Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction ScaleTRANSALPINENCT07555353
Translation and Validation Into French of a Maternal Satisfaction Scale Following a Cesarean Section (MSSCS)
An observational study of Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.
Trial summary
Cesarean section is currently the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, accounting for more than one-fifth of all deliveries in France. The experience of childbirth, particularly when it involves a cesarean section, is a significant life event with physical, psychological, and relational consequences. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale
- What is being tested?
- Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 May 2026to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patient who underwent a cesarean section under regional anesthesia at the Couple Enfant Hospital
Who may be able to join
- Patient on Day 1, Day 2, or Day 3 following a cesarean section performed under regional anesthesia at the Couple Enfant Hospital of the CHUGA
- Patient of legal age at the time of the cesarean section
Who cannot join
- Patients who underwent a cesarean section under general anesthesia
- Patients who underwent a cesarean section under deep sedation (this criterion will be verified by asking: "Do you remember your cesarean section?")
- Patients who were placed on mechanical ventilation and/or under sedation in the intensive care unit following their cesarean section
- Patient opposed to the use of her data for research purposes
- Non-French-speaking patient
- Patient who cannot read or write
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient with cognitive or psychiatric disorders preventing her from understanding the questionnaire
- Patient under legal guardianship or conservatorship, or deprived of liberty
- Patient not enrolled in the social security system
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Translation and Validation Into French of a Maternal Satisfaction Scale Following a Cesarean Section
Cesarean section is currently the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, accounting for more than one-fifth of all deliveries in France. The experience of childbirth, particularly when it involves a cesarean section, is a significant life event with physical, psychological, and relational consequences. Many factors influence women's perceptions of this experience, including whether the procedure was planned or unexpected, the quality of analgesia, communication with healthcare providers, and the degree of involvement in decision-making. Conversely, a negative experience may impair the mother infant bond or delay postpartum recovery. The quality of anesthetic management is a major determinant of maternal satisfaction.
Maternal satisfaction is widely recognized as an important indicator of healthcare quality. Its assessment requires a multidimensional approach. Although several tools exist in French to measure satisfaction during pregnancy or childbirth in general, none are specifically designed to evaluate the experience of cesarean section, with its particular features-especially those related to anesthesia. Scales such as Questionnaire for the Evaluation of the Childbirth Experience (QEVA) or Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) do not sufficiently address the specific characteristics of this procedure.
Read more
The Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSSCS), originally developed in English, is currently the only validated instrument specifically designed to assess women's satisfaction following a cesarean section. It covers the anesthetic, technical, psychological, and environmental dimensions of the procedure. To date, this scale has neither been translated nor validated in French.
The availability of a validated French version of the MSSCS would improve the assessment of maternal experience in French-speaking settings and help identify concrete areas for improvement in anesthetic and obstetric care related to cesarean section.
Read the detailed description
This prospective, single-center, non-interventional study focuses on a specific population of women undergoing cesarean section and is conducted in two phases, including a questionnaire validation process.
The first phase involves the translation and cultural adaptation of the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSSCS) in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines. This phase includes several steps: forward translation by two independent translators (one physician and one non-physician), reconciliation of the translated versions, back-translation, harmonization by an expert committee, pilot testing with 10 patients, and finalization of the scale.
The second phase consists of administering the translated questionnaire to a sample of women who have delivered by cesarean section at the Hôpital Couple Enfant of Grenoble Alpes University Hospital during their maternity stay. Two additional satisfaction assessment tools (QEVA) and a global Visual Analog Scale will also be administered. Eligible patients will be informed both orally and in writing shortly after their cesarean section. If they agree to participate, they will complete the questionnaires on postoperative day 1 whenever possible, or at another time during their hospitalization, without any modification to their standard care. This phase will allow field testing of the final French version of the scale and enable its psychometric validation.
