MyopiaNCT07505264
Comparison of Myopic Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) With VISUMAX 500 Versus VISUMAX 800 Platforms
A study testing SMILE surgery with Visumax 500 and SMILE surgery with Visumax 800 in people with Myopia, run by Singapore Eye Research Institute at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure is a well-known procedure for the correction of myopia. The purpose of this research study is to compare the two SMILE procedures with different laser platforms (VISUMAX 500 and VISUMAX 800) used for the correction of short-sightedness. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myopia
- What is being tested?
- SMILE surgery with Visumax 500 and SMILE surgery with Visumax 800
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 1 Dec 2025to Jun 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Cycloplegic spherical equivalent of >-1.00D
- Refractive cylinder -2.00 D or less; anisometropia <1.00D
- Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 6/12 or better in both eyes
- Spherical or cylindrical error has progressed at -0.50 D or less per year from date of baseline measurement in both eyes
- Contact lens wearers must have removed contact lenses at least 2 weeks before the baseline measurement
- No evidence of irregular astigmatism on corneal topography in both eyes
Who cannot join
- Progressive or unstable myopia and/or astigmatism
- Clinical or corneal topographic evidence of keratoconus
- Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease such as uveitis, severe dry eyes, severe allergic eye disease, glaucoma, visually significant cataract, and retinal disease
- Previous corneal surgery or trauma within the corneal flap zone
- Patent corneal vascularization within 1 mm of the corneal flap zone
- Taking systemic medications likely to affect wound healing, such as corticosteroids and antimetabolites
- Systemically immunocompromised or systemic disease likely to affect wound healing, such as diabetes, connective tissue disease, and severe atopy; pregnant or nursing
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Singapore National Eye Centre (SNEC)
Singapore, 169856
Jodhbir S Mehta, MD, FRCS, +65 6322 7478, jodhbir.s.mehta@singhealth.com.sg
About this study
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure is a well-known procedure for the correction of myopia. The purpose of this research study is to compare the two SMILE procedures with different laser platforms (VISUMAX 500 and VISUMAX 800) used for the correction of short-sightedness. The VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 perform the same procedure, but the VISUMAX 800 is a newer platform. This study is being done to see if the newer VISUMAX 800 provides the same or better results than the VISUMAX 500.
Read the detailed description
Surgical correction of refractive errors is widely performed. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a flapless refractive procedure introduced in 2011 for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In this procedure, a stromal lenticule is created within the cornea using a femtosecond laser and extracted through a small incision (2.0-5.0 mm). The procedure involves docking, femtosecond laser application, lenticule dissection from the surrounding stroma, and lenticule extraction.
The VisuMax 800 femtosecond laser system has recently been introduced and incorporates several technical advancements compared with the previous VisuMax 500 platform, including a faster 2-MHz laser frequency, a centration guidance system (CentraLign), a cyclotorsion compensation system (OcuLign), separate laser and microscope arms, and heads-up docking. Early reports of SMILE performed using the VisuMax 800 have demonstrated excellent visual and refractive outcomes that appear comparable to those reported with the VisuMax 500 femtosecond laser. However, limited data are available directly comparing the two platforms across multiple clinical, biomechanical, molecular, and subjective outcome measures.
This randomized controlled contralateral-eye study will enroll 100 patients undergoing bilateral SMILE surgery. In each participant, one eye will be randomly assigned to undergo SMILE using the VisuMax 500 platform and the fellow eye will undergo SMILE using the VisuMax 800 platform. This design allows direct within-patient comparison while minimizing inter-individual variability.
The study aims to compare refractive and visual outcomes, corneal biomechanical changes, tear proteomic profiles, corneal lenticule metabolomic characteristics, ocular surface parameters, patient-reported subjective outcomes, and surgeons' intraoperative experiences between the two platforms.
