VitiligoPhase 2/3VitiligoNCT07509242
Comparative Efficacy of hUCMSC-Secretome Delivered Via Microneedling and Intradermal Microinjection as Adjuvant Therapy to NB-UVB in Nonsegmental Vitiligo: A Quasi-Experimental Study
A Phase 2/3 study testing NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome, receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection and NB-UVB alone in people with Vitiligo, run by Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM at 1 site in Indonesia.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Vitiligo
- What is being tested?
- NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome, receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection and NB-UVB alone
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndonesia
- Study dates
- 18 Mar 2026to 18 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a diagnosis of non-segmental vitiligo (established by a dermatologist).
- Age 18-60 years.
- Fitzpatrick skin types III-V.
- Stable vitiligo lesions for at least 6 months (no new lesions and no lesion expansion >10% of body surface area within the past 6 months).
- Total lesion involvement of 1-20% body surface area (BSA).
- Willing to comply with the full course of therapy and all scheduled follow-up visits during the study.
- Provision of written informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Segmental, universal, or other vitiligo types that are difficult to standardize (e.g., lesions limited to the genital area).
- Currently receiving or having received within the past 3 months:
- Systemic immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, JAK inhibitors, etc.).
- Other phototherapy modalities (e.g., PUVA, excimer laser) within the past 3 months.
- History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring at the treatment sites.
- Active infection at the lesion sites (bacterial, viral, or fungal) or other skin diseases that may interfere with pigmentation assessment.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- History of skin cancer, lupus, or other photosensitive disorders.
- Severe allergy to secretome components or gel excipients (if known).
- Uncontrolled systemic diseases (e.g., heart failure, renal failure, active systemic autoimmune disease) that may compromise follow-up compliance.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Indonesia1 site
Klinik Precious Me
Tangerang, Banten, 11440
Sukmawati Tansil Tan, Dr., +6287871111318, sukmawati@fk.untar.ac.id
Yohanes Firmansyah, MD, +6281297934375, yohanes@fk.untar.ac.id
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are there differences in the level of vitiligo lesion repigmentation among the secretome therapy via microneedling, intradermal microinjection, and NB-UVB phototherapy groups?
- Are there differences in the time to onset of repigmentation among the treatment groups? What are the safety profiles and adverse events associated with each treatment modality?
- Are there differences in patient satisfaction and quality of life after undergoing each therapy?
- Are there differences in vitiligo recurrence rates during the follow-up period among the treatment groups?
Read more
Participants will be allocated into three groups as follows:
- Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
- Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
- Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention period lasts 12 weeks, with follow-up until week 24.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence.
This quasi-experimental three-group study involves patients with nonsegmental vitiligo who meet the inclusion criteria at the Precious Me Clinic, Serpong.
- Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
- Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
- Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention lasts for 12 weeks with follow-up until week 24. Assessments are conducted using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), onset of repigmentation, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Global Assessment, adverse event monitoring, and standardized dermatologic photographic documentation. Data analysis is performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and proportion tests as appropriate.
- Conditions
- Vitiligo
- Being tested
- NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome, receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection, NB-UVB alone
- Keywords
- Dermatology, Microneedling, NB-UVB, Secretome, Vitiligo
- Medical subject headings
- Vitiligo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretomeOther
Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injectionOther
Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection
NB-UVB aloneDrug
Group C receives NB-UVB alone
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome Receives: Other: NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome |
| Group B | Experimental | receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection. Receives: Other: receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection |
| Group C | Experimental | receives NB-UVB alone. Receives: Drug: NB-UVB alone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Patients Achieving ≥50% Repigmentation Assessed by Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% repigmentation of target vitiligo lesions, measured using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Repigmentation will be calculated as the percentage reduction in depigmented area compared to baseline. Assessment will be performed by blinded dermatologists using standardized clinical evaluation and validated scoring methods.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (primary endpoint), and Week 24 (follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in VASI Score from Baseline
The absolute change in VASI score (points) from baseline to each follow-up visit will be evaluated. VASI quantifies both the extent of vitiligo involvement and degree of depigmentation. Lower scores indicate clinical improvement.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Time to Onset of Repigmentation
Time (in weeks) from initiation of treatment to the first clinically observable repigmentation (≥10% repigmentation or perifollicular repigmentation), assessed by dermatologists based on clinical examination and standardized dermatological photography.
Measured: Up to Week 12
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Quality of life will be assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. The outcome will be expressed as the change in DLQI score (points) from baseline, with lower scores indicating improved quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Patient Satisfaction Measured by Likert Scale
Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied to 5 = very satisfied). The outcome will be reported as mean satisfaction score.
Measured: Week 12 and Week 24
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score
Clinical improvement as perceived by patients will be evaluated using the Patient Global Assessment (PGA) scale (0-4), where higher scores indicate greater perceived improvement.
