AzTrials
AzTrials

PheochromocytomaNCT07516275

Prospective Cohort Study of Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma

An observational study of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study will enroll patients scheduled for PPGL removal surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Before surgery, researchers will use a 6-variable model to predict the patient's risk of experiencing severe blood pressure swings during the operation. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
How many people
200 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Apr 2026to Feb 2028
How long will I take part?
6 Weeks
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma scheduled for elective surgical resection at Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Diagnosed with pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma by imaging and laboratory tests and scheduled for elective resection.
  • Planned intraoperative continuous invasive arterial pressure monitoring.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.
  • Able to comply with preoperative CGM monitoring, AI agent assessment, and postoperative follow-up.

Who cannot join

  • Intraoperative hemodynamic data missing ≥20%.
  • Postoperative histopathology excludes PPGL diagnosis.
  • Cardiac paraganglioma or metastatic PPGL.
  • Severe cardiac disease (e.g., severe valvular disease, severe heart failure) that could independently cause intraoperative HDI.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Mental illness, cognitive impairment, or communication barriers that prevent compliance with study procedures.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Refusal to undergo CGM monitoring or AI agent assessment.
  • Major illness (e.g., acute myocardial infarction, stroke, severe infection) within 3 months prior to surgery.
  • Severe hepatic or renal insufficiency (Child-Pugh class C, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m²).

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: Validation and Extension Study of the Predictive Model for Intraoperative Hemodynamic Instability in Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Resection - a Single-center, Prospective, Observational Cohort Study

The study will enroll patients scheduled for PPGL removal surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Before surgery, researchers will use a 6-variable model to predict the patient's risk of experiencing severe blood pressure swings during the operation. During surgery, a real-time early warning tool will be tested for its ability to accurately predict blood pressure changes 60 seconds in advance. The study will also explore the value of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in understanding blood pressure fluctuations and evaluate the performance of an artificial intelligence (AI) agent for preoperative anesthesia assessment, comparing its accuracy, consistency, and efficiency against that of human anesthesiologists.

Participation involves no changes to the patient's standard surgical or medical care. It includes collecting clinical data, wearing a CGM sensor from the day before to the day after surgery, and having the preoperative assessment performed by both the AI agent and anesthesiologists.

Read the detailed description

Background: Resection of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) carries a high risk of intraoperative hemodynamic instability (HDI) due to catecholamine release. Existing predictive models have limitations, and novel tools require prospective validation. This study aims to address this gap.

Objective: The primary objectives are to: 1) Prospectively validate a previously developed 6-variable model for predicting severe HDI subtypes; 2) Assess the accuracy and timeliness of a real-time intraoperative early warning tool for HDI events; 3) Explore the association between continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics and intraoperative HDI; and 4) Evaluate the clinical utility of an AI-based preoperative anesthesia assessment agent against human assessors.

Methods: This is a single-center, prospective, observational cohort study at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Eligible patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective PPGL resection will be enrolled.

Prediction Model Validation: Preoperative data (symptoms, hemoglobin, tumor functional status, epinephrine/norepinephrine elevation multiples, phenoxybenzamine dose) will be used to predict the HDI subtype (mild vs. severe). The predicted subtype will be compared against the actual subtype determined by post-hoc K-means clustering of intraoperative hemodynamic data (24 metrics).

Real-time Warning Tool Validation: The tool will be used intraoperatively to predict vital signs (SBP, DBP, MAP, HR) 60 seconds ahead based on the preceding 200 seconds of data. Its predictions will be compared against actual monitored values, and its sensitivity/specificity for predicting hypertensive, hypotensive, and tachycardic events will be calculated.

CGM Exploration: Patients will wear a CGM sensor from the day before surgery to one day after. Metrics like mean glucose, glycemic variability, and time in hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia will be analyzed for their association with intraoperative HDI outcomes using multivariable regression.

AI Agent Evaluation: Each patient will undergo paired preoperative assessments: one by the AI agent and one by a junior anesthesiologist (≤5 years experience). A senior anesthesiologist (≥10 years experience) will provide the reference standard for risk stratification, tumor functionality, and preparation adequacy. Accuracy, inter-rater agreement (Kappa), and assessment time will be compared between the AI and junior anesthesiologist.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes include the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUROC) for the prediction model, the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) for the warning tool, the occurrence of intraoperative HDI for the CGM analysis, and the accuracy of the AI agent's risk stratification. Sample sizes have been calculated for each sub-study, with a total target enrollment of approximately 202 participants to meet all objectives.

Keywords
Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma, Hemodynamic Instability, Predictive Model, Artificial Intelligence, Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Prospective Cohort
Medical subject headings
Pheochromocytoma, Paraganglioma, Intraoperative Complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07516275
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PPGL Resection CohortPatients diagnosed with pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma who are scheduled for elective surgical resection. All participants will undergo the same study procedures: preoperative data collection, CGM monitoring, AI and human preoperative assessment, intraoperative application of the real-time warning tool, and postoperative follow-up. No intervention is applied; this is purely observational.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Predictive Model Discrimination (AUROC)

    Discriminative ability of the preoperative 6-variable model for predicting severe intraoperative hemodynamic instability (HDI) subtype, assessed by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC).

    Measured: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Heart Rate (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for heart rate, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored heart rate values. Unit of Measure: %

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  2. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Systolic Blood Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for systolic blood pressure (SBP). Unit of Measure: %

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  3. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Diastolic Blood Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Unit of Measure: %

    Measured: Intraoperative period

  4. Predictive Model Calibration

    Calibration of the preoperative 6-variable predictive model, assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (p-value), calibration curve, and Brier score. Unit of Measure: p-value (dimensionless), Brier score (dimensionless)

    Measured: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

  5. Predictive Model Clinical Utility (DCA)

    Clinical utility of the preoperative model, assessed by Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to evaluate net clinical benefit at different threshold probabilities. Unit of Measure: Net benefit (dimensionless probability)

    Measured: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery

  6. Real-time Warning Tool Accuracy - Mean Arterial Pressure (MAPE)

    Accuracy of the intraoperative early warning tool for blood pressure parameters, measured by the Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) between its predicted and actual monitored values for mean arterial pressure (MAP). Unit of Measure: %

    Measured: Time Frame: Intraoperative period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2026
  2. Study startApr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionFeb 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
Target duration
6 Weeks
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07516275
Sponsor's protocol ID
PUMCH-PPGL-P1.0
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
24 Mar 2026
Last updated
7 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact YE MA, MD (+86 18801015226, maye_thu16@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Predictive Model Discrimination (AUROC) (time frame: From preoperative assessment up to end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in