AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental Pulp NecrosisNCT07546773

Metagenomic Analysis and Postoperative Pain in Infected Root Canals Using Different Irrigation Protocols

A study testing Ultrasonic Irrigation Activation, Laser-Activated Irrigation and Mechanical Irrigation Activation in people with Dental Pulp Necrosis and Pulpitis, run by Suez Canal University at 1 site in Egypt.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Achieving effective root canal disinfection while minimizing postoperative pain is a critical goal in endodontic therapy. Advanced irrigation protocols, such as ultrasonic activation, laser activation, negative pressure irrigation (PulpSucker device), and mechanical activation (Easy Clean device), have shown promise… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Dental Pulp Necrosis, Pulpitis
What is being tested?
Ultrasonic Irrigation Activation, Laser-Activated Irrigation and Mechanical Irrigation Activation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
30 Apr 2026to 15 Jan 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients aged 18-60 years
  • Requiring root canal treatment for teeth with necrotic pulp
  • Presence of periapical radiolucency confirmed radiographically
  • Good general health with no systemic diseases affecting healing outcomes
  • Willing to provide informed written consent
  • Available for follow-up appointments

Who cannot join

  • Patients with open apices
  • Severe periodontal disease
  • Currently taking antibiotics
  • Allergy to study materials (lidocaine, sodium hypochlorite, methylene blue, latex)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Compromised immunity or systemic conditions (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, HIV, immunosuppressive therapy)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Previous root canal treatment on the study tooth
  • Tooth not restorable
  • Presence of vertical root fracture

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Salma Mohamed Hassan Gohar, MSc contact

0020 1157445565

Salma_gohar@dent.suez.edu.eg

Egypt1 site
  • Endodontic Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University

    Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, 41522

    Salma Mohamed Hassan Gohar, MSc, 00201157445565, Salma_gohar@dent.suez.edu.eg

    Hayam Youssef Hassan, Professor, PhD, +20 1227609611

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Metagenomic Analysis and Post-operative Pain Assessment of Infected Root Canals Using Different Irrigation Protocols: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Achieving effective root canal disinfection while minimizing postoperative pain is a critical goal in endodontic therapy. Advanced irrigation protocols, such as ultrasonic activation, laser activation, negative pressure irrigation (PulpSucker device), and mechanical activation (Easy Clean device), have shown promise in enhancing bacterial reduction within the root canal system. However, their impact on postoperative pain has not been fully explored.

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to compare bacterial reduction and postoperative pain levels in infected root canals using four different irrigation protocols. The study will use metagenomic analysis to evaluate changes in bacterial community composition and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to assess patient-reported pain levels at multiple time points postoperatively.

Read the detailed description

Background: Effective bacterial reduction in root canals remains a significant challenge in endodontics due to complex bacterial communities, including species like Enterococcus faecalis that resist conventional treatment methods. Advanced irrigation protocols offer innovative solutions by disrupting biofilms and ensuring deeper penetration of irrigants into apical regions of the canal system.

Study Design: This is a randomized, parallel-group clinical trial involving 40 adult patients (18-60 years) requiring root canal treatment for teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical radiolucency. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of four irrigation protocol groups (10 patients per group):

Group 1: Ultrasonic Activation

Group 2: Laser Activation with methylene blue

Group 3: Mechanical Activation (Easy Clean device)

Group 4: Negative Pressure Irrigation (PulpSucker device)

Procedures: All patients will undergo standardized root canal preparation using rotary nickel-titanium files. Pre-irrigation bacterial samples will be collected before instrumentation, and post-irrigation samples will be collected after the irrigation protocol. All samples will undergo next-generation sequencing (NGS) for metagenomic analysis to assess bacterial reduction and community composition changes.

Outcomes: Postoperative pain will be evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days post-treatment. Statistical analyses will compare bacterial reduction efficacy and pain levels across all four groups.

Being tested
Ultrasonic Irrigation Activation, Laser-Activated Irrigation, Mechanical Irrigation Activation, Negative Pressure Irrigation
Keywords
Root canal treatment, Irrigation protocol, Ultrasonic activation, Laser activation, Negative pressure irrigation, Mechanical activation, Metagenomic analysis, Postoperative pain, Visual analogue scale, Bacterial reduction, Endodontics, PulpSucker, Easy clean device, Next generation sequencing
Medical subject headings
Dental Pulp Necrosis, Pulpitis, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasonic Irrigation ActivationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Group-I

    Sodium hypochlorite irrigation activated with ultrasonic device

  • Laser-Activated IrrigationProcedure or surgery

    Also called Group-II

    Laser-activated sodium hypochlorite with methylene blue photosensitizer

  • Mechanical Irrigation ActivationProcedure or surgery

    Mechanical activation device creating swirling motion

  • Negative Pressure IrrigationProcedure or surgery

    Continuous irrigation with negative pressure suction

Study groups in NCT07546773
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasonic ActivationExperimentalRoot canals will be irrigated with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) activated using an ultrasonic device (Ultramint with R17 tip).
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasonic Irrigation Activation
ARM 2: Laser ActivationExperimentalRoot canals will be irrigated with NaOCl activated using a diode laser device (Elexxon Pico, Germany) with methylene blue (0.1 mg/mL) as a photosensitizer to enhance antimicrobial effects.
Receives: Procedure: Laser-Activated Irrigation
ARM 3: Mechanical Activation (Easy Clean)ExperimentalRoot canals will be irrigated with NaOCl, activated mechanically using the Easy Clean device (BassiEndo) to create a swirling motion for improved disinfection.
Receives: Procedure: Mechanical Irrigation Activation
ARM 4: Negative Pressure Irrigation (PulpSucker)ExperimentalRoot canals will be irrigated with NaOCl using the PulpSucker device (PlanB dental), which employs negative pressure irrigation to ensure continuous delivery and debris removal.
Receives: Procedure: Negative Pressure Irrigation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Outcome 1: Bacterial Reduction

    Change in bacterial load (CFU/mL or relative abundance via metagenomic sequencing). Bacterial samples collected before and after irrigation protocol using sterile paper points, analyzed via next-generation sequencing (NGS) to assess bacterial reduction and changes in microbial community composition

    Measured: Pre-irrigation (baseline "Day-1") to post-irrigation "Day-1" after irrigation)

  2. Outcome 2: Postoperative Pain Level

    Patient-reported pain intensity using VAS where 0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain, 4-6=moderate pain, 7-9=severe tolerable pain, 10=severe intolerable pain.

    Measure: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score (0-10 scale)

    Measured: 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days post-treatment

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Bacterial Community Composition

    Changes in bacterial diversity and species abundance via metagenomic analysis. Next-generation sequencing analysis to identify changes in bacterial species composition and microbial diversity indices.

    Measured: Pre-irrigation (baseline "Day-1") to post-irrigation "Day-1" after irrigation)

  2. Correlation Between Bacterial Reduction and Pain

    Statistical correlation coefficient between bacterial load reduction and VAS scores. Pearson or Spearman correlation analysis to evaluate relationship between irrigation efficacy and postoperative pain levels.

    Measured: Post-irrigation bacterial analysis correlated with pain scores at 6 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Apr 2026
  2. Study start30 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Aug 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion15 Jan 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Single (Outcomes Assessor) Explanation: Patients and clinician cannot be blinded to irrigation method, but laboratory personnel analyzing bacterial samples and statisticians can be blinded to group allocation.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07546773
Sponsor's protocol ID
REC 928/2024
Other IDs
REC 928/2024
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 Mar 2026
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in