Core Stabilization and Kinesthetic Training in Diplegic CP

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of core stabilization exercises (CSE) and kinesthetic training (KT) on postural control in children diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) Level III, aged between 4 and 8 years. Children within this classification typically demonstrated limitations in independent mobility and required assistive devices for ambulation, with notable impairments in trunk control and balance.

Postural instability in this population was identified as a major contributor to functional limitations, affecting activities such as sitting, standing, and transitional movements. Impaired trunk stability and reduced proprioceptive input were considered key factors influencing balance deficits. Therefore, targeted interventions focusing on trunk control and sensory-motor integration were explored to enhance postural regulation and functional independence.

Core stabilization exercises were implemented with the aim of improving activation, strength, and endurance of deep trunk musculature, including the transversus abdominis, multifidus, and pelvic stabilizers. These exercises emphasized controlled movements, alignment, and postural symmetry in various positions such as supine, sitting, and supported standing. Progression was based on the child's ability to maintain stability with reduced external support.

Kinesthetic training was designed to enhance proprioceptive awareness, joint position sense, and neuromuscular coordination. Activities included weight-shifting, balance challenges on stable and unstable surfaces, guided movement tasks, and functional reaching exercises. The intervention focused on improving the child's ability to perceive and adjust body position in space, thereby facilitating better motor control and balance responses.

Participants were recruited through purposive sampling from pediatric rehabilitation settings and were randomly allocated into two intervention groups using a simple randomization method. Each group consisted of 16 participants. Both groups received a standardized conventional physiotherapy program to ensure consistency in baseline care. This included stretching of spastic muscle groups, range-of-motion exercises, and facilitation of functional movements.

Following conventional therapy, participants underwent their assigned intervention (CSE or KT) for 30 minutes per session. The intervention was delivered three times per week over a period of 12 weeks. Sessions were supervised by trained physiotherapists to ensure adherence, safety, and appropriate progression of exercises.

Outcome measures were recorded at three time points: baseline (prior to intervention), mid-intervention (6 weeks), and post-intervention (12 weeks). Postural control and balance were assessed using the Pediatric Berg Balance Scale (PBBS), a validated tool for measuring both static and dynamic balance in pediatric populations. The scale included functional tasks such as sitting, standing, reaching, turning, and transferring, with scores reflecting the child's level of independence and stability.

Data were analyzed using statistical software. Within-group comparisons were performed to assess changes over time, while between-group comparisons were conducted to determine differences in effectiveness between the two interventions. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

The findings of this study were intended to provide evidence regarding the relative effectiveness of core stabilization versus kinesthetic training in improving balance in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy. The results were expected to contribute to clinical decision-making and support the development of targeted rehabilitation protocols aimed at enhancing functional outcomes and quality of life in this population.