HealhtyNCT07530731
Platforms Comparison Study - NIXOS-COMPARISON
A study testing administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography in people with Healhty, run by Bulbitech at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to verify that BulbiCAM®, a video-oculography medical device, gives similar results regardless of the Operating System (OS) used. The study compares three platforms: Windows, Linux Ubuntu, and Linux NixOS. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healhty
- What is being tested?
- administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2026to 8 May 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy adult age 18-75 years inclusive
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Able to understand and follow instructions (Norwegian or English)
- Able to complete testing procedures
Who cannot join
- Ophthalmic:
- Visual disturbance and blindness of any cause, except for corrected refractive errors
- Visual acuity worse than 1.0 logMAR in the tested eye (unable to focus on test stimuli)
- History of eye surgery in the last 6 months
- Visible abnormalities of the eye (subconjunctival hemorrhages, inflammation, deformed pupils)
- Significant eyelid ptosis that would interfere with testing
Show all 15Show fewer
- Pupils unable to respond normally to dilation/contraction due to nerve damage, mechanical damage, or medication
- Neurological/Medical:
- Physical or psychiatric disease which may disturb the measuring procedure
- Unable to tolerate testing or maintain attention for ~80 minutes with rest periods
- Unable to understand and follow instructions
- Photosensitive epilepsy
- Other:
- Known alcoholic or drug dependency
- Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, would make the subject unsuitable for the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of NixOS-based Neuro-Ophtalmic Testing Platform Versus Windows and Ubuntu-based Platforms
The purpose of the study is to verify that BulbiCAM®, a video-oculography medical device, gives similar results regardless of the Operating System (OS) used. The study compares three platforms: Windows, Linux Ubuntu, and Linux NixOS.
- Conditions
- Healhty
- Being tested
- administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography
- Keywords
- video-oculography, healthy control
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyDevice
List of the 15 tests per platform:
- Calibration (functional screening)
- Fixation test
- Smooth pursuit
- Horizontal pro-saccade
- Multidirectional pro-saccade
- Pursuit acuity
- Pursuit contrast sensitivity
- Strobe contrast sensitivity
- Variable strobe
- Pupil dynamics
- RAPD
- Visual Field 16-points
- Ptosis
- Anti saccade
- Memory saccade
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ubuntu-NixOS-Windows | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
| Ubuntu - Windows - NixOS | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
| Windows - Ubuntu - NixOS | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
| Windiws - NixOS - Ubuntu | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
| NixOS - Ubuntu - Windows | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
| NixOS - Windows - Ubuntu | Experimental | order of tested platforms Receives: Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
No statistical difference between acuracy of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: %
Measured: single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between acuracy of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Unit: %
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between variable strobe test results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between strobe contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
unit: Pelli-Robson
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between RAPD test result when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between ptosis MRD1 and 2 when comparing the three platforms
unit mm
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between duration of fixation when comparing the three platforms
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the amplitude of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
Unit: degree
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the peak velocity of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the mean fixation time when comparing the three platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between mean pupil size when comparing the three platforms
unit: mm
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccade amplitudes when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccades peak velocity when comparing the three platforms
unit: degree/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades accuracy when comparing the three platforms
unit: %
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between number of errors in memory saccades task when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction time in visual field test when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil area when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm*s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil contraction latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of pupil dilation when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: mm/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccade latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
unit: %
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between the calibration ratio when comparing the three platforms
no unit
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pursuit acuity results when comparing Windows versus NixOS platforms
unit: LogMAR
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
Secondary outcomes (20)
No statistical difference between pupil areas when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: mm*s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: mm
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between latency of pupil contraction when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: %
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccade latency when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccade latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration.
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction times in visual field test when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration.
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccade latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of pupil dilation when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement and modified stimulus
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows.
Unit: mm/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil area when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: mm*s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: mm
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between latencies of pupil contraction when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay. .
Unit: %
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction time fo visual field test when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
A timing calibration was implemented for Ubuntu and NixOS to improve accuracy results by accounting for the device delay.
Unit: ms
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of the pupil when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement and modified stimulus
Ubuntu and NixOS platforms contain an enhanced algorithm incorporating Fourier transform analysis of pupil data.