- Being tested
- Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale Questionnaire
- Keywords
- caesaren, MSSCS Maternal satisfaction scale for ceasareran
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale QuestionnaireOther
consists of beta-testing the MSSCS on 10 cesarean patients to assess item clarity and comprehension, followed by analysis, minor revisions, and finalization of the translated scale in accordance with ISPOR guidelines. A final report will document all translation and cultural adaptation decisions. This phase 2 involves administering the finalized French version of the MSSCS, along with QEVA and a global visual analog scale, to eligible women after cesarean section during their maternity stay to evaluate satisfaction.
Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale QuestionnaireOther
This phase consists of beta-testing the MSSCS on 10 cesarean patients to assess item clarity and comprehension, followed by analysis, minor revisions, and finalization of the translated scale in accordance with ISPOR guidelines. A final report will document all translation and cultural adaptation decisions. Phase 2 involves administering the finalized French version of the MSSCS, along with QEVA and a global visual analog scale, to eligible women after cesarean section during their maternity stay to evaluate satisfaction.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Translate and validate the "Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section" (MSSCS) questionnaire into French
The translation will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations of ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) to ensure content validity. Other validity criteria to be assessed will include acceptability and feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and convergent validity.
Measured: from day 1 to day 3
Secondary outcomes (1)
Compare MSSCS scores based on factors that may influence the cesarean section experience : to demonstrate to study the determinants (known from the literature or hypothesized by the authors) of post-cesarean satisfaction at the Couple Enfant Hospital
- Obstetric context according to Robson's classification (into 10 groups based on the following 6 criteria:
- Parity (nulliparous or multiparous)
- History of cesarean section
- Onset of labor (spontaneous, induced, or cesarean section before labor)
- Number of fetuses (singleton or multiple)
- Presentation (cephalic, breech, transverse)
- Gestational age (≥ 37 weeks or < 37 weeks)
- Smoking during the peripartum period
- Degree of cesarean section urgency according to the Lucas classification (immediate, urgent, urgent elective, elective)
- Epidural anesthesia versus spinal anesthesia
- Hypnotic communication by the anesthesia team during the cesarean section
- Presence or absence of a support person during the cesarean section
- Immediate obstetric complication
- Immediate anesthetic complication
- Maternal transfer to intensive care
- Neonatal transfer to intensive care
Measured: from day 1 to day 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Apr 2026
- Study start1 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction ScaleStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07555353
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 38RC25.0398
- Acronym
- TRANSALPINE
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: The data will be anonymized and stored at the University Hospital Grenoble
Publications
Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
PubMed 29481436Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
PubMed 28616007Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, Robinson PN. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000 Jul;93(7):346-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300703.
PubMed 10928020Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. eCollection 2014.
PubMed 24892928Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80132-0.
PubMed 15321139Sword W, Heaman M, Peterson WE, Salvador A, Akhtar-Danesh N, Bradford-Janke A. Psychometric Testing of the French Language Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire. J Nurs Meas. 2015;23(3):436-51. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.436.
PubMed 26673769Floris L, Mermillod B, Chastonay P. [Translation and validation in French of a multidimensional scale to evaluate the degree of satisfaction during childbirth]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2010 Feb;58(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.09.005. Epub 2010 Jan 25. French.
PubMed 20097497Vignaud M, Morel C, Henault A, Futier E, Pereira B, Lambert C, Beloeil H. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40). Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Apr;40(2):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100822. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
PubMed 33722740Nilver H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y.
PubMed 28662645Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
PubMed 17996342Sobhy S, Zamora J, Dharmarajah K, Arroyo-Manzano D, Wilson M, Navaratnarajah R, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S. Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e320-7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30003-1.
PubMed 27102195Abe H, Sumitani M, Uchida K, Ikeda T, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H, Yamada Y. Association between mode of anaesthesia and severe maternal morbidity during admission for scheduled Caesarean delivery: a nationwide population-based study in Japan, 2010-2013. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Apr;120(4):779-789. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.101. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
PubMed 29576118Baldini V, Gnazzo M, De Ronchi D, Carotenuto M, Pera MC, Fiorillo A. Traumatic Childbirth Experiences and their Association with Postpartum Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review. Psychiatr Q. 2025 Jul 8. doi: 10.1007/s11126-025-10180-4. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 40627258Bell AF, Andersson E. The birth experience and women's postnatal depression: A systematic review. Midwifery. 2016 Aug;39:112-23. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 7.
