Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaEQUINOXENCT07547033
Superior Mesenteric Artery First Versus Standard Approach in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
A study testing SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. and Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Pancreatic Head Cancer, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 23 sites in France.
Trial summary
"Pancreatic cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is one of the most serious and deadly cancers. Its outlook is very poor, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Head Cancer
- What is being tested?
- SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. and Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 23 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 1 Sep 2031
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Primary resectable or borderline with isolated veinous contact pancreatic adenocarcinoma (according to the NCCN classification and international consensual definition of Isaji 2018): resectability is evaluated on arterial-phase and portal-phase IV contrast-enhanced multislice CT scan of the pancreas (slice thickness: 2.5 mm), and assessed in a multidisciplinary staff meeting including at least one radiologist and one expert surgeon.
- CT-scan of the thorax and abdomen confirming non-metastatic PAC at least 45 days before inclusion
- MRI of the liver without metastasis performed maximum one month before inclusion
- CA 19.9 (carbohydrate antigen) level ≤ 500 U/mL at the time of inclusion (in absence of cholestasis or biliary drainage)
- Age 18 or over
- Grade 0 or 1 Performans Status (ECOG)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Normal renal and liver function at the time of inclusion (According to Cockroft and Gault's equation Glomerular Function Rate > 50ml/min/m2; Prothrombin Time > 70%)
- Absolute neutrophil count > 1,500/mm3, platelet count > 100,000/mm3, haemoglobin level > 10 g/dl (transfusions are authorized) at time of inclusion
- Adequate contraception on fertile women
- "Women of childbearing potential (defined as under 50 years of age and without a history of hysterectomy or tubal ligation) must not self-report being pregnant on the day of inclusion."
- Patient who provides a signed written informed consent form
- Patient having the rights to French social insurance
Who cannot join
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma defined as "borderline" with arterial contact, locally advanced, non-resectable, or metastatic.
- Surgical or anesthesiologic contra-indications:
- Non-controlled congestive heart failure - non-treated angina - recent myocardial infarction (in the previous year) - non-controlled AHT (SBP >160 mm or DBP > 100 mm, despite optimal drug treatment), long QT
- Major non-controlled infection
- Major comorbidity that may preclude the surgery
- Severe liver failure
Show all 15Show fewer
- Any medical, psychological, or social situation that (in the investigator's opinion) could limit (i) the patient's compliance with the protocol or (ii) the ability to obtain or interpret data
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women and women of childbearing age not using effective means of contraception
- Curatorship or guardianship or patient placed under judicial protection
- Participation in other interventional research type 1, clinical investigation or clinical trial during the study
- Secondary exclusion criterion (during surgery):
- Evaluation of abdominal cavity, presenting infra-radiologic metastasis
- Positive tumoral invasion at frozen section after picking on the inter-aortic lymph nodes performed before any irrevocable organ section.
- Anasthaesiologic complication (induction allergy or unprevisible heart disease at induction)
- For fertile women: serological pregnancy test positive before surgery
Trial locations and contacts
23 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
23 sites in 1 country
France23 sites
CHU Amiens
Amiens
Jean-Marc REGIMBEAU, MD PHD, regimbeau.jean-marc@chu-amiens.fr
CHU Angers
Angers
Emilie LERMITE, MD PHD, emlermite@chu-angers.fr
CHU Besançon
Besançon
Alexandre DOUSSOT, MD, adoussot@chu-besancon.fr
Hôpital Haut Lévêque
Bordeaux
Christophe LAURENT, MD PHD, christophe.laurent@chu-bordeaux.fr
Hôpital Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand
Emmanuel BUC, Professor, ebuc@chu-clermontferrand.fr
Hôpital François Mitterrand
Dijon
Jean-Baptiste Dr LEQUEU, Dr, jean-baptiste.lequeu@chu-dijon.fr
CHU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille
Stéphanie TRUANT, MD PHD, stephanie.truant@chu-lille.fr
Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille
Julie VEZIANT, MD, Julie.veziant@chu-lille.fr
CHU Dupuytren 1
Limoges
Abdelkader TAIBI, Dr, abdelkader.taibi@chu-limoges.fr
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon
Aurélien DUPRE, MD PHD, aurelien.dupre@lyon.unicancer.fr
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse
Lyon
Jean-Yves MABRUT, MD PHD, jean-yves.mabrut@chu-lyon.fr
Hôpital Saint Eloi
Montpellier
François-Régis SOUCHE, Dr, Fr-souche@chu-montpellier.fr
Hôpitaux de Brabois
Nancy
Ahmet AYAV, MD PHD, a.ayav@chru-nancy.fr
