Lung CancerIMPULSIONNCT07513818
Implementing Low-dose ct Lung Cancer Screening in France.
A study testing Low-dose computed tomography of the chest in people with Lung Cancer, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
Trial summary
The main objective is to estimate the detection rate of lung cancer in the population screened by low-dose chest CT scans. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 74 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Low-dose computed tomography of the chest
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 20,000 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 11 May 2026to Nov 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 74 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 50-74 years
- Active or former smoker having quit less than 15 years ago
- Smoking history of at least 20 pack-years, or 15 cigarettes/day for 25 years or 10 cigarettes/day for 30 years
- Affiliation with a social security scheme
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
- Temporary exclusion Criteria
- Chest CT scan performed within the previous 12 months
- Signs of respiratory infection (fever, productive cough)
Who cannot join
- Severe co-morbidities contraindicating exploration and/or management (including stereotactic surgery or radiotherapy) of lung cancers
- Poor general status (PS2 and above)
- Rest dyspnea (mMRC4)
- Cancer under active surveillance by thoracic computed tomography (CT pr PET-CT)
- Personal history of lung cancer
- Symptoms raising suspicion of lung cancer (hemoptysis, unexplained weight loss, recent onset or modification of respiratory symptoms,…)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
HCL - Hôpital Lyon Sud
Lyon, France, 69495
Sébastien COURAUD, MD, PHD, 04 78 86 44 14 ext. +33, sebastien.couraud@chu-lyon.fr
- Recruiting
Hôpital Cochin
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014
Marie-Pierre REVEL, MD, PhD, 01 58 41 24 71 ext. +33, marie-pierre.revel@aphp.fr
About this study
The main objective is to estimate the detection rate of lung cancer in the population screened by low-dose chest CT scans.
Read the detailed description
Low-dose CT screening (LDCT) allows for the detection of lung cancer at an early stage, enabling curative treatment. Large randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that LDCT reduces mortality in smokers.
The objective of the current research is not to confirm a reduction in mortality, but to show that screening can be safely implemented at a population level. Different modes of recruitment and invitation will be tested to ensure that LDCT can be implemented equitably. The role of artificial intelligence as an alternative to double human reading will also be assessed.
Screening strategy includes baseline, followed by 1-year LDCT, and a third LDCT 2 years later. Current smokers will be offered smoking cessation support.
The management of screen-detected lung nodules will follow the 2025 guidelines from the European Society of Thoracic imaging.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Low-dose computed tomography of the chest
- Keywords
- Screening, Lung cancer, Computed Tomography, X-Ray, Smoking cessation
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Smoking Cessation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Low-dose computed tomography of the chestProcedure or surgery
Baseline low-dose CT acquisition, then at 1 year and 3 years to depict suspicious lung nodules
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Lung cancer detection rate in the population screened using low-dose chest CT
Number of individuals with detected cancer divided by the number of individuals included in the study, i.e., an intention-to-screen analysis.
Measured: 42 months
Secondary outcomes (23)
Evaluation of screening performance
- True positives: positive screening result and confirmation of malignancy.
- True negatives: negative screening result (absence of nodules, or nodules not meeting the criteria for a positive or indeterminate screening, see algorithms), including during retrospective review in cases where cancer is diagnosed within the following year.
- False positives: positive screening result but malignancy not confirmed after appropriate investigation(s).
- False negatives: CT screening considered negative, but cancer is diagnosed within the coming year and the CT scan is retrospectively interpreted as positive or indeterminate.
Measured: 42 months
Exploration and comparison of several methods for identifying and inviting the target population
The identification and invitation of participants will be carried out using a multimodal approach: local and national press campaigns, outreach to insured individuals aged 50 to 74 in certain regions, and through an ambassador network (healthcare professionals, institutional representatives, associations, and citizens aware of lung cancer screening).
Screening support tools will be deployed, including:
- A website with a calculator to help determine eligibility;
- A telephone call center to assess eligibility.
Inclusions :
Inclusions will be carried out by the participant's primary care physician if they are an investigator, or by other volunteer general practitioners, in health centers; by secondary care providers; or via outreach programs.
The inclusion visits or teleconsultations will allow verifying the eligibility criteria and obtaining electronic consent.
Measured: 18 months
Measurement of participation rate
The participation rate is defined as the number of individuals having performed at least one CT scan, divided by the number of eligible individuals.
Measured: 18 months
Measurement of response rates to follow-up invitations
The investigators will measure the participation rate to follow-up invitations following an indeterminate CT scan result
Measured: 42 months
Measurement of adherence to screening rounds
The investigators will measure the participation rate to screening at 1 year and 3 year
Measured: 18 months , 30 months & 54 months
Measurement of the complication rate of invasive investigations in positive cases (true positives and false positives)
For participants with a positive screening result, the procedures, results, and complications of diagnostic actions (PET, endoscopy, CT-guided or ultrasound-guided biopsy, surgery) will be collected from the participants' medical records .
The rate of early-stage lung cancers among the lung cancers diagnosed following a CT screening will also be measured (Evaluation criterion: number of lung cancers diagnosed at stage I or II divided by the total number of diagnosed lung cancers).
