Guided Immediate Implant PlacementNCT07509476
Labial Bone Thickness Change in Immediate Implant Placement In Maxillary Esthetic Zone
A study testing Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm and Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm in people with Guided Immediate Implant Placement and Jumping Gap, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of distance between the implant and the bone on the resultant bone thickness adjacent to the implant in place of a broken down tooth that happens to be bounded by two natural teeth. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Guided Immediate Implant Placement, Jumping Gap, Labial Bone Thickness Change
- What is being tested?
- Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm and Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 22 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 18 Jun 2025to 18 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a bounded single non-restorable upper tooth in the anterior maxilla (15-25) FDI (El Ebiary et al., 2023b)
- Patients with an age range of 21 to 65 years old (Levine et al., 2022)
- Patients with good oral hygiene with BoP ≤ 10 % (Chapple et al., 2018)
- Compliant patients willing to follow up to one year.
- Remaining labial bone thickness ≥ 1mm measured on C.B.C.T. and confirmed on the day of surgery after tooth extraction and before final implant placement.
Who cannot join
- The presence of acute/active infection related to the non-restorable tooth (Block et al., 2009) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Presence of labial bone defect as fenestration/dehiscence (Crespi et al., 2008) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Large cyst or pathological lesion related to the tooth (Tallarico et al., 2016-2017) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023); (Morton, Wismeijer, Chen, Hamilton, Wittneben, Casentini, Gonzaga, Lazarin, Martin, Molinero-Mourelle, et al., 2023)
- History of radiation to the maxilla (Cannizzaro et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- History of bisphosphonate therapy or other anti-resorptive agents (Cannizzaro et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Uncontrolled systemic or metabolic disease. (Cecchinato et al., 2015) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Patients with parafunctional habits or active periodontitis (Cannizzaro et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023) 8- Tobacco abuse (>10 cigarettes per day) (Canullo et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- 9- Alcohol abuse (Block et al., 2009) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Cairo University
Cairo
Isaac E Bastawros, +2 01004213926, isaac.bastawros@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Change in Labial Bone Thickness in Immediate Implant Placement In Maxillary Esthetic Zone Comparing a Jumping Gap of Less Than 2 mm to Equal or More Than 2 mm: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of distance between the implant and the bone on the resultant bone thickness adjacent to the implant in place of a broken down tooth that happens to be bounded by two natural teeth.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Does the horizontal implant position (and hence the gap between the implant and the socket wall i.e. jumping gap) affect the resultant labial bone thickness? Will it affect the quality of soft tissue, esthetics and patient satisfaction?
Participants will have an implant placed using a surgical guide with a jumping gap either less than 2 mm or equal or more than 2 mm and will be asked to visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups, radiographs, and readings.
Read the detailed description
Tooth replacement with dental implants in the esthetic zone is often accompanied with esthetic complications such as mid-facial gingival recession, implant thread exposure and a concave contour. Various methods have been introduced to minimize the occurrence of such complications, including applying connective tissue grafts, grafting the jumping gap, performing immediate temporization and using surgical guides to ensure the placement of the implant in the optimal prosthetic position.(El Ebiary et al., 2023)
It would be beneficial to establish an evidence-based protocol for the jumping gap distance to follow through, with all immediate implants in the aesthetic zone, most of which have thin labial bone to begin with. Though there have been multiple studies conducted, specifically in the past few years, there is insufficient evidence that tells us what the optimal jumping gap is. (Hamilton et al., 2023) (Lambert et al., 2023).
Therefore, the aim of our study is to evaluate this survival rate and the amount of change in labial bone thickness that will result in different horizontal defect dimensions (HDD) ≤ 2 mm in comparison to the > 2 mm HDD.
The study will be conducted at the department of periodontology at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. Patients screening will be carried out until the target sample is achieved.
Pre-operative phase:
Clinical evaluation:
- An assessment of the patients' medical history and overall oral health will be conducted to ensure that it meets the study's eligibility requirements for participation.
- Screening will then be done using periapical radiographs.
- After patients are found eligible for enrolment, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image will be taken to record the pre-operative bone level for the patient.
- Following an in-depth description of the study's purpose and steps, the enrolled patients will have the opportunity to discuss with the researcher the informed consent.
- The patients will sign a written informed consent form that has been translated into Arabic after they give their approval for the intervention and to follow the study process.
- Impressions/digital scans will be taken for the patient in addition to the CBCT scan. A surgical guide will be fabricated and 3D-printed using model resin.
