Non Small Cell Lung CancerAPRILNCT07565987
The APRIL Trial Evaluating Upfront Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Stage III Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A study testing SBRT in stage III NSCLC in people with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to test the feasibility \& loco-regional control rate by combining high precision SBRT with chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC in tumor/lymph nodes if tumors/lymph node size with ≤ 6cms in size. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- SBRT in stage III NSCLC
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIndia
- Study dates
- 19 Dec 2026to 18 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 or above and less than 75 years.
- Histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer.
- Stage T1-4, N1-3, M0 with maximum tumor size less than 6 cms and ≤ 3 stations of largest lymph node size less than 4 cms.
- ECOG status 0-1.
- Available to attend long term follow- up.
- Written informed consent for treatment.
Who cannot join
- Metastatic disease.
- Tumor size > 6cm.
- Involved Lymph node size greater than 4 cms \& more than 3 station of lymph nodes involved.
- Patients with superior vena cava obstruction.
- Tumor invading/encasing the proximal bronchial tree/, esophagus, pericardium.
- Previous radiotherapy to thorax.
Show all 13Show fewer
- Small cell histology.
- Age< 18 or > 75 years.
- Patients on anticoagulant therapy \& ultra-central cavitary tumors.
- Poor performance status ECOG 2-3.
- Immunocompromised states.
- Viral Markers negative.
- Pregnant women
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
India1 site
Nci, Aiims-Jhajjar
Jhajjar, Haryana, 124105
Aman Sharma, MD, amans757@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: The APRIL Trial: A Phase II Trial Evaluating Upfront Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Stage III Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
The aim of the study is to test the feasibility \& loco-regional control rate by combining high precision SBRT with chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC in tumor/lymph nodes if tumors/lymph node size with ≤ 6cms in size.
Read the detailed description
The standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC lung cancer is combination chemoradiotherapy and best results are achieved when radiation is given along with concurrent chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is associated an overall survival rate at 5 years between 15%-32%.
Local relapse in stage III NSCLC can vary from 20% to 50%. Conventional radiation therapy results in high local failure rates that theoretically could act as a nidus for metastasis. For NSCLC, there is a proposed dose effect on local control and survival with doses of at least 70 Gy and tumors with volumes >100 cc require higher doses for better local control. However, in a prospective randomized controlled trial setting, CRT dose escalation with conventional radiotherapy was associated with inferior local control, PFS, OS and higher toxicity.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers high dose conformal radiation through multiple radiation beams with steep dose gradients in 3-8 fractions and has shown limited toxicity despite delivering a high dose BED10>100 in early NSCLC. Local control in early-stage NSCLC with SBRT is around 85-90% . One landmark paper demonstrated significant survival benefits for stage I lung cancer with SBRT doses of biological equivalent (BED)10 in excess of 100 Gy. SBRT with BED10>100 Gy has convincingly achieved excellent treatment out comes in early-stage NSCLC. Similar local control may be achieved SBRT in stage III NSCLC provided safe dose of BED10>100 Gy is delivered. This holds true when tumor diameter is ≤ 6 cms.
SBRT has been combined with conventional CRT in stage III NSCLC with intent to decrease local failure. A recently conducted systematic review of SBRT in inoperable stage III NSCLC has published SBRT outcomes .In this systematic review, 6 studies considered SBRT administration in stage III NSCLC, 1 employed SBRT in monotherapy and 5 employed SBRT as dose escalation after conventional chemoradiotherapy. Median dose of conventional radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and median dose of SBRT boost was 22.25 Gy in 2 to 7 fractions. SBRT was used to treat primary tumor and involved lymph nodes in 3 out of 5 studies. The systematic review concluded that dose-escalation with 2 fraction SBRT (20-24 Gy) was feasible and was associated with local control rate of 78% at 1 year with 3.7% grade 5 and 14.2% grade 3toxicity.
There is data emerging on use of SBRT as monotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Ultra-central tumors in a study were treated with SBRT to primary and lymph nodes to a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Despite large tumors (median tumor diameter was 6.8 cm [range: 2.1-12.4 cms] and ultra-central location median local control was 17 months for stage III patients. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 9.8% of patients. Another phase II trials examined the feasibility of SBRT is locally advanced NSCLC. The prescribed doses were 30 Gy/5daily fractions at the reference isodose (60-70%) to the tumor, and 25 Gy/5 daily fractions to the clinically involved lymph nodes. Median follow-up was 87 months (range: 6-87), local PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI 9.7 - not reached), OS was 23 months. Late toxicity was represented by 24% dyspnea G3.
