DysmenorrheaNCT07563426
The Effect of Spinal Stabilization Training in Women With Dysmenorrhea
A study testing Spinal stabilization exercise group and Relaxation exercise group in people with Dysmenorrhea and Spinal Stabilization, run by Sevtap Günay at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The study, designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial, was conducted at Tonya Vocational School. Institutional approval was obtained to carry out the study at Tonya Vocational School (Appendix-). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 30 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Dysmenorrhea, Spinal Stabilization, Menstrual Symptoms
- What is being tested?
- Spinal stabilization exercise group and Relaxation exercise group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2024to 30 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 30 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being between 18 and 30 years of age
- Having no history of childbirth
- Being cooperative and oriented
- Having a regular menstrual cycle (28 ± 7 days)
- Scoring >1 on the WaLIDD scale
- Reporting a menstrual pain score greater than 4 out of 10 on the Visual 7)Analog Scale (VAS)
- 8)Volunteering to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Using hormonal contraceptive medications or an intrauterine device (IUD)
- Having any mental, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or orthopedic condition that could limit exercise participation
- Being pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Spinal Stabilization Training in Women With Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The study, designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial, was conducted at Tonya Vocational School. Institutional approval was obtained to carry out the study at Tonya Vocational School (Appendix-). Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and voluntarily agreed to participate were required to sign an informed consent form prior to the initiation of the study. Following the acquisition of informed consent, 50 women with dysmenorrhea, identified based on the WaLIDD score, were randomly allocated into two groups using a simple randomization method (sealed envelope): 25 participants in the experimental group and 25 in the control group.Baseline assessments were performed by the same researcher within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, prior to the commencement of the intervention. Participants' demographic characteristics and menstrual cycle information were recorded using a data collection form before the exercise intervention.
Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); menstrual symptom severity using the Menstrual Symptom Scale; body awareness using the Body Awareness Questionnaire; muscle endurance using the McGill trunk endurance tests; lumbopelvic mobility using the Modified Schober test; activities of daily living using the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; problem-solving skills using the Problem Solving Inventory; decision-making styles using the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; quality of life using the SF-12 questionnaire; and physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All measurements were conducted within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, both before (baseline assessment) and after (post-intervention assessment) the exercise program.
Read the detailed description
The study, designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial, was conducted at Tonya Vocational School. Institutional approval was obtained to carry out the study at Tonya Vocational School (Appendix-). Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and voluntarily agreed to participate were required to sign an informed consent form prior to the initiation of the study. Following the acquisition of informed consent, 50 women with dysmenorrhea, identified based on the WaLIDD score, were randomly allocated into two groups using a simple randomization method (sealed envelope): 25 participants in the experimental group and 25 in the control group.Baseline assessments were performed by the same researcher within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, prior to the commencement of the intervention. Participants' demographic characteristics and menstrual cycle information were recorded using a data collection form before the exercise intervention.
Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); menstrual symptom severity using the Menstrual Symptom Scale; body awareness using the Body Awareness Questionnaire; muscle endurance using the McGill trunk endurance tests; lumbopelvic mobility using the Modified Schober test; activities of daily living using the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; problem-solving skills using the Problem Solving Inventory; decision-making styles using the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; quality of life using the SF-12 questionnaire; and physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All measurements were conducted within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, both before (baseline assessment) and after (post-intervention assessment) the exercise program.
The control group was provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, including avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of the intake of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and high-salt foods; preference for loose and cotton clothing; taking warm standing showers; and maintaining adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours). These recommendations were delivered to the control group .In addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training. A total of 16 sessions of spinal stabilization training were administered under the supervision of a physiotherapist, with two sessions per week over an 8-week period. Each session lasted approximately 45-50 minutes. The exercise program began with a 5-6 minute warm-up, followed by a 35-40 minute main program, and concluded with a 5-6 minute cool-down period. The warm-up and cool-down phases consisted of general stretching exercises and light jogging.The exercise program was designed to be progressive; accordingly, during the first week, participants performed a single set of 6-10 repetitions for each exercise. The number of repetitions and sets was increased every two weeks based on the participants' capacity. Progression in the exercise program was achieved by increasing the number of repetitions and sets, adding resistance, and extending the duration. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg rating of 11-14.