Radiographic examination:
A preoperative CBCT will be performed for patients who met the inclusion criteria to ensure their eligibility prior to surgery. (Joshi and Gupta, 2015)
Patient Preparation:
- A full mouth supra and subgingival debridement (if needed) will be carried out for all recruited patients prior to surgery. Patients will be given oral hygiene instructions including brushing their teeth at least twice daily, in addition to rinse twice daily with 0.12% chlorohexidine mouthwash for two weeks.
- Surgical treatment will not be scheduled until the patient demonstrates adequate plaque control (i.e., FMPS < 20% and FMBS ≤ 10%).
- Patients will be prescribed pre-surgical prophylactic antibiotic (2 g of amoxicillin 1 h before surgery or Clindamycin 600 mg in case of allergy to penicillin). Additionally, the patient will be asked to rinse with chlorhexidine 0.2% mouth wash for 1 min at the start of the surgery. (Salgado-Peralvo et al., 2022)
Surgical phase:
- Following the administration of local anesthesia, atraumatic extraction of the remaining root will be done using a 15C lancet and a periotome to sever the periodontal ligament then using forceps with rotatory motion to pull out the root(s). The integrity of remaining labial bone wall (≥ 1mm) will be checked prior to the drilling sequence of the implant placement.
- In case of multiple roots; separation using a carbide surgical bur mounted on a high-speed handpiece will be carried out.
- Debridement of any granulation tissue will be carried out thoroughly using a bone curette and the area will be flushed with saline.
- A fully guided flapless implant placement protocol will then be followed according to the pre-planned dimensions in C.B.C.T.
- Implants with internal conical connection will be placed at least 4 mm away from the gingival margin to be able to establish a decent emergence profile later on in the prosthetic phase.
- Primary stability will be checked to be able to take the decision for placing a customized healing abutments attached to the implant in place. (ISQ ≥ 65)
- Bone substitute biomaterial will be grafted in the horizontal defect distance 'jumping gap' created between the external surface of the implant and inner wall of the socket.
- Customized healing collars will be inserted finally on the implants to cover the socket and stabilize the wound and graft material beneath.
Post-operative instructions:
- Patients will continue to receive postoperative antibiotics for five days after surgery (Salgado-Peralvo et al., 2022)
- Patients were instructed to follow oral hygiene measures and to use chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthwash for 2 weeks.
- All patients will be clinically evaluated at 1 week and 2 weeks to make sure that the initial healing phase is going without complications.
Follow-up:
Each patient will be evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-operatively.
- Conditions
- Guided Immediate Implant Placement, Jumping Gap, Labial Bone Thickness Change, Broken Down Tooth Rehabilitation
- Being tested
- Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm, Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm
- Keywords
- Immediate implant placement, Customized healing abutment, Jumping gap, Surgical guide, Accuracy of surgical guide
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mmProcedure or surgery
surgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper aesthetic zone with a jumping gap < 2 mm.
Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mmProcedure or surgery
surgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper esthetic zone with a jumping gap ≥ 2mm.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm | Experimental | surgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper aesthetic zone with a jumping gap < 2 mm. Receives: Procedure: Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm |
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm | Active comparator | surgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper esthetic zone with a jumping gap ≥ 2mm. Receives: Procedure: Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Δ Labial bone thickness
It will be measured virtually using CBCT measurements, fusion of the C.B.C.Ts will be done.
Measured: Assessment at baseline and after 12 months.
Secondary outcomes (6)
Jumping gap (accuracy)
A preliminary measurement of the jumping gap will be taken from the CBCT during implant planning and patient allocation either into the control or intervention group. These measurements will be done at the patient preparation phase and immediately post implant placement.
Measured: Before implant placement and immediately after.
Crestal Bone Level
It will be measured using periapical radiographs in parallel technique for standardization comparing different bone levels.
Measured: Assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Pink Esthetic Score
It will be measured in scale with numerical value. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES) as proposed by (Fürhauser et al., 2005) contains seven variables: distal papilla, mesial papilla, soft tissue contour, soft tissue level, deficiency of the alveolar process, and soft-tissue texture and color. Each variable was assessed with a 0-1-2 score, with 0 being the worst and 2 being the best.
Measured: Assessment after final crown delivery (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Patient satisfaction
It will be measured using a questionnaire at the end of the study. The questionnaire will be in a form of three questions:
- Considering this was an elective operation, how likely would you be to recommend it to others?
- If you had to make the decision again, how likely would you be to undergo this surgery'?
- Considering everything, how satisfied are you with the outcomes of your surgery? All of these questions will be answered by the patient in a paper and pencil form, using a 7-point response scale: very likely (or very satisfied) = 7; not at all likely (or not at all satisfied) = 1.
Measured: One time at 12 months after crown delivery.
