AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerPeds EthosNCT07528547

Hypersight and Ethos In Pediatric Radiotherapy

A study testing HyperSight CBCT scans in people with Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a single-center, prospective pilot study evaluating the utility of HyperSight CBCT imaging and Ethos adaptive radiation planning in pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy for non-cranial tumors. Twenty patients aged 18 or under will be enrolled. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Cancer
What is being tested?
HyperSight CBCT scans
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
14 Apr 2026to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patient (paediatric or adolescent) age 18 or under receiving at least 5 days of radiation therapy
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 3

Who cannot join

  • Patients with primary cranial tumours will be excluded due to the low expected utility of non-contrast CT scans in the delineation of brain edema and brain substructures.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Canada1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

    Dana Keilty, MD, 416-946-4501 ext. 6513, dana.keilty@uhn.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Hypersight and Ethos In Pediatric Radiotherapy (Peds Ethos)

This is a single-center, prospective pilot study evaluating the utility of HyperSight CBCT imaging and Ethos adaptive radiation planning in pediatric patients receiving radiation therapy for non-cranial tumors.

Twenty patients aged 18 or under will be enrolled. Participants will receive standard-of-care radiation therapy, with the addition of twice-weekly HyperSight CBCT scans. These scans will be used to assess anatomical changes and generate adapted radiation plans using the Ethos platform. Radiation oncologists and radiation therapists will independently evaluate the need for adaptation, and adapted vs. scheduled plans will be compared using dosimetric and anatomical similarity metrics.

An optional sub-study will allow anonymized imaging and planning data to be shared with Varian Medical Systems. The study duration will match the patient's treatment course, typically 1-6 weeks, with no additional follow-up beyond standard care.

Conditions
Cancer
Being tested
HyperSight CBCT scans
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HyperSight CBCT scansDevice

    During the standard of care pediatric radiation treatment, a Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) image is taken after the patient is positioned on the radiation treatment table. This image, captured using equipment built into the treatment machine, helps ensure accurate alignment and allows assessment of tumor or tissue changes.

Study groups in NCT07528547
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ImagingOtherParticipants will receive standard-of-care radiation therapy, with the addition of twice-weekly HyperSight CBCT scans.
Receives: Device: HyperSight CBCT scans

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Dice Similarity Coefficient

    Change in Tumor and OAR Anatomy During Pediatric Radiation Therapy Using HyperSight CBCT and Ethos Adaptive Replanning. This outcome measures how tumor and organ-at-risk (OAR) anatomy changes during pediatric radiation therapy using HyperSight CBCT.

    Measured: From baseline (start of radiation treatment) to end of treatment, approximately 6 to 8 weeks.

  2. Hausdorff distance

    Change in Tumor and OAR Anatomy During Pediatric Radiation Therapy Using HyperSight CBCT and Ethos Adaptive Replanning. This outcome measures how tumor and organ-at-risk (OAR) anatomy changes during pediatric radiation therapy using HyperSight CBCT. This will be measured in mm.

    Measured: From baseline (start of radiation treatment) to end of treatment, approximately 6 to 8 weeks.

  3. Volume differences

    Change in Tumor and OAR Anatomy During Pediatric Radiation Therapy Using HyperSight CBCT and Ethos Adaptive Replanning. This outcome measures how tumor and organ-at-risk (OAR) anatomy changes during pediatric radiation therapy using HyperSight CBCT. This will be measured in cm^3.

    Measured: Time Frame: From baseline (start of radiation treatment) to end of treatment, approximately 6 to 8 weeks.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Quality of cone beam CT

    Using the 5 liker scale

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  2. Organ motion

    Does the dose to the organ that day violate the prespecified constraints

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  3. Feasibility of Conformal Planning in Traditionally Field-Based Diseases

    All target coverage goals achieved with conformal planning measured in percentage (%).

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  4. Feasibility of Conformal Planning in Traditionally Field-Based Diseases

    All target coverage goals achieved with conformal planning measured in volume (mm^3)

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  5. Feasibility of Conformal Planning in Traditionally Field-Based Diseases

    All target coverage goals achieved with conformal planning measured in dose (gy)

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  6. Dosimetric Impact of Adaptive Radiation Therapy

    Measures the differences in accumulated radiation dose to the tumor and organs at risk (OARs) between adapted and non-adapted treatment plans using dose-volume metrics.

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  7. Safety of Minimized Target Expansion Volumes

    Evaluates whether reducing target margins in adaptive planning maintains safe dose coverage while avoiding increased exposure to surrounding healthy tissue. All target coverage goals achieved with smaller PTV sizes. It's a pre-defined metric that is specific to the tumour type. A common example is the dose to 95% of the PTV should be >95% of the prescription dose.

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

  8. Integration of Radiation Therapy Proficiencies in Adaptive Planning

    Image review, contour adjustments, and plan selection during daily treatment sessions. Measured >=0.70 Dice Similarity Coefficient between radiation oncology and radiation therapy delineations.

    Measured: From baseline to end of treatment (approximately 6 to 8 weeks)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2026
  2. Study start14 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07528547
Sponsor's protocol ID
25-5372
Acronym
Peds Ethos
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
26 May 2025
Last updated
15 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: To be discussed with PI

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HyperSight CBCT scans in people with Cancer, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dana Keilty, MD (416-946-4501 ext. 6513, dana.keilty@uhn.ca), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Dice Similarity Coefficient (time frame: From baseline (start of radiation treatment) to end of treatment, approximately 6 to 8 weeks.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in