DengueDigiAedesNCT07517731
Using Digital Technology for the Prevention of Aedes-Borne Diseases in Colombian Communities
A study testing Full intervention and Partial intervention in people with Dengue and Zika, run by University of Freiburg at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, remain an important public health concern in Colombian communities. Digital health tools such as WhatsApp may provide an opportunity to strengthen preventive behaviors and community engagement in vector control efforts. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya
- What is being tested?
- Full intervention and Partial intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 26 Mar 2026to 26 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Households/participants resided within one of the study clusters.
- The household had a laundry tank.
- One adult household member (household head or another adult resident) was available to participate and provide informed consent.
- For participation in the WhatsApp component, the participant owned a smartphone with WhatsApp installed and was able to read and respond to simple WhatsApp messages.
Who cannot join
- Uninhabited households.
- Households without a laundry tank.
- Households already using biological vector control methods in the laundry tank, particularly larvivorous fish.
- For the WhatsApp component, households or users without access to a smartphone or without WhatsApp installed.
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
Colombia1 site
Instituto Departamental de Salud de Norte de Santander
Cúcuta, Norte de Satander, 540001
Germany1 site
Centre for Medicine and Society
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79098
About this study
Official title: Use of Technology for Social Mobilization to Improve the Prevention and Control of Aedes-borne Diseases (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya) in Colombia
Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, remain an important public health concern in Colombian communities. Digital health tools such as WhatsApp may provide an opportunity to strengthen preventive behaviors and community engagement in vector control efforts. Therefore, a quasi-experimental implementation study was conducted in two endemic municipalities, Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, in Colombia, to evaluate a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy designed to support the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases and to promote the application of a protective coating (PC) in laundry tanks, one of the main breeding sites of Aedes mosquitoes.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Whether a WhatsApp-based digital health intervention, added to community-based strategies, can improve household preventive practices against Aedes-borne diseases, compared with community strategies alone or routine vector control activities.
Whether the combined use of WhatsApp messaging and community-based promotion of protective coating in laundry tanks can reduce Aedes entomological indices, compared with clusters not receiving the full intervention.
Whether the intervention is feasible and acceptable for households and community participants in endemic urban settings.
The study was conducted in three geographically separated clusters of approximately 3,000 - 3,500 households each. Cluster 1 received community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging, cluster 2 received community strategies only, and cluster 3 served as the control group. Protective coating was applied in clusters 1 and 2. The study included three phases: a pre-intervention baseline assessment, an intervention phase with interim assessment, and a post-intervention final evaluation and follow-up. Household surveys and entomological inspections were conducted to assess preventive practices, vector indices, and acceptance of the intervention.
Read the detailed description
Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted mainly by Aedes aegypti, remain a major public health problem in Colombia and other tropical and subtropical countries. In endemic urban communities, prevention and control are challenged by persistent vector breeding in domestic water containers, limitations of routine vector control programs, insecticide resistance, and insufficient community participation in sustained source reduction activities. In the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, north-eastern Colombia, laundry tanks are among the most productive breeding sites for Aedes mosquitoes. In this context, innovative and acceptable community-based strategies are needed to strengthen preventive practices and support vector control interventions.
Recent evidence suggests that mobile health tools may help reinforce health behaviours and improve community engagement in disease prevention. WhatsApp is widely used in Colombia and represents a feasible communication channel for delivering reminders, health education, and behaviour-oriented messages at household level. In parallel, a protective coating (PC) applied to laundry tanks had been developed and evaluated as a novel vector control tool in the study area. Because successful application of the PC depends in part on household preparation and acceptance, this study assessed whether a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy could support its uptake and reinforce preventive practices for the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases.
The purpose of this implementation study was to evaluate a WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention designed to encourage preventive health behaviours and strengthen community engagement in vector control activities, particularly in relation to the application of protective coating in laundry tanks. The study was conducted in the municipalities of Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, both located in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia. These municipalities are characterized by endemic transmission of dengue and other arboviral diseases, widespread use of domestic laundry tanks, and socioeconomic conditions that make sustained prevention especially relevant.
A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted. Cluster 1 received the full intervention, consisting of community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging (CS+WAM). Cluster 2 received community strategies only (CS), without WhatsApp messaging. Cluster 3 served as the control group and continued to receive routine vector control activities. PC was applied in clusters 1 and 2. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households and was selected from highly endemic urban communities with similar sociodemographic characteristics to reduce contamination and enhance comparability across groups.