Keratinized soft tissue width
It will be measured using a periodontal probe.
Measured: Assessment will be at the surgery day (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after crown delivery.
Keratinized soft tissue thickness
It will be measured using an anaesthetic needle with stopper + periodontal probe.
Measured: Assessment will be at the surgery day (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after crown delivery.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2026
- Study start18 Jun 2025
- Primary completion18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Guided Immediate Implant PlacementStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Isaac Essam Awad Bastawros, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07509476
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PER 28-1-2025
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 3 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Change in Labial Bone Thickness in Immediate Implant Placement In Maxillary Esthetic Zone Comparing a Jumping Gap of Less Than 2 mm to Equal or More Than 2 mm: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07509476
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PER 28-1-2025
- Conditions
- Guided Immediate Implant Placement, Jumping Gap, Labial Bone Thickness Change, Broken Down Tooth Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- Immediate implant placement, Customized healing abutment, Jumping gap, Surgical guide, Accuracy of surgical guide
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 22 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 18 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the effect of distance between the implant and the bone on the resultant bone thickness adjacent to the implant in place of a broken down tooth that happens to be bounded by two natural teeth.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does the horizontal implant position (and hence the gap between the implant and the socket wall i.e. jumping gap) affect the resultant labial bone thickness? Will it affect the quality of soft tissue, esthetics and patient satisfaction?
Participants will have an implant placed using a surgical guide with a jumping gap either less than 2 mm or equal or more than 2 mm and will be asked to visit the clinic once every 3 months for checkups, radiographs, and readings.
Detailed description
Tooth replacement with dental implants in the esthetic zone is often accompanied with esthetic complications such as mid-facial gingival recession, implant thread exposure and a concave contour. Various methods have been introduced to minimize the occurrence of such complications, including applying connective tissue grafts, grafting the jumping gap, performing immediate temporization and using surgical guides to ensure the placement of the implant in the optimal prosthetic position.(El Ebiary et al., 2023)
It would be beneficial to establish an evidence-based protocol for the jumping gap distance to follow through, with all immediate implants in the aesthetic zone, most of which have thin labial bone to begin with. Though there have been multiple studies conducted, specifically in the past few years, there is insufficient evidence that tells us what the optimal jumping gap is. (Hamilton et al., 2023) (Lambert et al., 2023).
Therefore, the aim of our study is to evaluate this survival rate and the amount of change in labial bone thickness that will result in different horizontal defect dimensions (HDD) ≤ 2 mm in comparison to the > 2 mm HDD.
The study will be conducted at the department of periodontology at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic at the faculty of dentistry, Cairo University, Egypt. Patients screening will be carried out until the target sample is achieved.
Pre-operative phase:
Clinical evaluation:
- An assessment of the patients' medical history and overall oral health will be conducted to ensure that it meets the study's eligibility requirements for participation.
- Screening will then be done using periapical radiographs.
- After patients are found eligible for enrolment, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image will be taken to record the pre-operative bone level for the patient.
- Following an in-depth description of the study's purpose and steps, the enrolled patients will have the opportunity to discuss with the researcher the informed consent.
- The patients will sign a written informed consent form that has been translated into Arabic after they give their approval for the intervention and to follow the study process.
- Impressions/digital scans will be taken for the patient in addition to the CBCT scan. A surgical guide will be fabricated and 3D-printed using model resin.
Radiographic examination:
A preoperative CBCT will be performed for patients who met the inclusion criteria to ensure their eligibility prior to surgery. (Joshi and Gupta, 2015)
Patient Preparation:
- A full mouth supra and subgingival debridement (if needed) will be carried out for all recruited patients prior to surgery. Patients will be given oral hygiene instructions including brushing their teeth at least twice daily, in addition to rinse twice daily with 0.12% chlorohexidine mouthwash for two weeks.
- Surgical treatment will not be scheduled until the patient demonstrates adequate plaque control (i.e., FMPS < 20% and FMBS ≤ 10%).
- Patients will be prescribed pre-surgical prophylactic antibiotic (2 g of amoxicillin 1 h before surgery or Clindamycin 600 mg in case of allergy to penicillin). Additionally, the patient will be asked to rinse with chlorhexidine 0.2% mouth wash for 1 min at the start of the surgery. (Salgado-Peralvo et al., 2022)
Surgical phase:
- Following the administration of local anesthesia, atraumatic extraction of the remaining root will be done using a 15C lancet and a periotome to sever the periodontal ligament then using forceps with rotatory motion to pull out the root(s). The integrity of remaining labial bone wall (≥ 1mm) will be checked prior to the drilling sequence of the implant placement.
