Students of Undergraduate School of NursingNCT07532616
Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies
A study testing Teaching in people with Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing, run by Chung Shan Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Teaching intervention Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing
- What is being tested?
- Teaching
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 85 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2025to 31 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- student over 20 years old
Who cannot join
- none
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
No.110, Sec.1, Jianguo N.Rd.,Taichung City 40201,Taiwan, R.O.C.
Taichung
About this study
Official title: Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition
Teaching intervention
Read the detailed description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance
- Being tested
- Teaching
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TeachingOther
This study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Teaching |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability
A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
teamwork
The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
self-efficacy
The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.
Measured: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2025
- Primary completion31 Jul 2026
- Study completion31 Jul 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Students of Undergraduate School of NursingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Chung Shan Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Hsiang Chu Pai, Chung Shan Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07532616
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CS1-25084
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing the Effectiveness of Evidence-Based Steps and Generative AI in Promoting Students' Development of Ultimate Concern Care Strategies: Challenges and Reflections on Meta-Cognition
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07532616
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CS1-25084
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 85 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Chung Shan Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Teaching intervention
Detailed description
This study aims to compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' development of ultimate concern care strategies. The indicators used to measure variables included metacognitive self-regulated learning ability, teamwork, and self-efficacy in learning and performance
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo | Experimental | Other: Teaching |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- student over 20 years old
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- none
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TeachingThis study adopted a mixed-method design, incorporating a single-group pre- and post-test experimental study and participatory action research. The study involved 110 fourth-year students from the Department of Nursing at Medical University, who are enrolled in the introductory nursing research, nursing ethics, and nursing practices course | Other | To compare the effectiveness of evidence-based steps and generative AI in promoting students' develo |
Primary outcome
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
A 12-item metacognitive self-regulated learning ability scale was used to assess students' metacognitive self-regulated learning ability. The scale encompasses the planning, monitoring, and regulation of cognitive self-regulation activities and employs a 7-point scoring system, with higher scores indicating stronger metacognitive self-regulated learning ability.
teamwork
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
The peer learning subscale uses a 3-question scale with a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better teamwork.
self-efficacy
Time frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.
The Learning and Performance Self-Efficacy Scale was used to assess students' learning self-efficacy. The scale consists of 8 questions and uses a 7-point scoring system; higher scores indicate better learning efficacy.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Student-Centred Simulation-Based Skills Training on Coping Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Anxiety Among Nursing Students in the UAE
Perceived Stress, State Anxiety
Not yet recruiting
Comparative Case Learning in Undergraduate Nursing Students
Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Education
Not yet recruiting
Effect of GenAI Patient Simulation on Clinical Preparedness and Clinical Competence in Nursing Students
Undergraduate Nursing Students
Not yet recruiting
Jigsaw Cooperative Learning for Pediatric Pain Education in Undergraduate Nursing Students
Pediatric Pain Education
RecruitingObservational study
Undergraduate Nursing Intern Cohort Study
Occupational Disidentification
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Teaching in people with Students of Undergraduate School of Nursing, run by Chung Shan Medical University at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
metacognitive self-regulated learning ability (time frame: Weeks 1 and 18 of the first semester, and weeks 1 and 18 of the second semester.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.