Muscle FatigueNCT07547566
Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: Comparison Between TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer"
A study testing Tecar therapy (capacitive mode) and Active recovery using cycle ergometer in people with Muscle Fatigue and Healthy Adult, run by Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two recovery methods after fatigue in young athletes. It aims to find out if tecar therapy (TECAR) or cycle ergometer exercise can improve recovery after intense physical activity and help athletes return to their normal performance more quickly. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
- What is being tested?
- Tecar therapy (capacitive mode) and Active recovery using cycle ergometer
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 48 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 27 Apr 2026to Feb 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Engaging in regular physical activity
- Experience with sports involving jumping or plyometric exercises
Who cannot join
- Performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours before the study
- Planned to perform intense physical exercise within 24 hours after the study
- Presence of muscle soreness at the beginning of the study
- Musculoskeletal injury in the previous 6 months
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Physiobalance
Córdoba, Córdoba, 14011
Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT, +34625434043, m72alcls@uco.es
Lourdes García Luque, PhD PT, +34627366324, z12galul@uco.es
About this study
Official title: Immediate and Short-term Effects of TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer on Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two recovery methods after fatigue in young athletes. It aims to find out if tecar therapy (TECAR) or cycle ergometer exercise can improve recovery after intense physical activity and help athletes return to their normal performance more quickly.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
Does TECAR or cycle ergometer improve physical performance after fatigue?
Do these methods reduce muscle pain and soreness after fatigue?
Researchers will compare TECAR with active recovery using a cycle ergometer to see which method is more effective.
Participants will:
Perform a series of jumps to induce fatigue
Be randomly assigned to one of the recovery methods
Complete physical tests before and after fatigue
Undergo simple measurements of muscle condition and pain
Report their level of effort and muscle soreness
Read the detailed description
This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two recovery strategies following exercise-induced fatigue in young athletes: tecar therapy (TECAR) and active recovery (usual care) using a cycle ergometer.
Exercise-induced fatigue can reduce physical performance and increase muscle soreness, which may negatively affect athletic performance and increase injury risk. This study aims to compare the effects of two commonly used recovery strategies on physical performance, muscle mechanical properties, and perceived recovery.
Participants will be physically active young athletes over 18 years of age, familiar with plyometric or jump-based activities. They will be recruited through convenience sampling. Individuals with recent musculoskeletal injuries or those who have performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours prior to testing will be excluded.
All procedures will be conducted in a controlled environment by trained personnel following a standardized protocol. After providing informed consent, participants will undergo baseline assessments, including physical performance tests, measurements of muscle mechanical properties, and subjective perception of effort and muscle soreness.
A standardized warm-up will be performed prior to testing, consisting of low-intensity aerobic activity for approximately five minutes, aiming to reach a moderate level of perceived exertion.
Participants will then complete a fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps from a fixed height of approximately 0.6 meters. The protocol will be organized into multiple sets with controlled rest intervals between repetitions and sets in order to induce acute neuromuscular fatigue in a standardized manner.
Immediately after the fatigue protocol, the same assessments will be repeated to evaluate the acute effects of fatigue.
Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of the two recovery interventions:
TECAR: application of capacitive and resistive electric transfer using radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes
Active recovery (usual care): continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer at low-to-moderate intensity for 20 minutes, reflecting standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings
Following the assigned recovery intervention, all assessments will be repeated to evaluate recovery effects.
In addition, subjective measures of muscle soreness and perceived effort will be collected at 12 and 24 hours after the intervention to assess short-term recovery.
Outcome measures will include objective indicators of physical performance and muscle mechanical properties, assessed using a handheld myotonometer, as well as pressure pain threshold (a measure of sensitivity to pressure), and subjective measures related to perceived effort and muscle soreness.
Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to compare differences between groups and over time. A two-way analysis of variance (group × time) will be used to evaluate the effects of the recovery intervention and measurement time points, including potential interaction effects. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.
This study aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of TECAR and active recovery strategies, contributing to the optimization of recovery protocols in athletic populations.
- Conditions
- Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
- Being tested
- Tecar therapy (capacitive mode), Active recovery using cycle ergometer
- Keywords
- Muscle Strength, Muscle Fatigue, Athletes, Recovery of Function, Countermovement jump, Pressure pain threshold, Muscle soreness, Muscle mechanical properties, Diathermy
- Medical subject headings
- Myalgia, Fever
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Tecar therapy (capacitive mode)Device
Also called Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy. Radiofrequency therapy
TECAR is applied using capacitive radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes following a standardized fatigue protocol. The intervention is delivered using capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application over the quadriceps region to promote recovery after exercise-induced fatigue.
Active recovery using cycle ergometerBehavioural
Also called Low-intensity cycling exercise
Active recovery consists of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. This intervention is performed after a standardized fatigue protocol and reflects common recovery practices in athletic settings.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TECAR | Experimental | Participants assigned to this group will receive tecar therapy (TECAR) for 20 minutes. TECAR will be applied using the capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants. Receives: Device: Tecar therapy (capacitive mode) |
| Active recovery (usual care) | Active comparator | Participants assigned to this group will perform active recovery (usual care) consisting of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants. This intervention reflects standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings. Receives: Behavioral: Active recovery using cycle ergometer |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Countermovement jump height
Vertical jump performance will be assessed using a countermovement jump test. Jump height will be measured using a validated mobile application after three attempts, and the mean value will be recorded.