- In case of multiple roots; separation using a carbide surgical bur mounted on a high-speed handpiece will be carried out.
- Debridement of any granulation tissue will be carried out thoroughly using a bone curette and the area will be flushed with saline.
- A fully guided flapless implant placement protocol will then be followed according to the pre-planned dimensions in C.B.C.T.
- Implants with internal conical connection will be placed at least 4 mm away from the gingival margin to be able to establish a decent emergence profile later on in the prosthetic phase.
- Primary stability will be checked to be able to take the decision for placing a customized healing abutments attached to the implant in place. (ISQ ≥ 65)
- Bone substitute biomaterial will be grafted in the horizontal defect distance 'jumping gap' created between the external surface of the implant and inner wall of the socket.
- Customized healing collars will be inserted finally on the implants to cover the socket and stabilize the wound and graft material beneath.
Post-operative instructions:
- Patients will continue to receive postoperative antibiotics for five days after surgery (Salgado-Peralvo et al., 2022)
- Patients were instructed to follow oral hygiene measures and to use chlorhexidine 0.2% mouthwash for 2 weeks.
- All patients will be clinically evaluated at 1 week and 2 weeks to make sure that the initial healing phase is going without complications.
Follow-up:
Each patient will be evaluated at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post-operatively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm | Experimental | Procedure: Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mmsurgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper aesthetic zone with a jumping gap < 2 mm. |
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm | Active comparator | Procedure: Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mmsurgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper esthetic zone with a jumping gap ≥ 2mm. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with a bounded single non-restorable upper tooth in the anterior maxilla (15-25) FDI (El Ebiary et al., 2023b)
- Patients with an age range of 21 to 65 years old (Levine et al., 2022)
- Patients with good oral hygiene with BoP ≤ 10 % (Chapple et al., 2018)
- Compliant patients willing to follow up to one year.
- Remaining labial bone thickness ≥ 1mm measured on C.B.C.T. and confirmed on the day of surgery after tooth extraction and before final implant placement.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- The presence of acute/active infection related to the non-restorable tooth (Block et al., 2009) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Presence of labial bone defect as fenestration/dehiscence (Crespi et al., 2008) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- Large cyst or pathological lesion related to the tooth (Tallarico et al., 2016-2017) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023); (Morton, Wismeijer, Chen, Hamilton, Wittneben, Casentini, Gonzaga, Lazarin, Martin, Molinero-Mourelle, et al., 2023)
- History of radiation to the maxilla (Cannizzaro et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
- History of bisphosphonate therapy or other anti-resorptive agents (Cannizzaro et al., 2010) cited in (Soegiantho et al., 2023)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mmsurgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper aesthetic zone with a jumping gap < 2 mm. | Procedure or surgery | Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm |
| Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mmsurgically guided placement of a single immediate post-extraction implant in the upper esthetic zone with a jumping gap ≥ 2mm. | Procedure or surgery | Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm |
Primary outcome
Δ Labial bone thickness
Time frame: Assessment at baseline and after 12 months.
It will be measured virtually using CBCT measurements, fusion of the C.B.C.Ts will be done.
6 secondary outcomes
Jumping gap (accuracy)
Time frame: Before implant placement and immediately after.
Crestal Bone Level
Time frame: Assessment at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Pink Esthetic Score
Time frame: Assessment after final crown delivery (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months.
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: One time at 12 months after crown delivery.
Keratinized soft tissue width
Time frame: Assessment will be at the surgery day (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after crown delivery.
Keratinized soft tissue thickness
Time frame: Assessment will be at the surgery day (baseline), 3 months, 6 months, 9 months and 12 months after crown delivery.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Apr 2026.
Related trials for Guided Immediate Implant Placement
Not yet recruiting
Immediate vs Conventional Loading With Different Crown Materials on Immediately Placed Single Implants
Partial Edentulism, Dental Implant
Not yet recruiting
Do Immediate Digital Workflows Increase Patient Value?
Dental Implant, Implant Therapy
Recruiting
Accuracy of Immediate Implant Placement
Edentulism in Lower Jaw
Active, not recruiting
Sleeved vs. Sleeveless Guides for Immediate Implant Placement
Tooth Loss, Maxillary Premolar Area
Recruiting
Guided Root Slice Replantation vs. Socket Shielding for Immediate Implant Placement in Esthetic Zone
TEETH EXTRACTION, Esthetic Zone Implantology
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Immediate implant placement with jumping gap equal to or more than 2 mm and Immediate implant placement with jumping gap less than 2 mm in people with Guided Immediate Implant Placement and Jumping Gap, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Δ Labial bone thickness (time frame: Assessment at baseline and after 12 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Apr 2026.