Assessments will be performed preoperatively (baseline), immediately after surgery, and at postoperative follow-up visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Being tested
- SMILE surgery with Visumax 500, SMILE surgery with Visumax 800
- Keywords
- SMILE, Visumax, Refractive surgery, RCT
- Medical subject headings
- Myopia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SMILE surgery with Visumax 500Procedure or surgery
Routinely conducted procedure using Visumax 500 laser system for correction of myopia.
SMILE surgery with Visumax 800Procedure or surgery
Routinely conducted procedure using Visumax 800 laser system for correction of myopia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 500 | Active comparator | Eyes that have undergone SMILE using Visumax 500 laser system Receives: Procedure: SMILE surgery with Visumax 500 |
| Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 800 | Active comparator | Eyes that have undergone SMILE using Visumax 800 laser system Receives: Procedure: SMILE surgery with Visumax 800 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual outcomes
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Refractive outcomes: Nine standard graphs for corneal refractive surgery: Post-operative UDVA versus pre-operative CDVA; Change in Snellen lines from pre-operative CDVA to post-operative UDVA; Change in Snellen lines from pre-operative CDVA to post-operative CDVA; Attempted versus achieved spherical equivalent refraction; Accuracy of post-operative spherical equivalent refraction to target; Stability of spherical equivalent refraction, shown as the trend of mean Spherical Equivalent (SE) at preop, one week, one month, three months, six months, and one year post-operatively; Change in refractive astigmatism; Target-induced astigmatism (TIA) vs. surgically induced astigmatism (SIA); Histogram of refractive astigmatism angle of error. Refractive predictability, which is defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±1.0 D of the intended target.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (18)
Patient-reported intraoperative experiences
The in-house patient questionnaire is used to assess patient-reported subjective intraoperative experiences. Rather than utilizing numerical scoring, it uses qualitative descriptors and binary "Yes/No" responses to evaluate perceived discomfort, fear levels, and visual phenomena-such as light perception loss or image clarity-during specific surgical steps like vacuum suction and lenticule creation. The form also includes a ranking system for identifying the most fearful parts of the procedure and asks patients to compare the experience, including perceived speed, between their right and left eyes.
Measured: Up to 1 hour post-surgery
Patient-reported outcomes
The in-house questionnaire is used to assess patient-reported outcomes. This evaluates postoperative outcomes for SMILE surgery performed on the VisuMax 500 and 800 platforms. Rather than using simple numerical scores, the assessment captures subjective patient experiences through qualitative descriptors and frequency-based scales for symptoms like light sensitivity, dryness, and visual disturbances. It also identifies specific environmental triggers, such as lighting conditions, and monitors the functional impact of surgery on daily activities like night driving.
Measured: 1 year
Surgeon experience
The Surgeon Questionnaire evaluates the intraoperative technical performance and early postoperative outcomes of SMILE procedures. Rather than relying on a single numerical score, it utilizes a combination of binary "Yes/No" indicators for surgical complications and descriptive scales to grade tissue adherence and ease of lenticule extraction.
Measured: Up to 1 hour post-surgery
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) is a 12-item questionnaire used to assess the symptoms of ocular irritation. The score ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate more severe ocular surface disease and a worse outcome.
Measured: 1 year
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) is a questionnaire used to evaluate ocular pain and its impact on daily functioning and quality of life. The score ranges from 0 to10, where 0 indicates no pain or interference and 10 indicates the most severe pain or maximum interference.
Measured: 1 year
Corvis ST
The Corvis ST (Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology) is a non-contact device that measures corneal biomechanical properties by recording corneal deformation in response to an air puff. The higher deformation amplitude (mm) indicating softer cornea and lower corneal stiffness.
Measured: 1 year
BOSS scan
The Brillouin Optical Scanning System (BOSS) is a non-contact device that maps corneal and ocular tissue biomechanics using Brillouin light scattering. It measures Brillouin frequency shifts at multiple points, which are converted to stiffness values (GPa). Higher Brillouin shifts indicate stiffer tissue, while lower shifts indicate softer tissue, allowing quantitative assessment of corneal biomechanical properties.
