AzTrials
AzTrials

StrokeES-FPNCT07568769

Exteroceptive Stimulation for Facial Palsy After Stroke

A study testing Exteroceptive Stimulation and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Stroke and Facial Palsy, run by University of Faisalabad at 1 site in Pakistan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide and frequently results in central facial palsy, which manifests as facial asymmetry, impaired muscle control, and reduced functional ability. These impairments can affect speech, emotional expression, and overall quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Stroke, Facial Palsy
What is being tested?
Exteroceptive Stimulation and Conventional Physiotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 sitePakistan
Study dates
1 Aug 2025to 24 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy
  • Age between 40 and 55 years
  • Both male and female participants
  • Acute onset of facial weakness within 1-3 weeks
  • Non-traumatic onset of disease
  • Commitment to comply with electrical stimulation treatment

Who cannot join

  • Participation in other therapies for facial nerve
  • Presence of neoplastic tumor, Pregnancy, Cardiac, Excessive perspiration, Psychiatric illness or Mental impairment, Neurotmesis, Post-surgical cases of heart and brain surgery
  • Bilateral facial palsy due to demyelinating disease e.g. motor neuron disease, trigeminal neuralgia, Open wounds/ulcers, ENT impairment/Otitis Media, Repetitive previous history of stroke
  • Invasive cardiac instrumentation such as endarterectomy or stent placement within 30 days prior to admission in ICU were excluded

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Pakistan1 site
  • Tertiary Care Hospitals, Faisalabad, Pakistan

    Faisalābad, Punjab Province, 3800

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

Official title: Effect of Exteroceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physiotherapy on Lip Angle Deviation and Facial Function in Patients With Post-Stroke Facial Palsy: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability worldwide and frequently results in central facial palsy, which manifests as facial asymmetry, impaired muscle control, and reduced functional ability. These impairments can affect speech, emotional expression, and overall quality of life. Conventional physiotherapy is commonly used to manage post-stroke facial palsy; however, the additional benefit of sensory-based rehabilitation approaches remains insufficiently explored, particularly in clinical settings with limited resources.

This study was conducted to evaluate whether the addition of exteroceptive stimulation to conventional physiotherapy leads to greater improvement in facial symmetry and functional outcomes compared to conventional physiotherapy alone. Exteroceptive stimulation aims to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation, potentially improving motor recovery in affected facial muscles.

Read more

In this double-blind randomized controlled trial, a total of 36 participants diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy were recruited and randomly allocated into two groups. The experimental group received exteroceptive stimulation in addition to conventional physiotherapy, while the control group received conventional physiotherapy alone. Both interventions were administered over a period of four weeks.

Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and at the end of the intervention period. The primary outcome was lip angle deviation, used as an indicator of facial symmetry. Secondary outcomes included facial function and disability assessed using standardized tools such as the Facial Disability Index and the Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire.

The findings of this study aim to provide evidence on the effectiveness of integrating sensory-based techniques into routine rehabilitation programs for post-stroke facial palsy. The results may support the development of more comprehensive and effective rehabilitation strategies to improve patient outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Post-stroke facial palsy is a frequent neurological complication resulting from upper motor neuron lesions affecting facial nerve pathways. It commonly presents with facial asymmetry, impaired voluntary muscle control, and altered emotional expression. These deficits can interfere with communication, oral competence, and social interaction, ultimately impacting functional independence and quality of life. Despite its clinical importance, rehabilitation strategies targeting facial motor recovery remain relatively underdeveloped compared to limb rehabilitation.

Conventional physiotherapy approaches for facial palsy typically focus on facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining aimed at improving motor control and symmetry. While these approaches are widely used in clinical practice, their outcomes are often variable, and recovery may be incomplete. In recent years, there has been increasing interest in integrating sensory-based interventions into neurorehabilitation, based on the premise that sensory input plays a critical role in motor relearning and cortical reorganization.

Exteroceptive stimulation is a sensory-based intervention designed to enhance afferent input through external stimuli applied to the skin and underlying tissues. By increasing sensory feedback, it may facilitate neuromuscular activation, improve motor coordination, and support adaptive neuroplastic changes. Although such approaches have shown promise in broader neurorehabilitation contexts, their role in the management of post-stroke facial palsy has not been sufficiently investigated through controlled clinical trials.

This study was designed as a double-blind randomized controlled trial to examine the additional benefit of exteroceptive stimulation when combined with conventional physiotherapy. Participants diagnosed with post-stroke facial palsy were recruited from tertiary care settings and randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups using a computer-generated randomization process. Measures were taken to ensure blinding of participants and outcome assessors to minimize bias.

The intervention was delivered over a defined treatment period, with both groups receiving standardized conventional physiotherapy to ensure consistency of baseline care. The experimental group received an additional structured program of exteroceptive stimulation targeting affected facial regions. The protocol was designed to be feasible within routine clinical practice and reproducible in similar healthcare settings.

Outcome assessments were conducted at predefined time points using validated clinical instruments to capture changes in facial symmetry, functional ability, and associated complications such as synkinesis. The selection of these measures was based on their relevance to clinical presentation and their use in prior rehabilitation research.

Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate changes over time within each group and to compare differences between groups following the intervention period. Appropriate parametric tests were applied after assessment of data distribution. A threshold for statistical significance was established a priori.

This study aims to contribute to the existing body of evidence by providing controlled clinical data on the role of sensory-based adjunct therapies in facial rehabilitation following stroke. The findings are expected to inform clinical practice by clarifying whether the addition of exteroceptive stimulation offers meaningful benefits beyond conventional physiotherapy alone. Furthermore, the study may serve as a basis for future research exploring optimized rehabilitation protocols, longer follow-up durations, and larger multi-center trials.

