Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionMWM KCT SIJDNCT07529093
Combined Effects of Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement and Kinetic Control Training on Pain, Range of Motion, Gait and Functional Disability Among Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
A study testing Mobilization with Movement in people with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences at 2 sites in Pakistan.
Trial summary
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a frequent source of low back and pelvic pain and contributes significantly to movement restriction, altered gait patterns, and functional disability in adults. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Mobilization with Movement
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesPakistan
- Study dates
- 15 Apr 2026to 15 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Both male and female patients
- Age between 45- 64 years
- Unilateral non-radiating pain
- Confirmed diagnosis through at least 3/5 provocative tests Faber test Distraction test Thigh thrust test Gaenslen test Sacral thrust test
- Pain rating from 4-6 on Numeric Pain Rating Scale
- Symptoms of SIJD for more than 2 months
Who cannot join
- Patients with history of any surgery at lumbo-sacral or pelvic region
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Congenital, postural deformities
- Acute disc hernia and spinal stenosis that may cause pain in the lower back and hips, piriformis syndrome
- Rheumatic diseases (fibromyalgia, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatic arthritis)
- Acute infections or malignancies
Show all 9Show fewer
- Having received manual therapy for the sacroiliac joint in the past 3 months
- Injection of corticosteroids or anesthesia in the SIJ during the previous 1 month
- Psychological disorders affecting the subject's ability to follow the instructions
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Not yet recruiting
Ali Hospital
Lahore, Punjab Province
- Recruiting
Physiotherapy Center
Lahore, Punjab Province
About this study
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a frequent source of low back and pelvic pain and contributes significantly to movement restriction, altered gait patterns, and functional disability in adults. It is associated with impaired lumbopelvic motor control, weakness of key stabilizing muscles, and faulty load transfer across the pelvis. SIJD is prevalent in both physically active individuals and sedentary populations. In addition to its clinical impact, SIJD imposes a considerable socioeconomic burden due to reduced work productivity and long-term disability.
Contemporary management of SIJD emphasises on pain reduction, restoration of movement, functional independence, and participation in daily activities. Manual therapy techniques such as Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) are widely used to correct positional faults and restore pain-free movement, while kinetic control training targets deficits in motor control of the lumbopelvic stabilizing muscles. Although both approaches are individually supported in the literature, evidence regarding their combined effectiveness on pain, range of motion, gait parameters, and functional disability remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of combined Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement and kinetic control training versus kinetic control training alone in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction using validated outcome measures.
Read the detailed description
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) refers to altered biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint, characterized by either excessive or restricted movement, or the presence of abnormal motion patterns. It is a recognized source of pain originating from the sacroiliac joint and occurs due to abnormal or increased movement of the ilium relative to the sacrum, leading to irritation of the surrounding joint structures. The prevalence of SIJD among individuals with low back pain has been reported to range from 15% to 30% in Asian populations, including Pakistan. In the Pakistani context, SIJD is frequently observed among healthcare professionals and individuals whose occupations involve prolonged standing or repetitive postural activities. In recent years, the incidence of SIJD appears to be increasing, possibly due to sedentary lifestyles, cumulative mechanical stress, and improved clinical recognition of the sacroiliac joint as a distinct contributor to low back pain.
The clinical diagnosis of SIJD is primarily based on a detailed patient history and focused physical examination, while its management involves a combination of therapeutic approaches. Current management strategies are consistent with the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Two therapeutic approaches of concern in this study are Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and KInetic Control (KC) training.
Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is a manual therapy technique that applies sustained accessory glides during active movement to correct positional faults and alleviate pain. This approach is intended to produce immediate functional improvement by combining pain-free accessory glides with physiological movement. Mobilization of the sacroiliac joint through physiotherapy aims to restore normal joint mechanics, enabling patients to maintain optimal sacroiliac joint function throughout daily activities.