Measured: 1 year
Schirmer I test
The Schirmer test is a clinical measure of tear production. A standardized filter paper strip is placed in the lower conjunctival fornix for 5 minutes, and the length of wetting (mm) is recorded. Lower values indicate reduced tear secretion, with ≤5 mm typically suggesting severe aqueous tear deficiency, 6-10 mm moderate, and >10 mm normal tear production.
Measured: 1 year
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT) measures tear film stability by timing the interval between a blink and the first appearance of a dry spot on the cornea after fluorescein instillation. It is recorded in seconds, with shorter times indicating less stable tear film. Values <10 s are generally considered abnormal, while longer times indicate normal tear stability.
Measured: 1 year
Corneal sensitivity
Corneal sensitivity is measured using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer, which applies a 0-6 cm nylon filament to different corneal locations. The filament length at which an escape response, blink reflex, or subject-reported sensation occurred is recorded. Summing the responses across all tested locations yielded a total corneal sensitivity score ranging from 0 to 30 cm, with higher values indicating greater corneal sensitivity.
Measured: 1 year
Corneal and Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining (NEI score)
The National Eye Institute (NEI) scale is used to grade the severity of ocular surface staining. The cornea is divided into 5 sectors (central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal), and the conjunctiva is divided into 6 sectors. Each sector is scored from 0 to 3 based on the density of staining. The total corneal score ranges from 0 to 15, and the total conjunctival score ranges from 0 to 18 (total maximum score of 33). A score of 0 represents no staining (best outcome), and a higher total score indicates more severe ocular surface damage (worst outcome).
Measured: 1 year
Oxford Grading Scale for ocular surface staining
The Oxford Grading Scale is a validated method used to quantify the severity of epithelial damage via fluorescein staining. Staining is assessed in three zones: the nasal conjunctiva, the cornea, and the temporal conjunctiva. Each zone is graded from 0 to 5 based on the density of punctate staining. The total score ranges from 0 to 15, where a score of 0 indicates no staining (best outcome) and a score of 15 indicates confluent staining (worst outcome). Higher scores represent increased ocular surface disease severity.
Measured: 1 year
Corneal Tomography
Corneal tomography is a non-invasive imaging technique that generates a comprehensive 3D map of the cornea's front and back surfaces. The measurements include corneal thickness (μm) and surface curvature (D).
Measured: 1 year
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT)
Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography (ASOCT) is a non-invasive imaging technique that produces high-resolution, cross-sectional views of the front portion of the eye. It provides precise structural measurements, including corneal thickness (µm) and anterior chamber dimensions or curvature (mm). These detailed values allow for the clear visualization of ocular anatomy and the monitoring of subtle changes in tissue structure over time.
Measured: 1 year
Higher order abberations (HOAs)
Higher-order aberrations (HOAs) are complex optical imperfections, such as coma and spherical aberration, that cannot be corrected by standard spectacles or contact lenses. These irregularities are measured using wavefront sensing technology, which quantifies the deviation of light as it passes through the eye's optical media. The primary numerical result is the Root Mean Square (RMS) error, expressed in microns (μm), which represents the total magnitude of these distortions. In a typical healthy eye, the HOA RMS is generally less than 0.30 μm, while values exceeding 0.50 μm often indicate clinically significant visual disturbances like halos or glare.
Measured: Change in HOAs from Baseline to 12 months
In-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)
In Vivo Confocal Microscopy (IVCM) is a non-invasive imaging technique that provides high-resolution, real-time "optical sections" of the living cornea at a cellular level. Rather than traditional photography, it produces detailed scans of individual corneal layers, allowing for the precise measurement of cell density in cells/mm² and nerve fiber morphology in µm/mm². Particularly this is used to assess the nerve and keratocyte changes after surgery.