Hilar/mediastinal SBRT is a safe technique for isolated nodal disease . A retrospective study that treated 40 patients of NSCLC with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes. The median dose of SBRT was 48 Gy in 4 fractions. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient. A systematic review of SBRT on mediastinal \& hilar lymph nodes that included 196 patients has been recently conducted. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common primary (65%) tumor subjected to mediastinal \& hilar node SBRT. The reported dose and fractionation ranged from 21 Gy to 60 Gy in 3-11 fractions, with median BED ranged from 46-106 Gy. SBRT was associated with excellent local control (LC) rates of 69%-97% \& 1 year OS of 69%-75%. Pooled grade 3-5 toxicity rate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 was 6% (n=11). Pooled SABR-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity) rate was 2% (n=4). Three SABR-related deaths from esophageal fistulae (2 to trachea, 1 to mediastinum) were reported, with all 3 having prior RT to the subcarinal nodes Given the safety \& excellent efficacy of SBRT for small tumors (≤ 6cms) as well as hilar \& mediastinal lymph nodes, the present phase study is designed evaluate SBRT in stage III NSCLC.
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- SBRT in stage III NSCLC
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SBRT in stage III NSCLCRadiation
SBRT to primary tumor and lymph nodes in stage III NSCLC when gross disease is < 6 cms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| SBRT in stage III NSCLC | Experimental | The study will evaluate efficacy \& toxicity of SBRT in stage III NSCLC Receives: Radiation: SBRT in stage III NSCLC |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Loco-regional control rate
Loco regional control rate assessment till 2 years
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (5)
Disease free survival
Longitudinal assessment every 2 months for initial six months and every 3 months till next 2 years
Measured: 2 years
Overall survival
Longitudinal assessment every 2 months for initial six months and every 3 months till next 2 years
Measured: 2 years
CTCAE V5 Toxicity
CTCAE Grades
Grade refers to the severity of the adverse event. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each AE based on this general guideline:
Grade 1 Mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; intervention not indicated. Grade 2 Moderate; minimal, local or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting age appropriate instrumental ADL*.
Grade 3 Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL**.
Grade 4 Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 Death related to AE.
Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly
Measured: 2 years
EORTC QLQ C30 Quality of life
The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items.
Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level. High score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly
Measured: 2 years
EORTC LC-13 Quality of life
The lung cancer module incorporates one multi-item scale to assess dyspnoea, and a series of single items assessing pain, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and haemoptysis. It has scoring system from 1 to 4, higher score represents higher symptom burden.
Assessed at base line, post SBRT, post Chemotherapy, first follow up, at 6 months and then 6 monthly
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 May 2026
- Study start19 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion18 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion18 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Non Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical Sciences
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aman Sharma, All India Institute of Medical Sciences
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07565987
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- The APRIL Trial
- Acronym
- APRIL
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2022
- Last updated
- 24 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The APRIL Trial: A Phase II Trial Evaluating Upfront Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Stage III Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07565987
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- APRIL / The APRIL Trial
- Conditions
- Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- All India Institute of Medical SciencesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 18 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 18 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to test the feasibility \& loco-regional control rate by combining high precision SBRT with chemotherapy in stage III NSCLC in tumor/lymph nodes if tumors/lymph node size with ≤ 6cms in size.
Detailed description
The standard of care for unresectable stage III NSCLC lung cancer is combination chemoradiotherapy and best results are achieved when radiation is given along with concurrent chemotherapy. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is associated an overall survival rate at 5 years between 15%-32%.
Local relapse in stage III NSCLC can vary from 20% to 50%. Conventional radiation therapy results in high local failure rates that theoretically could act as a nidus for metastasis. For NSCLC, there is a proposed dose effect on local control and survival with doses of at least 70 Gy and tumors with volumes >100 cc require higher doses for better local control. However, in a prospective randomized controlled trial setting, CRT dose escalation with conventional radiotherapy was associated with inferior local control, PFS, OS and higher toxicity.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers high dose conformal radiation through multiple radiation beams with steep dose gradients in 3-8 fractions and has shown limited toxicity despite delivering a high dose BED10>100 in early NSCLC. Local control in early-stage NSCLC with SBRT is around 85-90% . One landmark paper demonstrated significant survival benefits for stage I lung cancer with SBRT doses of biological equivalent (BED)10 in excess of 100 Gy. SBRT with BED10>100 Gy has convincingly achieved excellent treatment out comes in early-stage NSCLC. Similar local control may be achieved SBRT in stage III NSCLC provided safe dose of BED10>100 Gy is delivered. This holds true when tumor diameter is ≤ 6 cms.