The study population consisted of households located in the selected clusters. For household surveys and follow-up evaluations, one adult household member, usually the household head or another adult resident, was recruited in each selected household. Systematic sampling was used for baseline and final evaluations, with a target of 300 households per cluster, for a total of 900 households. Baseline and follow-up data collection included household questionnaires and entomological inspections. Additional recruitment activities in the intervention clusters were supported by female community leaders, community volunteers, and vector control staff, who also assisted with the implementation of the PC.
The study was implemented in three main phases. First, a pre-intervention phase was conducted to collect baseline information on household sociodemographic characteristics, preventive practices related to dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, and entomological indices. Second, the intervention phase included delivery of the WhatsApp-based communication strategy in cluster 1, promotion of the protective coating in clusters 1 and 2, and an interim assessment approximately four months after application of the coating. Third, a post-intervention phase was conducted to evaluate final changes in preventive practices, entomological indicators, and acceptance of the intervention. Baseline data collection took place in September 2021, the WhatsApp intervention started in October 2021, the protective coating was applied in December 2021, and the final evaluation was completed in September 2022.
The WhatsApp-based component was developed as a behaviour reinforcement and health promotion strategy. Participants in cluster 1 who consented to receive messages were sent periodic WhatsApp messages, generally on a weekly basis, focused on prevention of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and on preparation for the application of the protective coating. Reminder messages were sent before household visits for coating application. The intervention was informed by the Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI) framework and by national dengue prevention guidance. Messages were brief, written in Spanish, and designed to be understandable and engaging for community users. When needed, additional voice messages were provided by a facilitator to answer questions or clarify intervention procedures. This communication strategy was intended for health promotion and behaviour support only and did not provide medical care.
The partial intervention in cluster 2 consisted of conventional community strategies without WhatsApp messaging. Community volunteers promoted the protective coating through household visits, flyers, stickers, and direct practical instructions about how to prepare the laundry tank before application. In both intervention clusters, trained community volunteers and vector control staff supported the application of the coating and monitored implementation. Households in the control cluster did not receive WhatsApp messages or PC and continued with standard routine vector control activities.
Household surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, water storage practices, preventive behaviours, and acceptance of the intervention. Entomological inspections were conducted using standardized forms and World Health Organization operational procedures to identify water-holding containers and detect larvae and pupae. The main entomological indicators included the House Index (HI), Container Index (CI), Breteau Index (BI), and Pupae per Person Index (PPI). Acceptability of the WhatsApp component was assessed using Likert-scale items, while acceptance of the protective coating was assessed through household uptake and willingness to reapply the product.
Data analysis was conducted using RStudio. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize household and entomological data. Changes in preventive practices before and after the intervention were assessed using McNemar tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with post-intervention preventive behaviours. A difference-in-differences approach was used to compare changes over time between intervention and control clusters. Entomological indicators were calculated per cluster and compared between study phases to evaluate changes in vector density.
All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and provided informed consent before participation. Only adults were interviewed. Household data were anonymized by replacing personal identifiers with codes. The study protocol received ethical approval from the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany (application number 142/19), and from the National Institute of Health in Bogotá, Colombia, with support from local health authorities in Cúcuta and Norte de Santander.
- Conditions
- Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya, Aedes-borne Diseases
- Being tested
- Full intervention, Partial intervention
- Keywords
- Digital health, mHealth, WhatsApp, Disease prevention, Community involvement, Behaviour change, Colombia
- Medical subject headings
- Dengue, Zika Virus Infection, Chikungunya Fever, Mosquito-Borne Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Full interventionBehavioural
Participants received WhatsApp messages in Spanish to promote prevention and control of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and to support uptake of the PC intervention. Messages included health education, health promotion, behavior reinforcement, and reminders on cleaning water containers and preparing laundry tanks before coating application. Messages were brief, delivered through the WhatsApp broadcast function, and additional voice messages were provided when clarification was needed. This intervention was intended for health promotion only and not for medical care.