Measured: Change in IVCM findings from Baseline to 12 months
Intraoperative centration of the laser
Intraoperative centration of the laser is measured by the offset distance (in millimeters) between the intended treatment center and the actual center of the laser-cut lenticule. During docking, the surgeon aligns the suction cone with a specific reference point, such as the corneal vertex or pupil center, while the patient fixes their gaze. An offset of less than 0.2 mm indicates ideal centration, whereas a displacement above 0.5 mm is generally considered clinically significant and may cause visual disturbances.
Measured: During the surgical procedure
Complications
Incidence of surgical and clinical complications related to the SMILE procedure is recorded. Intraoperative complications include suction loss, opaque bubble layer formation, or difficult lenticule extraction. Postoperative complications include epithelial ingrowth, diffuse lamellar keratitis, infectious keratitis, or transient light sensitivity syndrome. Complications will be recorded based on clinical examination and slit-lamp microscopy. Results will be reported as the number of eyes experiencing one or more adverse events.
Measured: From the start of surgery to 1 year post-procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2026
- Study start1 Dec 2025
- Primary completionMay 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for MyopiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Within-Participant (Contralateral Eye Design)
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore Eye Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jodhbir S Mehta, MD, FRCS, Principal investigator, Singapore National Eye Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07505264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-4584
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 16 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 1 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Myopic Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) With VISUMAX 500 Versus VISUMAX 800 Platforms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07505264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-4584
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Keywords
- SMILE, Visumax, Refractive surgery, RCT
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Singapore Eye Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) procedure is a well-known procedure for the correction of myopia. The purpose of this research study is to compare the two SMILE procedures with different laser platforms (VISUMAX 500 and VISUMAX 800) used for the correction of short-sightedness. The VISUMAX 800 and VISUMAX 500 perform the same procedure, but the VISUMAX 800 is a newer platform. This study is being done to see if the newer VISUMAX 800 provides the same or better results than the VISUMAX 500.
Detailed description
Surgical correction of refractive errors is widely performed. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a flapless refractive procedure introduced in 2011 for the treatment of myopia and myopic astigmatism. In this procedure, a stromal lenticule is created within the cornea using a femtosecond laser and extracted through a small incision (2.0-5.0 mm). The procedure involves docking, femtosecond laser application, lenticule dissection from the surrounding stroma, and lenticule extraction.
The VisuMax 800 femtosecond laser system has recently been introduced and incorporates several technical advancements compared with the previous VisuMax 500 platform, including a faster 2-MHz laser frequency, a centration guidance system (CentraLign), a cyclotorsion compensation system (OcuLign), separate laser and microscope arms, and heads-up docking. Early reports of SMILE performed using the VisuMax 800 have demonstrated excellent visual and refractive outcomes that appear comparable to those reported with the VisuMax 500 femtosecond laser. However, limited data are available directly comparing the two platforms across multiple clinical, biomechanical, molecular, and subjective outcome measures.
This randomized controlled contralateral-eye study will enroll 100 patients undergoing bilateral SMILE surgery. In each participant, one eye will be randomly assigned to undergo SMILE using the VisuMax 500 platform and the fellow eye will undergo SMILE using the VisuMax 800 platform. This design allows direct within-patient comparison while minimizing inter-individual variability.
The study aims to compare refractive and visual outcomes, corneal biomechanical changes, tear proteomic profiles, corneal lenticule metabolomic characteristics, ocular surface parameters, patient-reported subjective outcomes, and surgeons' intraoperative experiences between the two platforms.