Chu Nantes
Nantes
Nicolas REGENET, MD PHD, nicolas.regenet@chu-nantes.fr
Hôpital Ambroise Paré
Paris
Renato LUPINACI, MD PHD, renato.lupinacci@aphp.fr
Hôpital Beaujon
Paris
Alain SAUVANET, MD PHD, alain.sauvanet@aphp.fr
Hôpital Cochin
Paris
Ugo MARCHESE, MD, ugo.marchese@aphp.fr
Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
Paris
Gaujoux Sébastien, MD PHD, sebastien.gaujoux@aphp.fr
Hôpital Charles-Nicolle
Rouen
Lilian SCHWARZ, MD - PHD, lilian.schwarz@chu-rouen.fr
CHU Strasbourg
Strasbourg
Pietro ADDEO, MD PHD, pietrofrancesco.addeo@chru-strasbourg.fr
Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse
Fabrice MUSCARI, MD PHD, muscari.f@chu-toulouse.fr
Hôpital Paul Brousse
Villejuif
Daniel Pietrasz, MD, +33 1 45 49 66 92, daniel.pietrasz@aphp.fr
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif
Maximiliano GELLI, MD, maximiliano.gelli@gustaveroussy.fr
About this study
"Pancreatic cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is one of the most serious and deadly cancers. Its outlook is very poor, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. This is largely because the disease is often discovered at a late stage and because it frequently comes back even after surgery.
When the tumor is located in the head of the pancreas, the only treatment that can potentially cure the disease is a major operation called a pancreaticoduodenectomy, also known as the Whipple procedure. This surgery is now safely performed in specialized hospitals, but it remains complex and carries a high risk of complications. Importantly, even after surgery, cancer cells often remain, leading to a high rate of local recurrence.
Read more
A newer surgical technique, known as the "artery-first" approach, changes the order of the operation. By carefully exposing a major blood vessel near the pancreas at the beginning of the surgery, surgeons can better assess whether the tumor can be completely removed and can improve the precision of the operation.
This research protocol aims to compare this artery-first technique with the standard surgical approach. The goal is to determine whether starting the operation by addressing the artery allows for more complete tumor removal and reduces the risk of cancer coming back in patients with pancreatic cancer of the head of the pancreas."
Read the detailed description
"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe by 2030. It remains the worst prognostic gastrointestinal cancer, with a 7-9% five-year overall survival (OS) rate. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, i.e., locally advanced (30%) or metastatic (50%), and more than 60% of the operated patients relapse within 3 years after surgery.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: standard approach Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative technique for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The procedure, commonly named the Whipple procedure, was described in 1935 when O.Whipple reported the previously modified technique by A.Codinivillan and W.Keusch. In its current form, the Whipple procedure owes its evolution to many physicians and surgeons' groundbreaking and innovative work. The procedure is now performed with an acceptable mortality rate of < 4% in expert centers and and nevertheless 30% morbidity.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: SMA first approach, peri-adventitial dissection Whipple procedure with mesenteric first approach is a technique described and validated in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This technique, which involves dissecting the peri-adventitial tissues of the superior mesenteric artery, has been reported mainly in borderline or locally advanced tumors of the head of the pancreas, to control the artery and improve the quality of the resection. This technique allows exposure of the right hemicircumference of the artery and clearance of the origin of the celiac trunk before sectioning the key elements of the duodenopancreatectomy cephalic.
Six surgical approaches that can be considered as "artery first" have been reported by Sanjay et al. Two approaches to avoid technical biases in SMA dissection and arterial margins will be considered: the right posterior approach and the anterior approach.
Although PD is mature, the low R0 resection rate remains a major issue, and most patients will develop a local recurrence, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.
The investigators hypothesise that the SMA first approach (SMA-PD) improves R0 resection margins compared to the standard procedure (ST-PD) during PD in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma."
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Head Cancer
- Being tested
- SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section., Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
- Keywords
- surgical oncology
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section.Procedure or surgery
Also called SMA-PD
Before any irreversible gesture, the surgeon identifies and isolates the superior mesenteric artery and dissects nerve plexus and nodes on the right side up to the SMA origin (right posterior or anterior approach).
Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.Procedure or surgery
Also called pancreaticoduodenectomy as standard of care
Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standard arm (ST-PD) | Active comparator | Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. Receives: Procedure: Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. |
| Experimental arm (SMA-PD) | Experimental | SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. Receives: Procedure: SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
R0 resection rate (clear margin > 1 mm)
Proportion of randomized patients with R0 margins. R0 defined as clear margin > 1 mm; R1 as ≤ 1 mm using standardized pathology protocol with central review.
Measured: day of surgery
Secondary outcomes (7)
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Disease-free survival will be evaluated using CT scans performed during follow-up
Measured: Up to 48 months after randomization
Overall survival (OS)
Death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to 48 months after randomization
Operative Blood Loss
Intraoperative blood loss measured in milliliters and perioperative transfusion requirements.
Measured: During surgery
Operative Time
Duration of surgical procedure measured in minutes from incision to skin closure.
Measured: During surgery
Postoperative Complications
Postoperative complications assessed using Clavien-Dindo classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI).
Measured: Up to 3 months after surgery
Postoperative Morbidity
Morbidity will be assessed by comparing the percentage distribution of postoperative complications between the two groups
Measured: Up to 3 months after surgery
Health related quality of Life
Quality of life will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Pancreatic Cancer Module 26 (QLQ-PAN26)
Measured: At inclusion and 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Sep 2031 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (25)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic AdenocarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07547033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP220920
- Other IDs
- 2024-A02711-46
- Acronym
- EQUINOXE
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PubMed 15273542Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.
PubMed 23728278Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, Chiorean EG, Chung V, Czito B, Del Chiaro M, Dillhoff M, Donahue TR, Dotan E, Ferrone CR, Fountzilas C, Hardacre J, Hawkins WG, Klute K, Ko AH, Kunstman JW, LoConte N, Lowy AM, Moravek C, Nakakura EK, Narang AK, Obando J, Polanco PM, Reddy S, Reyngold M, Scaife C, Shen J, Vollmer C, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Lynn B, George GV. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017.
PubMed 33845462Jiang X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Deng H, Ren W, Shi W, Jiao Z. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
PubMed 31751791Kim SY, Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Intraoperative Transfusion is Independently Associated with a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer-a Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):689. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030689.
PubMed 32143434Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Delman KA, Staley CA 3rd, Kooby DA. Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1327-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1476-3. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
PubMed 21369744Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Margonis GA, Gupta R, Amini N, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):887-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
PubMed 25707813Mavros MN, Xu L, Maqsood H, Gani F, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Al-Refaie WB, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4382-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4823-6. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
PubMed 26293837Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
PubMed 25724606Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Giuliani T, Di Gioia A, Andrianello S, Zingaretti CC, Brentegani G, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Pea A, Paiella S, Malleo G, Tuveri M, Landoni L, Esposito A, Casetti L, Butturini G, Falconi M, Salvia R. Pancreatoduodenectomy at the Verona Pancreas Institute: the Evolution of Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004753. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PubMed 33630454Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1581-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
PubMed 25794484Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan;16(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12061. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PubMed 23464850Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jan;70(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21590. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
PubMed 31912902Campbell F, Smith RA, Whelan P, Sutton R, Raraty M, Neoptolemos JP, Ghaneh P. Classification of R1 resections for pancreatic cancer: the prognostic relevance of tumour involvement within 1 mm of a resection margin. Histopathology. 2009 Sep;55(3):277-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03376.x.
PubMed 19723142Esposito I, Kleeff J, Bergmann F, Reiser C, Herpel E, Friess H, Schirmacher P, Buchler MW. Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Jun;15(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
PubMed 18351300
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Superior Mesenteric Artery First Versus Standard Approach in Pancreaticoduodenectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07547033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EQUINOXE / APHP220920
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Pancreatic Head Cancer
- Keywords
- surgical oncology
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 1 Sep 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2031 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
"Pancreatic cancer, especially pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, is one of the most serious and deadly cancers. Its outlook is very poor, with fewer than 10% of patients surviving five years after diagnosis. This is largely because the disease is often discovered at a late stage and because it frequently comes back even after surgery.
When the tumor is located in the head of the pancreas, the only treatment that can potentially cure the disease is a major operation called a pancreaticoduodenectomy, also known as the Whipple procedure. This surgery is now safely performed in specialized hospitals, but it remains complex and carries a high risk of complications. Importantly, even after surgery, cancer cells often remain, leading to a high rate of local recurrence.