- Being tested
- Spinal stabilization exercise group, Relaxation exercise group
- Keywords
- Menstrual symptom, Menstrual pain, spinal stabilization, Quality of life, Lumbopelvic mobility, endurance
- Medical subject headings
- Dysmenorrhea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal stabilization exercise groupOther
In addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training . Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, spinal stabilization exercises were performed twice weekly for eight weeks, with session durations of 30 minutes in the initial weeks and 45-55 minutes in the subsequent weeks. Each session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up (walking and stretching exercises), 30-40 minutes of spinal stabilization exercises in the early weeks and 45-55 minutes in the later weeks, and a 5-minute cool-down period (stretching exercises) (12).The progression of the exercises was individualized according to each patient's ability, fatigue level, and pain response. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg score of 11-14 (13).
Relaxation exercise groupOther
The control group will be provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations. After the relaxation exercises are explained by a physiotherapist, lifestyle recommendations for participants will include avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and foods with high salt content; use of loose and cotton clothing; warm standing showers; and adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours) (9,10).
To facilitate adherence and support the follow-up of relaxation training, a brochure was prepared and provided to the participants. Participants will perform relaxation exercises once per week for 8 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes (1).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Relaxation exercise group | Active comparator | The control group will be provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations. After the relaxation exercises are explained by a physiotherapist, lifestyle recommendations for participants will include avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and foods with high salt content; use of loose and cotton clothing; warm standing showers; and adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours) (9,10).
To facilitate adherence and support the follow-up of relaxation training, a brochure was prepared and provided to the participants. Participants will perform relaxation exercises once per week for 8 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes (1). Receives: Other: Relaxation exercise group |
| Experimental: Spinal Stabilization Exercise Group | Experimental | In addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training . Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, spinal stabilization exercises were performed twice weekly for eight weeks, with session durations of 30 minutes in the initial weeks and 45-55 minutes in the subsequent weeks. Each session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up (walking and stretching exercises), 30-40 minutes of spinal stabilization exercises in the early weeks and 45-55 minutes in the later weeks, and a 5-minute cool-down period (stretching exercises) (12).The progression of the exercises was individualized according to each patient's ability, fatigue level, and pain response. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg score of 11-14 (13). Receives: Other: Spinal stabilization exercise group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS):
Pain intensity was assessed using the VAS. Participants indicated the severity of pain by marking an "x" on a 10-cm line, with each centimeter representing one unit. A score of "0" indicated no pain, while a score of "10" represented the most severe pain.
Measured: "Baseline and Week 8
Menstruation Symptom Scale
This scale was used to evaluate menstrual symptoms. The questionnaire consists of 22 items, including 19 items assessing symptoms (emotional, physical, and pain-related) and 3 items evaluating coping strategies for symptoms. Higher total scores indicate more severe menstrual symptoms. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Gülten Güvenç.Minimum score: 22, Maximum score:110.
Measured: "Baseline and Week 8
McGill Trunk Endurance Tests:
Lumbopelvic muscle endurance was assessed using the McGill trunk endurance tests , which include trunk flexion, extension, and lateral flexion (right and left) endurance assessments. The testing positions were demonstrated and explained to participants in advance. Participants were then asked to repeat each position once to familiarize themselves with the assessment postures.