Conditions
Stroke, Facial Palsy
Being tested
Exteroceptive Stimulation, Conventional Physiotherapy
Keywords
Stroke Rehabilitation, Facial Paralysis, Exteroceptive Stimulation
Medical subject headings
Stroke, Facial Paralysis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Exteroceptive StimulationOther

    Exteroceptive stimulation was applied to the affected side of the face using structured sensory techniques, including light touch, stroking, tapping, and graded pressure over the perioral, cheek, and nasolabial regions. The intervention was delivered by a trained physiotherapist in a standardized sequence to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation. Each session lasted approximately 30-40 minutes and was administered 5 days per week for 4 weeks in a clinical setting. This intervention was provided in combination with conventional physiotherapy.

  • Conventional PhysiotherapyOther

    Conventional physiotherapy included a structured facial rehabilitation program comprising facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining to improve symmetry and coordination. Sessions were delivered by a qualified physiotherapist, lasting approximately 30-40 minutes, 5 days per week for 4 weeks. This intervention was provided alone in the control group and in combination with exteroceptive stimulation in the experimental group.

Study groups in NCT07568769
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Exteroceptive StimulationExperimentalExteroceptive stimulation was applied to the affected side of the face using structured sensory techniques, including light touch, stroking, tapping, and graded pressure over the perioral, cheek, and nasolabial regions. The intervention was delivered by a trained physiotherapist in a standardized sequence to enhance sensory input and facilitate neuromuscular activation.
Receives: Other: Exteroceptive Stimulation; Other: Conventional Physiotherapy
Conventional PhysiotherapyActive comparatorConventional physiotherapy included a structured facial rehabilitation program comprising facial muscle exercises, facilitation techniques, and functional retraining aimed at improving symmetry and muscle coordination.
Receives: Other: Conventional Physiotherapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Lip Angle Deviation

    Lip angle deviation was measured using standardized facial symmetry assessment techniques to evaluate improvement in facial alignment.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Facial Disability Index (FDI)

    Assessment of physical and social function using validated scoring system (FDI-P, FDI-S, FDI-T). The Facial Disability Index is a validated scale used to assess functional limitations and social well-being in patients with facial disorders. It consists of two subscales: Physical Function and Social Function, which are combined to generate a total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional status and improved quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

  2. Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ)

    Measurement of synkinesis severity using a structured questionnaire. The Synkinesis Assessment Questionnaire is a patient-reported outcome measure used to evaluate the severity of synkinesis. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity of synkinesis and worse clinical condition.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2026
  2. Study start1 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion24 Dec 2025
  4. Study completion24 Dec 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study followed a parallel-group randomized controlled design in which participants were allocated to one of two groups and remained in that group for the duration of the study. Both groups received conventional physiotherapy as standard care, while the experimental group received additional exteroceptive stimulation. Interventions were delivered concurrently over a four-week period, and outcomes were assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention. No crossover between groups occurred.
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07568769
Sponsor's protocol ID
TUF/EIRB/193/26
Acronym
ES-FP
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
28 Apr 2026
Last updated
3 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • 1. Albaret G, Domergue H. Stroke and stroke rehabilitation. Pathy's Princ Pract Geriatr Med. Published online February 18, 2022:619-634. doi:10.1002/9781119484288.CH48 2. Unnithan AKA, Das JM, Mehta P. Hemorrhagic Stroke. In Statpearls. Published online December 13, 2025:1-12. 3. Fulk GD., Chui KK. O'Sullivan & Schmitz's physical rehabilitation. Published online 2024:1337. 4. Choi JH, Kim BR, Han EY, Kim SM. The Effect of Dual-Task Training on Balance and Cognition in Patients With Subacute Post-Stroke. Ann Rehabil Med. 2015;39(1):81. doi:10.5535/ARM.2015.39.1.81 5. Junior VA dos S, Santos M de S, Ribeiro NM da S, Maldonado IL. Combining Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation and Virtual Reality for Improving Sensorimotor Function in Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2019;11. doi:10.1177/1179573519863826 6. Hashmi M, Khan M, Wasay M. Growing Burden of Stroke in Pakistan: A Review of Progress and Limitations. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(7):575-581. doi:10.1111/J.1747-4949.2012.00827.X 7. Schimmel M, Voegeli G, Duvernay E, Leemann B, Müller F. Oral tactile sensitivity and masticatory performance are impaired in stroke patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(3):163-171. doi:10.1111/JOOR.12482 8. Schimmel M, Ono T, Lam OLT, Müller F. Oro-facial impairment in stroke patients. J Oral Rehabil. 2017;44(4):313-326. doi:10.1111/JOOR.12486 9. Johal A, Dunne B, Bolooki H, Sandler C. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL), Pain and Side Effects in Adults Undergoing Different Orthodontic Treatment Modalities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthc 2025, Vol 13,. 2025;13(24). doi:10.3390/HEALTHCARE13243317 10. Taj F, Zahid R, Syeda UER, Murtaza M, Ahmed S, Kamal AK. Risk Factors of Stroke in Pakistan: A Dedicated Stroke Clinic Experience. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010;37(2):252-257. doi:10.1017/S0317167100010015 11. Walcott BP, Miller JC, Kwon CS, et al. Outcomes in severe middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(1)

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exteroceptive Stimulation and Conventional Physiotherapy in people with Stroke and Facial Palsy, run by University of Faisalabad at 1 site in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Lip Angle Deviation (time frame: Baseline and Week 4). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07568769, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in