BurnoutNCT07568977
A Tool of the Future for Strengthening Compassion in a Danish Hospital Setting.
An observational study of Burnout and Compassion Ability, run by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
This study is a multi-phase, mixed-methods clinical investigation designed to examine the feasibility, validity, and organizational applicability of a structured measurement framework for assessing compassion in a Danish hospital setting. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Burnout, Compassion Ability, Compassion Competence
- What is being tested?
- Sinclair Compassion Scale
- How many people
- 2,200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 16 Feb 2026to 31 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients and healthcare professionals in 5 different departments at Herlev Gentofte Hospital
Who may be able to join
- A patient at either the a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine, c. Emergency Department (ED) d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery.Rheumatology and Orthopedics or e. Perioperative and Intensive Care Department
- Age 18-100+
- All genders
- Danish speaking
- Must have had contact with at least one healthcare professional before completing the questionnaire.
Who cannot join
- Patient exclusion criteria:
- Age 0-17
- Non-Danish speaking
- Not a patient at the a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine, c. Emergency Department (ED) d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery or e. Department of Anesthesia, Operation and Intensive Care)
- No contact with a healthcare professional
- Has answered the questionnaire before
Show all 15Show fewer
- Healthcare professionals:
- HCP inclusion criteria
- Employed in one of the five departments included (phase 1b and 2): a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine c. Emergency Department, d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery or e. Department of Anesthesia, Operation and Intensive Care.
- All genders
- Danish speaking
- Must have engaged with a patient
- HCP exclusion criteria
- Not employed in one of the five departments included (a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine, c. Emergency Department, d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery or e. Department of Anesthesia, Operation and Intensive Care)
- Not Danish speaking
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Herlev Gentofte Hospital
Herlev, 2630
Camilla Birgitte Soerensen, MD, 004525671293, Camilla.Birgitte.Soerensen@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: A Tool of the Future for Strengthening Compassion in a Danish Hospital Setting
This study is a multi-phase, mixed-methods clinical investigation designed to examine the feasibility, validity, and organizational applicability of a structured measurement framework for assessing compassion in a Danish hospital setting. The study is conducted at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and involves both patients and healthcare professionals across multiple clinical departments.
The study is structured in three sequential phases, each addressing distinct methodological and implementation components.
Read more
Phase 1 (Translation and Cultural Adaptation):
The initial phase involves the linguistic translation and cultural adaptation of three versions of the Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire (SCQ) and associated healthcare professional measures. This process follows established international guidelines for cross-cultural validation, including forward translation, back-translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing. Cognitive interviewing techniques are used to evaluate comprehension, relevance, and cultural appropriateness among both patients and healthcare professionals. Particular attention is given to semantic equivalence and the contextual meaning of key constructs across languages and professional groups.
Phase 1b (Psychometric Validation):
Following adaptation, the instruments are administered to a patient sample recruited from departments of anesthesia, surgery, and intensive care. Data collected in this phase are used to assess the psychometric properties of the translated instruments, including internal consistency, construct validity, factor structure, and measurement invariance. Statistical analyses include confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing. The aim of this phase is to ensure that the instruments demonstrate robust measurement properties within the Danish healthcare context.
Phase 2 (Observational Implementation Study):
In the second phase, the validated instruments are implemented across four hospital departments, including medical, nephrology, orthopedic surgery, and emergency care. Data are collected from both patients and healthcare professionals to allow for multi-perspective analysis. In addition to questionnaire data, contextual variables such as demographic characteristics, professional background, and organizational factors are recorded. Administrative data, including sick leave and workforce indicators, are incorporated where available.
This phase employs a cross-sectional observational design with embedded comparative analyses across departments and professional groups. Multilevel modeling approaches are used to account for clustering within departments and to explore variation at individual and organizational levels. The design enables identification of patterns and differences across settings without introducing experimental manipulation.
Phase 3 (Contextualized Implementation and Development):
The third phase involves the application of findings from earlier phases to inform targeted implementation strategies. Rather than introducing a predefined intervention, this phase adopts an adaptive approach in which context-specific initiatives are selected or developed based on identified needs. This may include integration of existing training programs, workflow adjustments, or development of new tools. The implementation process is supported by interdisciplinary collaboration, including expertise in clinical practice, education, and organizational development.
