Free Gingival GraftNCT07568327
Free Gingival Graft Patients' Treatment Perception and Experience
An observational study of Free Gingival Graft and Survey and Questionnaire, run by Istanbul Aydın University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Free gingival graft (FGG) is a common and effective periodontal procedure used to improve gum health; however, it can involve challenges such as postoperative pain and discomfort due to the requirement of a secondary donor site. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Free Gingival Graft, Survey and Questionnaire, Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- Free Gingival Graft
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 27 Jun 2025to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population consists of patients who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, between January 2014 and May 2024. Potential participants were identified through a retrospective screening of institutional archive records based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria
Who may be able to join
- Individuals who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery at Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology; who accurately remember the surgical site and grant permission to use their patient records containing demographic and surgical data.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal plastic surgery due to an FGG procedure only once.
- Patients whose records contain complete information regarding the graft harvesting technique from the palatal donor site, including the date of the procedure and any complications within the first month following surgery.
- Patients who have not previously undergone any other surgical procedure in the palatal region.
Who cannot join
- Individuals who have not undergone FGG surgery.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal plastic surgery more than once.
- Patients who underwent FGG surgery but have missing or incomplete information in their medical records.
- Patients who have previously undergone any other surgical procedure in the palatal region.
- Patients who have previously received a different periodontal surgical treatment in the area where the relevant teeth are located.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology
Istanbul, Turkey, 34295
About this study
Official title: Patient Experience and Treatment Perception in Patients Undergoing Free Gingival Graft: A Retrospective Survey Study.
Free gingival graft (FGG) is a common and effective periodontal procedure used to improve gum health; however, it can involve challenges such as postoperative pain and discomfort due to the requirement of a secondary donor site. While clinical outcomes are well-documented, long-term patient perceptions and overall satisfaction levels have not been sufficiently explored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to systematically evaluate patient experiences, satisfaction levels, and the willingness to undergo the procedure again in individuals who underwent FGG surgery at least one year ago.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale: Free gingival graft (FGG) is a widely preferred mucogingival procedure in periodontal plastic surgery, aimed at increasing keratinized tissue width and improving gingival morphology. While FGG is highly effective for indications such as preventing gingival recession and enhancing oral hygiene maintenance, it requires a secondary surgical site (donor area), which can lead to postoperative pain, tissue morbidity, and reduced patient comfort. Current literature often focuses on short-term clinical outcomes, leaving long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and perceptions insufficiently explored.
Objectives:The primary objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the postoperative experiences, satisfaction levels, and overall surgical perceptions of individuals who underwent FGG surgery. Specifically, the study aims to investigate the willingness of patients to undergo the procedure again, should it be necessary in the future.
Methodology: This is a retrospective, non-interventional, observational, and cross-sectional study conducted at Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology. The study population includes patients who underwent FGG surgery between January 2014 and May 2024, with at least one year having passed since the operation.Data collection involves two stages:
- Archive Review: Patient demographics, smoking status, systemic health, and surgical details (e.g., complications, donor site technique) are retrieved from institutional records.
- Telephone Survey: A semi-structured survey is administered via telephone to assess patient-reported outcomes, including pain levels, satisfaction, analgesic requirements, and aesthetic perceptions.
- Being tested
- Free Gingival Graft
- Keywords
- Free gingival graft, Pain, Survey
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Free Gingival GraftProcedure or surgery
A surgical procedure performed to increase the amount of keratinised gingival tissue and improve periodontal health. The study examines the postoperative experiences and satisfaction levels of patients who have undergone this procedure.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Free Gingival Graft Patients | Patients who underwent free gingival graft (FGG) surgery at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, between January 2014 and May 2024 Receives: Procedure: Free Gingival Graft |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient Satisfaction and Willingness to Undergo the Procedure Again
This measure evaluates the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery and their willingness to repeat the procedure if necessary in the future. The assessment is conducted through a semi-structured retrospective telephone survey that covers postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic perception, and overall treatment experience.
Measured: At least 1 year post-operation (Range: 1 to 11 years, based on surgeries performed between January 2014 and May 2024).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2026
- Study start27 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025
- Study completion30 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Free Gingival GraftStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Aydın University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Cenker Zeki Koyuncuoğlu, Istanbul Aydın University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07568327
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 145/2025
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: As the informed consent form guarantees participants that their data will not be shared with third parties, the data will not be made available for sharing.
