AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung NeoplasmsNCT07525908

Efficacy of a Self-Efficacy Nursing Model in CyberKnife-Treated Lung Cancer Patients

A study testing Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model and Routine Nursing Care in people with Lung Neoplasms and Anxiety, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates whether a multi-component nursing model based on self-efficacy theory can alleviate psychological distress, mitigate pain, and improve the quality of life (QoL) in lung cancer patients undergoing CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery compared to routine nursing care. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Lung Neoplasms, Anxiety
What is being tested?
Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model and Routine Nursing Care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Oct 2023to 31 Oct 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged between 40 and 80 years, inclusive.
  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of primary lung cancer (suitable for CyberKnife treatment).
  • Scheduled to receive CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery as a primary or palliative treatment.
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80-100.
  • Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) score ≤ 5.
  • Estimated life expectancy of at least 6 months.
  • Able to understand, speak, and read Mandarin Chinese.
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Presence of severe, uncontrolled cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, respiratory, hepatic, or renal diseases.
  • Known history of severe psychiatric disorders or cognitive impairment.
  • Presence of other active malignancies requiring systemic treatment.
  • Known severe, uncontrolled endocrine or metabolic diseases.
  • Significant coagulation disorders.
  • Previous radiotherapy to the planned CyberKnife treatment field.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial concurrently or within 30 days prior to enrollment.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • First Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Clinical Study on the Impact of a Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model on Psychological Distress, Pain Level, and Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients Treated With CyberKnife

This study evaluates whether a multi-component nursing model based on self-efficacy theory can alleviate psychological distress, mitigate pain, and improve the quality of life (QoL) in lung cancer patients undergoing CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery compared to routine nursing care.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer patients undergoing CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery often experience significant psychological distress, including profound fear and anxiety, as well as pain, which negatively impacts their quality of life. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial investigated a structured nursing intervention based on Albert Bandura's self-efficacy theory. A total of 300 lung cancer patients scheduled for CyberKnife treatment were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to an intervention group or a control group. The control group received standard medical and routine nursing care. The intervention group received a multi-component nursing model in addition to routine care. The intervention included cognitive-behavioral strategies, psychological support, role model encouragement, functional exercise guidance, social support system enhancement, and self-management training, which was initiated upon admission and continued for 4 weeks. The primary hypothesis is that this theory-based approach will significantly improve general self-efficacy, reduce symptom burden (anxiety and pain), and enhance overall quality of life compared to standard care.

Being tested
Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model, Routine Nursing Care
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing ModelBehavioural

    Patients received routine nursing care plus a structured, multi-component nursing intervention based on self-efficacy theory. The core components delivered over 4 weeks included: cognitive-behavioral education (to correct misconceptions and set realistic goals), psychological support (active listening and guided relaxation), role-model encouragement (sharing experiences of successful patients), functional exercise guidance (gentle breathing and physical activity), reinforcement of social support systems, and self-management skill training (symptom monitoring and action plans).

  • Routine Nursing CareBehavioural

    Patients received standard medical care and routine nursing care. This included standard pre-treatment education regarding the CyberKnife procedure, basic symptom monitoring and management, general psychological support during routine interactions, and standard discharge planning.

Study groups in NCT07525908
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Self-Efficacy Nursing GroupExperimentalPatients received routine nursing care plus a structured, multi-component nursing intervention based on self-efficacy theory. The core components delivered over 4 weeks included: cognitive-behavioral education (to correct misconceptions and set realistic goals), psychological support (active listening and guided relaxation), role-model encouragement (sharing experiences of successful patients), functional exercise guidance (gentle breathing and physical activity), reinforcement of social support systems, and self-management skill training (symptom monitoring and action plans).
Receives: Behavioral: Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model
Control GroupActive comparatorPatients received standard medical care and routine nursing care. This included standard pre-treatment education regarding the CyberKnife procedure, basic symptom monitoring and management, general psychological support during routine interactions, and standard discharge planning.
Receives: Behavioral: Routine Nursing Care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in General Self-Efficacy

    Change in general self-efficacy was assessed using the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES). The GSES is a 10-item psychometric scale where each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived self-efficacy to cope with difficulties.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Change in Anxiety Level

    Change in anxiety level was measured using the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS). The SAS is a 20-item self-report questionnaire with a standardized index score ranging from 25 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater anxiety levels.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks

  2. Change in Pain Intensity

    Change in pain intensity was measured using a 10cm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Scores range from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst imaginable pain").

    Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks

  3. Change in Quality of Life (Physical Component Summary)

    Change in the Physical Component Summary (PCS) of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better physical health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks

  4. Change in Quality of Life (Mental Component Summary)

    Change in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better mental health-related quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Apr 2026
  2. Study start1 Oct 2023
  3. Primary completion31 Oct 2024
  4. Study completion31 Oct 2024

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07525908
Sponsor's protocol ID
2023S00352
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
6 Apr 2026
Last updated
13 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-Efficacy Theory-Based Nursing Model and Routine Nursing Care in people with Lung Neoplasms and Anxiety, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in General Self-Efficacy (time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in