Data Collection and Management:
Data are collected using secure electronic platforms compliant with Danish data protection regulations. All participant data are handled in accordance with GDPR requirements. Identifiable data are stored separately from research data, and access is restricted to authorized personnel. Data quality assurance procedures include validation checks and standardized data entry protocols.
Participant Involvement:
Patients are recruited during their contact with hospital departments and provide self-reported data through questionnaires. Healthcare professionals participate by completing self-assessment measures. Participation is voluntary, and no experimental interventions are administered.
Statistical Considerations:
The study uses both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Psychometric analyses are conducted in Phase 1b, while Phase 2 includes regression analyses and multilevel modeling to examine associations between variables. Missing data are handled using appropriate statistical techniques, such as multiple imputation where relevant.
Ethical Considerations:
The study adheres to ethical guidelines for clinical research involving human participants. Informed consent is obtained from all participants. Participation does not influence clinical care or employment conditions. The study design minimizes participant burden by integrating data collection into existing clinical workflows where possible.
Read the detailed description
Compassion in healthcare is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional construct that influences patient experiences, clinical effectiveness, and workforce sustainability. However, the integration of compassion into routine clinical assessment remains limited due to a lack of standardized, context-sensitive measurement approaches. This study is designed to operationalize compassion within a hospital setting by systematically introducing and evaluating structured measurement instruments in real-world clinical practice.
The study is conducted at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and follows a prospective, mixed-methods design with both cross-sectional and longitudinal components. It includes multiple clinical departments to ensure representation across different specialties, care intensities, and patient pathways. This diversity enables the assessment of compassion across heterogeneous contexts, including acute care, outpatient services, and longer-term treatment trajectories.
Participants include adult patients receiving care within participating departments and healthcare professionals employed in those units. Recruitment will occur consecutively to minimize selection bias and to reflect routine clinical populations. Healthcare professionals from various disciplines-including nursing staff, physicians, and allied health professionals-will be included to capture interdisciplinary perspectives on compassionate care delivery.
The study consists of several phases. The initial phase focuses on cultural and linguistic adaptation of the included measurement tools to ensure relevance and comprehensibility within a Danish healthcare context. This process includes translation, back-translation, and pilot testing with representative users. Feedback from this phase will inform minor adjustments to optimize clarity and usability.
The main data collection phase involves systematic administration of validated questionnaires to both patients and healthcare professionals. Patients will be invited to complete assessments in close temporal proximity to their care experience to reduce recall bias. Healthcare professionals will complete self-assessments at predefined intervals. Data collection will be facilitated through secure electronic platforms, with options for paper-based completion if needed to ensure inclusivity.
A longitudinal component is incorporated through repeated measurements over time. This allows for evaluation of temporal stability, responsiveness to organizational changes, and potential trends within and across departments. It also enables examination of how compassion-related measures evolve in relation to workplace conditions and clinical environments.
In parallel, a qualitative sub-study will be conducted to enrich interpretation of quantitative findings. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of patients and healthcare professionals will explore lived experiences, perceptions of compassionate care, and contextual factors influencing these experiences. This component will provide insight into mechanisms, barriers, and facilitators that are not captured through quantitative instruments alone.
Implementation processes will be systematically evaluated using principles from implementation science. Key domains include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and integration into existing workflows. The study will examine how the introduction of compassion measurement tools interacts with organizational structures, leadership support, and daily clinical practice. Attention will also be given to potential unintended consequences, such as increased administrative burden or response fatigue.
Data analysis will include psychometric evaluation of measurement tools (e.g., internal consistency, construct validity, factor structure) and statistical modeling to explore patterns and associations within the data. Multilevel analytical approaches will be used to account for clustering at departmental levels. Longitudinal analyses will assess changes over time and potential predictors of variation in measured outcomes.
All data will be handled in compliance with applicable data protection regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Participation is voluntary, and informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Data will be anonymized prior to analysis, and results will be reported at an aggregated level to ensure confidentiality.