SBRT has been combined with conventional CRT in stage III NSCLC with intent to decrease local failure. A recently conducted systematic review of SBRT in inoperable stage III NSCLC has published SBRT outcomes .In this systematic review, 6 studies considered SBRT administration in stage III NSCLC, 1 employed SBRT in monotherapy and 5 employed SBRT as dose escalation after conventional chemoradiotherapy. Median dose of conventional radiotherapy was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and median dose of SBRT boost was 22.25 Gy in 2 to 7 fractions. SBRT was used to treat primary tumor and involved lymph nodes in 3 out of 5 studies. The systematic review concluded that dose-escalation with 2 fraction SBRT (20-24 Gy) was feasible and was associated with local control rate of 78% at 1 year with 3.7% grade 5 and 14.2% grade 3toxicity.
There is data emerging on use of SBRT as monotherapy in stage III NSCLC. Ultra-central tumors in a study were treated with SBRT to primary and lymph nodes to a dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. Despite large tumors (median tumor diameter was 6.8 cm [range: 2.1-12.4 cms] and ultra-central location median local control was 17 months for stage III patients. Grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in 9.8% of patients. Another phase II trials examined the feasibility of SBRT is locally advanced NSCLC. The prescribed doses were 30 Gy/5daily fractions at the reference isodose (60-70%) to the tumor, and 25 Gy/5 daily fractions to the clinically involved lymph nodes. Median follow-up was 87 months (range: 6-87), local PFS was 19.8 months (95% CI 9.7 - not reached), OS was 23 months. Late toxicity was represented by 24% dyspnea G3.
Hilar/mediastinal SBRT is a safe technique for isolated nodal disease . A retrospective study that treated 40 patients of NSCLC with SBRT for primary/oligorecurrent hilar/mediastinal lymph nodes. The median dose of SBRT was 48 Gy in 4 fractions. The aortico-pulmonary window was the target in 40%, hilum in 25%, lower paratracheal in 20%, subcarinal in 10%, and prevascular in 5%. Acute grade 3+ morbidity was seen in 3 patients (hemoptysis, pericardial/pleural effusion, heart failure) and late grade 3+ morbidity (hemoptysis) in 1 patient. A systematic review of SBRT on mediastinal \& hilar lymph nodes that included 196 patients has been recently conducted. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was the most common primary (65%) tumor subjected to mediastinal \& hilar node SBRT. The reported dose and fractionation ranged from 21 Gy to 60 Gy in 3-11 fractions, with median BED ranged from 46-106 Gy. SBRT was associated with excellent local control (LC) rates of 69%-97% \& 1 year OS of 69%-75%. Pooled grade 3-5 toxicity rate according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0 was 6% (n=11). Pooled SABR-related mortality (grade 5 toxicity) rate was 2% (n=4). Three SABR-related deaths from esophageal fistulae (2 to trachea, 1 to mediastinum) were reported, with all 3 having prior RT to the subcarinal nodes Given the safety \& excellent efficacy of SBRT for small tumors (≤ 6cms) as well as hilar \& mediastinal lymph nodes, the present phase study is designed evaluate SBRT in stage III NSCLC.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| SBRT in stage III NSCLC | Experimental | Radiation: SBRT in stage III NSCLCThe study will evaluate efficacy \& toxicity of SBRT in stage III NSCLC |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Aged 18 or above and less than 75 years.
- Histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer.
- Stage T1-4, N1-3, M0 with maximum tumor size less than 6 cms and ≤ 3 stations of largest lymph node size less than 4 cms.
- ECOG status 0-1.
- Available to attend long term follow- up.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Metastatic disease.
- Tumor size > 6cm.
- Involved Lymph node size greater than 4 cms \& more than 3 station of lymph nodes involved.
- Patients with superior vena cava obstruction.
- Tumor invading/encasing the proximal bronchial tree/, esophagus, pericardium.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SBRT in stage III NSCLCSBRT to primary tumor and lymph nodes in stage III NSCLC when gross disease is < 6 cms | Radiation | SBRT in stage III NSCLC |
Primary outcome
Loco-regional control rate
Time frame: 2 years
Loco regional control rate assessment till 2 years
5 secondary outcomes
Disease free survival
Time frame: 2 years
Overall survival
Time frame: 2 years
CTCAE V5 Toxicity
Time frame: 2 years
EORTC QLQ C30 Quality of life
Time frame: 2 years
EORTC LC-13 Quality of life
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Sep 2026.
Related trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SBRT in stage III NSCLC in people with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by All India Institute of Medical Sciences at 1 site in India.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in India. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aman Sharma, MD (+91117018529339, amans757@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Loco-regional control rate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Sep 2026.