Measured: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Secondary outcomes (4)
Muscle mechanical properties
Muscle mechanical properties will be assessed using a handheld myotonometer. Parameters will include muscle tone and stiffness measured at standardized anatomical locations of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, medial gastrocnemius, and lateral gastrocnemius.
Measured: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Pressure pain threshold
Pressure pain threshold will be assessed using a handheld algometer. Measurements will be performed at standardized anatomical locations of the rectus femoris, vastus lateralis, and medial gastrocnemius, and the mean of repeated measurements will be recorded.
Measured: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Rating of perceived exertion
Perceived exertion will be assessed using a 0-10 rating scale, where higher values indicate greater perceived effort.
Measured: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, immediately after intervention (20 minutes), 12 hours, and 24 hours.
Delayed-onset muscle soreness.
Delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) will be assessed using a 0-10 numeric rating scale, where 0 indicates no muscle soreness and 10 indicates the worst possible muscle soreness.
Measured: Baseline (after warm-up), 12 hours, and 24 hours.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2026
- Study start27 Apr 2026
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Muscle FatigueStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: TECAR therapy or active recovery (usual care). The study follows a pre-post design with repeated measurements, including baseline assessment, post-fatigue assessment, and post-intervention assessment. Additional follow-up measurements of perceived effort and muscle soreness will be collected at 12 and 24 hours after the intervention.
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT, Principal investigator, Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC). Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain;
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07547566
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MGC24
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 26 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lettner J, Graventein L, Hakam HT, Ramadanov N, Becker R, Prill R. Assessment of Muscle Stiffness Using the MyotonPro: Effects of Fatigue on Vastus Lateralis and Medialis Muscles. J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):301. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030301.
PubMed 38541043Nakamura M, Sato S, Kiyono R, Yahata K, Yoshida R, Kasahara K, Konrad A. The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Intervention on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness Induced by Eccentric Exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 8;19(9):5723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095723.
PubMed 35565117Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 26;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. eCollection 2018.
PubMed 29755363
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immediate and Short-term Effects of TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer on Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07547566
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MGC24
- Conditions
- Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
- Keywords
- Muscle Strength, Muscle Fatigue, Athletes, Recovery of Function, Countermovement jump, Pressure pain threshold, Muscle soreness, Muscle mechanical properties
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 48 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of CórdobaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Feb 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare two recovery methods after fatigue in young athletes. It aims to find out if tecar therapy (TECAR) or cycle ergometer exercise can improve recovery after intense physical activity and help athletes return to their normal performance more quickly.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does TECAR or cycle ergometer improve physical performance after fatigue?
Do these methods reduce muscle pain and soreness after fatigue?
Researchers will compare TECAR with active recovery using a cycle ergometer to see which method is more effective.
Participants will:
Perform a series of jumps to induce fatigue
Be randomly assigned to one of the recovery methods
Complete physical tests before and after fatigue
Undergo simple measurements of muscle condition and pain
Report their level of effort and muscle soreness
Detailed description
This study is a randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of two recovery strategies following exercise-induced fatigue in young athletes: tecar therapy (TECAR) and active recovery (usual care) using a cycle ergometer.
Exercise-induced fatigue can reduce physical performance and increase muscle soreness, which may negatively affect athletic performance and increase injury risk. This study aims to compare the effects of two commonly used recovery strategies on physical performance, muscle mechanical properties, and perceived recovery.
Participants will be physically active young athletes over 18 years of age, familiar with plyometric or jump-based activities. They will be recruited through convenience sampling. Individuals with recent musculoskeletal injuries or those who have performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours prior to testing will be excluded.
All procedures will be conducted in a controlled environment by trained personnel following a standardized protocol. After providing informed consent, participants will undergo baseline assessments, including physical performance tests, measurements of muscle mechanical properties, and subjective perception of effort and muscle soreness.
A standardized warm-up will be performed prior to testing, consisting of low-intensity aerobic activity for approximately five minutes, aiming to reach a moderate level of perceived exertion.
Participants will then complete a fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps from a fixed height of approximately 0.6 meters. The protocol will be organized into multiple sets with controlled rest intervals between repetitions and sets in order to induce acute neuromuscular fatigue in a standardized manner.
Immediately after the fatigue protocol, the same assessments will be repeated to evaluate the acute effects of fatigue.
Participants will then be randomly assigned to one of the two recovery interventions:
TECAR: application of capacitive and resistive electric transfer using radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes
Active recovery (usual care): continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer at low-to-moderate intensity for 20 minutes, reflecting standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings
Following the assigned recovery intervention, all assessments will be repeated to evaluate recovery effects.
In addition, subjective measures of muscle soreness and perceived effort will be collected at 12 and 24 hours after the intervention to assess short-term recovery.
