AzTrials
AzTrials

DGBIiACTforDGBINCT07521709

Evaluation of an Online ACT and Compassion-based Intervention for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction

A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training and Education in people with DGBI and Depression/Anxiety, run by Örebro University, Sweden at 1 site in Sweden.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the iACTforDGBI intervention among adults with Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) and psychological distress. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
DGBI, Depression/Anxiety
What is being tested?
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training and Education
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
30 Apr 2026to 30 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age between 18 and 75 years
  • Meeting clinical symptom levels for least one DGBI diagnosis (assessed with the Rome IV Diagnostic Questionnaire for Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders in Adults (Palsson et al., 2016))
  • Clinically meaningful levels of depressive symptoms or anxiety: score ≥ 13 on the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (Svanborg \& Åsberg, 1994; (MADRS-S; depressive symptoms), or score ≥ 10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 (GAD-7; anxiety symptoms; Spitzer et al., 2006)
  • Stable medication for psychiatric symptoms including anxiety, depression and sleep problems for at least two months prior to intervention.
  • Ability to read and write Swedish
  • Have access to a device (like computer, tablet or smartphone with) with access to the internet and that can be used to attend video conferences and preview the intervention platform (i.e., have a microphone and speakers or headphones).

Who cannot join

  • Currently undergoing any form of psychological intervention.
  • Increased risk of suicide (≥4 points on MADRS item 9).
  • Ongoing or previously diagnosed severe psychiatric disorder, such as schizophrenia spectrum disorders or bipolar disorder.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Örebro University

    Örebro

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Cost Effectiveness of an Online ACT Intervention for Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the iACTforDGBI intervention among adults with Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction (DGBI) and psychological distress. The main questions it aims to answer are: What is the efficacy of iACTforDGBI vs DGBI School? What is the cost-effectiveness of iACTforDGBI vs DGBI School? Who are the responders of each intervention? What are the moderators and mechanisms of change of the interventions? Participants will be asked to: Complete one of the two interventions (to which they will be randomly allocated to). Both interventions are 8-session online programs, delivered via an interactive platform and tailored for Swedish-speaking adults with symptoms compatible with a DGBI and psychological distress. Both interventions are theory-based and expected to be beneficial. Participants will be asked to fill out online questionnaires for screening of study eligibility, and baseline, post-treatment and follow-up outcome measures to evaluate the intervention. A subsample will also be interviewed post treatment.

Being tested
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training, Education
Medical subject headings
Depression, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion trainingBehavioural

    The self-guided Online version of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion components (iACTforDGBI) intervention will include 8 weekly sessions of around 20-30 minutes each, and will comprise ACT-consistent informative texts, audio exercises, and videos.

  • EducationOther

    Participants in the active control group will be asked to complete 8 weekly 20-minute sessions of an online course for education on DGBIs. This course will be delivered through the same platform than the one delivering the online ACT for DGBI intervention, via the same website. The intervention platform will have similar designs and structure, and will be developed by the same web development company. This intervention is based on the IBS school program (e.g., Ringström et al., 2009), in particular its online version (Lindfors et al., 2021), developed by members of the current research team.

Study groups in NCT07521709
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion trainingExperimentalAcceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training
Receives: Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training
Education about DGBI and distressActive comparatorEducation
Receives: Other: Education

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS)

    Symptom Severity of DGBI, minimum 15, maximum 105, higher = worse gastrointestinal symptoms

    Measured: T0 (week 0), Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up). T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  2. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 (GAD-7)

    Symptoms of general anxiety, total score 0-21, higher = worse anxiety symptoms

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  3. The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    symptoms of depression, total score 0-27, higher = worse depressive symptoms

    Measured: T0 (week 0), Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L), EQ Vas 0-100, higher = better health-related quality of life

    Health-related Quality of Life

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  2. Assessment of Quality of Life - 8 dimensions (AQoL-8D)

    Health-related Quality of Life, Utility score -0.04 - 1.00, higher = better quality of life

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  3. The Trimbos and Institute of Medical Technology Assessment Cost Questionnaire for Psychiatry (TIC-P)

    Healthcare Utilization, no single fixed min/max, higher = worse/more costly outcome

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  4. The Chronic Illness Shame Scale (CISS)

    Shame of Chronic Illnesses, total score 0-28, higher = worse shame related to chronic illness

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  5. The Credibility / Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Treatment Credibility and Expectancy, total score 3-27 each, higher = better treatment credibility/expectancy

    Measured: T0 (week 0, only expectancy sub scale), Tmid (week 4, both subscales)

  6. The System Usability Scale (SUS)

    Intervention Platform Usability, total score 0-100, higher = better usability

    Measured: T1 (week 8)

  7. The Negative Effects Questionnaire (NEQ-20)

    Negative Side Effects and Events, total score 0-80, higher = worse negative effects

    Measured: T1 (week 8)

  8. Global Impression of Change Scale

    Impression of change, a single global change item, higher = worse

    Measured: Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  9. Awareness of Processes Post-Intervention Scale

    Awareness of Processes, higher = more awareness

    Measured: T1 (week 8)

  10. The Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI)

    Psychological flexibility, composites scored as means, higher = worse for inflexibility

    Measured: T0 (week 0), Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  11. Self-Compassion Scale

    Self-compassion, higher = better self-compassion

    Measured: T0 (week 0), Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  12. Insomnia Severity Index

    Insomnia symptoms, total score 0-28, higher = worse insomnia severity

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up), T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)

  13. Major Life Events

    Past 12 months. Questions about psychological/physical diagnoses, usually more events/greater burden = worse stress exposure

    Measured: T0 (week 0), T3 (6 month follow-up)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2026
  2. Study start30 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2026

Why it stopped: Study halted before recruitment started due to data integrity issues from the previous pilot studies. Decision made by PI, with support from the host institution.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a randomized controlled trial in which we intend to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the iACTforDGBI intervention compared to the active control group (DGBI School).
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07521709
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023-00751e
Other IDs
2023
Acronym
iACTforDGBI
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
27 Mar 2026
Last updated
8 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: This question is under investigation. Some of our data contain sensitive information on health, and the main priority is participants integrity which need to be balanced against basic scientific principles on scrutiny. However, any personal data that can be shared without compromising participants integrity to a reasonable degree will be shared upon reasonable request.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Acceptance and Commitment Therapy with explicit self-compassion training and Education in people with DGBI and Depression/Anxiety, run by Örebro University, Sweden at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) (time frame: T0 (week 0), Tmid (week 4), T1 (week 8), T2 (3 month follow-up). T3 (6 month follow-up), T4 (12 month follow-up)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in