A newer surgical technique, known as the "artery-first" approach, changes the order of the operation. By carefully exposing a major blood vessel near the pancreas at the beginning of the surgery, surgeons can better assess whether the tumor can be completely removed and can improve the precision of the operation.
This research protocol aims to compare this artery-first technique with the standard surgical approach. The goal is to determine whether starting the operation by addressing the artery allows for more complete tumor removal and reduces the risk of cancer coming back in patients with pancreatic cancer of the head of the pancreas."
Detailed description
"Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is projected to become the second leading cause of cancer death in the United States and Europe by 2030. It remains the worst prognostic gastrointestinal cancer, with a 7-9% five-year overall survival (OS) rate. The majority of patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage, i.e., locally advanced (30%) or metastatic (50%), and more than 60% of the operated patients relapse within 3 years after surgery.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: standard approach Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is the only potentially curative technique for PDAC of the pancreatic head. The procedure, commonly named the Whipple procedure, was described in 1935 when O.Whipple reported the previously modified technique by A.Codinivillan and W.Keusch. In its current form, the Whipple procedure owes its evolution to many physicians and surgeons' groundbreaking and innovative work. The procedure is now performed with an acceptable mortality rate of < 4% in expert centers and and nevertheless 30% morbidity.
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: SMA first approach, peri-adventitial dissection Whipple procedure with mesenteric first approach is a technique described and validated in surgery for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This technique, which involves dissecting the peri-adventitial tissues of the superior mesenteric artery, has been reported mainly in borderline or locally advanced tumors of the head of the pancreas, to control the artery and improve the quality of the resection. This technique allows exposure of the right hemicircumference of the artery and clearance of the origin of the celiac trunk before sectioning the key elements of the duodenopancreatectomy cephalic.
Six surgical approaches that can be considered as "artery first" have been reported by Sanjay et al. Two approaches to avoid technical biases in SMA dissection and arterial margins will be considered: the right posterior approach and the anterior approach.
Although PD is mature, the low R0 resection rate remains a major issue, and most patients will develop a local recurrence, as demonstrated by autopsy studies.
The investigators hypothesise that the SMA first approach (SMA-PD) improves R0 resection margins compared to the standard procedure (ST-PD) during PD in patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma."
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standard arm (ST-PD) | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. |
| Experimental arm (SMA-PD) | Experimental | Procedure: SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section.SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Primary resectable or borderline with isolated veinous contact pancreatic adenocarcinoma (according to the NCCN classification and international consensual definition of Isaji 2018): resectability is evaluated on arterial-phase and portal-phase IV contrast-enhanced multislice CT scan of the pancreas (slice thickness: 2.5 mm), and assessed in a multidisciplinary staff meeting including at least one radiologist and one expert surgeon.
- CT-scan of the thorax and abdomen confirming non-metastatic PAC at least 45 days before inclusion
- MRI of the liver without metastasis performed maximum one month before inclusion
- CA 19.9 (carbohydrate antigen) level ≤ 500 U/mL at the time of inclusion (in absence of cholestasis or biliary drainage)
- Age 18 or over
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Pancreatic adenocarcinoma defined as "borderline" with arterial contact, locally advanced, non-resectable, or metastatic.
- Surgical or anesthesiologic contra-indications:
- Non-controlled congestive heart failure - non-treated angina - recent myocardial infarction (in the previous year) - non-controlled AHT (SBP >160 mm or DBP > 100 mm, despite optimal drug treatment), long QT
- Major non-controlled infection
- Major comorbidity that may preclude the surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section.Also: SMA-PDBefore any irreversible gesture, the surgeon identifies and isolates the superior mesenteric artery and dissects nerve plexus and nodes on the right side up to the SMA origin (right posterior or anterior approach). | Procedure or surgery | Experimental arm (SMA-PD) |
| Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section.Also: pancreaticoduodenectomy as standard of careConventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. | Procedure or surgery | Standard arm (ST-PD) |
Primary outcome
R0 resection rate (clear margin > 1 mm)
Time frame: day of surgery
Proportion of randomized patients with R0 margins. R0 defined as clear margin > 1 mm; R1 as ≤ 1 mm using standardized pathology protocol with central review.