Assessments will be performed preoperatively (baseline), immediately after surgery, and at postoperative follow-up visits at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, care provider)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Within-Participant (Contralateral Eye Design)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 500 | Active comparator | Procedure: SMILE surgery with Visumax 500Eyes that have undergone SMILE using Visumax 500 laser system |
| Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 800 | Active comparator | Procedure: SMILE surgery with Visumax 800Eyes that have undergone SMILE using Visumax 800 laser system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Cycloplegic spherical equivalent of >-1.00D
- Refractive cylinder -2.00 D or less; anisometropia <1.00D
- Best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 6/12 or better in both eyes
- Spherical or cylindrical error has progressed at -0.50 D or less per year from date of baseline measurement in both eyes
- Contact lens wearers must have removed contact lenses at least 2 weeks before the baseline measurement
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Progressive or unstable myopia and/or astigmatism
- Clinical or corneal topographic evidence of keratoconus
- Residual, recurrent or active ocular disease such as uveitis, severe dry eyes, severe allergic eye disease, glaucoma, visually significant cataract, and retinal disease
- Previous corneal surgery or trauma within the corneal flap zone
- Patent corneal vascularization within 1 mm of the corneal flap zone
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SMILE surgery with Visumax 500Routinely conducted procedure using Visumax 500 laser system for correction of myopia. | Procedure or surgery | Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 500 |
| SMILE surgery with Visumax 800Routinely conducted procedure using Visumax 800 laser system for correction of myopia. | Procedure or surgery | Eyes that have undergone SMILE with Visumax 800 |
Primary outcome
Visual outcomes
Time frame: 1 year
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA). Refractive outcomes: Nine standard graphs for corneal refractive surgery: Post-operative UDVA versus pre-operative CDVA; Change in Snellen lines from pre-operative CDVA to post-operative UDVA; Change in Snellen lines from pre-operative CDVA to post-operative CDVA; Attempted versus achieved spherical equivalent refraction; Accuracy of post-operative spherical equivalent refraction to target; Stability of spherical equivalent refraction, shown as the trend of mean Spherical Equivalent (SE) at preop, one week, one month, three months, six months, and one year post-operatively; Change in refractive astigmatism; Target-induced astigmatism (TIA) vs. surgically induced astigmatism (SIA); Histogram of refractive astigmatism angle of error. Refractive predictability, which is defined as the proportion number of eyes achieving a postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) within ±1.0 D of the intended target.
18 secondary outcomes
Patient-reported intraoperative experiences
Time frame: Up to 1 hour post-surgery
Patient-reported outcomes
Time frame: 1 year
Surgeon experience
Time frame: Up to 1 hour post-surgery
Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Time frame: 1 year
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS)
Time frame: 1 year
Corvis ST
Time frame: 1 year
BOSS scan
Time frame: 1 year
Schirmer I test
Time frame: 1 year
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)
Time frame: 1 year
Corneal sensitivity
Time frame: 1 year
Corneal and Conjunctival Fluorescein Staining (NEI score)
Time frame: 1 year
Oxford Grading Scale for ocular surface staining
Time frame: 1 year
Corneal Tomography
Time frame: 1 year
Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT)
Time frame: 1 year
Higher order abberations (HOAs)
Time frame: Change in HOAs from Baseline to 12 months
In-vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM)
Time frame: Change in IVCM findings from Baseline to 12 months
Intraoperative centration of the laser
Time frame: During the surgical procedure
Complications
Time frame: From the start of surgery to 1 year post-procedure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myopia
Recruiting
Managing Premyopia in Chinese Children Using Artificial Intelligence Assisted Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments Based Spectacle Lens: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Pre-myopia, Myopia
Not yet recruiting
BRIGHT-LIGHT: Studying Red Light Therapy for Severe Short-Sightedness or Short-Sightedness That Worsens Despite Standard Treatment
Myopia, Myopia Progressing
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance and Outcomes After Toric Lens Transition
Astigmatism
Active, not recruiting
Effect of IOP Lowering on Progressive HM
High Myopia, Intraocular Pressure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a New Laser Refractive Vision Correction Using the TENEO™ 317 Model 2
Hyperopia and Myopia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Jodhbir S Mehta, MD, FRCS principal investigator
Singapore National Eye Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SMILE surgery with Visumax 500 and SMILE surgery with Visumax 800 in people with Myopia, run by Singapore Eye Research Institute at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jodhbir S Mehta, MD, FRCS (+65 6322 7478, jodhbir.s.mehta@singhealth.com.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual outcomes (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Apr 2026.