Participants were encouraged to maintain each isometric position for as long as possible for each test. The duration for which individuals were able to maintain the correct posture was recorded in seconds . The McGill trunk endurance tests were terminated when the test position deteriorated or when participants indicated that they could no longer continue the test.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Modified Schober Test:
This test was used to assess lumbopelvic mobility. It is a method that measures lumbar spinal mobility during flexion and extension movements . For the measurement, the line between both posterior superior iliac spines was first marked, and points 10 cm above and 5 cm below this mark were identified. Participants were then asked to bend forward. The difference between the initial and final measurements was recorded in centimeters. In this test, a 0-5 cm difference indicates reduced flexion flexibility, a difference greater than 10 cm indicates increased flexibility, and values between 5-10 cm are considered normal.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Secondary outcomes (6)
Problem Solving Inventory:
his inventory was used to determine individuals' problem-solving skills. The scale was developed by Heppner et al. and its Turkish adaptation was performed . The scale is a six-point Likert-type instrument consisting of 35 items and includes the subdimensions of "impulsive approach," "avoidant approach," "thinking approach," "confident approach," "evaluative approach," and "problem-solving self-confidence approach." Items 9, 11, 22, and 29 are not scored. The total score ranges from 31 to 186, and lower scores indicate higher problem-solving ability.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire:
This scale was used to assess self-esteem in decision making and decision-making styles. It was developed by Mann, Burnett, Radford, and Ford , and its Turkish adaptation has been conducted. The scale consists of two parts. The first part measures self-esteem in decision making (self-confidence) and includes six items; items 1, 3, and 5 are positively scored, while items 2, 4, and 6 are reverse scored. The maximum possible score is 12, and higher scores indicate higher self-esteem in decision making. The second part consists of 22 items and assesses decision-making styles, including panic, avoidant, procrastinating, and vigilant styles.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12):
This questionnaire was used to assess individuals' quality of life. It measures perceived health status and functional health using 12 items. The SF-12 consists of 12 items covering physical functioning (2 items), physical role (2 items), bodily pain (1 item), general health (1 item), vitality (1 item), social functioning (1 item), emotional role (2 items), and mental health (2 items). Higher scores indicate better health status . The Turkish adaptation of the scale was performed by Soylu and Kütük.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Body Awareness Questionnaire:
This questionnaire was used to evaluate changes in individuals' body awareness. It aims to identify normal or abnormal bodily cues such as sensitivity to body cycles and rhythms, the ability to detect subtle changes in normal functioning, and the ability to anticipate bodily reactions. The questionnaire consists of 18 items and includes four subdimensions: prediction of bodily responses, sleep-wake cycle, anticipation of illness onset, and awareness of changes in bodily processes and responses . Higher scores indicate a higher level of body awareness. The Turkish version of the scale was adapted by Karaca et al.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
his scale was used to evaluate impairment in individuals' daily living activities. The Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Işık et al. in 2020, and the internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) for the overall scale was 0.843. The scale consists of eight items assessing the ability to use the telephone, shop, prepare food, perform housework, do laundry, use transportation, and manage finances. Each item is scored as 0 (unable or partially able) or 1 (able). The total score ranges from 0 (low functioning, dependent) to 8 (high functioning, independent), with lower scores indicating greater dependence.
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF):
This questionnaire was used to determine individuals' physical activity levels. It was developed with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Sağlam et al. The form provides information regarding the time spent in light, moderate, and vigorous physical activities, as well as sitting time. For each activity level, a fixed MET (metabolic equivalent) value is multiplied by the number of days and minutes to obtain a "MET-minutes/week" score. The assigned MET values are 3.3 for walking, 4 for moderate-intensity activity, and 8 for vigorous-intensity activity. Physical activity levels are classified as inactive (<600 MET-min/week), minimally active (600-3000 MET-min/week), and highly active (>3000 MET-min/week).
Measured: Baseline and Week 8
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2026
- Study start1 Apr 2024
- Primary completion30 Aug 2024
- Study completion30 Dec 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for DysmenorrheaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sevtap Günay
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Sevtap Günay, Izmir Katip Celebi University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07563426
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Trabzon University
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 7 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Spinal Stabilization Training in Women With Dysmenorrhea: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07563426
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Trabzon University
- Keywords
- Menstrual symptom, Menstrual pain, spinal stabilization, Quality of life, Lumbopelvic mobility, endurance
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sevtap GünayUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The study, designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial, was conducted at Tonya Vocational School. Institutional approval was obtained to carry out the study at Tonya Vocational School (Appendix-). Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and voluntarily agreed to participate were required to sign an informed consent form prior to the initiation of the study. Following the acquisition of informed consent, 50 women with dysmenorrhea, identified based on the WaLIDD score, were randomly allocated into two groups using a simple randomization method (sealed envelope): 25 participants in the experimental group and 25 in the control group.Baseline assessments were performed by the same researcher within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, prior to the commencement of the intervention. Participants' demographic characteristics and menstrual cycle information were recorded using a data collection form before the exercise intervention.
Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); menstrual symptom severity using the Menstrual Symptom Scale; body awareness using the Body Awareness Questionnaire; muscle endurance using the McGill trunk endurance tests; lumbopelvic mobility using the Modified Schober test; activities of daily living using the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; problem-solving skills using the Problem Solving Inventory; decision-making styles using the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; quality of life using the SF-12 questionnaire; and physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All measurements were conducted within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, both before (baseline assessment) and after (post-intervention assessment) the exercise program.
Detailed description
The study, designed as a randomized controlled experimental trial, was conducted at Tonya Vocational School. Institutional approval was obtained to carry out the study at Tonya Vocational School (Appendix-). Participants who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and voluntarily agreed to participate were required to sign an informed consent form prior to the initiation of the study. Following the acquisition of informed consent, 50 women with dysmenorrhea, identified based on the WaLIDD score, were randomly allocated into two groups using a simple randomization method (sealed envelope): 25 participants in the experimental group and 25 in the control group.Baseline assessments were performed by the same researcher within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, prior to the commencement of the intervention. Participants' demographic characteristics and menstrual cycle information were recorded using a data collection form before the exercise intervention.
Pain intensity was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS); menstrual symptom severity using the Menstrual Symptom Scale; body awareness using the Body Awareness Questionnaire; muscle endurance using the McGill trunk endurance tests; lumbopelvic mobility using the Modified Schober test; activities of daily living using the Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale; problem-solving skills using the Problem Solving Inventory; decision-making styles using the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire; quality of life using the SF-12 questionnaire; and physical activity levels using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-SF). All measurements were conducted within the first week immediately following the most recent menstrual period, both before (baseline assessment) and after (post-intervention assessment) the exercise program.
The control group was provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, including avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of the intake of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and high-salt foods; preference for loose and cotton clothing; taking warm standing showers; and maintaining adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours). These recommendations were delivered to the control group .In addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training. A total of 16 sessions of spinal stabilization training were administered under the supervision of a physiotherapist, with two sessions per week over an 8-week period. Each session lasted approximately 45-50 minutes. The exercise program began with a 5-6 minute warm-up, followed by a 35-40 minute main program, and concluded with a 5-6 minute cool-down period. The warm-up and cool-down phases consisted of general stretching exercises and light jogging.The exercise program was designed to be progressive; accordingly, during the first week, participants performed a single set of 6-10 repetitions for each exercise. The number of repetitions and sets was increased every two weeks based on the participants' capacity. Progression in the exercise program was achieved by increasing the number of repetitions and sets, adding resistance, and extending the duration. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg rating of 11-14.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Comparator: Relaxation exercise group | Active comparator | Other: Relaxation exercise groupThe control group will be provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations. After the relaxation exercises are explained by a physiotherapist, lifestyle recommendations for participants will include avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and foods with high salt content; use of loose and cotton clothing; warm standing showers; and adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours) (9,10). To facilitate adherence and support the follow-up of relaxation training, a brochure was prepared and provided to the participants. Participants will perform relaxation exercises once per week for 8 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes (1). |
| Experimental: Spinal Stabilization Exercise Group | Experimental | Other: Spinal stabilization exercise groupIn addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training . Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, spinal stabilization exercises were performed twice weekly for eight weeks, with session durations of 30 minutes in the initial weeks and 45-55 minutes in the subsequent weeks. Each session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up (walking and stretching exercises), 30-40 minutes of spinal stabilization exercises in the early weeks and 45-55 minutes in the later weeks, and a 5-minute cool-down period (stretching exercises) (12).The progression of the exercises was individualized according to each patient's ability, fatigue level, and pain response. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg score of 11-14 (13). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 30 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Being between 18 and 30 years of age
- Having no history of childbirth
- Being cooperative and oriented
- Having a regular menstrual cycle (28 ± 7 days)
