COPDEmoD-2NCT07524023
Emotional-distress-based Integrated Care Programme in Patients With Stable COPD
A study testing EmoD Intervention in people with COPD and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The investigators have developed a new counselling service that focuses on the emotional distress experienced by people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (*COPD*). The new programme is led by an advanced practice nursing (*APN*) team. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- COPD, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
- What is being tested?
- EmoD Intervention
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- 16 Mar 2026to 10 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD (GOLD 1-4) and existing lung function in the past 12 months
- Age ≥ 18
- Outpatient treatment on the pneumology clinic of the university hospital Zurich. Last consultation within the past 12 months
Who cannot join
- Significant changes in symptoms over the past 3 months that exceeded the everyday fluctuations and required intensification of treatment (moderate, severe exacerbations or pneumonia) and no COPD-related hospitalisation in the past 3 months
- Cognitive impairment (dementia, delirium)
- Unstable psychiatric situation, i.e., current psychiatric treatment due to personality disorder, schizophrenia, drug use, suicidal tendencies. No exclusion for nicotine and alcohol abuse, anxiety, and depression
- Not speaking or reading German
- Intervention via telephone or video call not possible
- Lung transplant (recipient or candidate)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
University Hospital Zürich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091
About this study
Official title: Emotional-distress-based Integrated Care Programme in Patients With Stable COPD - A Feasibility Study (EmoD-2)
The investigators have developed a new counselling service that focuses on the emotional distress experienced by people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (*COPD*). The new programme is led by an advanced practice nursing (*APN*) team. Other professionals are involved in the programme, such as medical staff and physiotherapists. The new counselling service lasts three months. Patients will receive ten counselling sessions with a specialized nurse. The overall objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of the newly developed emotional-distress-based integrated care programme.
- Conditions
- COPD, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
- Being tested
- EmoD Intervention
- Keywords
- copd, Feasibility study, Mixed-methods design, Emotional Distress, Integrated care prgramme, APN
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EmoD InterventionOther
Outpatients in a stable phase of chronic pulmonary disease (*COPD*) will be aligned to a nurse-led emotional-distress-based integrated care programme for three months.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EmoD Intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: EmoD Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in COPD-related emotional distress (CRED)
Change in COPD-related emotional distress between baseline and month 3. COPD-related emotional distress will be assessed using the newly developed "COPD-Related Emotional Distress Questionnaire (CRED)", which was developed for CF and COPD patients (publication in progress; former name of the questionnaire: IRED-RESP). The questionnaire includes 36 items and assesses distress related to symptoms, treatment, restrictions in range of mobility and participation in social life, unpredictability of the disease and stigma, using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores mean more emotional distress (worse outcome).
Measured: Quantitative data will be collected baseline, in the first month (Baseline measurement, week 0-4), and follow-up, three months after (week 14-17)]
Secondary outcomes (27)
Reach: Total number of patients who take up the programme
Percentage of patients approached who take up the programme
Measured: Four months
Reach: Percentage of patients who take part in at least one outpatient intervention
Number of interventions per patient and number of patients with termination of the programme before Week 13 is documented by the advanced practice nursing team
Measured: Four months
Reach: Reasons for participating in the programme (facilitators and barriers)
Patients who decline the intervention are asked by the study nurse for their reasons (barriers). The reasons for taking up the programme (facilitators) will be qualitatively investigated in interviews. A semi-structured interview guide will be used.
Measured: Four months
Reach: Reasons for ending (prematurely or on schedule) the programme (facilitators and barriers)
The reasons for ending (prematurely or on schedule) the programme will be qualitatively investigated in interviews. A semi-structured interview guide will be used
Measured: Four months
Potential effectiveness: Change in depression
Quantitative:
Depression will be screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (*HADS*). The concept is measured with seven 4-point rating scales, ranging from 0 to 3. The sum score, ranging from 0 to 21, will be calculated. Higher scores mean worse outcomes. Differences between MZP1 and MZP2 will be calculated per subscale.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in anxiety
Quantitative:
Anxiety will be screened with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (*HADS*). The concept is measured with seven 4-point rating scales, ranging from 0 to 3. The sum score, ranging from 0 to 21, will be calculated. Higher scores mean worse outcomes. Differences between MZP1 and MZP2 will be calculated per subscale.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health-related quality of life (*QoL*)
Quantitative:
Health-related quality of life will be assessed with the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (*CRQ*), following the defined procedure of the developers. The self-administered questionnaire version with standardised dyspnoea questions (*SAS*) will be used. The questionnaire was developed for patients with chronic airflow limitations and comprises 20 items, which assess four domains: 1) dyspnea, 2) fatigue, 3) emotional function, and 4) mastery. The scoring scale ranges from 1 (extreme) to 7 (not at all), and will be assessed with a recall period of the past two weeks. A subscore for each domain (sum of items / number of items) will be calculated. The CRQ-SAS is available in German. It has demonstrated high sensitivity in the evaluation of a rehabilitation programme. Differences between baseline measurement and second measurement will be calculated per subscore.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Patient satisfaction with programme
Quantitative:
The questionnaire on the quality of nursing care counselling (*ANP-BQ*) is used to assess patient satisfaction. This instrument includes, for example, a question to assess the satisfaction of care provided by the ANP on an NRS 1-10.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Number of moderate exacerbations within 3 months
Quantitative
The number of moderate exacerbations during the previous three months are assessed at weeks 14-17. For this purpose, moderate exacerbations are defined as an acute (more than normal day-to-day variation) worsening of respiratory symptoms (breathlessness, sputum and / or coughing) that are treated with systemic antibiotics and / or corticosteroids (systemic = oral or intravenous).