Kinetic Control, as proposed by Comerford and Mottram, focuses on retraining faulty movement patterns to address uncontrolled movement and enhance joint stability. Movement is fundamental to functional performance and participation in daily life, and restoring controlled movement enables individuals to regain the functional choices that are often lost in the presence of pain and movement impairment. This study therefore seeks to compare the effects of Mulligan's MWM combined with kinetic control training targeting the gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles.
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Kinetic Control + Mobilization with Movement, Mobilization with Movement
- Keywords
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement, Kinetic Control Training, Uncontrolled Movement
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Kinetic Control + Mobilization with MovementOther
Participants will receive baseline therapy consisting of superficial heating therapy followed by structured stretching and strengthening exercises for the sacroiliac joint and lumbar region on mat. Then Mulligan's MWM will be applied to the sacroiliac joint using sustained accessory glides combined with pain-free active movement. This will be followed by kinetic control training targeting the gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles. Gluteus maximus retraining will be performed in supported positions emphasising controlled hip extension with the knee flexed while maintaining lumbo-pelvic neutrality.
Multifidus retraining will target the deep segmental lumbar extensors with contribution from the deep thoracic extensors. Training will begin in crook lying with a pillow or thick folded towel under the sacrum to elevate the pelvis and allow the lumbar spine to relax while thoracic spine remians neutral. Each session lasts 45 minutes. The intervention will be delivered for 8 weeks.
Mobilization with MovementOther
Participants will receive baseline therapy consisting of superficial heating therapy followed by structured stretching and strengthening exercises for the sacroiliac joint and lumbar region on mat. Mulligan's MWM will be applied according to standard Mulligan principles. Participants will be classified as having anterior or posterior ilial rotation based on physical examination findings. For anterior rotation, a sustained posterior glide to the affected ilium with sacral stabilization will be applied during prone press-up. For posterior rotation, an anterolateral glide will be delivered over the posterior superior iliac spine with counter-pressure to the opposite ilium. Mobilization will be performed in non-weight-bearing for 3 sets of 10 repetitions per session, within a pain-free range, over 8 weeks (3 sessions/week).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| KC + MWM Group | Experimental | Group A will receive routine physical therapy along with kinetic control training of multifidus and glutues maximus with mulliogan's mobilization with movement. Receives: Other: Kinetic Control + Mobilization with Movement |
| MWMGroup | Active comparator | Group B will receive routine physical therapy along with Mulligan's mobilization with movement. Receives: Other: Mobilization with Movement |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The intensity of pain was measured by using the NPRS, a scale of 11 points starting from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. The NPRS has been found to possess good construct validity by showing strong correlation with other pain intensity measurement tools. This scale has also been found to possess consistent reliability (ICC: 0.58 to 0.88), especially in patients experiencing neck pain. The application of this scale has also been found to extend beyond patients experiencing musculoskeletal disorders.
Measured: 8 weeks
Inclinometer
ROM was measured by using an inclinometer to measure joint movement quantitatively. Inclinometer has been found to possess superior reliability over a goniometer for measuring ROM. High intrarater reliability values (ICC>0.90) has been observed for inclinometers, indicating excellent consistency of measurement by a tester. High reliability has also been found for medical and digital types of inclinometers (ICC ≈ 0.91-0.95). For measuring ROM two inclinometers were fixed, with one placed over the T12 spinous process and the other over the S1 spinous process. This helped to measure the ROM of lumbar spine, keeping the effects of hip and sacral joints at a minimum. The ROM of lumbar spine was measured by using a dual inclinometer technique, keeping one over the superior aspect of T12 and the other over the inferior aspect of S1. The subjects were asked to perform various types of lumbar spine movements by keeping their knees straight.
Measured: 8 weeks
Observational Gait Analysis (OGA)
Gait assessment was carried out by using observational gait analysis (OGA), which is a structured assessment of gait using standardized gait assessment scales. It helps to assess and quantify abnormalities of gait through visual observation. The basic framework of OGA is a 5-point scale, where each gait parameter is scored during the stance and swing phases. The clinician first observes the gait cycle of the patient, focusing on the kinematic gait patterns including pelvic alignment during initial contact of the foot and knee flexion during the mid-swing phase. The OGA form provides a connection between qualitative and quantitative assessment of gait. This heps in the development of a rehabilitation program for each patient.