7 secondary outcomes
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time frame: Up to 48 months after randomization
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 48 months after randomization
Operative Blood Loss
Time frame: During surgery
Operative Time
Time frame: During surgery
Postoperative Complications
Time frame: Up to 3 months after surgery
Postoperative Morbidity
Time frame: Up to 3 months after surgery
Health related quality of Life
Time frame: At inclusion and 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 15273542Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
- Background: PubMed 23728278Slankamenac K, Graf R, Barkun J, Puhan MA, Clavien PA. The comprehensive complication index: a novel continuous scale to measure surgical morbidity. Ann Surg. 2013 Jul;258(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318296c732.
- Background: PubMed 33845462Tempero MA, Malafa MP, Al-Hawary M, Behrman SW, Benson AB, Cardin DB, Chiorean EG, Chung V, Czito B, Del Chiaro M, Dillhoff M, Donahue TR, Dotan E, Ferrone CR, Fountzilas C, Hardacre J, Hawkins WG, Klute K, Ko AH, Kunstman JW, LoConte N, Lowy AM, Moravek C, Nakakura EK, Narang AK, Obando J, Polanco PM, Reddy S, Reyngold M, Scaife C, Shen J, Vollmer C, Wolff RA, Wolpin BM, Lynn B, George GV. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Apr 1;19(4):439-457. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0017.
- Background: PubMed 31751791Jiang X, Yu Z, Ma Z, Deng H, Ren W, Shi W, Jiao Z. Superior mesenteric artery first approach can improve the clinical outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.007. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
- Background: PubMed 32143434Kim SY, Choi M, Hwang HK, Rho SY, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Intraoperative Transfusion is Independently Associated with a Worse Prognosis in Resected Pancreatic Cancer-a Retrospective Cohort Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):689. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030689.
- Background: PubMed 21369744Kneuertz PJ, Patel SH, Chu CK, Maithel SK, Sarmiento JM, Delman KA, Staley CA 3rd, Kooby DA. Effects of perioperative red blood cell transfusion on disease recurrence and survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 May;18(5):1327-34. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1476-3. Epub 2011 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 25707813Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Margonis GA, Gupta R, Amini N, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Impact of blood transfusions and transfusion practices on long-term outcome following hepatopancreaticobiliary surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 May;19(5):887-96. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2776-5. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
- Background: PubMed 26293837Mavros MN, Xu L, Maqsood H, Gani F, Ejaz A, Spolverato G, Al-Refaie WB, Frank SM, Pawlik TM. Perioperative Blood Transfusion and the Prognosis of Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4382-91. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4823-6. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
- Background: PubMed 25724606Cameron JL, He J. Two thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):530-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.031. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
- Background: PubMed 33630454Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Giuliani T, Di Gioia A, Andrianello S, Zingaretti CC, Brentegani G, De Pastena M, Fontana M, Pea A, Paiella S, Malleo G, Tuveri M, Landoni L, Esposito A, Casetti L, Butturini G, Falconi M, Salvia R. Pancreatoduodenectomy at the Verona Pancreas Institute: the Evolution of Indications, Surgical Techniques, and Outcomes: A Retrospective Analysis of 3000 Consecutive Cases. Ann Surg. 2022 Dec 1;276(6):1029-1038. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004753. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
- Background: PubMed 25794484Amini N, Spolverato G, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Trends in Hospital Volume and Failure to Rescue for Pancreatic Surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Sep;19(9):1581-92. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2800-9. Epub 2015 Mar 21.
- Background: PubMed 23464850Delpero JR, Bachellier P, Regenet N, Le Treut YP, Paye F, Carrere N, Sauvanet A, Autret A, Turrini O, Monges-Ranchin G, Boher JM. Pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a French multicentre prospective evaluation of resection margins in 150 evaluable specimens. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Jan;16(1):20-33. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12061. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
- Protocol for the Examination of Specimens From Patients With Carcinoma of the PancreasLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Zoldonrasib + Chemo of Investigator's Choice vs Placebo + Chemo of Investigator's Choice as First-line Treatment in Metastatic KRAS G12D-mutated Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ( RASolute 305 )
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
23 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SMA-first pancreaticoduodenectomy using either right posterior or anterior approach. SMA identified and isolated with peri-adventitial dissection before any irreversible section. and Conventional pancreaticoduodenectomy without prior isolation of the SMA; antero-posterior approach of the uncinate process after pancreatic section. in people with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma and Pancreatic Head Cancer, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 23 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 23 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Daniel Pietrasz, Medical Doctor (+33 45 49 66 92, daniel.pietrasz@aphp.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
R0 resection rate (clear margin > 1 mm) (time frame: day of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07547033, which also lists 25 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.