AzTrials
AzTrials

Medication ErrorsATOMNCT07504211

Augmenting the On-Scene Medic (ATOM): A Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Augmented Reality Software on Prehospital Pediatric Medication Administration Accuracy

A study testing Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing in people with Medication Errors and Pediatric Medication Error, run by Western Michigan University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this research study is to use simulated pediatric emergencies to test the effectiveness of a drug dosing safety system for EMS providers by comparing usual care to use of an augmented reality device. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Medication Errors, Pediatric Medication Error
What is being tested?
Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
312 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Apr 2023to 31 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Eligible participants were licensed EMTPs or EMTs authorized to practice within their agency.

Who cannot join

  • strabismus
  • severe astigmatism
  • vertigo
  • significant visual impairment
  • motion sickness
  • claustrophobia
  • screen-induced nausea/headache

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Western Michigan University School of Medicine

    Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49008

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary objective of this research study is to use simulated pediatric emergencies to test the effectiveness of a drug dosing safety system for EMS providers by comparing usual care to use of an augmented reality device.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this project is to develop a safe and effective dynamic cognitive aid application for use through a head-mounted display (HMD), to reduce error rates associated with pediatric medication administration (PMA) by emergency medical services (EMS). This objective will be achieved by examining characteristics associated with PMA, using a design thinking process to develop a prototype application, examining usability of the prototype, and testing the safety and efficacy in a randomized controlled trial.

Errors associated with PMA in EMS are alarmingly high. Numerous studies have shown that there is a 31% error rate across all drugs administered to children by EMS. Medications such as midazolam and fentanyl have even higher rates at 61% and 65%, respectfully, with many being 10-fold errors. Sadly, previous strategies have had little impact on reducing error rates below 31%. System changes have failed due to inconsistencies in EMS systems, and challenges associated with medication shortages. Previously developed cognitive aids have fallen short often due to the fact they generally act as simple reference tools and do not address all causes of error associated with PMA. As a result, we are proposing the most comprehensive design process ever taken to combat this issue, utilizing advanced technology, to implement a dynamic cognitive aid to help providers improve dosing accuracy during PMA.

We hypothesize that PMA errors in EMS will be significantly reduced by this application due to the comprehensive and rigorous design thinking process we will utilize followed by a randomized controlled trial to test safety and efficacy. Our interdisciplinary team will combine the fields of pediatric emergency medicine, EMS, engineering, computer science and user interface/user experience to address this issue with the support and effort of two medical schools in Michigan. In SA1 we will develop a prototype application. This will begin with identifying user and contextual information associated with PMA, and examine failure modes, root causes, and a task analysis of the procedure. We will then proceed into a comprehensive design thinking process to develop the application. During this process we will also create a desktop program that will allow EMS agency administrators to add new medications to the HMD application. In SA2, we will examine usability of the HMD application and associated desktop program in a simulation-based environment with a sample of end users, examining task duration, cognitive load and error rates and make any necessary refinements. In SA3, we will test the HMD application in a simulation-based randomized controlled trial to examine its safety and efficacy for use in EMS. This will result in a safe and effective tool to mitigate this alarming issue in the vulnerable EMS pediatric population.

Being tested
Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing
Keywords
Simulated Pediatric Emergencies, Emergency Medical Services, Medication Errors, Patient Safety, Simulation, pediatrics

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosingOther

    Augmented reality software, developed by the study team, will be utilized by the experimental arm. This software is specifically designed to decrease errors in the prehospital pediatric medication administration process.

Study groups in NCT07504211
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Augmented realityExperimentalEMS crews who will utilize the augmented reality application
Receives: Other: Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing
Usual careNo interventionEMS crews who will provide usal care using their existing pediatric dosing references

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Drug dosing accuracy

    Proportion of medication administration tasks performed accurately, with a target difference of >20% between control and experimental groups, assessed via structured observational methods over a [2] hour timeframe.

    Measured: 2 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Tenfold dosing errors

    Number of medication doses administered at ten times, one-tenth, or greater deviation from the correct dose, assessed over a 2-hour observation window.