Measured: Week 12 and Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2026
- Study start18 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion18 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion18 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for VitiligoStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM, Tarumanagara University
- Investigators
- Sukmawati Tansil Tan, Principal investigator, Tarumanagara UniversityYohanes Firmansyah, Study director, Universitas TarumanagaraMichael Jansen Politan, Study chair, Precious Me Clinic
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07509242
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15.01.2026.15.04
- Acronym
- Vitiligo
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparative Efficacy of hUCMSC-Secretome Delivered Via Microneedling and Intradermal Microinjection as Adjuvant Therapy to NB-UVB in Nonsegmental Vitiligo: A Quasi-Experimental Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07509242
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Vitiligo / 15.01.2026.15.04
- Conditions
- Vitiligo
- Keywords
- Dermatology, Microneedling, NB-UVB, Secretome, Vitiligo
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MMUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 18 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Are there differences in the level of vitiligo lesion repigmentation among the secretome therapy via microneedling, intradermal microinjection, and NB-UVB phototherapy groups?
- Are there differences in the time to onset of repigmentation among the treatment groups? What are the safety profiles and adverse events associated with each treatment modality?
- Are there differences in patient satisfaction and quality of life after undergoing each therapy?
- Are there differences in vitiligo recurrence rates during the follow-up period among the treatment groups?
Participants will be allocated into three groups as follows:
- Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
- Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
- Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention period lasts 12 weeks, with follow-up until week 24.
Detailed description
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of SM-hUCMSC secretome administered via microneedling and intradermal microinjection as adjuvant therapy to NB-UVB, compared with NB-UVB alone, in terms of repigmentation, onset of improvement, safety, patient satisfaction, and vitiligo recurrence.
This quasi-experimental three-group study involves patients with nonsegmental vitiligo who meet the inclusion criteria at the Precious Me Clinic, Serpong.
- Group A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome.
- Group B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection.
- Group C receives NB-UVB alone. The intervention lasts for 12 weeks with follow-up until week 24. Assessments are conducted using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI), onset of repigmentation, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient Global Assessment, adverse event monitoring, and standardized dermatologic photographic documentation. Data analysis is performed using ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis tests, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and proportion tests as appropriate.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group A | Experimental | Other: NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretomereceives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome |
| Group B | Experimental | Other: receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injectionreceives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection. |
| Group C | Experimental | Drug: NB-UVB alonereceives NB-UVB alone. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with a diagnosis of non-segmental vitiligo (established by a dermatologist).
- Age 18-60 years.
- Fitzpatrick skin types III-V.
- Stable vitiligo lesions for at least 6 months (no new lesions and no lesion expansion >10% of body surface area within the past 6 months).
- Total lesion involvement of 1-20% body surface area (BSA).
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Segmental, universal, or other vitiligo types that are difficult to standardize (e.g., lesions limited to the genital area).
- Currently receiving or having received within the past 3 months:
- Systemic immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., systemic corticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate, JAK inhibitors, etc.).
- Other phototherapy modalities (e.g., PUVA, excimer laser) within the past 3 months.
- History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scarring at the treatment sites.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretomeGroup A receives NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome. | Other | Group A |
| receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injectionGroup B receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection | Other | Group B |
| NB-UVB aloneGroup C receives NB-UVB alone | Drug | Group C |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Patients Achieving ≥50% Repigmentation Assessed by Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI)
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (primary endpoint), and Week 24 (follow-up)
The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% repigmentation of target vitiligo lesions, measured using the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI). Repigmentation will be calculated as the percentage reduction in depigmented area compared to baseline. Assessment will be performed by blinded dermatologists using standardized clinical evaluation and validated scoring methods.
5 secondary outcomes
Change in VASI Score from Baseline
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24
Time to Onset of Repigmentation
Time frame: Up to Week 12
Change in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12, Week 24
Patient Satisfaction Measured by Likert Scale
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score
Time frame: Week 12 and Week 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Vitiligo
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of EB06 Versus Placebo in Adults With Moderate to Severe Non-segmental Vitiligo
Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV)
RecruitingObservational study
National Ophthalmic Genotyping and Phenotyping Network (eyeGENE (Registered Trademark)), Stage 3 - Expansion of DNA and Data Repositories for Rare Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases
Inherited Ophthalmic Diseases, Hypopigmentation Disorder
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
Two Trials to Evaluate TEV-53408 in Participants With Non-Segmental Vitiligo
Vitiligo
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of LY4005130 in Adult Participants With Non-Segmental Vitiligo
Vitiligo, Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Nonsegmental Vitiligo
Nonsegmental Vitiligo
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sukmawati Tansil Tan principal investigator
Tarumanagara University
Yohanes Firmansyah study director
Universitas Tarumanagara
Michael Jansen Politan study chair
Precious Me Clinic
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing NB-UVB combined with microneedling and topical 10% secretome, receives NB-UVB combined with intradermal secretome injection and NB-UVB alone in people with Vitiligo, run by Yohanes Firmansyah, dr, MH, MM at 1 site in Indonesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Indonesia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sukmawati Tansil Tan, Dr. (+6287871111318, sukmawati@fk.untar.ac.id), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Patients Achieving ≥50% Repigmentation Assessed by Vitiligo Area Scoring Index (VASI) (time frame: Baseline, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 (primary endpoint), and Week 24 (follow-up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.