AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeNCT07558876

Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training With Focal Vibration in Stroke

A study testing Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration and Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training Alone in people with Stroke, run by Jisu Kim at 2 sites in South Korea.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration on hand function, proprioception, and muscle tone in patients with stroke. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Stroke
What is being tested?
Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration and Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training Alone
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
38 participants
Where
2 sitesSouth Korea
Study dates
27 Apr 2026to Feb 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Individuals diagnosed with stroke at least 3 months prior
  • Individuals with sufficient cognitive function (Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score ≥ 24)
  • Individuals able to maintain a seated position independently and perform upper limb functional tasks (Trunk Control Test [TCT] ≥ 50)
  • Individuals with muscle tone of the affected upper limb of Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Grade ≤ 2
  • Individuals with Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) scores between 20 and 50
  • Individuals able to grasp and move objects with the affected upper limb and with muscle strength of Manual Muscle Test (MMT) Grade ≥ 3
  • Individuals with impaired proprioception in the affected hand (defined as a score < 2 on the wrist or thumb position item of the FMA-UE)

Who cannot join

  • Individuals within 3 months after stroke onset
  • Individuals with fractures, severe soft tissue injuries, or contraindications to focal vibration
  • Individuals with severe sensory hypersensitivity or complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS)
  • Individuals who received treatments affecting upper limb function within the past 3 months (e.g., botulinum toxin injection, surgery, nerve block)

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

South Korea2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Cheongdam Hospital

    Seoul

    Jisu Kim, PT, +82-10-8362-6639, ksuu6639@naver.com

    Recruiting
  • Sahmyook University

    Seoul

    Jisu Kim, PT, +82-10-8362-6639, ksuu6639@naver.com

    Not yet recruiting

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Effects of Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training With Localized Vibration on Hand Function, Proprioception, and Muscle Tone in Patients With Stroke

This study aims to investigate the effects of task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration on hand function, proprioception, and muscle tone in patients with stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving task-oriented training with concurrent focal vibration or a control group receiving task-oriented training alone. The intervention will be conducted over 6 weeks. Outcome measures will be assessed before and after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

Stroke often results in impairments in upper limb function, including reduced motor control, altered muscle tone, and deficits in proprioception. These impairments can significantly limit functional use of the affected limb in daily activities.

Task-oriented training has been widely used in stroke rehabilitation to improve motor function through repetitive and goal-directed tasks. However, recovery may be limited when sensory input is insufficient. Enhancing sensory feedback, particularly proprioceptive input, may facilitate sensorimotor integration and improve functional outcomes.

Focal vibration applied to muscle or tendon has been shown to stimulate muscle spindle afferents, thereby enhancing proprioceptive input to the central nervous system. When applied during active task performance, focal vibration may further augment motor learning and functional recovery.

This study is designed as a randomized controlled trial to investigate the effects of task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving task-oriented training with concurrent focal vibration applied to wrist extensor muscles or a control group receiving task-oriented training alone.

The intervention will be conducted for 6 weeks. Outcome measures will include upper limb motor function, proprioception, manual dexterity, and muscle tone, assessed before and after the intervention.

The findings of this study may provide evidence for the effectiveness of combining focal vibration with task-oriented training to enhance upper limb recovery in patients with stroke.

Conditions
Stroke
Being tested
Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration, Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training Alone
Keywords
Stroke, Upper Limb Rehabilitation, Task-Oriented Training, Hand Function, Focal Vibration, Proprioception, Muscle Tone
Medical subject headings
Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibrationProcedure or surgery

    Participants in the experimental group will receive task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration applied to the wrist extensor muscles during task performance. The intervention will be administered for 30 minutes per session, 2 times per week, for 6 weeks, and no vibration will be applied during rest periods.

  • Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training AloneProcedure or surgery

    Participants in the control group will receive task-oriented upper limb training without the application of focal vibration, with the device attached to the wrist extensor muscles. The intervention will be administered for 30 minutes per session, 2 times per week, for 6 weeks.

Study groups in NCT07558876
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training with Focal VibrationExperimentalParticipants will receive task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration applied to the wrist extensor muscles during task performance. The intervention will be conducted for 6 weeks, twice per week, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Each session will include functional tasks such as reaching, grasping, object manipulation, and wrist control exercises. Focal vibration will be applied only during active task execution to enhance proprioceptive input, improve hand function, and reduce muscle tone.
Receives: Procedure: Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration
Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training AloneActive comparatorParticipants will receive the same task-oriented upper limb training without focal vibration for 6 weeks, twice per week, with each session lasting 30 minutes. Each session will include functional tasks such as reaching, grasping, object manipulation, and wrist control exercises. The vibration device will be attached to the wrist extensor muscles in the same manner as the experimental group, but no vibration will be applied.
Receives: Procedure: Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training Alone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) will be used to evaluate motor function of the affected upper limb. The total score ranges from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better motor function.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Joint Position Sense (JPS)

    Joint position sense (JPS) will be assessed using an electronic goniometer by measuring the absolute error between a target joint angle and the reproduced angle. Lower error values indicate better proprioceptive function.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

  2. Thumb Localization Test (TLT)

    The Thumb Localization Test (TLT) will be used to assess proprioceptive function of the affected upper limb. Participants will be asked to locate and grasp the thumb of the affected hand with the unaffected hand while their eyes are closed. Performance will be scored on a 4-point scale, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

  3. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) will be used to assess upper limb functional ability. The test consists of 19 items divided into four subscales: grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0-3), with a total score ranging from 0 to 57. Higher scores indicate better upper limb function.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

  4. Box and Block Test (BBT)

    The Box and Block Test (BBT) will be used to assess gross manual dexterity of the affected upper limb. Participants will be instructed to move as many blocks as possible from one compartment of a box to another within 60 seconds. The score is the number of blocks transferred, with higher scores indicating better manual dexterity

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

  5. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) will be used to assess muscle tone of the affected upper limb. Spasticity is graded on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 to 4, including a 1+ grade, with higher scores indicating greater spasticity.

    Measured: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Apr 2026
  2. Study start27 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionFeb 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration or a control group receiving task-oriented upper limb training alone.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
38 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07558876
Sponsor's protocol ID
SU-PT-2026-01-018-002
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
23 Apr 2026
Last updated
16 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Task-oriented upper limb training combined with focal vibration and Active Comparator: Task-Oriented Upper Limb Training Alone in people with Stroke, run by Jisu Kim at 2 sites in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Jisu Kim, PT (+82-10-8362-6639, ksuu6639@naver.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) (time frame: Baseline and immediately after 6 weeks of intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT07558876 | AzTrials