Measured: 42 months
Measurement of the adherence rate to the offered smoking cessation support
The investigators will record the proportion of active smokers who either decline the systematically offered smoking-cessation assistance or fail to attend the scheduled appointment, as well as the factors underlying this refusal. The investigators will also assess smoking cessation rates during follow-up and identify their predictors.
Measured: 48 months
Measurement of the adherence rate to smoking cessation support
The investigators will record the proportion of active smokers who declined smoking-cessation support or did not attend the scheduled appointments
Measured: 48 months
Identification of reasons for refusal of smoking cessation support.
Investigators will collect the reasons selected by participants for refusing smoking cessation support from a pre-established list (e.g., concern about weight gain, fear of failure).
Measured: 48 months
Measurement of smoking cessation rate
The investigators will assess smoking cessation rates during follow-up and identify their predictors.
Measured: 48 months
Identification of the predictors of smoking cessation rates.
The investigators will identify the predictor of smoking cessation rates (correlation with age, gender, level of education, occupation, etc…)
Measured: 48 months
Evaluation of the feasibility and relevance of a double reading of CT scans, and role of artificial intelligence
- Agreement in classifying cases as "screen-negative" versus "positive or indeterminate" between a single AI-assisted reading and a double AI-assisted reading (with a third adjudication in case of disagreement, serving as the reference), measured using the kappa coefficient.
- Agreement in classifying cases as "screen-negative" versus "positive or indeterminate" between AI alone and the reference, measured using the kappa coefficient.
Measured: 12 months
Measurement of the detection rate of coronary artery calcifications, pulmonary emphysema, osteoporosis, and incidental findings
For each of these anomalies, the detection rate will be calculated as the number of participants with the anomaly divided by the number of participants who underwent at least one CT scan. The presence and severity of emphysema (Fleischner classification), the Shemesh score, attenuation at the T8 level, and the diameter of the ascending aorta if >4 cm will be systematically recorded in the structured CT screening report. Interstitial lung abnormalities (ILA, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis), osteoporotic compression fractures, and all anomalies requiring clinical care will also be systematically documented.
Measured: 24 months
Impact of the program on healthcare pathways
The impacts on care pathways can be measured by evaluating the following time intervals,
-Time between registration on the platform and completion of the inclusion visit,
- Time between inclusion and completion of the initial CT scan,
- Time until availability of radiology reports (single and double reading),
- Time to first contact with a tobacco cessation specialist
AND Using the date of the CT scan as the reference date:
- Time to presentation of positive cases at the MDTB,
- Time to a positive diagnosis (pathological report or MDTB report )
- Time to first treatment for positive cases requiring it,
- Time to the first thoracic surgery consultation,
- Time to surgery
- Time to other consultations depending on incidental findings
Measured: 42 months
Comparison of healthcare pathways
Healthcare utilization will be compared between screening-adherent and non-adherent patients, using two different denominators: the target population and the invited population after linkage with the SNDS (French National Health Data System).
Measured: 42 months
Creation of a CT scan dataset
As part of the IMPULSION study, an imaging dataset for research and teaching purposes will be created, including all CT scans performed during the study (baseline, follow-up, and subsequent screening rounds), unless the participant explicitly objects.
Measured: 42 months
Definition of a lung cancer risk score
Using the variables collected in the IMPULSION study, a predictive lung cancer risk score will be developed for the eligible population, specifically tailored to the French population.
Measured: 42 months
Cost effectiveness analysis
The costs associated with screening (including surgical treatment of early-stage cancers and hospitalization for invasive procedures) will be compared with the costs that would have been incurred if the screen-detected lung cancers had all been diagnosed at an advanced stage.
Measured: 42 months
Panel characteristics of participants
The objective of this sub-study is to conduct a qualitative analysis of the characteristics of participants in lung cancer screening and the program.
Measured: 48 months
Panel - participant perceptions
Qualitative assessment of participant perceptions regarding lung cancer screening in a random sample of 2,000 participants enrolled in the main study.
Measured: 48 months
Ultra low-dose
The objective is to assess whether this dose level, using modern techniques, provides information equivalent to that obtained with the dose used in the main protocol.
A second ultra-low-dose acquisition (CTDI 0.15 mGy for weight < 80 kg, CTDI 0.20 mGy for weight ≥ 80 kg) immediatly after the IMPULSION CT scan.
The ultra-low-dose CT scan will be read exclusively in a centralized manner by a certified radiologist assisted by AI software, using the same criteria as those applied to the low-dose reference acquisition, and blinded to the low-dose CT data.
An assessment of concordance will be performed in 2,500 participants.
Measured: 1 day (baseline scanner)
Biobank
Collection of a maximum of 28 mL of whole blood (i.e., approximately 7 tubes of 5 mL with 4 mL collected per tube) for storage for research purposes.
The collected samples are intended to create a biobank linked to clinical and radiological data. This biobank will make it possible to test various biomarkers for predicting individual cancer risk, the risk that a nodule is cancerous, or the risk of developing a disease evaluated in this cohort (including COPD, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, or interstitial lung disease).