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Number of severe exacerbations within 3 months
Quantitative:
The number of severe exacerbations during the previous three months are assessed at weeks 14-17. For this purpose, severe exacerbations are defined as acute (more than normal day-to-day variation) worsening of respiratory symptoms (breathlessness, sputum and/or coughing) that result in hospitalisation or emergency room visit.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Rehospitalisation at day 90
Quantitative
The number of COPD-related rehospitalisations after 3 months is assessed by medical chart review.
Qualitative
In the case of rehospitalisation, a one-to-one interview and medical chart review will be performed to assess reasons for rehospitalisation.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking- current status
Quantitative
Smoking behaviour will be assessed by using the questionnaire from the WHO. It assesses the current status of smoking (yes / no).
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking - ex- smoker
Quantitative
Smoking behaviour will be assessed by using the questionnaire from the WHO. If an ex-smoker, it assesses date of smoking cessation (year).
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking -smoker
Quantitative
Smoking behaviour will be assessed by using the questionnaire from the WHO. If a smoker, it assesses the substance and the number per day.
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - body weight
Quantitative
Current body weight (kg) will be assessed.
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - body height
Quantitative
Current body height (m) will be assessed.
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - BMI
Quantitative:
Current body mass index (*BMI*) will be calculated according to the WHO recommendations (kg/m²).
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - NRS
Quantitative:
The current nutritional risk screening (*NRS*) will be assessed during hospitalisation. Three and more points means a worse outcome.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour physical activity - C-PPAC
Quantitative:
Self-report by patient, based on the first two items of the clinical version of PROactive Physical Activity in COPD instrument (*C-PPAC*). The items measure the amount of activity over the last 7 days, with a range from 0-4. Higher scores mean better outcomes.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results:
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour physical activity - Pulmonary rehabilitation
Quantitative
The use of pulmonary rehabilitation (*PR*) /outpatient physiotherapy is recorded.
Qualitative
A semi-structured interview guide will be used based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour inhalation adherence
Quantitative:
Adherence to inhalation will be assessed. The items were derived from the Zurich Assessment of Therapy Adherence CF (*ZATA-CF*) and adapted slightly. Patients are asked how often they needed to inhale the medication per day, and how often they had skipped an inhalation in the past seven days. Higher scores mean worse outcomes.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour action plan
Quantitative:
Availability of a prescription for an action plan (with/without self-medication) and adherence of patients to the action plan will be assessed.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour oxygen use
Quantitative:
Availability of an oxygen prescription, and the patient's compliance with the prescription, are assessed.
Qualitative:
A semi-structured interview guide will be used, based on the quantitative results.
Measured: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Implementation: Percent of programme components carried out according to the intervention manual
Quantitative:
Completed intervention components per patient were documented by the ANP team. Necessary, but not or not fully completed parts of the intervention are also documented.
Qualitative:
To understand reasons for performing, omitting or modifying components of the programme, structured small group interviews will be conducted with HCP's involved in intervention delivery. The interview guide will be based on the results of the document analysis.
Measured: Six months
Implementation: Acceptability of the programme
Quantitative:
The German translation of the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (*AIM*) scale will be used to assess the healthcare professional's perspective. The scale contains four items; all are rated on a 5-point response scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree). The investigators added a sixth option, "no response" (0 points).
Qualitative:
To understand reasons for the results, structured small group interviews will be conducted with involved HCPs. The interview guide will be based on the results of the questionnaires.
Measured: Six months
Implementation: Appropriateness of the programme
Quantitative:
The German translation of the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (*IAM*) scale will be used to assess the healthcare professional's perspective. The scale contains four items; all are rated on a 5-point response scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree). The investigators added a sixth option, "no response" (0 points).
Qualitative:
To understand reasons for the results, structured small group interviews will be conducted with involved HCPs. The interview guide will be based on the results of the questionnaires.
Measured: Six months
Implementation: Feasibility of the programme
Quantitative
The German translation of the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (*FIM*) scale will be used to assess the healthcare professional's perspective. The scale contains four items; all are rated on a 5-point response scale (1 = completely disagree, 5 = completely agree). The investigators added a sixth option "no response" (0 points).
Qualitative
To understand reasons for the results structured small group interviews will be conducted with involved HCPs. The interview guide will be based on the results of the questionnaires.
