AzTrials
AzTrials

DengueDigiAedesNCT07517731

Using Digital Technology for the Prevention of Aedes-Borne Diseases in Colombian Communities

A study testing Full intervention and Partial intervention in people with Dengue and Zika, run by University of Freiburg at 2 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, remain an important public health concern in Colombian communities. Digital health tools such as WhatsApp may provide an opportunity to strengthen preventive behaviors and community engagement in vector control efforts. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya
What is being tested?
Full intervention and Partial intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
900 participants
Where
2 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
26 Mar 2026to 26 Mar 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Households/participants resided within one of the study clusters.
  • The household had a laundry tank.
  • One adult household member (household head or another adult resident) was available to participate and provide informed consent.
  • For participation in the WhatsApp component, the participant owned a smartphone with WhatsApp installed and was able to read and respond to simple WhatsApp messages.

Who cannot join

  • Uninhabited households.
  • Households without a laundry tank.
  • Households already using biological vector control methods in the laundry tank, particularly larvivorous fish.
  • For the WhatsApp component, households or users without access to a smartphone or without WhatsApp installed.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 2 countries.

2 sites in 2 countries

Colombia1 site
  • Instituto Departamental de Salud de Norte de Santander

    Cúcuta, Norte de Satander, 540001

Other trials in Colombia

Germany1 site
  • Centre for Medicine and Society

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79098

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Use of Technology for Social Mobilization to Improve the Prevention and Control of Aedes-borne Diseases (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya) in Colombia

Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, remain an important public health concern in Colombian communities. Digital health tools such as WhatsApp may provide an opportunity to strengthen preventive behaviors and community engagement in vector control efforts. Therefore, a quasi-experimental implementation study was conducted in two endemic municipalities, Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, in Colombia, to evaluate a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy designed to support the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases and to promote the application of a protective coating (PC) in laundry tanks, one of the main breeding sites of Aedes mosquitoes.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more

Whether a WhatsApp-based digital health intervention, added to community-based strategies, can improve household preventive practices against Aedes-borne diseases, compared with community strategies alone or routine vector control activities.

Whether the combined use of WhatsApp messaging and community-based promotion of protective coating in laundry tanks can reduce Aedes entomological indices, compared with clusters not receiving the full intervention.

Whether the intervention is feasible and acceptable for households and community participants in endemic urban settings.

The study was conducted in three geographically separated clusters of approximately 3,000 - 3,500 households each. Cluster 1 received community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging, cluster 2 received community strategies only, and cluster 3 served as the control group. Protective coating was applied in clusters 1 and 2. The study included three phases: a pre-intervention baseline assessment, an intervention phase with interim assessment, and a post-intervention final evaluation and follow-up. Household surveys and entomological inspections were conducted to assess preventive practices, vector indices, and acceptance of the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted mainly by Aedes aegypti, remain a major public health problem in Colombia and other tropical and subtropical countries. In endemic urban communities, prevention and control are challenged by persistent vector breeding in domestic water containers, limitations of routine vector control programs, insecticide resistance, and insufficient community participation in sustained source reduction activities. In the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, north-eastern Colombia, laundry tanks are among the most productive breeding sites for Aedes mosquitoes. In this context, innovative and acceptable community-based strategies are needed to strengthen preventive practices and support vector control interventions.

Recent evidence suggests that mobile health tools may help reinforce health behaviours and improve community engagement in disease prevention. WhatsApp is widely used in Colombia and represents a feasible communication channel for delivering reminders, health education, and behaviour-oriented messages at household level. In parallel, a protective coating (PC) applied to laundry tanks had been developed and evaluated as a novel vector control tool in the study area. Because successful application of the PC depends in part on household preparation and acceptance, this study assessed whether a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy could support its uptake and reinforce preventive practices for the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases.

The purpose of this implementation study was to evaluate a WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention designed to encourage preventive health behaviours and strengthen community engagement in vector control activities, particularly in relation to the application of protective coating in laundry tanks. The study was conducted in the municipalities of Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, both located in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia. These municipalities are characterized by endemic transmission of dengue and other arboviral diseases, widespread use of domestic laundry tanks, and socioeconomic conditions that make sustained prevention especially relevant.

A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted. Cluster 1 received the full intervention, consisting of community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging (CS+WAM). Cluster 2 received community strategies only (CS), without WhatsApp messaging. Cluster 3 served as the control group and continued to receive routine vector control activities. PC was applied in clusters 1 and 2. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households and was selected from highly endemic urban communities with similar sociodemographic characteristics to reduce contamination and enhance comparability across groups.