Partial interventionBehavioural
Community-based promotion activities were conducted by trained community volunteers and supported by vector control staff. These activities included household visits, direct instructions on how to prepare laundry tanks for coating application, distribution of flyers and stickers, and local announcements to inform households about the intervention.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Full intervention | Experimental | Community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging and protective coating in laundry tanks. Receives: Behavioral: Full intervention |
| Partial intervention | Active comparator | Community strategies plus protective coating only. Receives: Behavioral: Partial intervention |
| Control | No intervention | Routine vector control activities. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in household preventive practices for Aedes-borne disease prevention
Change from baseline to post-intervention in the proportion of households reporting certain preventive practices, such as weekly cleaning of laundry tanks, management of small water containers, and covering water containers.
Measured: Baseline and 9 months after intervention initiation (final evaluation).
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in House Index
Change in the House Index, defined as the percentage of inspected households positive for Aedes larvae and/or pupae. Values range from 0 to 100%. Higher values indicate greater household infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 5% have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Container Index
Change in the Container Index, defined as the percentage of inspected water-holding containers positive for Aedes larvae and/or pupae. Values range from 0 to 100%. Higher values indicate greater container infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 3% have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Breteau Index
Change in the Breteau Index, defined as the number of Aedes-positive containers per 100 houses inspected. Values have a minimum of 0 and no fixed upper bound. Higher values indicate greater vector infestation and a worse entomological outcome; values above 20 have been used as indicative of increased epidemic disease transmission risk.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Pupae per Person Index
Change in the Pupae per Person Index, defined as the number of Aedes pupae per person in inspected households. Values have a minimum of 0 and no fixed upper bound. Higher values indicate greater pupal density and a worse entomological outcome. In WHO/TDR-related literature, PPI thresholds for increased epidemic transmission risk have been estimated to vary by epidemiological context, with values around 0.5 to 1.5 pupae per person reported under specific assumptions of temperature and population seroprevalence.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptability score in terms of perceived usefulness of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Mean score for perceived usefulness of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater perceived usefulness; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.
Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptability score in terms of enjoyment of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Mean score for enjoyment of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater enjoyment; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.
Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Satisfaction with the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Mean score for satisfaction with the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention, assessed using a single 5-point Likert item ranging from 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction; scores above 3 indicate agreement or positive acceptability.
Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptance of protective coating application
Proportion of households in the intervention clusters that accepted the application of protective coating in household laundry tanks.
Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Willingness to reapply protective coating
Proportion of households in the intervention clusters reporting willingness to reapply protective coating in household laundry tanks.
Measured: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Apr 2026
- Study start26 Mar 2026
- Primary completion26 Mar 2026
- Study completion26 Mar 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for DengueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Colombia. The clusters received full intervention, partial intervention, or routine vector control activities. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Freiburg
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Departamental de Salud de Norte de Santander, Universidad Francisco de Paula de Santander
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Maria Angelica Carrillo Diaz, University of Freiburg
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07517731
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 142/19
- Acronym
- DigiAedes
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified household-level data generated during this study may be shared partially through publications and supplementary materials, and additional data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Because the unit of analysis was the household, no direct personal identifiers, including names, phone numbers, addresses, or WhatsApp contact information, will be shared. Shared data may include household survey variables, preventive practices, acceptability measures, and entomological indicators used in the analyses.
Publications
Cardenas R, Cabrera OL, Carrillo MA, Pineda A, Ahumada ML, Yanez Y, Ismail H, Paine M, Rivera T, Kroeger A. Aedes aegypti control in breeding sites through an insecticidal coating with dual effect: Laboratory trials and safety assessment. Med Vet Entomol. 2025 Jun;39(2):252-265. doi: 10.1111/mve.12776. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
PubMed 39543943Carrillo MA, Gessler AM, Rivera Ramirez T, Cardenas Sanchez R, Lindenmeier J, Kern WV, Kroeger A. WhatsApp-based intervention in urban Colombia to support the prevention of arboviral diseases: a feasibility study. Pathog Glob Health. 2024 Jun;118(4):334-347. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2024.2358263. Epub 2024 May 24.
PubMed 38794811Carrillo MA, Cardenas R, Yanez J, Petzold M, Kroeger A. Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
PubMed 37254133Carrillo MA, Kroeger A, Cardenas Sanchez R, Diaz Monsalve S, Runge-Ranzinger S. The use of mobile phones for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4.