Publications
Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, Kneifati A, Majzoub J, Stefanini M, Zucchelli G, Wang HL. Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment: A 10- to 15-year cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2021 May;92(5):637-647. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0350. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
PubMed 32946124Curtis JW Jr, McLain JB, Hutchinson RA. The incidence and severity of complications and pain following periodontal surgery. J Periodontol. 1985 Oct;56(10):597-601. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.10.597.
PubMed 3863909Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):425-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325.
PubMed 18315424Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):2070-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050296.
PubMed 17209793Brasher WJ, Rees TD, Boyce WA. Complications of free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol. 1975 Mar;46(3):133-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.3.133.
PubMed 1079047Miller PD Jr. Root coverage grafting for regeneration and aesthetics. Periodontol 2000. 1993 Feb;1(1):118-27. No abstract available.
PubMed 8401856Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase keratinized tissue: a retrospective long-term evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J Periodontol. 2008 Apr;79(4):587-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070414.
PubMed 18380550Corn H. Periosteal separation-its clinical significance. The Journal of Periodontology. 1962;33(2):140-53
Lang NP, Loe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972 Oct;43(10):623-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.10.623. No abstract available.
PubMed 4507712Carranza FA Jr, Carraro JJ. Mucogingival techniques in periodontal surgery. J Periodontol. 1970 May;41(5):294-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1970.41.5.294. No abstract available.
PubMed 5267748Miller PD Jr. Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Mucogingival surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1988 Apr;32(2):287-306.
PubMed 3288514Camargo PM, Melnick PR, Kenney EB. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:72-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001072.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 11551301Glossary of periodontal terms: American Academy of Periodontology; 1992.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patient Experience and Treatment Perception in Patients Undergoing Free Gingival Graft: A Retrospective Survey Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07568327
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 145/2025
- Keywords
- Free gingival graft, Pain, Survey
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul Aydın UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 27 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Free gingival graft (FGG) is a common and effective periodontal procedure used to improve gum health; however, it can involve challenges such as postoperative pain and discomfort due to the requirement of a secondary donor site. While clinical outcomes are well-documented, long-term patient perceptions and overall satisfaction levels have not been sufficiently explored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to systematically evaluate patient experiences, satisfaction levels, and the willingness to undergo the procedure again in individuals who underwent FGG surgery at least one year ago.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale: Free gingival graft (FGG) is a widely preferred mucogingival procedure in periodontal plastic surgery, aimed at increasing keratinized tissue width and improving gingival morphology. While FGG is highly effective for indications such as preventing gingival recession and enhancing oral hygiene maintenance, it requires a secondary surgical site (donor area), which can lead to postoperative pain, tissue morbidity, and reduced patient comfort. Current literature often focuses on short-term clinical outcomes, leaving long-term patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and perceptions insufficiently explored.
Objectives:The primary objective of this study is to retrospectively evaluate the postoperative experiences, satisfaction levels, and overall surgical perceptions of individuals who underwent FGG surgery. Specifically, the study aims to investigate the willingness of patients to undergo the procedure again, should it be necessary in the future.
Methodology: This is a retrospective, non-interventional, observational, and cross-sectional study conducted at Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology. The study population includes patients who underwent FGG surgery between January 2014 and May 2024, with at least one year having passed since the operation.Data collection involves two stages:
- Archive Review: Patient demographics, smoking status, systemic health, and surgical details (e.g., complications, donor site technique) are retrieved from institutional records.
- Telephone Survey: A semi-structured survey is administered via telephone to assess patient-reported outcomes, including pain levels, satisfaction, analgesic requirements, and aesthetic perceptions.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Free Gingival Graft Patients | – | Procedure: Free Gingival GraftPatients who underwent free gingival graft (FGG) surgery at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, between January 2014 and May 2024 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population consists of patients who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery at the Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul Aydın University, between January 2014 and May 2024. Potential participants were identified through a retrospective screening of institutional archive records based on the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Individuals who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery at Istanbul Aydin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Periodontology; who accurately remember the surgical site and grant permission to use their patient records containing demographic and surgical data.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal plastic surgery due to an FGG procedure only once.
- Patients whose records contain complete information regarding the graft harvesting technique from the palatal donor site, including the date of the procedure and any complications within the first month following surgery.
- Patients who have not previously undergone any other surgical procedure in the palatal region.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals who have not undergone FGG surgery.
- Patients who have undergone periodontal plastic surgery more than once.
- Patients who underwent FGG surgery but have missing or incomplete information in their medical records.
- Patients who have previously undergone any other surgical procedure in the palatal region.
