation Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks).

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

  2. Change in thalamic volume (mL)

    Measured from randomization to end of treatment (up to 96 weeks). Presented as mean and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

  3. Change in cortical thickness (mm)

    Measured from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks), Presented as mean and standard deviation.

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

  4. Change in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness

    Measured in μm, from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks),

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

  5. Change in ganglion cell/inner plexiform thickness

    Measured in μm, from randomization to end of treatment (approximately 96 weeks),

    Measured: Baseline, week 48, and week 96

  6. Disability progression as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

    Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). Scale range 0-10; higher score is worse disability progression

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  7. Disability progression as assessed by the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)

    The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) calculates a single Z-score from tests of ambulation, arm dexterity, and cognition. Scores are converted to a z score with a mean and standard deviation. A higher Z-score indicates better function.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  8. Disability progression as assessed by the Expanded Disability Status Scale-Plus

    The EDSS-plus allows for documentation of progression as a composite value, considering progression as having occurred if any one of the following occurs: 20% increase in timed 25-foot walk or 9-hole peg test, or a 1.0-point increase in EDSS (if baseline is 5.5 or less) or a 0.5-point increase (if baseline is >5.5).

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  9. Patient-reported disability progression as assessed by the Patient-Determined Disease Steps

    Patient-Determined Disease Steps score range 0-8; higher is worse progression

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  10. Change in self-reported anxiety as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Anxiety Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Anxiety Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  11. Change in self-reported depression as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Depression Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  12. Change in self-reported fatigue as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Fatigue Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Fatigue Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  13. Change in self-reported upper extremity function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Upper Extremity Function Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Upper Extremity Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  14. Change in self-reported lower extremity function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Lower Extremity Function Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Lower Extremity Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  15. Change in self-reported cognitive function as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Cognitive Function Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Cognitive Function Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  16. Change in positive affect/well-being as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect/Well-being Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Positive Affect/Well-being Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  17. Change in self-reported sleep disturbance as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Sleep Disturbance Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Sleep Disturbance Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  18. Change in self-reported ability to participate in social roles Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Ability to Participate in Social Roles Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  19. Change in self-reported stigma as assessed by the Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Stigma Subscale

    Quality of Life in Neurological Disorders (Neuro-QOL) Stigma Subscale. Higher scores indicate more of the domain; distribution of T-Score has a mean of 50, standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: Approximately every 24 weeks, up to 96 weeks

  20. Adverse events

    Proportion of individuals in each arm experiencing adverse events

    Measured: From randomization to week 96

  21. Serious adverse events

    Proportion of individuals in each arm experiencing serious adverse events

    Measured: From randomization to week 96

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Mar 2026
  2. Study start28 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completionJan 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07497399
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00454859
Acronym
TAG-MS
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
11 Mar 2026
Last updated
5 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this publication, along with the protocol and analysis plan, will be available upon reasonable request to qualified researchers. Requests must include a proposal and are contingent on meeting regulatory approvals, including a signed data use agreement.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing NLY01 in people with Multiple Sclerosis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Study Manager (667-306-8153, mvieira4@jh.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in normalized (for head size) brain parenchymal volume (nBPV) (time frame: Baseline, week 48, and week 96). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in