PubMed 33422034Carrillo MA, Cardenas Sanchez R, Koo Chong S, Rivera Ramirez T, Yanez J, Kern WV, Lindenmeier J, Kroeger A. Using a digital health tool to strengthen community engagement in arboviral disease prevention: an implementation study in Colombia. BMC Public Health. 2026 Aug 4;26(1):2261. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-28576-7.
PubMed 42552527
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Technology for Social Mobilization to Improve the Prevention and Control of Aedes-borne Diseases (Dengue, Zika and Chikungunya) in Colombia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07517731
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DigiAedes / 142/19
- Conditions
- Dengue, Zika, Chikungunya, Aedes-borne Diseases
- Keywords
- Digital health, mHealth, WhatsApp, Disease prevention, Community involvement, Behaviour change, Colombia
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of FreiburgUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Departamental de Salud de Norte de Santander, Universidad Francisco de Paula de Santander
- Study start
- 26 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Mar 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes, remain an important public health concern in Colombian communities. Digital health tools such as WhatsApp may provide an opportunity to strengthen preventive behaviors and community engagement in vector control efforts. Therefore, a quasi-experimental implementation study was conducted in two endemic municipalities, Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, in Colombia, to evaluate a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy designed to support the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases and to promote the application of a protective coating (PC) in laundry tanks, one of the main breeding sites of Aedes mosquitoes.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Whether a WhatsApp-based digital health intervention, added to community-based strategies, can improve household preventive practices against Aedes-borne diseases, compared with community strategies alone or routine vector control activities.
Whether the combined use of WhatsApp messaging and community-based promotion of protective coating in laundry tanks can reduce Aedes entomological indices, compared with clusters not receiving the full intervention.
Whether the intervention is feasible and acceptable for households and community participants in endemic urban settings.
The study was conducted in three geographically separated clusters of approximately 3,000 - 3,500 households each. Cluster 1 received community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging, cluster 2 received community strategies only, and cluster 3 served as the control group. Protective coating was applied in clusters 1 and 2. The study included three phases: a pre-intervention baseline assessment, an intervention phase with interim assessment, and a post-intervention final evaluation and follow-up. Household surveys and entomological inspections were conducted to assess preventive practices, vector indices, and acceptance of the intervention.
Detailed description
Arboviral diseases such as dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, transmitted mainly by Aedes aegypti, remain a major public health problem in Colombia and other tropical and subtropical countries. In endemic urban communities, prevention and control are challenged by persistent vector breeding in domestic water containers, limitations of routine vector control programs, insecticide resistance, and insufficient community participation in sustained source reduction activities. In the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, north-eastern Colombia, laundry tanks are among the most productive breeding sites for Aedes mosquitoes. In this context, innovative and acceptable community-based strategies are needed to strengthen preventive practices and support vector control interventions.
Recent evidence suggests that mobile health tools may help reinforce health behaviours and improve community engagement in disease prevention. WhatsApp is widely used in Colombia and represents a feasible communication channel for delivering reminders, health education, and behaviour-oriented messages at household level. In parallel, a protective coating (PC) applied to laundry tanks had been developed and evaluated as a novel vector control tool in the study area. Because successful application of the PC depends in part on household preparation and acceptance, this study assessed whether a WhatsApp-based digital health strategy could support its uptake and reinforce preventive practices for the prevention and control of Aedes-borne diseases.
The purpose of this implementation study was to evaluate a WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention designed to encourage preventive health behaviours and strengthen community engagement in vector control activities, particularly in relation to the application of protective coating in laundry tanks. The study was conducted in the municipalities of Villa del Rosario and Los Patios, both located in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Norte de Santander, Colombia. These municipalities are characterized by endemic transmission of dengue and other arboviral diseases, widespread use of domestic laundry tanks, and socioeconomic conditions that make sustained prevention especially relevant.
A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted. Cluster 1 received the full intervention, consisting of community strategies plus WhatsApp messaging (CS+WAM). Cluster 2 received community strategies only (CS), without WhatsApp messaging. Cluster 3 served as the control group and continued to receive routine vector control activities. PC was applied in clusters 1 and 2. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households and was selected from highly endemic urban communities with similar sociodemographic characteristics to reduce contamination and enhance comparability across groups.