By embedding structured assessment of compassion into routine clinical settings, this study aims to generate actionable knowledge on how compassion can be systematically understood, monitored, and supported in healthcare organizations. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of scalable approaches for integrating relational aspects of care into quality improvement frameworks, thereby supporting both patient-centered care and sustainable working conditions for healthcare professionals.
- Conditions
- Burnout, Compassion Ability, Compassion Competence, Compassionate Care, Investigate Compassionate Care and Burnout in Healthcare
- Being tested
- Sinclair Compassion Scale
- Keywords
- Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire (SCQ), Validation, Compassion ability for healthcare providers, Compassion competence for healthcare providers, Compassionate care for patients, burnout in healthcare providers
- Medical subject headings
- Burnout, Psychological
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Sinclair Compassion ScaleOther
Patients are given the SCQ, healthcare providers are given the SCQ-ability and the SCQ-competence and the CBI
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Department cohorts | Cohort 1 with 5 subgroups
1. Department of Anaesthesia, operation and intensive care
2. Department of Nephrology
3. Department of Internal Medicine
4. Emergency Department
5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery Receives: Other: Sinclair Compassion Scale |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Sinclair Compassion Scale (SCQ)
An overall score is obtained by summing all individual items and calculating a single mean score, in which a higher final score is indicative of a greater experience of compassion.
Measured: September 1st 2025 - July 31st 2027
Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire -Health Care Professional Ability Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPASA)
The Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire -Health Care Professional Ability Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPASA) is a self-report questionnaire which measures health care professionals ability to provide compassionate care to their patients.
Measured: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire Health Care Professional Competence Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPCSA)
The Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire Health Care Professional Competence Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPCSA) is a self-report questionnaire that measures healthcare providers own competence in providing compassionate care
Measured: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) is a self report questionnaire that measures healthcare professionels own experience of personal and work-related burnout.
Measured: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2026
- Study start16 Feb 2026
- Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for BurnoutStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Copenhagen, University of Calgary
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Camilla Birgitte Sorensen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
- Investigators
- Camilla B Sorensen, MD, Principal investigator, Herlev Gentofte HospitalNanja H Hansen, Psychologist, Principal investigator, Herlev Gentofte Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07568977
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CompassionHGH-01
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 14 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Tool of the Future for Strengthening Compassion in a Danish Hospital Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07568977
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CompassionHGH-01
- Conditions
- Burnout, Compassion Ability, Compassion Competence, Compassionate Care, Investigate Compassionate Care and Burnout in Healthcare
- Keywords
- Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire (SCQ), Validation, Compassion ability for healthcare providers, Compassion competence for healthcare providers, Compassionate care for patients, burnout in healthcare providers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 2,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Herlev and Gentofte HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Copenhagen, University of Calgary
- Study start
- 16 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 May 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a multi-phase, mixed-methods clinical investigation designed to examine the feasibility, validity, and organizational applicability of a structured measurement framework for assessing compassion in a Danish hospital setting. The study is conducted at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and involves both patients and healthcare professionals across multiple clinical departments.
The study is structured in three sequential phases, each addressing distinct methodological and implementation components.
Phase 1 (Translation and Cultural Adaptation):
The initial phase involves the linguistic translation and cultural adaptation of three versions of the Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire (SCQ) and associated healthcare professional measures. This process follows established international guidelines for cross-cultural validation, including forward translation, back-translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing. Cognitive interviewing techniques are used to evaluate comprehension, relevance, and cultural appropriateness among both patients and healthcare professionals. Particular attention is given to semantic equivalence and the contextual meaning of key constructs across languages and professional groups.
Phase 1b (Psychometric Validation):
Following adaptation, the instruments are administered to a patient sample recruited from departments of anesthesia, surgery, and intensive care. Data collected in this phase are used to assess the psychometric properties of the translated instruments, including internal consistency, construct validity, factor structure, and measurement invariance. Statistical analyses include confirmatory factor analysis and reliability testing. The aim of this phase is to ensure that the instruments demonstrate robust measurement properties within the Danish healthcare context.
Phase 2 (Observational Implementation Study):
In the second phase, the validated instruments are implemented across four hospital departments, including medical, nephrology, orthopedic surgery, and emergency care. Data are collected from both patients and healthcare professionals to allow for multi-perspective analysis. In addition to questionnaire data, contextual variables such as demographic characteristics, professional background, and organizational factors are recorded. Administrative data, including sick leave and workforce indicators, are incorporated where available.