The light used as a stimulus for the pupil dynamics test has been modified (in intensity, wavelength, and spatial characteristics) under Ubuntu/NixOS platform compared to the original stimulus under Windows Unit: mm/s
Measured: Single visit at enrollment
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2026
- Primary completion8 May 2026
- Study completion8 May 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealhtyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Each subject will be tested on each of the three platform and serve as its own comparator.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Bulbitech
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07530731
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NIXOS-COMPARISON
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 27 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of NixOS-based Neuro-Ophtalmic Testing Platform Versus Windows and Ubuntu-based Platforms
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07530731
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NIXOS-COMPARISON
- Conditions
- Healhty
- Keywords
- video-oculography, healthy control
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BulbitechIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 8 May 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 8 May 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to verify that BulbiCAM®, a video-oculography medical device, gives similar results regardless of the Operating System (OS) used. The study compares three platforms: Windows, Linux Ubuntu, and Linux NixOS.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
- Model description
- Each subject will be tested on each of the three platform and serve as its own comparator.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ubuntu-NixOS-Windows | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
| Ubuntu - Windows - NixOS | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
| Windows - Ubuntu - NixOS | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
| Windiws - NixOS - Ubuntu | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
| NixOS - Ubuntu - Windows | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
| NixOS - Windows - Ubuntu | Experimental | Device: administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyorder of tested platforms |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Healthy adult age 18-75 years inclusive
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Able to understand and follow instructions (Norwegian or English)
- Able to complete testing procedures
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Visual disturbance and blindness of any cause, except for corrected refractive errors
- Visual acuity worse than 1.0 logMAR in the tested eye (unable to focus on test stimuli)
- History of eye surgery in the last 6 months
- Visible abnormalities of the eye (subconjunctival hemorrhages, inflammation, deformed pupils)
- Significant eyelid ptosis that would interfere with testing
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculographyList of the 15 tests per platform: 1. Calibration (functional screening) 2. Fixation test 3. Smooth pursuit 4. Horizontal pro-saccade 5. Multidirectional pro-saccade 6. Pursuit acuity 7. Pursuit contrast sensitivity 8. Strobe contrast sensitivity 9. Variable strobe 10. Pupil dynamics 11. RAPD 12. Visual Field 16-points 13. Ptosis 14. Anti saccade 15. Memory saccade | Device | NixOS - Ubuntu - Windows, NixOS - Windows - Ubuntu, Ubuntu - Windows - NixOS, Ubuntu-NixOS-Windows, Windiws - NixOS - Ubuntu, Windows - Ubuntu - NixOS |
Primary outcome
No statistical difference between acuracy of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: single visit at enrollment
unit: %
No statistical difference between peak velocity of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: degree/s
No statistical difference between acuracy of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
Unit: %
No statistical difference between peak velocity of multidirectional pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: degree/s
No statistical difference between contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: Pelli-Robson
No statistical difference between variable strobe test results when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: Pelli-Robson
No statistical difference between strobe contrast sensitivity results when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: Pelli-Robson
No statistical difference between RAPD test result when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
no unit
No statistical difference between ptosis MRD1 and 2 when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit mm
No statistical difference between duration of fixation when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
Unit: ms
No statistical difference between the amplitude of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
Unit: degree
No statistical difference between the peak velocity of intrusive saccades when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: degree/s
No statistical difference between the mean fixation time when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between mean pupil size when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: mm
No statistical difference between anti-saccade amplitudes when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: degree
No statistical difference between anti-saccades peak velocity when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: degree/s
No statistical difference between memory saccades accuracy when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: %
No statistical difference between number of errors in memory saccades task when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
no unit
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between anti saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction time in visual field test when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between pupil area when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: mm*s
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: mm
No statistical difference between pupil contraction latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between peak velocity of pupil dilation when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: mm/s
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccade latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccades latencies when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: ms
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Ubuntu and NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: %
No statistical difference between the calibration ratio when comparing the three platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
no unit
No statistical difference between pursuit acuity results when comparing Windows versus NixOS platforms
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
unit: LogMAR
20 secondary outcomes
No statistical difference between pupil areas when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between latency of pupil contraction when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccade latency when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccade latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration.
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction times in visual field test when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration.
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccade latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of pupil dilation when comparing Windows versus Ubuntu using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement and modified stimulus
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil area when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between pupil diameters when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between latencies of pupil contraction when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement, modified stimulus and timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between smooth pursuit gain when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between horizontal pro-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between multidirectional pro-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between saccadic reaction time fo visual field test when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between anti-saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between memory saccades latencies when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for timing calibration
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
No statistical difference between peak velocity of the pupil when comparing Windows versus NixOS using the corrective formulas for signal processing enhancement and modified stimulus
Time frame: Single visit at enrollment
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Healhty
Recruiting
Insulin-Mediated Glucose Uptake and Organ Perfusion Assessed by Total-Body PET During GIP and GLP-1 Infusion
Type 2 Diabetes, Healhty
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Tolerability of BGM1812 Injection Following Single and Multiple Subcutaneous Administration in Normal to Overweight or Obese But Otherwise Healthy Men and Women
Healhty, Overweight or Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Effect of Chronotype on Balance and Cognitive Function
Healhty
Recruiting
Oromucosal Oxytocin and Vasopressin Modulation of Emotional Face Attention
Healhty
Recruiting
Chewing, Eating Rate, and Weight Status in Children
Healhty
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing administration of 15 neuro-ophtalmological tests per platform by video-oculography in people with Healhty, run by Bulbitech at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
No statistical difference between acuracy of horizontal pro-saccades when comparing the three platforms (time frame: single visit at enrollment). The study lists 30 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jul 2026.