The study population consisted of households located in the selected clusters. For household surveys and follow-up evaluations, one adult household member, usually the household head or another adult resident, was recruited in each selected household. Systematic sampling was used for baseline and final evaluations, with a target of 300 households per cluster, for a total of 900 households. Baseline and follow-up data collection included household questionnaires and entomological inspections. Additional recruitment activities in the intervention clusters were supported by female community leaders, community volunteers, and vector control staff, who also assisted with the implementation of the PC.
The study was implemented in three main phases. First, a pre-intervention phase was conducted to collect baseline information on household sociodemographic characteristics, preventive practices related to dengue, Zika, and chikungunya, and entomological indices. Second, the intervention phase included delivery of the WhatsApp-based communication strategy in cluster 1, promotion of the protective coating in clusters 1 and 2, and an interim assessment approximately four months after application of the coating. Third, a post-intervention phase was conducted to evaluate final changes in preventive practices, entomological indicators, and acceptance of the intervention. Baseline data collection took place in September 2021, the WhatsApp intervention started in October 2021, the protective coating was applied in December 2021, and the final evaluation was completed in September 2022.
The WhatsApp-based component was developed as a behaviour reinforcement and health promotion strategy. Participants in cluster 1 who consented to receive messages were sent periodic WhatsApp messages, generally on a weekly basis, focused on prevention of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and on preparation for the application of the protective coating. Reminder messages were sent before household visits for coating application. The intervention was informed by the Communication for Behavioural Impact (COMBI) framework and by national dengue prevention guidance. Messages were brief, written in Spanish, and designed to be understandable and engaging for community users. When needed, additional voice messages were provided by a facilitator to answer questions or clarify intervention procedures. This communication strategy was intended for health promotion and behaviour support only and did not provide medical care.
The partial intervention in cluster 2 consisted of conventional community strategies without WhatsApp messaging. Community volunteers promoted the protective coating through household visits, flyers, stickers, and direct practical instructions about how to prepare the laundry tank before application. In both intervention clusters, trained community volunteers and vector control staff supported the application of the coating and monitored implementation. Households in the control cluster did not receive WhatsApp messages or PC and continued with standard routine vector control activities.
Household surveys collected information on demographic characteristics, water storage practices, preventive behaviours, and acceptance of the intervention. Entomological inspections were conducted using standardized forms and World Health Organization operational procedures to identify water-holding containers and detect larvae and pupae. The main entomological indicators included the House Index (HI), Container Index (CI), Breteau Index (BI), and Pupae per Person Index (PPI). Acceptability of the WhatsApp component was assessed using Likert-scale items, while acceptance of the protective coating was assessed through household uptake and willingness to reapply the product.
Data analysis was conducted using RStudio. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize household and entomological data. Changes in preventive practices before and after the intervention were assessed using McNemar tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with post-intervention preventive behaviours. A difference-in-differences approach was used to compare changes over time between intervention and control clusters. Entomological indicators were calculated per cluster and compared between study phases to evaluate changes in vector density.
All participants were informed about the purpose of the study and provided informed consent before participation. Only adults were interviewed. Household data were anonymized by replacing personal identifiers with codes. The study protocol received ethical approval from the Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Germany (application number 142/19), and from the National Institute of Health in Bogotá, Colombia, with support from local health authorities in Cúcuta and Norte de Santander.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- A quasi-experimental study with three geographically separated clusters was conducted in the metropolitan area of Cúcuta, Colombia. The clusters received full intervention, partial intervention, or routine vector control activities. Each cluster included approximately 3,000 households.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Full intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Full interventionCommunity strategies plus WhatsApp messaging and protective coating in laundry tanks. |
| Partial intervention | Active comparator | Behavioral: Partial interventionCommunity strategies plus protective coating only. |
| Control | No intervention | –Routine vector control activities. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Households/participants resided within one of the study clusters.
- The household had a laundry tank.
- One adult household member (household head or another adult resident) was available to participate and provide informed consent.
- For participation in the WhatsApp component, the participant owned a smartphone with WhatsApp installed and was able to read and respond to simple WhatsApp messages.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Uninhabited households.
- Households without a laundry tank.
- Households already using biological vector control methods in the laundry tank, particularly larvivorous fish.