This phase employs a cross-sectional observational design with embedded comparative analyses across departments and professional groups. Multilevel modeling approaches are used to account for clustering within departments and to explore variation at individual and organizational levels. The design enables identification of patterns and differences across settings without introducing experimental manipulation.
Phase 3 (Contextualized Implementation and Development):
The third phase involves the application of findings from earlier phases to inform targeted implementation strategies. Rather than introducing a predefined intervention, this phase adopts an adaptive approach in which context-specific initiatives are selected or developed based on identified needs. This may include integration of existing training programs, workflow adjustments, or development of new tools. The implementation process is supported by interdisciplinary collaboration, including expertise in clinical practice, education, and organizational development.
Data Collection and Management:
Data are collected using secure electronic platforms compliant with Danish data protection regulations. All participant data are handled in accordance with GDPR requirements. Identifiable data are stored separately from research data, and access is restricted to authorized personnel. Data quality assurance procedures include validation checks and standardized data entry protocols.
Participant Involvement:
Patients are recruited during their contact with hospital departments and provide self-reported data through questionnaires. Healthcare professionals participate by completing self-assessment measures. Participation is voluntary, and no experimental interventions are administered.
Statistical Considerations:
The study uses both descriptive and inferential statistical methods. Psychometric analyses are conducted in Phase 1b, while Phase 2 includes regression analyses and multilevel modeling to examine associations between variables. Missing data are handled using appropriate statistical techniques, such as multiple imputation where relevant.
Ethical Considerations:
The study adheres to ethical guidelines for clinical research involving human participants. Informed consent is obtained from all participants. Participation does not influence clinical care or employment conditions. The study design minimizes participant burden by integrating data collection into existing clinical workflows where possible.
Detailed description
Compassion in healthcare is increasingly recognized as a multidimensional construct that influences patient experiences, clinical effectiveness, and workforce sustainability. However, the integration of compassion into routine clinical assessment remains limited due to a lack of standardized, context-sensitive measurement approaches. This study is designed to operationalize compassion within a hospital setting by systematically introducing and evaluating structured measurement instruments in real-world clinical practice.
The study is conducted at Herlev and Gentofte Hospital and follows a prospective, mixed-methods design with both cross-sectional and longitudinal components. It includes multiple clinical departments to ensure representation across different specialties, care intensities, and patient pathways. This diversity enables the assessment of compassion across heterogeneous contexts, including acute care, outpatient services, and longer-term treatment trajectories.
Participants include adult patients receiving care within participating departments and healthcare professionals employed in those units. Recruitment will occur consecutively to minimize selection bias and to reflect routine clinical populations. Healthcare professionals from various disciplines-including nursing staff, physicians, and allied health professionals-will be included to capture interdisciplinary perspectives on compassionate care delivery.
The study consists of several phases. The initial phase focuses on cultural and linguistic adaptation of the included measurement tools to ensure relevance and comprehensibility within a Danish healthcare context. This process includes translation, back-translation, and pilot testing with representative users. Feedback from this phase will inform minor adjustments to optimize clarity and usability.
The main data collection phase involves systematic administration of validated questionnaires to both patients and healthcare professionals. Patients will be invited to complete assessments in close temporal proximity to their care experience to reduce recall bias. Healthcare professionals will complete self-assessments at predefined intervals. Data collection will be facilitated through secure electronic platforms, with options for paper-based completion if needed to ensure inclusivity.
A longitudinal component is incorporated through repeated measurements over time. This allows for evaluation of temporal stability, responsiveness to organizational changes, and potential trends within and across departments. It also enables examination of how compassion-related measures evolve in relation to workplace conditions and clinical environments.
In parallel, a qualitative sub-study will be conducted to enrich interpretation of quantitative findings. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a purposive sample of patients and healthcare professionals will explore lived experiences, perceptions of compassionate care, and contextual factors influencing these experiences. This component will provide insight into mechanisms, barriers, and facilitators that are not captured through quantitative instruments alone.