PubMed 27321728
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Translation and Validation Into French of a Maternal Satisfaction Scale Following a Cesarean Section
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07555353
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TRANSALPINE / 38RC25.0398
- Keywords
- caesaren, MSSCS Maternal satisfaction scale for ceasareran
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cesarean section is currently the most commonly performed surgical procedure worldwide, accounting for more than one-fifth of all deliveries in France. The experience of childbirth, particularly when it involves a cesarean section, is a significant life event with physical, psychological, and relational consequences. Many factors influence women's perceptions of this experience, including whether the procedure was planned or unexpected, the quality of analgesia, communication with healthcare providers, and the degree of involvement in decision-making. Conversely, a negative experience may impair the mother infant bond or delay postpartum recovery. The quality of anesthetic management is a major determinant of maternal satisfaction.
Maternal satisfaction is widely recognized as an important indicator of healthcare quality. Its assessment requires a multidimensional approach. Although several tools exist in French to measure satisfaction during pregnancy or childbirth in general, none are specifically designed to evaluate the experience of cesarean section, with its particular features-especially those related to anesthesia. Scales such as Questionnaire for the Evaluation of the Childbirth Experience (QEVA) or Women's Views of Birth Labour Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) do not sufficiently address the specific characteristics of this procedure.
The Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSSCS), originally developed in English, is currently the only validated instrument specifically designed to assess women's satisfaction following a cesarean section. It covers the anesthetic, technical, psychological, and environmental dimensions of the procedure. To date, this scale has neither been translated nor validated in French.
The availability of a validated French version of the MSSCS would improve the assessment of maternal experience in French-speaking settings and help identify concrete areas for improvement in anesthetic and obstetric care related to cesarean section.
Detailed description
This prospective, single-center, non-interventional study focuses on a specific population of women undergoing cesarean section and is conducted in two phases, including a questionnaire validation process.
The first phase involves the translation and cultural adaptation of the Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section (MSSCS) in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) guidelines. This phase includes several steps: forward translation by two independent translators (one physician and one non-physician), reconciliation of the translated versions, back-translation, harmonization by an expert committee, pilot testing with 10 patients, and finalization of the scale.
The second phase consists of administering the translated questionnaire to a sample of women who have delivered by cesarean section at the Hôpital Couple Enfant of Grenoble Alpes University Hospital during their maternity stay. Two additional satisfaction assessment tools (QEVA) and a global Visual Analog Scale will also be administered. Eligible patients will be informed both orally and in writing shortly after their cesarean section. If they agree to participate, they will complete the questionnaires on postoperative day 1 whenever possible, or at another time during their hospitalization, without any modification to their standard care. This phase will allow field testing of the final French version of the scale and enable its psychometric validation.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patient who underwent a cesarean section under regional anesthesia at the Couple Enfant Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient on Day 1, Day 2, or Day 3 following a cesarean section performed under regional anesthesia at the Couple Enfant Hospital of the CHUGA
- Patient of legal age at the time of the cesarean section
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients who underwent a cesarean section under general anesthesia
- Patients who underwent a cesarean section under deep sedation (this criterion will be verified by asking: "Do you remember your cesarean section?")