Measured: Inclusion (day 1)
Spirometry
The purpose of this examination is to assess lung volumes at inclusion visit.
In participating an optional, spirometry will be performed at inclusion. The following mesaures will be recorded : FEV1 and FVC.
Interpretation will be based on GOLD recommendations and using the GLI system for reference values.
The following definitions will be used:
- Pre-COPD: FEV₁ < 80% and FEV₁/FVC ≥ 0.7
- Obstructive ventilatory defect (OVD): FEV₁/FVC < 0.7 on spirometry
- GOLD stages 1 to 4 according to the FEV₁ value. Participant questionnaire will also includes questions about chronic COPD symptoms in order to assess the presence of a COPD.
Measured: Inclusion (day 1)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2026
- Study start11 May 2026
- Primary completionMay 2031 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Marie-Pierre REVEL, PhD, Principal investigator, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisSébastien COURAUD, PhD, Study chair, Hospices Civils de Lyon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07513818
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP250243
- Other IDs
- ID-RCB Number
- Acronym
- IMPULSION
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementing Low-dose ct Lung Cancer Screening in France.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07513818
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPULSION / APHP250243
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- Screening, Lung cancer, Computed Tomography, X-Ray, Smoking cessation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- URC-CIC Paris Descartes Necker Cochin
- Study start
- 11 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- May 2031 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective is to estimate the detection rate of lung cancer in the population screened by low-dose chest CT scans.
Detailed description
Low-dose CT screening (LDCT) allows for the detection of lung cancer at an early stage, enabling curative treatment. Large randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that LDCT reduces mortality in smokers.
The objective of the current research is not to confirm a reduction in mortality, but to show that screening can be safely implemented at a population level. Different modes of recruitment and invitation will be tested to ensure that LDCT can be implemented equitably. The role of artificial intelligence as an alternative to double human reading will also be assessed.
Screening strategy includes baseline, followed by 1-year LDCT, and a third LDCT 2 years later. Current smokers will be offered smoking cessation support.
The management of screen-detected lung nodules will follow the 2025 guidelines from the European Society of Thoracic imaging.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 74 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adults aged 50-74 years
- Active or former smoker having quit less than 15 years ago
- Smoking history of at least 20 pack-years, or 15 cigarettes/day for 25 years or 10 cigarettes/day for 30 years
- Affiliation with a social security scheme
- Written informed consent prior to study participation
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Severe co-morbidities contraindicating exploration and/or management (including stereotactic surgery or radiotherapy) of lung cancers
- Poor general status (PS2 and above)
- Rest dyspnea (mMRC4)
- Cancer under active surveillance by thoracic computed tomography (CT pr PET-CT)
- Personal history of lung cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Low-dose computed tomography of the chestBaseline low-dose CT acquisition, then at 1 year and 3 years to depict suspicious lung nodules | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Lung cancer detection rate in the population screened using low-dose chest CT
Time frame: 42 months
Number of individuals with detected cancer divided by the number of individuals included in the study, i.e., an intention-to-screen analysis.
23 secondary outcomes
Evaluation of screening performance
Time frame: 42 months
Exploration and comparison of several methods for identifying and inviting the target population
Time frame: 18 months
Measurement of participation rate
Time frame: 18 months
Measurement of response rates to follow-up invitations
Time frame: 42 months
Measurement of adherence to screening rounds
Time frame: 18 months , 30 months & 54 months
Measurement of the complication rate of invasive investigations in positive cases (true positives and false positives)
Time frame: 42 months
Measurement of the adherence rate to the offered smoking cessation support
Time frame: 48 months
Measurement of the adherence rate to smoking cessation support
Time frame: 48 months
Identification of reasons for refusal of smoking cessation support.
Time frame: 48 months
Measurement of smoking cessation rate
Time frame: 48 months
Identification of the predictors of smoking cessation rates.
Time frame: 48 months
Evaluation of the feasibility and relevance of a double reading of CT scans, and role of artificial intelligence
Time frame: 12 months
Measurement of the detection rate of coronary artery calcifications, pulmonary emphysema, osteoporosis, and incidental findings
Time frame: 24 months
Impact of the program on healthcare pathways
Time frame: 42 months
Comparison of healthcare pathways
Time frame: 42 months
Creation of a CT scan dataset
Time frame: 42 months
Definition of a lung cancer risk score
Time frame: 42 months
Cost effectiveness analysis
Time frame: 42 months
Panel characteristics of participants
Time frame: 48 months
Panel - participant perceptions
Time frame: 48 months
Ultra low-dose
Time frame: 1 day (baseline scanner)
Biobank
Time frame: Inclusion (day 1)
Spirometry
Time frame: Inclusion (day 1)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2026.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Marie-Pierre REVEL, PhD principal investigator
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Sébastien COURAUD, PhD study chair
Hospices Civils de Lyon
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Low-dose computed tomography of the chest in people with Lung Cancer, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 2 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marie-Pierre REVEL, PhD (01 58 41 24 71 ext. +33, marie-pierre.revel@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Lung cancer detection rate in the population screened using low-dose chest CT (time frame: 42 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2026.