Implementation processes will be systematically evaluated using principles from implementation science. Key domains include feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and integration into existing workflows. The study will examine how the introduction of compassion measurement tools interacts with organizational structures, leadership support, and daily clinical practice. Attention will also be given to potential unintended consequences, such as increased administrative burden or response fatigue.
Data analysis will include psychometric evaluation of measurement tools (e.g., internal consistency, construct validity, factor structure) and statistical modeling to explore patterns and associations within the data. Multilevel analytical approaches will be used to account for clustering at departmental levels. Longitudinal analyses will assess changes over time and potential predictors of variation in measured outcomes.
All data will be handled in compliance with applicable data protection regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Participation is voluntary, and informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Data will be anonymized prior to analysis, and results will be reported at an aggregated level to ensure confidentiality.
By embedding structured assessment of compassion into routine clinical settings, this study aims to generate actionable knowledge on how compassion can be systematically understood, monitored, and supported in healthcare organizations. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of scalable approaches for integrating relational aspects of care into quality improvement frameworks, thereby supporting both patient-centered care and sustainable working conditions for healthcare professionals.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Department cohorts | – | Other: Sinclair Compassion ScaleCohort 1 with 5 subgroups 1. Department of Anaesthesia, operation and intensive care 2. Department of Nephrology 3. Department of Internal Medicine 4. Emergency Department 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients and healthcare professionals in 5 different departments at Herlev Gentofte Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- A patient at either the a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine, c. Emergency Department (ED) d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery.Rheumatology and Orthopedics or e. Perioperative and Intensive Care Department
- Age 18-100+
- All genders
- Danish speaking
- Must have had contact with at least one healthcare professional before completing the questionnaire.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Patient exclusion criteria:
- Age 0-17
- Non-Danish speaking
- Not a patient at the a. Department of Nephrology, b. Department of Internal Medicine, c. Emergency Department (ED) d. Department of Orthopedic Surgery or e. Department of Anesthesia, Operation and Intensive Care)
- No contact with a healthcare professional
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Sinclair Compassion ScalePatients are given the SCQ, healthcare providers are given the SCQ-ability and the SCQ-competence and the CBI | Other | Department cohorts |
Primary outcome
Sinclair Compassion Scale (SCQ)
Time frame: September 1st 2025 - July 31st 2027
An overall score is obtained by summing all individual items and calculating a single mean score, in which a higher final score is indicative of a greater experience of compassion.
Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire -Health Care Professional Ability Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPASA)
Time frame: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
The Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire -Health Care Professional Ability Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPASA) is a self-report questionnaire which measures health care professionals ability to provide compassionate care to their patients.
Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire Health Care Professional Competence Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPCSA)
Time frame: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
The Sinclair Compassion Questionnaire Health Care Professional Competence Self Assessment (SCQ-HCPCSA) is a self-report questionnaire that measures healthcare providers own competence in providing compassionate care
Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI)
Time frame: February 16th 2026 - July 31st 2027
The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) is a self report questionnaire that measures healthcare professionels own experience of personal and work-related burnout.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Burnout
Not yet recruiting
Hand in Hand: Feasibility of a Compassion-Focused App to Support Parents of Children With Mental Health Problems
Physiological Conditions, Distress, Emotional
Active, not recruiting
Health enSuite Caregivers: an App-based Treatment for Distressed Caregivers of Persons With Moderate Dementia
Caregiver Burnout
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Relationship of Forward Head Posture With Burnout and Quality of Life
Forward Head Posture
Active, not recruiting
Online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction for the Mental Health of Healthcare Professionals
Occupational Stress or Workplace Stress, Burnout, Professionals
Active, not recruiting
Self-Help Plus (SH+) for Stress Reduction in Social Service Workers: A Pilot RCT
Stress, Psychological, Occupational, Stress, Psychological
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Camilla B Sorensen, MD principal investigator
Herlev Gentofte Hospital
Nanja H Hansen, Psychologist principal investigator
Herlev Gentofte Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Burnout and Compassion Ability, run by Herlev and Gentofte Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Camilla B. Sørensen, MD (+45 21 35 77 43, camilla.birgitte.sorensen@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Sinclair Compassion Scale (SCQ) (time frame: September 1st 2025 - July 31st 2027). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2026.