AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain, Postoperative; Anesthesia, RegionalSESP-HIPNCT07516795

Analgesic Efficacy of Continuous SESP vs Continuous FICB After Hip Arthroplasty

A study testing Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in people with Pain, Postoperative; Anesthesia, Regional and Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, run by Bach Mai Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of continuous intermediate-approach sacral erector spinae plane (SESP) block versus continuous supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in adult patients undergoing… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteVietnam
Study dates
9 Apr 2026to 30 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 80 years. Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty due to osteoarthritis (not due to hip fracture or trauma).
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I, II, or III. Ability to understand and cooperate with study procedures, including postoperative pain assessment using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and follow-up evaluations.
  • Provided written informed consent to participate in the study.

Who cannot join

  • Patient refusal to participate or inability to provide informed consent. Contraindications to regional anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks (e.g., coagulopathy, therapeutic anticoagulation, infection at the injection site, or severe spinal deformity).
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics (ropivacaine or bupivacaine).
  • Previous surgery on the same hip. Severe cardiopulmonary disease (e.g., NYHA class III-IV, severe COPD) that may interfere with postoperative recovery assessment.
  • Neurological disorders affecting the lower extremities (e.g., stroke with residual motor deficit, peripheral neuropathy).
  • Cognitive impairment or inability to cooperate with catheter care and follow-up assessments.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Vietnam1 site
  • Bach Mai Hospital

    Hanoi, Hanoi, 100000

Other trials in Vietnam

About this study

Official title: Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Randomized Clinical Trial

The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial is to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of continuous intermediate-approach sacral erector spinae plane (SESP) block versus continuous supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in adult patients undergoing elective posterior-approach total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia.

Sixty patients will be randomly allocated to receive either a continuous SESP block or a continuous supra-inguinal FICB. Both techniques involve an initial bolus of 30 mL 0.1% ropivacaine followed by intermittent boluses of 20 mL 0.1% ropivacaine every 6 hours for 72 hours via an indwelling catheter, in addition to standardized multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome is cumulative morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumption over the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes include pain scores at rest and during movement (NRS), quality of recovery (QoR-15) at 72 hours, motor function (modified Bromage scale), and adverse events.

We hypothesize that continuous SESP block will provide superior opioid-sparing analgesia compared with continuous supra-inguinal FICB while maintaining comparable pain control, quality of recovery, and motor function preservation.

Read the detailed description

Effective postoperative pain management after total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the posterior approach remains challenging because the surgical site receives innervation from both the lumbar and sacral plexuses. Multimodal analgesia incorporating regional anesthesia techniques is recommended to minimize opioid consumption and facilitate early rehabilitation. However, the optimal continuous regional technique for posterior THA has not been clearly established.

This prospective, randomized, observer-blinded trial compares two continuous ultrasound-guided regional analgesia techniques in patients undergoing elective posterior-approach THA under spinal anesthesia. Eligible adult patients (ASA I-III) are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either continuous intermediate-approach sacral erector spinae plane (SESP) block or continuous supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB).

In the SESP group, with the patient in the lateral decubitus position, a catheter is placed in the interfascial plane between the erector spinae muscle and the intermediate sacral crest under ultrasound guidance. In the FICB group, with the patient supine, a catheter is placed in the fascia iliaca compartment using the supra-inguinal approach with identification of the characteristic bow-tie sign. Both groups receive an initial bolus of 30 mL 0.1% ropivacaine followed by intermittent boluses of 20 mL 0.1% ropivacaine every 6 hours for a total of 72 hours via the indwelling catheter. All patients receive standardized multimodal analgesia consisting of intravenous paracetamol 1 g every 8 h and diclofenac 75 mg every 12 h, with intravenous fentanyl PCA as rescue analgesia.

The primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME) during the first 72 postoperative hours. Key secondary outcomes include NRS pain scores at rest and during hip flexion at multiple time points up to 72 hours, the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) score at 72 hours, motor function assessed by the modified Bromage scale at 24, and the incidence of adverse events. Catheter boluses were administered every 6 h by the anaesthesiologists who performed the blocks, who were necessarily unblinded and collected no outcome data. Outcome assessors, the ward nurses administering multimodal analgesia and managing the PCA devices, and data analysts remained blinded to group allocation. Patients could not be blinded due to the distinct anatomical locations of the two interventions.

This trial aims to determine whether continuous SESP block provides clinically meaningful opioid-sparing benefits compared with continuous supra-inguinal FICB in patients undergoing posterior THA, without compromising recovery quality or safety.

Being tested
Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block, Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block
Keywords
Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block, Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block, Regional Anesthesia, Continuous Analgesia
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane BlockProcedure or surgery

    Also called Continuous Sacral ESP Block, Continuous Sacral ESPB

    Under ultrasound guidance, a catheter is inserted into the sacral erector spinae plane. An initial bolus of 30 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine is injected at catheter placement, followed by intermittent boluses of 20 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine every 6 hours for 72 hours via the indwelling catheter.

  • Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment BlockProcedure or surgery

    Also called Continuous Fascia Iliaca Block, Continuous FICB, Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (CFICB)

    Under ultrasound guidance, a catheter is inserted deep to the fascia iliaca. An initial bolus of 30 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine is injected at catheter placement, followed by intermittent boluses of 20 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine every 6 hours for 72 hours via the indwelling catheter.

Study groups in NCT07516795
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Continuous SESPExperimentalPatients in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane (SESP) block for postoperative analgesia following hip replacement surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block
Continuous FICBActive comparatorPatients in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for postoperative analgesia following hip replacement surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Consumption at 72 Hours Postoperatively

    Total cumulative consumption of rescue opioid analgesics administered from the completion of surgery until 72 hours postoperatively, converted to intravenous morphine milligram equivalents (MME). A higher value indicates greater opioid requirement.

    Measured: 0 to 72 hours after block placement

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Cumulative MME Consumption at 24 Hours and 48 Hours Postoperatively

    Total rescue opioid consumption (MME) during 0-24 h and 24-48 h intervals.

    Measured: 0-24 h and 24-48 h after block placement

  2. Pain scores at rest (NRS)

    Pain scores at rest assessed using 0-10 NRS at 0, 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 72 hours after block placement.

    Measured: 0 to 72 hours after block placement

  3. Pain Intensity During Movement (NRS)

    Pain scores during hip flexion (active movement) assessed using 0-10 NRS at the same time points.

    Measured: 0 to 72 hours after block placement

  4. Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) Score at 72 Hours

    Total QoR-15 score (range 0-150) assessing quality of recovery at 72 hours postoperatively. Higher scores indicate better recovery.

    Measured: 72 hours after block placement

  5. Motor Function (Modified Bromage Scale)

    Motor block assessed by modified Bromage scale (0 = no motor block, 3 = complete motor block) at 24 hours after block placement.

    Measured: 24 hours after block placement

  6. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Number of participants with nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, catheter-related complications (dislodgement/occlusion), local anesthetic systemic toxicity, hematoma, infection, or neurological deficit.

    Measured: 0 to 72 hours after block placement

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2026
  2. Study start9 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Eligible patients are randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups (SESP or FICB) in a 1:1 ratio.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07516795
Sponsor's protocol ID
SESP-FICB-HIP-RCT-2026
Other IDs
BM-2025-33
Acronym
SESP-HIP
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
1 Apr 2026
Last updated
1 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Public sharing of IPD is not planned due to patient confidentiality regulations in Vietnam. However, completely de-identified data underlying the results reported in this study may be made available to qualified researchers upon a reasonable and methodologically sound request, strictly subject to approval by the Principal Investigator and the Institutional Review Board.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Continuous Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block and Continuous Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block in people with Pain, Postoperative; Anesthesia, Regional and Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, run by Bach Mai Hospital at 1 site in Vietnam.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) Consumption at 72 Hours Postoperatively (time frame: 0 to 72 hours after block placement). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in