The study population consisted of households located in the selected clusters. For household surveys and follow-up evaluations, one adult household member, usually the household head or another adult resident, was recruited in each selected household. Systematic sampling was used for baseline and final evaluations, with a target of 300 households per cluster, for a total of 900 households. Baseline and follow-up data collection included household questionnaires and entomological inspections. Additional recruitment activities in the intervention clusters were supported by female community leaders, community volunteers, and vector control staff, who also assisted with the implementation of the PC.

The study was implemented in three main phases. First, a pre-intervention phase was conducted to collect baseline information on household sociodemographic characteristics, preventive practices related to dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, and entomological indices. Second, the intervention phase included delivery of the WhatsApp-based communication strategy in cluster 1, promotion of the protective coating in clusters 1 and 2, and an interim assessment approximately four months after application of the coating. Third, a post-intervention phase was conducted to evaluate final changes in preventive practices, entomological indicators, and acceptance of the intervention. Baseline data collection took place in September 2021, the WhatsApp intervention started in October 2021, the protective coating was applied in December 2021, and the final evaluation was completed in September 2022.

The WhatsApp-based component was developed as a behaviour reinforcement and health promotion strategy. Participants in cluster 1 who consented to receive messages were sent periodic WhatsApp messages, generally on a weekly basis, focused on prevention of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and on preparation for the application of the protective coating. Reminder messages were sent before household visits for coating application. The intervention was informed by the Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI) framework and by national dengue prevention guidance. Messages were brief, written in Spanish, and designed to be understandable and engaging for community users. When needed, additional voice messages were provided by a facilitator to answer questions or clarify intervention procedures. This communication strategy was intended for health promotion and behaviour support only and did not provide medical care.

The partial intervention in cluster 2 consisted of conventional community strategies without WhatsApp messaging. Community volunteers promoted the protective coating through household visits, flyers, stickers, and direct practical instructions about how to prepare the laundry tank before application. In both intervention clusters, trained community volunteers and vector control staff supported the application of the coating and monitored implementation. Households in the control cluster did not receive WhatsApp messages or PC and continued with standard routine vector control activities.

Household surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, water storage practices, preventive behaviours, and acceptance of the intervention. Entomological inspections were conducted using standardized forms and World Health Organization operational procedures to identify water-holding containers and detect larvae and pupae. The main entomological indicators included the House Index (HI), Container Index (CI), Breteau Index (BI), and Pupae per Person Index (PPI). Acceptability of the WhatsApp component was assessed using Likert-scale items, while acceptance of the protective coating was assessed through household uptake and willingness to reapply the product.

Data analysis was conducted using RStudio. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize household and entomological data. Changes in preventive practices before and after the intervention were assessed using McNemar tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with post-intervention preventive behaviours. A difference-in-differences approach was used to compare changes over time between intervention and control clusters. Entomological indicators were calculated per cluster and compared between study phases to evaluate changes in vector density.

All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and provided informed consent before participation. Only adults were interviewed. Household data were anonymized by replacing personal identifiers with codes. The study protocol received ethical approval from the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany (application number 142/19), and from the National Institute of Health in Bogotá, Colombia, with support from local health authorities in Cúcuta and Norte de Santander.

Being tested
Full intervention, Partial intervention
Keywords
Digital health, mHealth, WhatsApp, Disease prevention, Community involvement, Behaviour change, Colombia
Medical subject headings
Dengue, Zika Virus Infection, Chikungunya Fever, Mosquito-Borne Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Full interventionBehavioural

    Participants received WhatsApp messages in Spanish to promote prevention and control of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and to support uptake of the PC intervention. Messages included health education, health promotion, behavior reinforcement, and reminders on cleaning water containers and preparing laundry tanks before coating application. Messages were brief, delivered through the WhatsApp broadcast function, and additional voice messages were provided when clarification was needed. This intervention was intended for health promotion only and not for medical care.

  • Partial interventionBehavioural

    Community-based promotion activities were conducted by trained community volunteers and supported by vector control staff. These activities included household visits, direct instructions on how to prepare laundry tanks for coating application, distribution of flyers and stickers, and local announcements to inform households about the intervention.