- Scoring >1 on the WaLIDD scale
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Using hormonal contraceptive medications or an intrauterine device (IUD)
- Having any mental, cardiovascular, pulmonary, or orthopedic condition that could limit exercise participation
- Being pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal stabilization exercise groupIn addition to relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations, the experimental group received spinal stabilization training . Under the supervision of a physiotherapist, spinal stabilization exercises were performed twice weekly for eight weeks, with session durations of 30 minutes in the initial weeks and 45-55 minutes in the subsequent weeks. Each session consisted of a 5-minute warm-up (walking and stretching exercises), 30-40 minutes of spinal stabilization exercises in the early weeks and 45-55 minutes in the later weeks, and a 5-minute cool-down period (stretching exercises) (12).The progression of the exercises was individualized according to each patient's ability, fatigue level, and pain response. The level of exertion was determined using the Borg Scale (6-20), and the exercise intensity was increased when participants reached a Borg score of 11-14 (13). | Other | Experimental: Spinal Stabilization Exercise Group |
| Relaxation exercise groupThe control group will be provided with relaxation exercises and lifestyle recommendations. After the relaxation exercises are explained by a physiotherapist, lifestyle recommendations for participants will include avoidance of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke; reduction or cessation of smoking and alcohol consumption; limitation of caffeine, sugar, cold foods and beverages, and foods with high salt content; use of loose and cotton clothing; warm standing showers; and adequate and good-quality sleep (at least 6-8 hours) (9,10). To facilitate adherence and support the follow-up of relaxation training, a brochure was prepared and provided to the participants. Participants will perform relaxation exercises once per week for 8 weeks, with each session lasting 30 minutes (1). | Other | Active Comparator: Relaxation exercise group |
Primary outcome
Visual Analog Scale (VAS):
Time frame: "Baseline and Week 8
Pain intensity was assessed using the VAS. Participants indicated the severity of pain by marking an "x" on a 10-cm line, with each centimeter representing one unit. A score of "0" indicated no pain, while a score of "10" represented the most severe pain.
Menstruation Symptom Scale
Time frame: "Baseline and Week 8
This scale was used to evaluate menstrual symptoms. The questionnaire consists of 22 items, including 19 items assessing symptoms (emotional, physical, and pain-related) and 3 items evaluating coping strategies for symptoms. Higher total scores indicate more severe menstrual symptoms. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Gülten Güvenç.Minimum score: 22, Maximum score:110.
McGill Trunk Endurance Tests:
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Lumbopelvic muscle endurance was assessed using the McGill trunk endurance tests , which include trunk flexion, extension, and lateral flexion (right and left) endurance assessments. The testing positions were demonstrated and explained to participants in advance. Participants were then asked to repeat each position once to familiarize themselves with the assessment postures. Participants were encouraged to maintain each isometric position for as long as possible for each test. The duration for which individuals were able to maintain the correct posture was recorded in seconds . The McGill trunk endurance tests were terminated when the test position deteriorated or when participants indicated that they could no longer continue the test.
Modified Schober Test:
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
This test was used to assess lumbopelvic mobility. It is a method that measures lumbar spinal mobility during flexion and extension movements . For the measurement, the line between both posterior superior iliac spines was first marked, and points 10 cm above and 5 cm below this mark were identified. Participants were then asked to bend forward. The difference between the initial and final measurements was recorded in centimeters. In this test, a 0-5 cm difference indicates reduced flexion flexibility, a difference greater than 10 cm indicates increased flexibility, and values between 5-10 cm are considered normal.
6 secondary outcomes
Problem Solving Inventory:
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire:
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Short Form Health Survey (SF-12):
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Body Awareness Questionnaire:
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Lawton-Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
International Physical Activity Questionnaire - Short Form (IPAQ-SF):
Time frame: Baseline and Week 8
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Dysmenorrhea
Not yet recruiting
Radiofrequency and Pelvic Floor Exercise for Primary Dysmenorrhea
Primary Dysmenorrhea
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
PRECISION-E2: Teverelix in Women With Endometriosis - Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Precision Medicine Correlates
Endometriosis Pelvic, Endometriosis Ovaries
Not yet recruiting
Ultrasound-Guided Radiofrequency Ablation for Focal Adenomyosis
Adenomyosis, Adenomyoma of Uterus
Active, not recruiting
Mindfulness-Based Education For Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS), Menstrual Symptoms
Not yet recruiting
The Effect of a Ginger Formula on Menstrual Health vs a Placebo
Painful Menstruation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Spinal stabilization exercise group and Relaxation exercise group in people with Dysmenorrhea and Spinal Stabilization, run by Sevtap Günay at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Visual Analog Scale (VAS): (time frame: "Baseline and Week 8). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2026.