- Patients who were placed on mechanical ventilation and/or under sedation in the intensive care unit following their cesarean section
- Patient opposed to the use of her data for research purposes
- Non-French-speaking patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale Questionnaireconsists of beta-testing the MSSCS on 10 cesarean patients to assess item clarity and comprehension, followed by analysis, minor revisions, and finalization of the translated scale in accordance with ISPOR guidelines. A final report will document all translation and cultural adaptation decisions. This phase 2 involves administering the finalized French version of the MSSCS, along with QEVA and a global visual analog scale, to eligible women after cesarean section during their maternity stay to evaluate satisfaction. | Other | – |
| Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale QuestionnaireThis phase consists of beta-testing the MSSCS on 10 cesarean patients to assess item clarity and comprehension, followed by analysis, minor revisions, and finalization of the translated scale in accordance with ISPOR guidelines. A final report will document all translation and cultural adaptation decisions. Phase 2 involves administering the finalized French version of the MSSCS, along with QEVA and a global visual analog scale, to eligible women after cesarean section during their maternity stay to evaluate satisfaction. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Translate and validate the "Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section" (MSSCS) questionnaire into French
Time frame: from day 1 to day 3
The translation will be conducted in accordance with the recommendations of ISPOR (International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research) to ensure content validity. Other validity criteria to be assessed will include acceptability and feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and convergent validity.
1 secondary outcome
Compare MSSCS scores based on factors that may influence the cesarean section experience : to demonstrate to study the determinants (known from the literature or hypothesized by the authors) of post-cesarean satisfaction at the Couple Enfant Hospital
Time frame: from day 1 to day 3
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29481436Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA. Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864.
- BackgroundNunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
- Background: PubMed 28616007Tsang S, Royse CF, Terkawi AS. Guidelines for developing, translating, and validating a questionnaire in perioperative and pain medicine. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017 May;11(Suppl 1):S80-S89. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_203_17.
- Background: PubMed 10928020Lucas DN, Yentis SM, Kinsella SM, Holdcroft A, May AE, Wee M, Robinson PN. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med. 2000 Jul;93(7):346-50. doi: 10.1177/014107680009300703.
- Background: PubMed 24892928Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gulmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A systematic review of the Robson classification for caesarean section: what works, doesn't work and how to improve it. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097769. eCollection 2014.
- Background: PubMed 15321139Morgan PJ, Halpern S, Lo J. The development of a maternal satisfaction scale for caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 1999 Jul;8(3):165-70. doi: 10.1016/s0959-289x(99)80132-0.
- Background: PubMed 26673769Sword W, Heaman M, Peterson WE, Salvador A, Akhtar-Danesh N, Bradford-Janke A. Psychometric Testing of the French Language Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire. J Nurs Meas. 2015;23(3):436-51. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.436.
- Background: PubMed 20097497Floris L, Mermillod B, Chastonay P. [Translation and validation in French of a multidimensional scale to evaluate the degree of satisfaction during childbirth]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique. 2010 Feb;58(1):13-22. doi: 10.1016/j.respe.2009.09.005. Epub 2010 Jan 25. French.
- Background: PubMed 33722740Vignaud M, Morel C, Henault A, Futier E, Pereira B, Lambert C, Beloeil H. Variability and reliability of the French version of the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire (QoR-40). Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Apr;40(2):100822. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100822. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
- Background: PubMed 28662645Nilver H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women's childbirth experiences: a systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y.
- Background: PubMed 17996342Larkin P, Begley CM, Devane D. Women's experiences of labour and birth: an evolutionary concept analysis. Midwifery. 2009 Apr;25(2):e49-59. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.07.010. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
- Background: PubMed 27102195Sobhy S, Zamora J, Dharmarajah K, Arroyo-Manzano D, Wilson M, Navaratnarajah R, Coomarasamy A, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S. Anaesthesia-related maternal mortality in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016 May;4(5):e320-7. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30003-1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. The data will be anonymized and stored at the University Hospital Grenoble
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Post-Cesarean Maternal Satisfaction Scale, run by University Hospital, Grenoble.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jean Noel EJ EVAIN, Doctor (04 76 76 67 29 ext. +33, jnevain@chu-grenoble.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Translate and validate the "Maternal Satisfaction Scale for Caesarean Section" (MSSCS) questionnaire into French (time frame: from day 1 to day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07555353, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2026.