Study groups in NCT07517731
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Full interventionExperimentalCommunity strategies plus WhatsApp messaging and protective coating in laundry tanks.
Receives: Behavioral: Full intervention
Partial interventionActive comparatorCommunity strategies plus protective coating only.
Receives: Behavioral: Partial intervention
ControlNo interventionRoutine vector control activities.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in household preventive practices for Aedes-borne disease prevention

    Change from baseline to post-intervention in the proportion of households reporting certain preventive practices, such as weekly cleaning of laundry tanks, management of small water containers, and covering water containers.

    Measured: Baseline and 9 months after intervention initiation (final evaluation).

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change in House Index

    Change in the House Index, defined as the percentage of inspected households positive for Aedes larvae and/or pupae. Values range from 0 to 100%. Higher values indicate greater household infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 5% have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  2. Change in Container Index

    Change in the Container Index, defined as the percentage of inspected water-holding containers positive for Aedes larvae and/or pupae. Values range from 0 to 100%. Higher values indicate greater container infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 3% have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  3. Change in Breteau Index

    Change in the Breteau Index, defined as the number of Aedes-positive containers per 100 houses inspected. Values have a minimum of 0 and no fixed upper bound. Higher values indicate greater vector infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 20 have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  4. Change in Pupae per Person Index

    Change in the Pupae per Person Index, defined as the number of Aedes pupae per person in inspected households. Values have a minimum of 0 and no fixed upper bound. Higher values indicate greater pupal density and a worse entomological outcome. In WHO/TDR-related literature, PPI thresholds for increased epidemic transmission risk have been estimated to vary by epidemiological context, with values around 0.5 to 1.5 pupae per person reported under specific assumptions of temperature and population seroprevalence.

    Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  5. Acceptability score in terms of perceived usefulness of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention

    Mean score for perceived usefulness of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived usefulness; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.

    Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  6. Acceptability score in terms of enjoyment of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention

    Mean score for enjoyment of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater enjoyment; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.

    Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  7. Satisfaction with the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention

    Mean score for satisfaction with the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.

    Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  8. Acceptance of protective coating application

    Proportion of households in the intervention clusters that accepted the application of protective coating in household laundry tanks.

    Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.

  9. Willingness to reapply protective coating

    Proportion of households in the intervention clusters reporting willingness to reapply protective coating in household laundry tanks.

    Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2026
  2. Study start26 Mar 2026
  3. Primary completion26 Mar 2026
  4. Study completion26 Mar 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Colombia. The clusters received full intervention, partial intervention, or routine vector control activities. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
900 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07517731
Sponsor's protocol ID
142/19
Acronym
DigiAedes
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2026
Last updated
8 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified household-level data generated during this study may be shared partially through publications and supplementary materials, and additional data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Because the unit of analysis was the household, no direct personal identifiers, including names, phone numbers, addresses, or WhatsApp contact information, will be shared. Shared data may include household survey variables, preventive practices, acceptability measures, and entomological indicators used in the analyses.

Publications

  • Cardenas R, Cabrera OL, Carrillo MA, Pineda A, Ahumada ML, Yanez Y, Ismail H, Paine M, Rivera T, Kroeger A. Aedes aegypti control in breeding sites through an insecticidal coating with dual effect: Laboratory trials and safety assessment. Med Vet Entomol. 2025 Jun;39(2):252-265. doi: 10.1111/mve.12776. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

    PubMed 39543943
  • Carrillo MA, Gessler AM, Rivera Ramirez T, Cardenas Sanchez R, Lindenmeier J, Kern WV, Kroeger A. WhatsApp-based intervention in urban Colombia to support the prevention of arboviral diseases: a feasibility study. Pathog Glob Health. 2024 Jun;118(4):334-347. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2024.2358263. Epub 2024 May 24.

    PubMed 38794811
  • Carrillo MA, Cardenas R, Yanez J, Petzold M, Kroeger A. Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.

    PubMed 37254133
  • Carrillo MA, Kroeger A, Cardenas Sanchez R, Diaz Monsalve S, Runge-Ranzinger S. The use of mobile phones for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4.

    PubMed 33422034
  • Carrillo MA, Cardenas Sanchez R, Koo Chong S, Rivera Ramirez T, Yanez J, Kern WV, Lindenmeier J, Kroeger A. Using a digital health tool to strengthen community engagement in arboviral disease prevention: an implementation study in Colombia. BMC Public Health. 2026 Aug 4;26(1):2261. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-28576-7.

    PubMed 42552527

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Full intervention and Partial intervention in people with Dengue and Zika, run by University of Freiburg at 2 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Colombia, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in household preventive practices for Aedes-borne disease prevention (time frame: Baseline and 9 months after intervention initiation (final evaluation).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07517731, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in