Measured: 8 weeks
Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI)
Functional disability was measured using MODI, a self reported questionnaire that was designed to measure disability related to low back and lumbopelvic disorders. MODI follows the same scoring system and disability interpretation criteria as the original ODI. It consists of 10 sections that include pain intensity, personal care (e.g., washing and dressing etc), lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travelling and eployment/home making. Each scored from 0 to 5, yielding a maximum total score of 50 points (or 45 points if 1 section is omitted). The final score is calculated by formula:
Patient's total score / total possible score × 100
The percentage score is interpreted as follows:
- 0-20% : minimal disbability
- 21-40% : moderate disability
- 41-60% : severe disability
- 61-80% : crippling disability where pain impinges on all aspects of patient's life
- 81-100%: patients are bed bound a minimum change of 10% is necessary to reflect reliable change in disability
Measured: 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Apr 2026
- Study start15 Apr 2026
- Primary completion15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Sacroiliac Joint DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Interventional Study Model: Randomized Clinical Trial (Parallel-Group Design): This study will adopt a randomized clinical trial (RCT) model, employing a parallel-group design to evaluate and compare the combined effects of two physiotherapeutic interventions-Muligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and Kinetic Control (KC) training-on pain, range of Motion, gait and Functional disability among patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD). Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two groups: One group i.e. MWM Group will receive treatment on Mulligan's concept of MWM . Second group i.e. MWM + KC group will receive Mulligan's MWM followed by kinetic control training of gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles. Baseline treatment will be given to both groups which includes heat therapy, stretches and strengthening exercises. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted using validated functional outcome measures to ensure objectivity.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dr. Shoaib Waqas, Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07529093
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UBAS/ERB/FoRS/25/019
- Acronym
- MWM KCT SIJD
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2026
- Last updated
- 26 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Combined Effects of Mulligan's Mobilization With Movement and Kinetic Control Training on Pain, Range of Motion, Gait and Functional Disability Among Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07529093
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MWM KCT SIJD / UBAS/ERB/FoRS/25/019
- Conditions
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
- Keywords
- Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement, Kinetic Control Training, Uncontrolled Movement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) is a frequent source of low back and pelvic pain and contributes significantly to movement restriction, altered gait patterns, and functional disability in adults. It is associated with impaired lumbopelvic motor control, weakness of key stabilizing muscles, and faulty load transfer across the pelvis. SIJD is prevalent in both physically active individuals and sedentary populations. In addition to its clinical impact, SIJD imposes a considerable socioeconomic burden due to reduced work productivity and long-term disability.
Contemporary management of SIJD emphasises on pain reduction, restoration of movement, functional independence, and participation in daily activities. Manual therapy techniques such as Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) are widely used to correct positional faults and restore pain-free movement, while kinetic control training targets deficits in motor control of the lumbopelvic stabilizing muscles. Although both approaches are individually supported in the literature, evidence regarding their combined effectiveness on pain, range of motion, gait parameters, and functional disability remains limited. Therefore, this study aims to compare the effects of combined Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement and kinetic control training versus kinetic control training alone in patients with sacroiliac joint dysfunction using validated outcome measures.
Detailed description
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction (SIJD) refers to altered biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint, characterized by either excessive or restricted movement, or the presence of abnormal motion patterns. It is a recognized source of pain originating from the sacroiliac joint and occurs due to abnormal or increased movement of the ilium relative to the sacrum, leading to irritation of the surrounding joint structures. The prevalence of SIJD among individuals with low back pain has been reported to range from 15% to 30% in Asian populations, including Pakistan. In the Pakistani context, SIJD is frequently observed among healthcare professionals and individuals whose occupations involve prolonged standing or repetitive postural activities. In recent years, the incidence of SIJD appears to be increasing, possibly due to sedentary lifestyles, cumulative mechanical stress, and improved clinical recognition of the sacroiliac joint as a distinct contributor to low back pain.