Outcome measures will include objective indicators of physical performance and muscle mechanical properties, assessed using a handheld myotonometer, as well as pressure pain threshold (a measure of sensitivity to pressure), and subjective measures related to perceived effort and muscle soreness.
Statistical analysis will include descriptive statistics and inferential analysis to compare differences between groups and over time. A two-way analysis of variance (group × time) will be used to evaluate the effects of the recovery intervention and measurement time points, including potential interaction effects. Statistical significance will be set at p < 0.05.
This study aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of TECAR and active recovery strategies, contributing to the optimization of recovery protocols in athletic populations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: TECAR therapy or active recovery (usual care). The study follows a pre-post design with repeated measurements, including baseline assessment, post-fatigue assessment, and post-intervention assessment. Additional follow-up measurements of perceived effort and muscle soreness will be collected at 12 and 24 hours after the intervention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TECAR | Experimental | Device: Tecar therapy (capacitive mode)Participants assigned to this group will receive tecar therapy (TECAR) for 20 minutes. TECAR will be applied using the capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants. |
| Active recovery (usual care) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Active recovery using cycle ergometerParticipants assigned to this group will perform active recovery (usual care) consisting of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. The intervention will be applied after a standardized fatigue protocol consisting of repeated drop jumps, which is identical for all participants. This intervention reflects standard recovery practices commonly used in athletic settings. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- Engaging in regular physical activity
- Experience with sports involving jumping or plyometric exercises
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Performed intense physical exercise within 24 hours before the study
- Planned to perform intense physical exercise within 24 hours after the study
- Presence of muscle soreness at the beginning of the study
- Musculoskeletal injury in the previous 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Tecar therapy (capacitive mode)Also: Capacitive and resistive electric transfer therapy. Radiofrequency therapyTECAR is applied using capacitive radiofrequency energy for 20 minutes following a standardized fatigue protocol. The intervention is delivered using capacitive mode only, combining manual mobile application and fixed automatic application over the quadriceps region to promote recovery after exercise-induced fatigue. | Device | TECAR |
| Active recovery using cycle ergometerAlso: Low-intensity cycling exerciseActive recovery consists of continuous cycling on a cycle ergometer for 20 minutes at low intensity, not exceeding 2-3 on a 0-10 rating of perceived exertion scale. This intervention is performed after a standardized fatigue protocol and reflects common recovery practices in athletic settings. | Behavioural | Active recovery (usual care) |
Primary outcome
Countermovement jump height
Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Vertical jump performance will be assessed using a countermovement jump test. Jump height will be measured using a validated mobile application after three attempts, and the mean value will be recorded.
4 secondary outcomes
Muscle mechanical properties
Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Pressure pain threshold
Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).
Rating of perceived exertion
Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, immediately after intervention (20 minutes), 12 hours, and 24 hours.
Delayed-onset muscle soreness.
Time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), 12 hours, and 24 hours.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Nov 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38541043Lettner J, Graventein L, Hakam HT, Ramadanov N, Becker R, Prill R. Assessment of Muscle Stiffness Using the MyotonPro: Effects of Fatigue on Vastus Lateralis and Medialis Muscles. J Pers Med. 2024 Mar 12;14(3):301. doi: 10.3390/jpm14030301.
- Background: PubMed 35565117Nakamura M, Sato S, Kiyono R, Yahata K, Yoshida R, Kasahara K, Konrad A. The Effect of Capacitive and Resistive Electric Transfer Intervention on Delayed-Onset Muscle Soreness Induced by Eccentric Exercise. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 8;19(9):5723. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095723.
- Background: PubMed 29755363Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An Evidence-Based Approach for Choosing Post-exercise Recovery Techniques to Reduce Markers of Muscle Damage, Soreness, Fatigue, and Inflammation: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. Front Physiol. 2018 Apr 26;9:403. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00403. eCollection 2018.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Muscle Fatigue
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Functional Inspiratory Muscle Training and Combined Exercise Training in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Recruiting
Acute Effects of Post-Exercise Hyperoxia on Recovery in Cycling
Athletic Performance, Hyperbaric Oxygenation
Recruiting
Whole-body Cryotherapy in Those With Chronic Fatigue: A Feasibility Study
ME/CFS, Fibromyalgia (FM)
Not yet recruiting
Acute Effects of High-Intensity Laser Therapy on Pain, Muscle Stiffness, and Grip Strength in Healthy Adults
Exercise-Induced Muscle Fatigue, Fatigue Recovery
Recruiting
ME/CFS Brain Fog: Cognitive Rehabilitation Trial
ME/CFS, ME/CFS Following EBV-associated Infectious Mononucleosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT principal investigator
Maimonides Biomedical Research Institute of Cordoba (IMIBIC). Department of Nursing, Pharmacology and Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain;
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Tecar therapy (capacitive mode) and Active recovery using cycle ergometer in people with Muscle Fatigue and Healthy Adult, run by Maimónides Biomedical Research Institute of Córdoba at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sandra Alcaraz Clariana, PhD PT (+34625434043, m72alcls@uco.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Countermovement jump height (time frame: Baseline (after warm-up), immediately after fatigue protocol, and immediately after intervention (20 minutes).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07547566, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026.