AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonic PolypsNCT07563816

ColoMaia II Software to Support Lesion Detection During Colonoscopy

A study testing ColoMaia II software and Standard colonoscopy in people with Colonic Polyps and Adenomatous Polyps, run by MAIA Labs s.r.o. at 3 sites in Czechia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ColoMaia II software can help doctors find colon lesions during colonoscopy and whether it is safe to use in adults aged 40 to 80 years having screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 80 years
What is being tested?
ColoMaia II software and Standard colonoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
600 participants
Where
3 sitesCzechia
Study dates
11 Nov 2025to 8 May 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 40-80 years, indicated for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with active inflammatory bowel disease, known familial polyposis, contraindication to polypectomy, personal history of colorectal cancer (CRC), prior resection of the colon, patients who do not provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Czechia3 sites
  • Nemocnice Hořovice - NH Hospital a.s.

    Hořovice, 26801

  • Nemocnice AGEL Nový Jičín a.s.

    Nový Jičín, 74101

  • Nemocnice AGEL Ostrava-Vítkovice a.s.

    Ostrava, 70300

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: Clinical Investigation of the ColoMaia II Software for Supporting Lesion Detection During Colonoscopy

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the ColoMaia II software can help doctors find colon lesions during colonoscopy and whether it is safe to use in adults aged 40 to 80 years having screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are whether the software increases the number of participants in whom at least one adenoma is found, and whether the software is safe to use during colonoscopy. Researchers will compare colonoscopy with ColoMaia II software assistance to standard colonoscopy without the software. Participants will be assigned to a colonoscopy with or without ColoMaia II software assistance, have a colonoscopy performed by a qualified physician, have tissue samples examined if needed, and allow study data and procedure videos to be collected and reviewed.

Being tested
ColoMaia II software, Standard colonoscopy
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps, Adenomatous Polyps, Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ColoMaia II softwareDevice

    AI software providing real-time visual and acoustic alerts during colonoscopy

  • Standard colonoscopyProcedure or surgery

    Standard colonoscopy

Study groups in NCT07563816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ColoMaia II-Assisted ColonoscopyExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: ColoMaia II software
Standard ColonoscopyActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Standard colonoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR)

    Proportion of participants with at least 1 adenoma detected, removed, and histologically verified during the index colonoscopy.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  2. Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE)

    Number of serious adverse events considered to have a causal or reasonably possible relationship to the ColoMaia II software.

    Measured: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Usability Questionnaire Score

    The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a standardized 10-item questionnaire used to assess perceived usability of the investigational device. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Responses are converted to a total SUS score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better usability.

    Measured: Immediately after the index colonoscopy procedure

  2. Adenomas Per Colonoscopy (APC)

    Mean number of histologically verified adenomas per colonoscopy.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  3. Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) for Clinically Significant Lesions

    Proportion of clinically significant excised lesions among all excised lesions with histology available. Clinically significant lesions are defined per protocol.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  4. Visual Alert Sensitivity for Pre-specified Detection Delays

    Percentage of lesions for which the software renders a visual alert within a specified time interval from first lesion visibility.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  5. Acoustic Alert Sensitivity for Pre-specified Detection Delays

    Percentage of lesions for which the software gives an acoustic alert within a specified time interval from first lesion visibility.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  6. False Acoustic Alerts per Minute

    Average number of acoustic alerts per minute not associated with any possibly clinically significant lesion.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  7. Erroneous Visual Alerts per Minute

    Average number of visual alerts per minute not associated with any possibly clinically significant lesion.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  8. Average Alert Delay

    Average time from first clear lesion visibility until the visual alert is rendered.

    Measured: Periprocedural

  9. Average Percentage of Time With an Incorrect Visual Alert

    Proportion of video frames containing a visual alert not associated with any possibly clinically significant lesion.

    Measured: Periprocedural

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 May 2026
  2. Study start11 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion11 Apr 2026
  4. Study completion8 May 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
600 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07563816
Sponsor's protocol ID
MaiaLabs-2025-001
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
23 Apr 2026
Last updated
18 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ColoMaia II software and Standard colonoscopy in people with Colonic Polyps and Adenomatous Polyps, run by MAIA Labs s.r.o. at 3 sites in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR) (time frame: Periprocedural). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in