The clinical diagnosis of SIJD is primarily based on a detailed patient history and focused physical examination, while its management involves a combination of therapeutic approaches. Current management strategies are consistent with the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. Two therapeutic approaches of concern in this study are Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and KInetic Control (KC) training.
Mulligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) is a manual therapy technique that applies sustained accessory glides during active movement to correct positional faults and alleviate pain. This approach is intended to produce immediate functional improvement by combining pain-free accessory glides with physiological movement. Mobilization of the sacroiliac joint through physiotherapy aims to restore normal joint mechanics, enabling patients to maintain optimal sacroiliac joint function throughout daily activities.
Kinetic Control, as proposed by Comerford and Mottram, focuses on retraining faulty movement patterns to address uncontrolled movement and enhance joint stability. Movement is fundamental to functional performance and participation in daily life, and restoring controlled movement enables individuals to regain the functional choices that are often lost in the presence of pain and movement impairment. This study therefore seeks to compare the effects of Mulligan's MWM combined with kinetic control training targeting the gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Interventional Study Model: Randomized Clinical Trial (Parallel-Group Design): This study will adopt a randomized clinical trial (RCT) model, employing a parallel-group design to evaluate and compare the combined effects of two physiotherapeutic interventions-Muligan's Mobilization with Movement (MWM) and Kinetic Control (KC) training-on pain, range of Motion, gait and Functional disability among patients with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction (SIJD). Participants who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into two groups: One group i.e. MWM Group will receive treatment on Mulligan's concept of MWM . Second group i.e. MWM + KC group will receive Mulligan's MWM followed by kinetic control training of gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles. Baseline treatment will be given to both groups which includes heat therapy, stretches and strengthening exercises. Pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted using validated functional outcome measures to ensure objectivity.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| KC + MWM Group | Experimental | Other: Kinetic Control + Mobilization with MovementGroup A will receive routine physical therapy along with kinetic control training of multifidus and glutues maximus with mulliogan's mobilization with movement. |
| MWMGroup | Active comparator | Other: Mobilization with MovementGroup B will receive routine physical therapy along with Mulligan's mobilization with movement. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Both male and female patients
- Age between 45- 64 years
- Unilateral non-radiating pain
- Confirmed diagnosis through at least 3/5 provocative tests Faber test Distraction test Thigh thrust test Gaenslen test Sacral thrust test
- Pain rating from 4-6 on Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with history of any surgery at lumbo-sacral or pelvic region
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Congenital, postural deformities
- Acute disc hernia and spinal stenosis that may cause pain in the lower back and hips, piriformis syndrome
- Rheumatic diseases (fibromyalgia, ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatic arthritis)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Kinetic Control + Mobilization with MovementParticipants will receive baseline therapy consisting of superficial heating therapy followed by structured stretching and strengthening exercises for the sacroiliac joint and lumbar region on mat. Then Mulligan's MWM will be applied to the sacroiliac joint using sustained accessory glides combined with pain-free active movement. This will be followed by kinetic control training targeting the gluteus maximus and multifidus muscles. Gluteus maximus retraining will be performed in supported positions emphasising controlled hip extension with the knee flexed while maintaining lumbo-pelvic neutrality. Multifidus retraining will target the deep segmental lumbar extensors with contribution from the deep thoracic extensors. Training will begin in crook lying with a pillow or thick folded towel under the sacrum to elevate the pelvis and allow the lumbar spine to relax while thoracic spine remians neutral. Each session lasts 45 minutes. The intervention will be delivered for 8 weeks. | Other | KC + MWM Group |
| Mobilization with MovementParticipants will receive baseline therapy consisting of superficial heating therapy followed by structured stretching and strengthening exercises for the sacroiliac joint and lumbar region on mat. Mulligan's MWM will be applied according to standard Mulligan principles. Participants will be classified as having anterior or posterior ilial rotation based on physical examination findings. For anterior rotation, a sustained posterior glide to the affected ilium with sacral stabilization will be applied during prone press-up. For posterior rotation, an anterolateral glide will be delivered over the posterior superior iliac spine with counter-pressure to the opposite ilium. Mobilization will be performed in non-weight-bearing for 3 sets of 10 repetitions per session, within a pain-free range, over 8 weeks (3 sessions/week). | Other | MWMGroup |
Primary outcome
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time frame: 8 weeks
The intensity of pain was measured by using the NPRS, a scale of 11 points starting from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. The NPRS has been found to possess good construct validity by showing strong correlation with other pain intensity measurement tools. This scale has also been found to possess consistent reliability (ICC: 0.58 to 0.88), especially in patients experiencing neck pain. The application of this scale has also been found to extend beyond patients experiencing musculoskeletal disorders.