- For the WhatsApp component, households or users without access to a smartphone or without WhatsApp installed.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Full interventionParticipants received WhatsApp messages in Spanish to promote prevention and control of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya and to support uptake of the PC intervention. Messages included health education, health promotion, behavior reinforcement, and reminders on cleaning water containers and preparing laundry tanks before coating application. Messages were brief, delivered through the WhatsApp broadcast function, and additional voice messages were provided when clarification was needed. This intervention was intended for health promotion only and not for medical care. | Behavioural | Full intervention |
| Partial interventionCommunity-based promotion activities were conducted by trained community volunteers and supported by vector control staff. These activities included household visits, direct instructions on how to prepare laundry tanks for coating application, distribution of flyers and stickers, and local announcements to inform households about the intervention. | Behavioural | Partial intervention |
Primary outcome
Change in household preventive practices for Aedes-borne disease prevention
Time frame: Baseline and 9 months after intervention initiation (final evaluation).
Change from baseline to post-intervention in the proportion of households reporting certain preventive practices, such as weekly cleaning of laundry tanks, management of small water containers, and covering water containers.
9 secondary outcomes
Change in House Index
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Container Index
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Breteau Index
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Change in Pupae per Person Index
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months after protective coating application, and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptability score in terms of perceived usefulness of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Time frame: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptability score in terms of enjoyment of the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Time frame: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Satisfaction with the WhatsApp-based mHealth intervention
Time frame: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Acceptance of protective coating application
Time frame: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Willingness to reapply protective coating
Time frame: 4 months after protective coating application and 9 months after intervention initiation.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 39543943Cardenas R, Cabrera OL, Carrillo MA, Pineda A, Ahumada ML, Yanez Y, Ismail H, Paine M, Rivera T, Kroeger A. Aedes aegypti control in breeding sites through an insecticidal coating with dual effect: Laboratory trials and safety assessment. Med Vet Entomol. 2025 Jun;39(2):252-265. doi: 10.1111/mve.12776. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 38794811Carrillo MA, Gessler AM, Rivera Ramirez T, Cardenas Sanchez R, Lindenmeier J, Kern WV, Kroeger A. WhatsApp-based intervention in urban Colombia to support the prevention of arboviral diseases: a feasibility study. Pathog Glob Health. 2024 Jun;118(4):334-347. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2024.2358263. Epub 2024 May 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 37254133Carrillo MA, Cardenas R, Yanez J, Petzold M, Kroeger A. Risk of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya transmission in the metropolitan area of Cucuta, Colombia: cross-sectional analysis, baseline for a cluster-randomised controlled trial of a novel vector tool for water containers. BMC Public Health. 2023 May 30;23(1):1000. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15893-4.
- Results publication: PubMed 33422034Carrillo MA, Kroeger A, Cardenas Sanchez R, Diaz Monsalve S, Runge-Ranzinger S. The use of mobile phones for the prevention and control of arboviral diseases: a scoping review. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jan 9;21(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-10126-4.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42552527Carrillo MA, Cardenas Sanchez R, Koo Chong S, Rivera Ramirez T, Yanez J, Kern WV, Lindenmeier J, Kroeger A. Using a digital health tool to strengthen community engagement in arboviral disease prevention: an implementation study in Colombia. BMC Public Health. 2026 Aug 4;26(1):2261. doi: 10.1186/s12889-026-28576-7.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified household-level data generated during this study may be shared partially through publications and supplementary materials, and additional data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Because the unit of analysis was the household, no direct personal identifiers, including names, phone numbers, addresses, or WhatsApp contact information, will be shared. Shared data may include household survey variables, preventive practices, acceptability measures, and entomological indicators used in the analyses.
Related trials for Dengue
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Challenge Study Using rDEN2delta30-7169 to Evaluate Host-Pathogen Interactions in Primary, Homotypic, and Heterotypic Dengue Virus Infection
Healthy Volunteers, Dengue
Active, not recruiting
A Controlled Human Infection Model of Dengue
Dengue
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Emetine for Viral Outbreaks (a.k.a. EVOLVE Antiviral Initiative)
Dengue
RecruitingPhase 2
Adaptive Dengue Antiviral Platform Trial
Dengue, Antiviral Drugs
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Responses to Dengue and Sepsis
Dengue, Sepsis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Full intervention and Partial intervention in people with Dengue and Zika, run by University of Freiburg at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Colombia, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in household preventive practices for Aedes-borne disease prevention (time frame: Baseline and 9 months after intervention initiation (final evaluation).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07517731, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2026.