- Patients who have previously received a different periodontal surgical treatment in the area where the relevant teeth are located.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Free Gingival GraftA surgical procedure performed to increase the amount of keratinised gingival tissue and improve periodontal health. The study examines the postoperative experiences and satisfaction levels of patients who have undergone this procedure. | Procedure or surgery | Free Gingival Graft Patients |
Primary outcome
Patient Satisfaction and Willingness to Undergo the Procedure Again
Time frame: At least 1 year post-operation (Range: 1 to 11 years, based on surgeries performed between January 2014 and May 2024).
This measure evaluates the overall satisfaction of patients who underwent Free Gingival Graft (FGG) surgery and their willingness to repeat the procedure if necessary in the future. The assessment is conducted through a semi-structured retrospective telephone survey that covers postoperative pain, complications, aesthetic perception, and overall treatment experience.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 32946124Tavelli L, Barootchi S, Di Gianfilippo R, Kneifati A, Majzoub J, Stefanini M, Zucchelli G, Wang HL. Patient experience of autogenous soft tissue grafting has an implication for future treatment: A 10- to 15-year cross-sectional study. J Periodontol. 2021 May;92(5):637-647. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0350. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
- Background: PubMed 3863909Curtis JW Jr, McLain JB, Hutchinson RA. The incidence and severity of complications and pain following periodontal surgery. J Periodontol. 1985 Oct;56(10):597-601. doi: 10.1902/jop.1985.56.10.597.
- Background: PubMed 18315424Wessel JR, Tatakis DN. Patient outcomes following subepithelial connective tissue graft and free gingival graft procedures. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar;79(3):425-30. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070325.
- Background: PubMed 17209793Griffin TJ, Cheung WS, Zavras AI, Damoulis PD. Postoperative complications following gingival augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 2006 Dec;77(12):2070-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050296.
- Background: PubMed 1079047Brasher WJ, Rees TD, Boyce WA. Complications of free grafts of masticatory mucosa. J Periodontol. 1975 Mar;46(3):133-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.1975.46.3.133.
- Background: PubMed 8401856Miller PD Jr. Root coverage grafting for regeneration and aesthetics. Periodontol 2000. 1993 Feb;1(1):118-27. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 18380550Agudio G, Nieri M, Rotundo R, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G. Free gingival grafts to increase keratinized tissue: a retrospective long-term evaluation (10 to 25 years) of outcomes. J Periodontol. 2008 Apr;79(4):587-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2008.070414.
- BackgroundCorn H. Periosteal separation-its clinical significance. The Journal of Periodontology. 1962;33(2):140-53
- Background: PubMed 4507712Lang NP, Loe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972 Oct;43(10):623-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.10.623. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 5267748Carranza FA Jr, Carraro JJ. Mucogingival techniques in periodontal surgery. J Periodontol. 1970 May;41(5):294-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1970.41.5.294. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 3288514Miller PD Jr. Regenerative and reconstructive periodontal plastic surgery. Mucogingival surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1988 Apr;32(2):287-306.
- Background: PubMed 11551301Camargo PM, Melnick PR, Kenney EB. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontol 2000. 2001;27:72-96. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0757.2001.027001072.x. No abstract available.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. As the informed consent form guarantees participants that their data will not be shared with third parties, the data will not be made available for sharing.
Related trials for Free Gingival Graft
Not yet recruiting
Free Soft Tissue Grafts (FSTG) Using Autograft Palatal Donor Tissue vs. Xenograft Collagen Matrix (Zderm™)
Gingival Recession Localized Moderate, Dental Implant
Recruiting
Palatal Wound Healing After Free Gingival Graft Harvest in Diabetic Patients: A Clinical Trial
Diabetes Mellitus, Gingival Recession, Generalized
Not yet recruiting
Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Using Augmented Gingival Matrix Compared to Free Gingival Graft Around Implants
Keratinized Tissue Augmentation Around Dental Implants
Recruiting
Effects of Low-Level Laser Therapy and Hyaluronic Acid After Free Gingival Graft
Gingival Recession, Mucogingival Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of the Keratinized Tissue Gain in Frenal Relocation Alone to Frenal Relocation Combined With the Application of Free Gingival Graft in High Frenum Attachment in Adults
Keratinized Tissue Gain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Free Gingival Graft and Survey and Questionnaire, run by Istanbul Aydın University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient Satisfaction and Willingness to Undergo the Procedure Again (time frame: At least 1 year post-operation (Range: 1 to 11 years, based on surgeries performed between January 2014 and May 2024).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07568327, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.