Measured: Six months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Apr 2026
- Study start16 Mar 2026
- Primary completion10 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion10 Sep 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for COPDStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ZurichThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Zurich
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07524023
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-02396
- Other IDs
- 2025
- Acronym
- EmoD-2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 17 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Emotional-distress-based Integrated Care Programme in Patients With Stable COPD - A Feasibility Study (EmoD-2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07524023
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EmoD-2 / 2025-02396
- Conditions
- COPD, COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
- Keywords
- copd, Feasibility study, Mixed-methods design, Emotional Distress, Integrated care prgramme, APN
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ZurichUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 10 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators have developed a new counselling service that focuses on the emotional distress experienced by people living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (*COPD*). The new programme is led by an advanced practice nursing (*APN*) team. Other professionals are involved in the programme, such as medical staff and physiotherapists. The new counselling service lasts three months. Patients will receive ten counselling sessions with a specialized nurse. The overall objective of the study is to assess the feasibility of the newly developed emotional-distress-based integrated care programme.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- Explanatory sequential mixed-methods design
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EmoD Intervention | Experimental | Other: EmoD Intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD (GOLD 1-4) and existing lung function in the past 12 months
- Age ≥ 18
- Outpatient treatment on the pneumology clinic of the university hospital Zurich. Last consultation within the past 12 months
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Significant changes in symptoms over the past 3 months that exceeded the everyday fluctuations and required intensification of treatment (moderate, severe exacerbations or pneumonia) and no COPD-related hospitalisation in the past 3 months
- Cognitive impairment (dementia, delirium)
- Unstable psychiatric situation, i.e., current psychiatric treatment due to personality disorder, schizophrenia, drug use, suicidal tendencies. No exclusion for nicotine and alcohol abuse, anxiety, and depression
- Not speaking or reading German
- Intervention via telephone or video call not possible
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EmoD InterventionOutpatients in a stable phase of chronic pulmonary disease (*COPD*) will be aligned to a nurse-led emotional-distress-based integrated care programme for three months. | Other | EmoD Intervention |
Primary outcome
Change in COPD-related emotional distress (CRED)
Time frame: Quantitative data will be collected baseline, in the first month (Baseline measurement, week 0-4), and follow-up, three months after (week 14-17)]
Change in COPD-related emotional distress between baseline and month 3. COPD-related emotional distress will be assessed using the newly developed "COPD-Related Emotional Distress Questionnaire (CRED)", which was developed for CF and COPD patients (publication in progress; former name of the questionnaire: IRED-RESP). The questionnaire includes 36 items and assesses distress related to symptoms, treatment, restrictions in range of mobility and participation in social life, unpredictability of the disease and stigma, using a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores mean more emotional distress (worse outcome).
27 secondary outcomes
Reach: Total number of patients who take up the programme
Time frame: Four months
Reach: Percentage of patients who take part in at least one outpatient intervention
Time frame: Four months
Reach: Reasons for participating in the programme (facilitators and barriers)
Time frame: Four months
Reach: Reasons for ending (prematurely or on schedule) the programme (facilitators and barriers)
Time frame: Four months
Potential effectiveness: Change in depression
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in anxiety
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health-related quality of life (*QoL*)
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Patient satisfaction with programme
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Number of moderate exacerbations within 3 months
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Number of severe exacerbations within 3 months
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Rehospitalisation at day 90
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking- current status
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking - ex- smoker
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months, with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second, measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour smoking -smoker
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - body weight
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - body height
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - BMI
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour nutrition - NRS
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour physical activity - C-PPAC
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour physical activity - Pulmonary rehabilitation
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour inhalation adherence
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour action plan
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Potential effectiveness: Change in health behaviour oxygen use
Time frame: Study duration per patient is three months with two measurement points. Baseline measurements will be applied in the first month (week 0-4). Second measurement will take place in month four (week 14-17).
Implementation: Percent of programme components carried out according to the intervention manual
Time frame: Six months
Implementation: Acceptability of the programme
Time frame: Six months
Implementation: Appropriateness of the programme
Time frame: Six months
Implementation: Feasibility of the programme
Time frame: Six months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for COPD
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Firefighter's Longitudinal Airway and Respiratory Exposome/Multiome Study (FLARES)
Anosmia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Multidisciplinary Care, Structured and Targeted on the COPD Patient's Clinical Pathway.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Lung Diseases, Obstructive
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
The AIRWARD Study: A Study to Test Whether Verducatib Helps People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Phase 2b Efficacy and Safety Study of AERO-007, an Inhaled LABA+LAMA Combination for Nebulization Delivery in COPD Patients
COPD, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Effectiveness and Efficiency of Home Telemonitoring and Non-invasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD and Hypercapnia (EVALECO)
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive (COPD), Hypercapnia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EmoD Intervention in people with COPD and COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), run by University of Zurich at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in COPD-related emotional distress (CRED) (time frame: Quantitative data will be collected baseline, in the first month (Baseline measurement, week 0-4), and follow-up, three months after (week 14-17)]). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2026.