Inclinometer
Time frame: 8 weeks
ROM was measured by using an inclinometer to measure joint movement quantitatively. Inclinometer has been found to possess superior reliability over a goniometer for measuring ROM. High intrarater reliability values (ICC>0.90) has been observed for inclinometers, indicating excellent consistency of measurement by a tester. High reliability has also been found for medical and digital types of inclinometers (ICC ≈ 0.91-0.95). For measuring ROM two inclinometers were fixed, with one placed over the T12 spinous process and the other over the S1 spinous process. This helped to measure the ROM of lumbar spine, keeping the effects of hip and sacral joints at a minimum. The ROM of lumbar spine was measured by using a dual inclinometer technique, keeping one over the superior aspect of T12 and the other over the inferior aspect of S1. The subjects were asked to perform various types of lumbar spine movements by keeping their knees straight.
Observational Gait Analysis (OGA)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Gait assessment was carried out by using observational gait analysis (OGA), which is a structured assessment of gait using standardized gait assessment scales. It helps to assess and quantify abnormalities of gait through visual observation. The basic framework of OGA is a 5-point scale, where each gait parameter is scored during the stance and swing phases. The clinician first observes the gait cycle of the patient, focusing on the kinematic gait patterns including pelvic alignment during initial contact of the foot and knee flexion during the mid-swing phase. The OGA form provides a connection between qualitative and quantitative assessment of gait. This heps in the development of a rehabilitation program for each patient.
Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI)
Time frame: 8 weeks
Functional disability was measured using MODI, a self reported questionnaire that was designed to measure disability related to low back and lumbopelvic disorders. MODI follows the same scoring system and disability interpretation criteria as the original ODI. It consists of 10 sections that include pain intensity, personal care (e.g., washing and dressing etc), lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, social life, travelling and eployment/home making. Each scored from 0 to 5, yielding a maximum total score of 50 points (or 45 points if 1 section is omitted). The final score is calculated by formula: Patient's total score / total possible score × 100 The percentage score is interpreted as follows: * 0-20% : minimal disbability * 21-40% : moderate disability * 41-60% : severe disability * 61-80% : crippling disability where pain impinges on all aspects of patient's life * 81-100%: patients are bed bound a minimum change of 10% is necessary to reflect reliable change in disability
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Retro Walking in Patients With Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence of SI-BONE's iFuse TORQ TNT Advancing Treatment of Pelvic Ring Fractures
Fracture; Pelvic, Insufficiency Fractures
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of High-Intensity and Conventional Physical Therapy in Musculoskeletal Disorders
Low Back Pain, Radicular Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Correlation Between Trunk Muscles Endurance and Dynamic Balance in Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Trunk Extensor Muscle Endurance
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Post-Market Clinical Study on a Modular SI Joint Fusion System
Sacroiliitis, Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mobilization with Movement in people with Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction, run by Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences at 2 sites in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Misha Zahid (+923277866777, misha15zahid@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) (time frame: 8 weeks). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 May 2026.