    Measured: 2 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Mar 2026
  2. Study start1 Apr 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
312 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07504211
Sponsor's protocol ID
Augmenting the On-Scene Medic
Other IDs
5R18HS029283-03
Acronym
ATOM
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
16 Mar 2026
Last updated
31 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • R: The r project for statistical computing. Accessed May 20, 2022. https://www.r-project.org/

  • Python eda documentation. Accessed May 20, 2022. https://pyeda.readthedocs.io/en/latest/index.html

  • Ledalab software. Accessed May 20, 2022. http://www.ledalab.de/software.htm

  • Romine WL, Schroeder NL, Graft J, Yang F, Sadeghi R, Zabihimayvan M, Kadariya D, Banerjee T. Using Machine Learning to Train a Wearable Device for Measuring Students' Cognitive Load during Problem-Solving Activities Based on Electrodermal Activity, Body Temperature, and Heart Rate: Development of a Cognitive Load Tracker for Both Personal and Classroom Use. Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 27;20(17):4833. doi: 10.3390/s20174833.

    PubMed 32867055
  • Saitis C, Parvez MZ, Kalimeri K. Cognitive load assessment from EEG and peripheral biosignals for the design of visually impaired mobility aids. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. Published online 2018:1-9. doi:10.1155/2018/8971206

  • Wilson JC, Nair S, Scielzo S, Larson EC. Objective measures of cognitive load using deep multi-modal learning. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies. 2021;5(1):1-35. doi:10.1145/3448111

  • Leuze C, Zoellner A, Schmidt AR, Cushing RE, Fischer MJ, Joltes K, Zientara GP. Augmented reality visualization tool for the future of tactical combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Aug 1;91(2S Suppl 2):S40-S45. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003263.

    PubMed 33938509
  • Mela CA, Papay FA, Liu Y. Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging and Multimodal Surgical Navigation Using Goggle System. Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1444:85-95. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3721-9_9.

    PubMed 27283420
  • Follmann A, Ohligs M, Hochhausen N, Beckers SK, Rossaint R, Czaplik M. Technical Support by Smart Glasses During a Mass Casualty Incident: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial on Technically Assisted Triage and Telemedical App Use in Disaster Medicine. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jan 3;21(1):e11939. doi: 10.2196/11939.

    PubMed 30609988
  • Siebert JN, Ehrler F, Gervaix A, Haddad K, Lacroix L, Schrurs P, Sahin A, Lovis C, Manzano S. Adherence to AHA Guidelines When Adapted for Augmented Reality Glasses for Assisted Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 29;19(5):e183. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7379.

    PubMed 28554878
  • Scherl C, Stratemeier J, Rotter N, Hesser J, Schonberg SO, Servais JJ, Mannle D, Lammert A. Augmented Reality with HoloLens(R) in Parotid Tumor Surgery: A Prospective Feasibility Study. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2021;83(6):439-448. doi: 10.1159/000514640. Epub 2021 Mar 30.

    PubMed 33784686
  • Frantz T, Jansen B, Duerinck J, Vandemeulebroucke J. Augmenting Microsoft's HoloLens with vuforia tracking for neuronavigation. Healthc Technol Lett. 2018 Oct 4;5(5):221-225. doi: 10.1049/htl.2018.5079. eCollection 2018 Oct.

    PubMed 30464854
  • Song T, Yang C, Dianat O, Azimi E. Endodontic guided treatment using augmented reality on a head-mounted display system. Healthcare Technology Letters. 2018;5(5):201-207. doi:10.1049/htl.2018.5062

  • Al Janabi HF, Aydin A, Palaneer S, Macchione N, Al-Jabir A, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Effectiveness of the HoloLens mixed-reality headset in minimally invasive surgery: a simulation-based feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2020 Mar;34(3):1143-1149. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06862-3. Epub 2019 Jun 18.

    PubMed 31214807
  • Vorraber W, Gasser J, Webb H, Neubacher D, Url P. Assessing augmented reality in production: remote-assisted maintenance with HoloLens. Procedia CIRP. 2020;88:139-144. doi:10.1016/j.procir.2020.05.025

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Augmented reality software for pediatric drug dosing in people with Medication Errors and Pediatric Medication Error, run by Western Michigan University School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Drug dosing accuracy (time frame: 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07504211, which also lists 40 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Mar 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in